Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Zumer, M."
  1. Harej, V.; Zumer, M.: Analysis of FRBR user tasks (2013) 0.01
    0.008015502 = product of:
      0.024046507 = sum of:
        0.010283092 = weight(_text_:information in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010283092 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
        0.013763415 = product of:
          0.041290242 = sum of:
            0.041290242 = weight(_text_:29 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041290242 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD models propose user tasks as a way to address and categorize functions that a catalog should support. The user tasks are not harmonized among these models, but to do that, they should first be fully understood and analyzed, especially "select" and "identify." We decided to look at the FRBR user tasks from the perspective of interactive information retrieval (IIR). Several IIR models were reviewed and Ellis' and Belkin's models were chosen for further analysis and interpretation of FRBR "select" and "identify" tasks.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:13:13
  2. Mercun, T.; Zumer, M.; Aalberg, T.: Presenting bibliographic families : Designing an FRBR-based prototype using information visualization (2016) 0.01
    0.007657731 = product of:
      0.022973193 = sum of:
        0.014371058 = weight(_text_:information in 2879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014371058 = score(doc=2879,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 2879, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2879)
        0.008602135 = product of:
          0.025806403 = sum of:
            0.025806403 = weight(_text_:29 in 2879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025806403 = score(doc=2879,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2879, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2879)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Despite the importance of bibliographic information systems for discovering and exploring library resources, some of the core functionality that should be provided to support users in their information seeking process is still missing. Investigating these issues, the purpose of this paper is to design a solution that would fulfil the missing objectives. Design/methodology/approach - Building on the concepts of a work family, functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR) and information visualization, the paper proposes a model and user interface design that could support a more efficient and user-friendly presentation and navigation in bibliographic information systems. Findings - The proposed design brings together all versions of a work, related works, and other works by and about the author and shows how the model was implemented into a FrbrVis prototype system using hierarchical visualization layout. Research limitations/implications - Although issues related to discovery and exploration apply to various material types, the research first focused on works of fiction and was also limited by the selected sample of records. Practical implications - The model for presenting and interacting with FRBR-based data can serve as a good starting point for future developments and implementations. Originality/value - With FRBR concepts being gradually integrated into cataloguing rules, formats, and various bibliographic services, one of the important questions that has not really been investigated and studied is how the new type of data would be presented to users in a way that would exploit the true potential of the changes.
    Date
    15. 4.2016 14:29:41
  3. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.01
    0.0070455233 = product of:
      0.021136569 = sum of:
        0.010906866 = weight(_text_:information in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010906866 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
        0.010229703 = product of:
          0.030689107 = sum of:
            0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030689107 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Terminology registries (TRs) are a crucial element of the infrastructure required for resource discovery services, digital libraries, Linked Data, and semantic interoperability generally. They can make the content of knowledge organization systems (KOS) available both for human and machine access. The paper describes the attributes and functionality for a TR, based on a review of published literature, existing TRs, and a survey of experts. A domain model based on user tasks is constructed and a set of core metadata elements for use in TRs is proposed. Ideally, the TR should allow searching as well as browsing for a KOS, matching a user's search while also providing information about existing terminology services, accessible to both humans and machines. The issues surrounding metadata for KOS are also discussed, together with the rationale for different aspects and the importance of a core set of KOS metadata for future machine-based access; a possible core set of metadata elements is proposed. This is dealt with in terms of practical experience and in relation to the Dublin Core Application Profile.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1901-1916
  4. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.01
    0.0070455233 = product of:
      0.021136569 = sum of:
        0.010906866 = weight(_text_:information in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010906866 = score(doc=2610,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
        0.010229703 = product of:
          0.030689107 = sum of:
            0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030689107 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Riva, P.; Boeuf, P. le; Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model : a conceptual model for bibliographic information (2017) 0.01
    0.0070135645 = product of:
      0.021040693 = sum of:
        0.008997706 = weight(_text_:information in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008997706 = score(doc=5179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
        0.012042987 = product of:
          0.03612896 = sum of:
            0.03612896 = weight(_text_:29 in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03612896 = score(doc=5179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    19. 3.2019 12:26:29
  6. Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005) 0.01
    0.006977453 = product of:
      0.020932358 = sum of:
        0.008997706 = weight(_text_:information in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008997706 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
        0.011934653 = product of:
          0.03580396 = sum of:
            0.03580396 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03580396 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    1.11.2005 18:56:22
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
  7. Zumer, M.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Consequences of implementing FRBR : are we ready to open pandora's box? (2002) 0.01
    0.006011627 = product of:
      0.018034881 = sum of:
        0.007712319 = weight(_text_:information in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007712319 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
        0.0103225615 = product of:
          0.030967683 = sum of:
            0.030967683 = weight(_text_:29 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030967683 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The study Functional Requirements for Bibliograpbic Records (FRBR) was commissioned by IFLA and published in 1998. It defines the core functions of a catalogue (and bibliographic records) as a gateway to information. For that purpose an abstract entity-relationship model of a catalogue is proposed. The FRBR model is revolutionary. The (computer) catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a replica of the traditional card catalogue, but rather as a network of connected entities, enabling the user to perform seamlessly all the necessary functions. So far there has been some theoretical discussion of the model and some limited experiments, but there is a lack of research in how to implement this theoretical model in practice, in new-generation catalogues. In this paper some reactions to the model are analysed. The main focus is an consequences of the model for the OPAC interface design, particularly the searching functionality and display of results.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.78-86
  8. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004) 0.00
    0.004007751 = product of:
      0.012023253 = sum of:
        0.005141546 = weight(_text_:information in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005141546 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
        0.0068817073 = product of:
          0.020645121 = sum of:
            0.020645121 = weight(_text_:29 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020645121 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 13:47:31
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  9. Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: EDLproject : one more step towards the European digtial library (2007) 0.00
    0.0034099012 = product of:
      0.020459406 = sum of:
        0.020459406 = product of:
          0.061378215 = sum of:
            0.061378215 = weight(_text_:22 in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061378215 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  10. Pauman Budanovi, M.; Zumer, M.: Investigating mental models of cataloguers as the first step towards the development of intuitive cataloguer's tools (2015) 0.00
    0.0030296852 = product of:
      0.018178111 = sum of:
        0.018178111 = weight(_text_:information in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018178111 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  11. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.00
    0.0024111643 = product of:
      0.014466985 = sum of:
        0.014466985 = product of:
          0.043400954 = sum of:
            0.043400954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043400954 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  12. Mercun, T.; Zumer, M.; Aalberg, T.: Presenting bibliographic families using information visualization : evaluation of FRBR-based prototype and hierarchical visualizations (2017) 0.00
    0.0023951763 = product of:
      0.014371058 = sum of:
        0.014371058 = weight(_text_:information in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014371058 = score(doc=3350,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Since their beginnings, bibliographic information systems have been displaying results in the form of long, textual lists. With the development of new data models and computer technologies, the need for new approaches to present and interact with bibliographic data has slowly been maturing. To investigate how this could be accomplished, a prototype system, FrbrVis1, was designed to present work families within a bibliographic information system using information visualization. This paper reports on two user studies, a controlled and an observational experiment, that have been carried out to assess the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)-based against an existing system as well as to test four different hierarchical visual layouts. The results clearly show that FrbrVis offers better performance and user experience compared to the baseline system. The differences between the four hierarchical visualizations (Indented tree, Radial tree, Circlepack, and Sunburst) were, on the other hand, not as pronounced, but the Indented tree and Sunburst design proved to be the most successful, both in performance as well as user perception. The paper therefore not only evaluates the application of a visual presentation of bibliographic work families, but also provides valuable results regarding the performance and user acceptance of individual hierarchical visualization techniques.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.2, S.392-411
  13. Brito, M. de; Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Zumer, M.; Bastos Vieira, S.: Indexing with images : the imagetic conceptual methodology (2016) 0.00
    0.0022939024 = product of:
      0.013763415 = sum of:
        0.013763415 = product of:
          0.041290242 = sum of:
            0.041290242 = weight(_text_:29 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041290242 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  14. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬The new FRBR-LRM model : some accents (2016) 0.00
    0.0022939024 = product of:
      0.013763415 = sum of:
        0.013763415 = product of:
          0.041290242 = sum of:
            0.041290242 = weight(_text_:29 in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041290242 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  15. Riva, P.; Doerr, M.; Zumer, M.: FRBRoo: enabling a common view of information from memory institutions (2008) 0.00
    0.0021423108 = product of:
      0.012853865 = sum of:
        0.012853865 = weight(_text_:information in 3743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012853865 = score(doc=3743,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3743, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3743)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In 2008 the FRBR/CRM Harmonisation Working Group has achieved a major milestone: a complete version of the object-oriented definition of FRBR (FRBRoo) was released for comment. After a brief overview of the history and context of the Working Group, this paper focuses on the primary contributions resulting from this work. - FRBRoo is a self-contained document which expresses the concepts of FRBR using the objectoriented methodology and framework of CIDOC CRM. It is an alternative view on library conceptualisation for a different purpose, not a replacement for FRBR. - This 'translation' process presented an opportunity to verify and confirm FRBR's internal consistency. - FRBRoo offers a common view of library and museum documentation as two kinds of information from memory institutions. Such a common view is necessary to provide interoperable information systems for all users interested in accessing common or related content. - The analysis provided an opportunity for mutual enrichment of FRBR and CIDOC CRM. Examples include: - - Addition of the modelling of time and events to FRBR, which can be seen in its application to the publishing process - - Clarification of the manifestation entity - - Explicit modelling of performances and recordings in FRBR - - Adding the work entity to CRM - - Adding the identifier assignment process to CRM. - Producing a formalisation which is more suited for implementation with object-oriented tools, and which facilitates the testing and adoption of FRBR concepts in implementations with different functional specifications and in different environments.
    Content
    Beitrag während: World library and information congress: 74th IFLA general conference and council, 10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada.
  16. Bastos Vieira, S.; DeBrito, M.; Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Zumer, M.: Developing imaged KOS with the FRSAD Model : a conceptual methodology (2016) 0.00
    0.0020990274 = product of:
      0.012594164 = sum of:
        0.012594164 = weight(_text_:information in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012594164 = score(doc=3109,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This proposal presents the methodology of indexing with images suggested by De Brito and Caribé (2015). The imagetic model is used as a compatible mechanism with FRSAD for a global information share and use of subject data, both within the library sector and beyond. The conceptual model of imagetic indexing shows how images are related to topics and 'key-images' are interpreted as nomens to implement the FRSAD model. Indexing with images consists of using images instead of key-words or descriptors, to represent and organize information. Implementing the imaged navigation in OPACs denotes multiple advantages derived from this rethinking the OPAC anew, since we are looking forward to sharing concepts within the subject authority data. Images, carrying linguistic objects, permeate inter-social and cultural concepts. In practice it includes translated metadata, symmetrical multilingual thesaurus, or any traditional indexing tools. iOPAC embodies efforts focused on conceptual levels as expected from librarians. Imaged interfaces are more intuitive since users do not need specific training for information retrieval, offering easier comprehension of indexing codes, larger conceptual portability of descriptors (as images), and a better interoperability between discourse codes and indexing competences affecting positively social and cultural interoperability. The imagetic methodology deploys R&D fields for more suitable interfaces taking into consideration users with specific needs such as deafness and illiteracy. This methodology arouse questions about the paradigms of the primacy of orality in information systems and pave the way to a legitimacy of multiple perspectives in document indexing by suggesting a more universal communication system based on images. Interdisciplinarity in neurosciences, linguistics and information sciences would be desirable competencies for further investigations about he nature of cognitive processes in information organization and classification while developing assistive KOS for individuals with communication problems, such autism and deafness.
  17. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.00
    0.0020093035 = product of:
      0.012055821 = sum of:
        0.012055821 = product of:
          0.03616746 = sum of:
            0.03616746 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03616746 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  18. Aalberg, T.; O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.: Extending the LRM Model to integrating resources (2021) 0.00
    0.0020071645 = product of:
      0.012042987 = sum of:
        0.012042987 = product of:
          0.03612896 = sum of:
            0.03612896 = weight(_text_:29 in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03612896 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    28. 6.2021 19:29:58
  19. Vilar, P.; Zumer, M.: Perceptions and importance of user friendliness of IR systems according to users' individual characteristics and academic discipline (2008) 0.00
    0.0018552958 = product of:
      0.011131775 = sum of:
        0.011131775 = weight(_text_:information in 2378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011131775 = score(doc=2378,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2378, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2378)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents one part of a wider study, performed at the Department of library and information science and book studies (LIS & BS) at the University of Ljubljana (UL). The study investigated the perceptions of user friendliness of information-retrieval systems (IRS) and the role of individual characteristics of users in these perceptions. Based on an expert study, a user study with 61 postgraduate students of the UL was performed. Three interfaces of e-journals were studied: Science Direct, Proquest Direct, and Ebsco Host. Questionnaires and observations were used for data collection. The users'perceptions of user friendliness and of importance of auxiliary functions were investigated. Also, the connections between these perceptions and the users'individual characteristics were identified. Three sets of individual characteristics were included: approaches to studying, thinking styles, and hemisphere leanings. In connection with the dimensions of individual characteristics, very different perceptions of user friendliness were expressed. Some dimensions of individual characteristics were also found to be connected to the users'academic areas. It is shown that participants from different academic areas have different requirements and perceptions of user friendliness. The results of the study are relevant for the design of the user interfaces of disciplinary IR systems. They also have implications for other areas, for example, user education and training.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.12, S.1995-2007
  20. Aalberg, T.; Zumer, M.: ¬The value of MARC data, or, challenges of frbrisation (2013) 0.00
    0.0018552958 = product of:
      0.011131775 = sum of:
        0.011131775 = weight(_text_:information in 1769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011131775 = score(doc=1769,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1769, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1769)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Bibliographic records should now be used in innovative end-user applications that enable users to learn about, discover and exploit available content, and this information should be interpreted and reused also beyond the library domain. New conceptual models such as FRBR offer the foundation for such developments. The main motivation for this research is to contribute to the adoption of the FRBR model in future bibliographic standards and systems, by analysing limitations in existing bibliographic information and looking for short- and long-term solutions that can improve the data quality in terms of expressing the FRBR model. Design/methodology/approach - MARC records in three collections (BIBSYS catalogue, Slovenian National Bibliography and BTJ catalogue) were first analysed by looking at statistics of field and subfield usage to determine common patterns that express FRBR. Based on this, different rules for interpreting the information were developed. Finally typical problems/errors found in MARC records were analysed. Findings - Different types of FRBR entity-relationship structures that typically can be found in bibliographic records are identified. Problems related to interpreting these from bibliographic records are analyzed. Frbrisation of consistent and complete MARC records is relatively successful, particularly if all entities are systematically described and relationships among them are clearly indicated. Research limitations/implications - Advanced matching was not used for clustering of identical entities. Practical implications - Cataloguing guidelines are proposed to enable better frbrisation of MARC records in the interim period, before new formats are developed and implemented. Originality/value - This is the first in depth analysis of manifestations embodying several expressions and of works and agents as subjects.