Search (82 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Verteilte bibliographische Datenbanken"
  1. SRW/U erleichtert verteilte Datenbankrecherchen (2005) 0.04
    0.035410047 = product of:
      0.10623013 = sum of:
        0.0064269323 = weight(_text_:information in 3972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064269323 = score(doc=3972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3972)
        0.0998032 = weight(_text_:strukturierung in 3972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0998032 = score(doc=3972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26115823 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.38215607 = fieldWeight in 3972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3972)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    "Seit zwei Jahrzehnten nutzen vor allem Bibliotheksverbünde das Protokoll Z39.50, um ihren Benutzern im Internet die simultane Abfrage mehrerer Datenbanken zu ermöglichen. Jetzt gibt es einen Nachfolger dieses Protokolls, der eine einfachere Implementierung verspricht. Damit ist auch eine größere Verbreitung für die Suche in verteilten Datenbeständen anderer Institutionen, wie z.B. Archiven und Museen, wahrscheinlich. SRW/U (Search and Retrieve Web Service bzw. Search and Retrieve URL Service, www.loc.90v/z3950/agency/zing/srw) wurde von einer an der Library of Congress angesiedelten Initiative entwickelt und beruht auf etablierten Standards wie URI und XML. Die mit SRW und SRU möglichen Abfragen und Ergebnisse unterscheiden sich nur in der Art der Übertragung, verwenden aber beide dieselben Prozeduren. Davon gibt es nur drei: explain, scan und searchRetrieve. Die beiden Erstgenannten dienen dazu, allgemeine Informationen über den Datenanbieter bzw. die verfügbaren Indexe zubekommen. Das Herzstück ist die search-Retrieve-Anweisung. Damit werden Anfragen direkt an die Datenbank gesendet und die Parameter des Suchergebnisses definiert. Verwendet wird dafür die Retrievalsprache CQL (Common Query Language), die simple Freitextsuchen, aber auch mit Boolschen Operatoren verknüpfte Recherchen ermöglicht. Bei SRU werden die Suchbefehle mittels einfacher HTTP GET -Anfragen übermittelt, die Ergebnisse in XML zurückgeliefert. Zur Strukturierung der Daten dienen z.B. Dublin Core, MARC oder EAD. Welches Format von der jeweiligen Datenbank bereitgestellt wird, kann durch die explain-Anweisung ermittelt gebracht werden."
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.5/6, S.274
  2. Dempsey, L.; Russell, R.; Kirriemur, J.W.: Towards distributed library systems : Z39.50 in a European context (1996) 0.02
    0.023116175 = product of:
      0.06934852 = sum of:
        0.014542488 = weight(_text_:information in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014542488 = score(doc=127,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
        0.054806035 = product of:
          0.08220905 = sum of:
            0.041290242 = weight(_text_:29 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041290242 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
            0.040918812 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040918812 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Z39.50 is an information retrieval protocol. It has generated much interest but is so far little deployed in UK systems and services. Gives a functional overview of the protocol itself and the standards background, describes some European initiatives which make use of it, and outlines various issues to do with its future use and acceptance. Z39.50 is a crucial building block of future distributed information systems but it needs to be considered alongside other protocols and services to provide useful applications
    Date
    3. 3.1999 17:29:59
    Source
    Program. 30(1996) no.1, S.1-22
  3. Arch-Int, N.; Sophatsathit, P.: ¬A semantic information gathering approach for heterogeneous information sources on WWW (2003) 0.02
    0.015787128 = product of:
      0.04736138 = sum of:
        0.026716258 = weight(_text_:information in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026716258 = score(doc=4694,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
        0.020645123 = product of:
          0.061935365 = sum of:
            0.061935365 = weight(_text_:29 in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061935365 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.5, S.357-374
  4. Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001) 0.01
    0.011961348 = product of:
      0.035884045 = sum of:
        0.015424638 = weight(_text_:information in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015424638 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
        0.020459406 = product of:
          0.061378215 = sum of:
            0.061378215 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061378215 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:59
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  5. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.01
    0.011913449 = product of:
      0.035740346 = sum of:
        0.02380569 = weight(_text_:information in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02380569 = score(doc=4866,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
        0.011934653 = product of:
          0.03580396 = sum of:
            0.03580396 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03580396 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.40-45
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  6. Friedrich, M.; Schimkat, R.-D.; Küchlin, W.: Information retrieval in distributed environments based on context-aware, proactive documents (2002) 0.01
    0.010720823 = product of:
      0.03216247 = sum of:
        0.020119483 = weight(_text_:information in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020119483 = score(doc=3608,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
        0.012042987 = product of:
          0.03612896 = sum of:
            0.03612896 = weight(_text_:29 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03612896 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this position paper we propose a document-centric middleware component called Living Documents to support context-aware information retrieval in distributed communities. A Living Document acts as a micro server for a document which contains computational services, a semi-structured knowledge repository to uniformly store and access context-related information, and finally the document's digital content. Our initial prototype of Living Documents is based an the concept of mobile agents and implemented in Java and XML.
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  7. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.01
    0.010483481 = product of:
      0.031450443 = sum of:
        0.017810838 = weight(_text_:information in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017810838 = score(doc=3173,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
        0.013639605 = product of:
          0.040918812 = sum of:
            0.040918812 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040918812 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the backgroud to the construction of a thesaurus at Hydro-Quebec, Quebec, Canada. Several information units, linked to form a network, share the same bibliographic database. The need for coherence and efficiency was the principle motive for the construction of the multidisciplinary thesaurus. Describes the construction process, discusses the specifity of the tool, its circulation, and considers its use on a partnership basis with other information services
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The development of an information tool at Hydro-Quebec: the HQ Thesaurus
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  8. Lopatenko, A.; Asserson, A.; Jeffery, K.G.: CERIF - Information retrieval of research information in a distributed heterogeneous environment (2002) 0.01
    0.009737937 = product of:
      0.029213808 = sum of:
        0.018891247 = weight(_text_:information in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018891247 = score(doc=3597,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
        0.0103225615 = product of:
          0.030967683 = sum of:
            0.030967683 = weight(_text_:29 in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030967683 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    User demands to have access to complete and actual information about research may require integration of data from different CRISs. CRISs are rarely homogenous systems and problems of CRISs integration must be addressed from technological point of view. Implementation of CRIS providing access to heterogeneous data distributed among a number of CRISs is described. A few technologies - distributed databases, web services, semantic web are used for distributed CRIS to address different user requirements. Distributed databases serve to implement very efficient integration of homogenous systems, web services - to provide open access to research information, semantic web - to solve problems of integration semantically and structurally heterogeneous data sources and provide intelligent data retrieval interfaces. The problems of data completeness in distributed systems are addressed and CRIS-adequate solution for data completeness is suggested.
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  9. Ostergren, M.; Wright, G.: Creating a bibliographic database for a widely distributed collection (1998) 0.01
    0.009435302 = product of:
      0.028305903 = sum of:
        0.014542488 = weight(_text_:information in 1503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014542488 = score(doc=1503,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1503, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1503)
        0.013763415 = product of:
          0.041290242 = sum of:
            0.041290242 = weight(_text_:29 in 1503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041290242 = score(doc=1503,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1503, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1503)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Managing information from over 375 separate parks is a challenge for the US National Parks Service (NPS). Describes the National Resource Bibliography Project initiated by the NPS, which so far includes more than 100.000 records from over 160 different US parks. The goal is to complete all of the units designated for the project by 1998. The result will be a virtual library comprising document collections from over 300 parks, forming a unique and valuable research tool, available to anyone interested
    Date
    23. 7.1998 19:29:54
    Source
    Information outlook. 2(1998) no.1, S.27-30
  10. Johnson, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval (2000) 0.01
    0.008089153 = product of:
      0.024267457 = sum of:
        0.015742704 = weight(_text_:information in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015742704 = score(doc=6959,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
        0.008524753 = product of:
          0.025574258 = sum of:
            0.025574258 = weight(_text_:22 in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025574258 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The success of the World Wide Web Shows that we can access, search, and retrieve information from globally distributed databases. lf a database, such as a library catalog, has some sort of Web-based front end, we can type its URL into a Web browser and use its HTML-based forms to search for items in that database. Depending an how well the query conforms to the database content, how the search engine interprets the query, and how the server formats the results into HTML, we might actually find something usable. While the first two issues depend an ourselves and the server, an the Web the latter falls to the mercy of HTML, which we all know as a great destroyer of information because it codes for display but not for content description. When looking at an HTML-formatted display, we must depend an our own interpretation to recognize such entities as author names, titles, and subject identifiers. The Web browser can do nothing but display the information. lf we want some other view of the result, such as sorting the records by date (provided it offers such an option to begin with), the server must do it. This makes poor use of the computing power we have at the desktop (or even laptop), which, unless it involves retrieving more records, could easily do the result Set manipulation that we currently send back to the server. Despite having personal computers wich immense computational power, as far as information retrieval goes, we still essentially use them as dumb terminals.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  11. Smith, N.A.: ONE, OPAC network in Europe : taking a further step towards a Europe-wide information network (1995) 0.01
    0.008015502 = product of:
      0.024046507 = sum of:
        0.010283092 = weight(_text_:information in 8452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010283092 = score(doc=8452,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 8452, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8452)
        0.013763415 = product of:
          0.041290242 = sum of:
            0.041290242 = weight(_text_:29 in 8452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041290242 = score(doc=8452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 8452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8452)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Program. 29(1995) no.4, S.427-432
  12. Lunau, C.D.: Z39.50: a critical component of the Canadian resource sharing infrastructure : implementation activities and results achieved (1997) 0.01
    0.007974233 = product of:
      0.023922697 = sum of:
        0.010283092 = weight(_text_:information in 3193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010283092 = score(doc=3193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3193)
        0.013639605 = product of:
          0.040918812 = sum of:
            0.040918812 = weight(_text_:22 in 3193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040918812 = score(doc=3193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3193)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    3. 3.1999 17:22:57
    Source
    New review of information networking. 1997, no.3, S.77-92
  13. Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993) 0.01
    0.007974233 = product of:
      0.023922697 = sum of:
        0.010283092 = weight(_text_:information in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010283092 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
        0.013639605 = product of:
          0.040918812 = sum of:
            0.040918812 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040918812 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes a new model for bibliographic access, the virtual catalogue, to serve the virtual library. Suggests the use of current software and networks to build links between bibliographic databases of all kinds, including full text, to enable the user to search a specified subset of databases. Suggests that local data be limited to holdings information linked to, but separate from, bibliographic databases both local and remote
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:47:22
  14. Neuroth, H.; Lepschy, P.: ¬Das EU-Projekt Renardus (2001) 0.01
    0.007862611 = product of:
      0.023587832 = sum of:
        0.013358129 = weight(_text_:information in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013358129 = score(doc=5589,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
        0.010229703 = product of:
          0.030689107 = sum of:
            0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030689107 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Der vollständige Projektname von Renardus lautet "Academic Subject Gateway Service Europe". Renardus wird von der Europäischen Union im 5. Rahmenprogramm mit dem Schwerpunktthema "Information Society Technologies" im zweiten Thematischen Programm "Benutzerfreundliche Informationsgesellschaft" ('Promoting a User-friendly Information Society') gefördert. Die Projektlaufzeit ist von Januar 2000 bis Juni 2002. Insgesamt zwölf Partner (Principal und Assistant Contractors) aus Finnland, Dänemark, Schweden, Großbritannien, den Niederlanden, Frankreich und Deutschland beteiligen sich an diesem Projekt. Die Europäische Union unterstützt das Projekt mit 1,7 Mio. EURO, die Gesamtkosten belaufen sich inklusive der Eigenbeteiligungen der Partner auf 2,3 Mio. EURO. Das Ziel des Projektes Renardus ist es, über eine Schnittstelle Zugriff auf verteilte Sammlungen von "High Quality" Internet Ressourcen in Europa zu ermöglichen. Diese Schnittstelle wird über den Renardus Broker realisiert, der das "Cross-Searchen" und "Cross-Browsen" über verteilte "Quality-Controlled Subject Gateways" ermöglicht. Ein weiteres Ziel von Renardus ist es, Möglichkeiten von "metadata sharing" zu evaluieren und in kleinen Experimenten zwischen z. B. Subject Gateways und Nationalbibliothek zu testen bzw. zu realisieren
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:32:15
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  15. Sarinder, K.K.S.; Lim, L.H.S.; Merican, A.F.; Dimyati, K.: Biodiversity information retrieval across networked data sets (2010) 0.01
    0.00708477 = product of:
      0.02125431 = sum of:
        0.0090890555 = weight(_text_:information in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0090890555 = score(doc=3951,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
        0.012165255 = product of:
          0.036495764 = sum of:
            0.036495764 = weight(_text_:29 in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036495764 = score(doc=3951,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Biodiversity resources are inevitably digital and stored in a wide variety of formats by researchers or stakeholders. In Malaysia, although digitizing biodiversity data has long been stressed, the interoperability of the biodiversity data is still an issue that requires attention. This is because, when data are shared, the question of copyright occurs, creating a setback among researchers wanting to promote or share data through online presentations. To solve this, the aim is to present an approach to integrate data through wrapping of datasets stored in relational databases located on networked platforms. Design/methodology/approach - The approach uses tools such as XML, PHP, ASP and HTML to integrate distributed databases in heterogeneous formats. Five current database integration systems were reviewed and all of them have common attributes such as query-oriented, using a mediator-based approach and integrating a structured data model. These common attributes were also adopted in the proposed solution. Distributed Generic Information Retrieval (DiGIR) was used as a model in designing the proposed solution. Findings - A new database integration system was developed, which is user-friendly and simple with common attributes found in current integration systems.
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:29:10
  16. Vikor, D.L.; Gaumond, G.; Heath, F.M.: Building electronic cooperation in the 1990s : the Maryland, Georgia, and Texas experiences (1997) 0.01
    0.007076476 = product of:
      0.021229427 = sum of:
        0.010906866 = weight(_text_:information in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010906866 = score(doc=1680,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
        0.0103225615 = product of:
          0.030967683 = sum of:
            0.030967683 = weight(_text_:29 in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030967683 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    During the 1990s statewide cooperative use of networks in the USA has moved towards providing mainly access to bibliographic and full-text resources not held locally and usually provided by commercial vendors for use by libraries. Describes 3 academic library networks: the University System of Maryland's Library Information Management System serving the information needs of users throughout the state; Georgia's GALILEO (Georgia Library Learning On-Line) which provides a set of electronic resources and services for the 34 colleges and universities of the University System of Georgia; and TexShare in which all 52 libraries from the public educational institutions in Texas participate. Although the development of funding sources, the technical implementations and support, and the management organization differ from state to state, all three reflect an incremental shift towards the electronic library
    Date
    29. 7.1998 19:42:59
  17. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001) 0.01
    0.007048292 = product of:
      0.021144876 = sum of:
        0.0090890555 = weight(_text_:information in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0090890555 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.012055821 = product of:
          0.03616746 = sum of:
            0.03616746 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03616746 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:22
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  18. Avrahami, T.T.; Yau, L.; Si, L.; Callan, J.P.: ¬The FedLemur project : Federated search in the real world (2006) 0.01
    0.0070455233 = product of:
      0.021136569 = sum of:
        0.010906866 = weight(_text_:information in 5271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010906866 = score(doc=5271,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5271, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5271)
        0.010229703 = product of:
          0.030689107 = sum of:
            0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 5271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030689107 = score(doc=5271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5271)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Federated search and distributed information retrieval systems provide a single user interface for searching multiple full-text search engines. They have been an active area of research for more than a decade, but in spite of their success as a research topic, they are still rare in operational environments. This article discusses a prototype federated search system developed for the U.S. government's FedStats Web portal, and the issues addressed in adapting research solutions to this operational environment. A series of experiments explore how well prior research results, parameter settings, and heuristics apply in the FedStats environment. The article concludes with a set of lessons learned from this technology transfer effort, including observations about search engine quality in the real world.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:02:07
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.347-358
  19. Meiert, M.: Elektronische Publikationen an Hochschulen : Modellierung des elektronischen Publikationsprozesses am Beispiel der Universität Hildesheim (2006) 0.01
    0.0070455233 = product of:
      0.021136569 = sum of:
        0.010906866 = weight(_text_:information in 5974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010906866 = score(doc=5974,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5974, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5974)
        0.010229703 = product of:
          0.030689107 = sum of:
            0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 5974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030689107 = score(doc=5974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5974)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    1. 9.2006 13:22:15
    Source
    Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis: ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005. Hrsg.: T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  20. Stark, T.: ¬The Net and Z39.50 : toward a virtual union catalog (1997) 0.01
    0.0070135645 = product of:
      0.021040693 = sum of:
        0.008997706 = weight(_text_:information in 3194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008997706 = score(doc=3194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3194)
        0.012042987 = product of:
          0.03612896 = sum of:
            0.03612896 = weight(_text_:29 in 3194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03612896 = score(doc=3194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3194)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The State Library of Iowa, USA, received a Higher Education Act title II grant from the US Dept. of Education in 1994 to create a demonstration project of new library information technologies. Describes 2 interlinked components of the project: Web-based union catalogue development and statewide deployment of the ANSI/NISO Z39.50 standard for database search and retrieval. Z39.50 was chosen because of its ability to searching multiple remote databases in a single session and its common interface across a variety of implementations. Use of a distributed Z39.50 search makes the need for maintaining large union catalogues unnecessary
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 17(1997) no.10, S.27-29

Languages

  • e 53
  • d 27
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 73
  • el 9
  • m 4
  • x 4
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications