Search (74 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.010483481 = product of:
      0.031450443 = sum of:
        0.017810838 = weight(_text_:information in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017810838 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.013639605 = product of:
          0.040918812 = sum of:
            0.040918812 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040918812 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  2. Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985) 0.01
    0.010019379 = product of:
      0.030058134 = sum of:
        0.012853865 = weight(_text_:information in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012853865 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
        0.01720427 = product of:
          0.051612806 = sum of:
            0.051612806 = weight(_text_:29 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051612806 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  3. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.01
    0.010019379 = product of:
      0.030058134 = sum of:
        0.012853865 = weight(_text_:information in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012853865 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
        0.01720427 = product of:
          0.051612806 = sum of:
            0.051612806 = weight(_text_:29 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051612806 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
    Source
    Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 29(1986), S.648-656
  4. Wenzel, F.: Semantische Eingrenzung im Freitext-Retrieval auf der Basis morphologischer Segmentierungen (1980) 0.01
    0.010019379 = product of:
      0.030058134 = sum of:
        0.012853865 = weight(_text_:information in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012853865 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
        0.01720427 = product of:
          0.051612806 = sum of:
            0.051612806 = weight(_text_:29 in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051612806 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The basic problem in freetext retrieval is that the retrieval language is not properly adapted to that of the author. Morphological segmentation, where words with the same root are grouped together in the inverted file, is a good eliminator of noise and information loss, providing high recall but low precision
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 31(1980) H.1, S.29-35
  5. Albus, W.; Smulders, H.: Doeltreffend zoeken in volledige teksten : 1. full-text retrieval bij de HavenInformatieBank (1998) 0.01
    0.0100128 = product of:
      0.030038398 = sum of:
        0.017995412 = weight(_text_:information in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017995412 = score(doc=1682,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
        0.012042987 = product of:
          0.03612896 = sum of:
            0.03612896 = weight(_text_:29 in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03612896 = score(doc=1682,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    At Rotterdam Ports Authority in the Netherlands the Habour information database includes a press cuttings service and various online databases. To enable research staff to have direct access to information the POINT (Point Information Net) was begun in 1993. Using Verity software POINT provides simultaneously full text searching on a range of databases. The software uses current Web indexing technqiues to overcome the problems of excessive recall and low precision. A key element is the system's ability to recognise word combinations
    Date
    29. 7.1998 19:54:49
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Effective searching on full texts: 1. full-text-retrieval on the Harbour information database
  6. Witt, M.: Au sujet des mots-clés (1997) 0.01
    0.009915833 = product of:
      0.0297475 = sum of:
        0.010283092 = weight(_text_:information in 1666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010283092 = score(doc=1666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1666)
        0.019464407 = product of:
          0.05839322 = sum of:
            0.05839322 = weight(_text_:29 in 1666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05839322 = score(doc=1666,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.43971092 = fieldWeight in 1666, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1666)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Information research using keywords is largely ignored by readers but in medium sized libraries such as that of the City of Science and Industry (Paris), with a multimedia collection of some 200.000 documents, it is the most effective tool. The reader, however, needs guidance in using this technique, and in refining searches to reduce noise. Examples are given demonstrating how keyword searches can identify non-indexed material, documents in other languages, and collective authors
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    29. 7.1998 18:19:41
  7. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.01
    0.009134339 = product of:
      0.054806035 = sum of:
        0.054806035 = product of:
          0.08220905 = sum of:
            0.041290242 = weight(_text_:29 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041290242 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
            0.040918812 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040918812 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06
    Source
    Dokumente und Datenbanken in elektronischen Netzen: Tagungsberichte vom 6. und 7. Österreichischen Online-Informationstreffen bzw. vom 7. und 8. Österreichischen Dokumentartag, Schloß Seggau, Seggauberg bei Leibnitz, 26.-29. September 1995, Congresszentrum Igls bei Innsbruck, 21.-24. Oktober 1997. Hrsg.: E. Pipp
  8. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.01
    0.008551448 = product of:
      0.025654342 = sum of:
        0.015424638 = weight(_text_:information in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015424638 = score(doc=3564,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
        0.010229703 = product of:
          0.030689107 = sum of:
            0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030689107 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
    Imprint
    Medford, New Jersey : Learned Information
    Source
    ASIS'89. Managing information and technology. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington D.C., 30.10.-2.11.1989. Vol.26. Ed.by J. Katzer and G.B. Newby
  9. Molto, M.: Improving full text search performance through textual analysis (1993) 0.01
    0.008015502 = product of:
      0.024046507 = sum of:
        0.010283092 = weight(_text_:information in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010283092 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
        0.013763415 = product of:
          0.041290242 = sum of:
            0.041290242 = weight(_text_:29 in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041290242 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.5, S.614-632
  10. Kristensen, J.: Expanding end-users' query statements for free text searching with a search-aid thesaurus (1993) 0.01
    0.008015502 = product of:
      0.024046507 = sum of:
        0.010283092 = weight(_text_:information in 6621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010283092 = score(doc=6621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6621)
        0.013763415 = product of:
          0.041290242 = sum of:
            0.041290242 = weight(_text_:29 in 6621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041290242 = score(doc=6621,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6621, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6621)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.6, S.733-744
  11. Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.01
    0.007974233 = product of:
      0.023922697 = sum of:
        0.010283092 = weight(_text_:information in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010283092 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
        0.013639605 = product of:
          0.040918812 = sum of:
            0.040918812 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040918812 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2001 12:22:31
  12. Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval : Evaluation and implications (1986) 0.01
    0.007076476 = product of:
      0.021229427 = sum of:
        0.010906866 = weight(_text_:information in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010906866 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.0103225615 = product of:
          0.030967683 = sum of:
            0.030967683 = weight(_text_:29 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030967683 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Recently, a detailed evaluation of a large, operational full-text document retrieval system was reported in the literature. Values of precision and recall were estimated usind traditional statistical sampling methods and blind evaluation procedures. The results of this evaluation demonstrated that the system tested was retrieving less then 20% of the relevant documents when the searchers believed it was retrieving over 75% of the relevant documents. This evaluation is described including some data not reported in the original article. Also discussed are the implications which this study has for how the subjects of documents should be represented, as well as the importance of rigorous retrieval evaluations for the furtherhance of information retrieval research
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: An evaluation ... Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299; Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.648-656; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  13. Preston, L.A.; Ebbs, C.M.; Luther, J.: 'Full text' access evaluation : are we getting the real thing? (1998) 0.01
    0.0070135645 = product of:
      0.021040693 = sum of:
        0.008997706 = weight(_text_:information in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008997706 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
        0.012042987 = product of:
          0.03612896 = sum of:
            0.03612896 = weight(_text_:29 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03612896 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the comparative value of full text access and journal subscription through a sampling of journal issues available online from the Information Access Corporation and in print at James Madison University in Virginia. Presents a model for assessing the value of full text online subscriptions which can be used to evaluate journal subscription, back file retention, document delivery options, index selection, and online access
    Footnote
    Part of an issue devoted to 'Experimentation and collaboration: creating series for a new millenium', part 2, Proceedings of the North American Serials Interest Group, Inc.'s 12th annual conference, 29 May - 1 June 1997, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
  14. Rösener, C.: ¬Die Stecknadel im Heuhaufen : Natürlichsprachlicher Zugang zu Volltextdatenbanken (2005) 0.01
    0.005262376 = product of:
      0.015787126 = sum of:
        0.008905419 = weight(_text_:information in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008905419 = score(doc=548,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
        0.0068817073 = product of:
          0.020645121 = sum of:
            0.020645121 = weight(_text_:29 in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020645121 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die Möglichkeiten, die der heutigen Informations- und Wissensgesellschaft für die Beschaffung und den Austausch von Information zur Verfügung stehen, haben kurioserweise gleichzeitig ein immer akuter werdendes, neues Problem geschaffen: Es wird für jeden Einzelnen immer schwieriger, aus der gewaltigen Fülle der angebotenen Informationen die tatsächlich relevanten zu selektieren. Diese Arbeit untersucht die Möglichkeit, mit Hilfe von natürlichsprachlichen Schnittstellen den Zugang des Informationssuchenden zu Volltextdatenbanken zu verbessern. Dabei werden zunächst die wissenschaftlichen Fragestellungen ausführlich behandelt. Anschließend beschreibt der Autor verschiedene Lösungsansätze und stellt anhand einer natürlichsprachlichen Schnittstelle für den Brockhaus Multimedial 2004 deren erfolgreiche Implementierung vor
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: 2: Wissensrepräsentation 2.1 Deklarative Wissensrepräsentation 2.2 Klassifikationen des BMM 2.3 Thesauri und Ontologien: existierende kommerzielle Software 2.4 Erstellung eines Thesaurus im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 3: Analysekomponenten 3.1 Sprachliche Phänomene in der maschinellen Textanalyse 3.2 Analysekomponenten: Lösungen und Forschungsansätze 3.3 Die Analysekomponenten im LeWi-Projekt 4: Information Retrieval 4.1 Grundlagen des Information Retrieval 4.2 Automatische Indexierungsmethoden und -verfahren 4.3 Automatische Indexierung des BMM im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 4.4 Suchstrategien und Suchablauf im LeWi-Kontext
    Date
    29. 3.2009 11:11:45
  15. Tenopir, C.: Searching by controlled vocabulary or free text (1987) 0.00
    0.004587805 = product of:
      0.02752683 = sum of:
        0.02752683 = product of:
          0.082580484 = sum of:
            0.082580484 = weight(_text_:29 in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082580484 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037751827 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 112(1987) Nov.15, S.58-29
  16. Ashford, J.H.; Matkin, D.I.: Studies in the application of free text package systems for information storage and retrieval in libraries and related information centres (1982) 0.00
    0.004241559 = product of:
      0.025449354 = sum of:
        0.025449354 = weight(_text_:information in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025449354 = score(doc=1351,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  17. Tenopir, C.; Ro, J.S.: Full text databases (1990) 0.00
    0.004241559 = product of:
      0.025449354 = sum of:
        0.025449354 = weight(_text_:information in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025449354 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information technology and libraries. 10(1991) S.156-157 (E. Kanter)
    Series
    New directions in information management; 21
  18. Sormunen, E.: Free-text searching in full-text databases : probing system limits (1993) 0.00
    0.004241559 = product of:
      0.025449354 = sum of:
        0.025449354 = weight(_text_:information in 7120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025449354 = score(doc=7120,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7120, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7120)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Imprint
    Oxford : Learned Information
    Source
    Online information 93: 17th International Online Meeting Proceedings, London, 7.-9.12.1993. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al
  19. Full-text retrieval (1996) 0.00
    0.004241559 = product of:
      0.025449354 = sum of:
        0.025449354 = weight(_text_:information in 3320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025449354 = score(doc=3320,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3320, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3320)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    A special section devoted to full text information retrieval
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.261-330
  20. Sievert, M.E.C.: Full-text information retrieval : an introduction (1996) 0.00
    0.004241559 = product of:
      0.025449354 = sum of:
        0.025449354 = weight(_text_:information in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025449354 = score(doc=4206,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.261-262

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 66
  • m 3
  • x 3
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…