Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Gnoli, C."
  1. Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004) 0.01
    0.007076476 = product of:
      0.021229427 = sum of:
        0.010906866 = weight(_text_:information in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010906866 = score(doc=2663,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
        0.0103225615 = product of:
          0.030967683 = sum of:
            0.030967683 = weight(_text_:29 in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030967683 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 17:33:13
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  2. Gnoli, C.: Boundaries and overlaps of disciplines in Bloch's methodology of historical knowledge (2014) 0.01
    0.005980674 = product of:
      0.017942023 = sum of:
        0.007712319 = weight(_text_:information in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007712319 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
        0.010229703 = product of:
          0.030689107 = sum of:
            0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030689107 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Marc Bloch's famous methodological essay, The Historian's Craft, contains many relevant considerations on knowledge organization. These have been selected and grouped into four main themes: terminology problems in history; principles for the organization of historical knowledge, with special reference to the genetic principle; sources of historical information, to be found not only in archives but also in very different media and contexts; and the nature and boundaries of history as a discipline. Analysis of them shows that knowledge organization is an important part of historians' work, and suggests that it can be especially fruitful when a cross-medial, interdisciplinary approach is adopted.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.01
    0.005980674 = product of:
      0.017942023 = sum of:
        0.007712319 = weight(_text_:information in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007712319 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
        0.010229703 = product of:
          0.030689107 = sum of:
            0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030689107 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This is the fourth in a series of papers on classification based on phenomena instead of disciplines. Together with types, levels and facets that have been discussed in the previous parts, themes and rhemes are further structural components of such a classification. In a statement or in a longer document, a base theme and several particular themes can be identified. Base theme should be cited first in a classmark, followed by particular themes, each with its own facets. In some cases, rhemes can also be expressed, that is new information provided about a theme, converting an abstract statement ("wolves, affected by cervids") into a claim that some thing actually occurs ("wolves are affected by cervids"). In the Integrative Levels Classification rhemes can be expressed by special deictic classes, including those for actual specimens, anaphoras, unknown values, conjunctions and spans, whole universe, anthropocentric favoured classes, and favoured host classes. These features, together with rules for pronounciation, make a classification of phenomena a true language, that may be suitable for many uses.
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  4. Gnoli, C.: Classification transcends library business : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.01
    0.00587127 = product of:
      0.01761381 = sum of:
        0.0090890555 = weight(_text_:information in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0090890555 = score(doc=3698,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
        0.008524753 = product of:
          0.025574258 = sum of:
            0.025574258 = weight(_text_:22 in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025574258 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Although bibliographic classifications usually adopt a perspective different from that of object classifications, the two have obvious relationships. These become especially relevant when users are looking for knowledge scattered in a wide variety of forms and media. This is an increasingly common situation, as library catalogues now coexist in the global digital environment with catalogues of archives, of museums, of commercial products, and many other information resources. In order to make the subject content of all these resources searchable, a broader conception of classification is needed, that can be applied to an knowledge item, rather than only bibliographic materials. To illustrate this we take an example of the research on bagpipes in Northern Italian folklore. For this kind of research, the most effective search strategy is a cross-media one, looking for many different knowledge sources such as published documents, police archives, painting details, museum specimens, organizations devoted to related subjects. To provide satisfying results for this kind of search, the traditional disciplinary approach to classification is not sufficient. Tools are needed in which knowledge items dealing with a phenomenon of interest can be retrieved independently from the other topics with which it is combined, the disciplinary context, and the medium where it occurs. This can be made possible if the basic units of classification are taken to be the phenomena treated, as recommended in the León Manifesto, rather than disciplines or other aspect features. The concept of bagpipes should be retrievable and browsable in any combination with other phenomena, disciplines, media etc. Examples are given of information sources that could be managed by this freely-faceted technique of classification.
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:08
  5. Gnoli, C.: Progress in synthetic classification : towards unique definition of concepts (2007) 0.01
    0.0050096894 = product of:
      0.015029067 = sum of:
        0.0064269323 = weight(_text_:information in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064269323 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
        0.008602135 = product of:
          0.025806403 = sum of:
            0.025806403 = weight(_text_:29 in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025806403 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Beitrag anlässlich: Proceedings of the International Seminar "Information access for the global community", 4-5 June 2007, The Hague. - Vgl.: http://www.udcc.org/seminar07/presentations/gnoli.pdf.
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 29(2007), S.167-182
  6. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.00
    0.0049838955 = product of:
      0.014951685 = sum of:
        0.0064269323 = weight(_text_:information in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064269323 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
        0.008524753 = product of:
          0.025574258 = sum of:
            0.025574258 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025574258 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The Integrative Level Classification (ILC) research project is experimenting with a knowledge organization system based on phenomena rather than disciplines. Each phenomenon has a constant notation, which can be combined with that of any other phenomenon in a freely faceted structure. Citation order can express differential focality of the facets. Very specific subjects can have long classmarks, although their complexity is reduced by various devices. Freely faceted classification is being tested by indexing a corpus of about 3300 papers in the interdisciplinary domain of bioacoustics. The subjects of these papers often include phenomena from a wide variety of integrative levels (mechanical waves, animals, behaviour, vessels, fishing, law, ...) as well as information about the methods of study, as predicted in the León Manifesto. The archive is recorded in a MySQL database, and can be fed and searched through PHP Web interfaces. Indexer's work is made easier by mechanisms that suggest possible classes on the basis of matching title words with terms in the ILC schedules, and synthesize automatically the verbal caption corresponding to the classmark being edited. Users can search the archive by selecting and combining values in each facet. Search refinement should be improved, especially for the cases where no record, or too many records, match the faceted query. However, experience is being gained progressively, showing that freely faceted classification by phenomena, theories, and methods is feasible and successfully working.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  7. Gnoli, C.; Ridi, C.R.: Unified Theory of Information, hypertextuality and levels of reality : without, within, and withal knowledge management (2014) 0.00
    0.0035526208 = product of:
      0.021315724 = sum of:
        0.021315724 = weight(_text_:information in 1796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021315724 = score(doc=1796,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 1796, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1796)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The different senses of the term information in physical, biological and social interpretations, and the possibility of connections between them, are addressed. Special attention is paid to Hofkirchner's Unified Theory of Information (UTI), proposing an integrated view in which the notion of information gets additional properties as one moves from the physical to the biological and the social realms. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - UTI is compared to other views of information, especially to two theories complementing several ideas of it: the theory of the hypertextual documental universe ("docuverse") and the theory of integrative levels of reality. Two alternative applications of the complex of these three theories are discussed: a pragmatical, hermeneutic one, and a more ambitious realist, ontological one. The latter can be extended until considering information ("bit") together with matter-energy ("it") as a fundamental element in the world. Problems and opportunities with each view are discussed. Findings - It is found that the common ground for all three theories is an evolutionary approach, paying attention to the phylogenetic connections between the different meanings of information. Research limitations/implications - Other theories of information, like Leontiev's, are not discussed as not especially related to the focus of the approach. Originality/value - The paper builds on previously unnoticed affinities between different families of information-related theories, showing how each of them can provide fruitful complements to the other ones in clarifying the nature of information.
    Theme
    Information
  8. Santis, R. de; Gnoli, C.: Expressing dependence relationships in the Integrative Levels Classification using OWL (2016) 0.00
    0.0022939024 = product of:
      0.013763415 = sum of:
        0.013763415 = product of:
          0.041290242 = sum of:
            0.041290242 = weight(_text_:29 in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041290242 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  9. Gnoli, C.: Mentefacts as a missing level in theory of information science (2018) 0.00
    0.0019161411 = product of:
      0.011496847 = sum of:
        0.011496847 = weight(_text_:information in 4624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011496847 = score(doc=4624,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.1734784 = fieldWeight in 4624, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4624)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The current debate between two theoretical approaches in library and information science and knowledge organization (KO), the cognitive one and the sociological one, is addressed in view of their possible integration in a more general model. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach Personal knowledge of individual users, as focused in the cognitive approach, and social production and use of knowledge, as focused in the sociological approach, are reconnected to the theory of levels of reality, particularly in the versions of Nicolai Hartmann and Karl R. Popper (three worlds). The notions of artefact and mentefact, as proposed in anthropological literature and applied in some KO systems, are also examined as further contributions to the generalized framework. Some criticisms to these models are reviewed and discussed. Findings Both the cognitive approach and the sociological approach, if taken in isolation, prove to be cases of philosophical monism as they emphasize a single level over the others. On the other hand, each of them can be considered as a component of a pluralist ontology and epistemology, where individual minds and social communities are but two successive levels in knowledge production and use, and are followed by a further level of "objectivated spirit"; this can in turn be analyzed into artefacts and mentefacts. While all these levels are relevant to information science, mentefacts and their properties are its most peculiar objects of study, which make it distinct from such other disciplines as psychology and sociology. Originality/value This analysis shows how existing approaches can benefit from additional notions contributed by levels theory, to develop more complete and accurate models of information and knowledge phenomena.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/JD-04-2018-0054. Vgl. auch den Folgeartikel von B. Hjoerland: The foundation of information science: one world or three? A discussion of Gnoli (2018). In: Journal of documentation. 74(2019) no.1, S.164-171.
  10. Gnoli, C.: Phylogenetic classification (2006) 0.00
    0.001720427 = product of:
      0.0103225615 = sum of:
        0.0103225615 = product of:
          0.030967683 = sum of:
            0.030967683 = weight(_text_:29 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030967683 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    11. 3.2007 14:19:29
  11. Gnoli, C.; Ledl, A.; Park, Z.; Trzmielewski, M.: Phenomenon-based vs. disciplinary classification : possibilities for evaluating and for mapping (2018) 0.00
    0.0017138487 = product of:
      0.010283092 = sum of:
        0.010283092 = weight(_text_:information in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010283092 = score(doc=4804,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  12. Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017) 0.00
    0.0017049506 = product of:
      0.010229703 = sum of:
        0.010229703 = product of:
          0.030689107 = sum of:
            0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030689107 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
  13. Gnoli, C.: Metadata about what? : distinguishing between ontic, epistemic, and documental dimensions in knowledge organization (2012) 0.00
    0.0015148426 = product of:
      0.0090890555 = sum of:
        0.0090890555 = weight(_text_:information in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0090890555 = score(doc=323,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The spread of many new media and formats is changing the scenario faced by knowledge organizers: as printed monographs are not the only standard form of knowledge carrier anymore, the traditional kind of knowledge organization (KO) systems based on academic disciplines is put into question. A sounder foundation can be provided by an analysis of the different dimensions concurring to form the content of any knowledge item-what Brian Vickery described as the steps "from the world to the classifier." The ultimate referents of documents are the phenomena of the real world, that can be ordered by ontology, the study of what exists. Phenomena coexist in subjects with the perspectives by which they are considered, pertaining to epistemology, and with the formal features of knowledge carriers, adding a further, pragmatic layer. All these dimensions can be accounted for in metadata, but are often done so in mixed ways, making indexes less rigorous and interoperable. For example, while facet analysis was originally developed for subject indexing, many "faceted" interfaces today mix subject facets with form facets, and schemes presented as "ontologies" for the "semantic Web" also code for non-semantic information. In bibliographic classifications, phenomena are often confused with the disciplines dealing with them, the latter being assumed to be the most useful starting point, for users will have either one or another perspective. A general citation order of dimensions- phenomena, perspective, carrier-is recommended, helping to concentrate most relevant information at the beginning of headings.
  14. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : Part 1: dimensions (2016) 0.00
    0.0015148426 = product of:
      0.0090890555 = sum of:
        0.0090890555 = weight(_text_:information in 3417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0090890555 = score(doc=3417,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3417, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3417)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This is the first part of a study on the classification of phenomena. It starts by addressing the status of classification schemes among knowledge organization systems (KOSs), as some features of them have been overlooked in recent reviews of KOS types. It then considers the different dimensions implied in a KOS, which include: the observed phenomena, the cultural and disciplinary perspective under which they are treated, the features of documents carrying such treatment, the collections of such documents as managed in libraries, archives or museums, the information needs prompting to search and use these collections and the people experiencing such different information needs. Until now, most library classification schemes have given priority to the perspective dimension as they first list disciplines. However, an increasing number of voices are now considering the possibility of classification schemes giving priority to phenomena as advocated in the León Manifesto. Although these schemes first list phenomena as their main classes, they can as well express perspective or the other relevant dimensions that occur in a classified item. The independence of a phenomenon-based classification from the institutional divisions into disciplines contributes to giving knowledge organization a more proactive and influential role.
  15. Gnoli, C.; Santis, R. de; Pusterla, L.: Commerce, see also Rhetoric : cross-discipline relationships as authority data for enhanced retrieval (2015) 0.00
    0.0014336891 = product of:
      0.008602135 = sum of:
        0.008602135 = product of:
          0.025806403 = sum of:
            0.025806403 = weight(_text_:29 in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025806403 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
  16. Gnoli, C.; Mei, H.: Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval (2006) 0.00
    0.0012853865 = product of:
      0.007712319 = sum of:
        0.007712319 = weight(_text_:information in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007712319 = score(doc=534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  17. Gnoli, C.: Ten long-term research questions in knowledge organization (2008) 0.00
    0.0012853865 = product of:
      0.007712319 = sum of:
        0.007712319 = weight(_text_:information in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007712319 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Research can benefit by periodical consideration of its status in a long-term perspective. In knowledge organization (KO), a number of basic questions remain to be addressed in the 21st century. Ten of them are identified and synthetically discussed: (1) Can KO principles be extended to a broader scope, including hypertexts, multimedia, museum objects, and monuments? (2) Can the two basic approaches, ontological and epistemological, be reconciled? (3) Can any ontological foundation of KO be identified? (4) Should disciplines continue to be the structural base of KO? (5) How can viewpoint warrant be respected? (6) How can KO be adapted to local collection needs? (7) How can KO deal with changes in knowledge? (8) How can KO systems represent all the dimensions listed above? (9) How can software and formats be improved to better serve these needs? (10) Who should do KO: information professionals, authors or readers?
  18. Szostak, R.; Gnoli, C.; López-Huertas, M.: Interdisciplinary knowledge organization 0.00
    0.0012118741 = product of:
      0.007271244 = sum of:
        0.007271244 = weight(_text_:information in 3804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007271244 = score(doc=3804,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 3804, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3804)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    LCSH
    Information technology / Management
    Subject
    Information technology / Management
  19. Gnoli, C.: Fundamentos ontológicos de la organización del conocimiento : la teoría de los niveles integrativos aplicada al orden de cita (2011) 0.00
    0.0011469512 = product of:
      0.0068817073 = sum of:
        0.0068817073 = product of:
          0.020645121 = sum of:
            0.020645121 = weight(_text_:29 in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020645121 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Scire. 17(2011) no.1, S.29-34
  20. Gnoli, C.: ISKO News (2007) 0.00
    0.0010711554 = product of:
      0.0064269323 = sum of:
        0.0064269323 = weight(_text_:information in 1092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064269323 = score(doc=1092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1092)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Bericht über: Levels of Reality, Seminar, Bolzano (Bozen) Italy, 26-28 September 2007: Ontologies, the knowledge organization systems now widely used in knowledge management applications, take their name from a branch of philosophy. Philosophical ontology deals with the kinds and the properties of what exists, and with how they can be described by categories like entity, attribute, or process. Readers familiar with facet analysis will notice some analogy with the "fundamental categories" of faceted classifications, and this resemblance is not accidental. Indeed, knowledge organization systems use conceptual structures that can be variously reconnected with the categories of ontology. Though having more practical purposes, the ontologies and classifications of information science can benefit of those of philosophy.