-
Lambe, P.: From cataloguers to designers : Paul Otlet, social Impact and a more proactive role for knowledge organisation professionals (2015)
0.06
0.05810751 = product of:
0.15495336 = sum of:
0.046277866 = weight(_text_:world in 2378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046277866 = score(doc=2378,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 2378, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2378)
0.061494615 = weight(_text_:wide in 2378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061494615 = score(doc=2378,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 2378, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2378)
0.047180872 = weight(_text_:web in 2378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047180872 = score(doc=2378,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 2378, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2378)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- In the early 20th century, Paul Otlet carved out a role for bibliography and documentation as a force for positive social change. While his ideals appeared to be utopian to many of his contemporaries, his activism and vision foreshadowed the potential of the World Wide Web. This paper discusses the role that KO professionals could play in enhancing the positive social impact of the web of knowledge, and how our roles are shifting from the more passive role of descriptive cataloguers, to proactive designers of positive and productive knowledge environments.
-
Laaff, M.: Googles genialer Urahn (2011)
0.06
0.055238303 = product of:
0.110476606 = sum of:
0.01652781 = weight(_text_:world in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01652781 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.10616741 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
0.021962361 = weight(_text_:wide in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021962361 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.122383565 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
0.020637332 = weight(_text_:web in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020637332 = score(doc=4610,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.15613155 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
0.051349103 = sum of:
0.037630405 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037630405 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23490155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.1601965 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
0.013718699 = weight(_text_:22 in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013718699 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14183156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Content
- Karteikästen, Telefone, Multimedia-Möbel 1934 entwickelte Otlet die Idee eines weltweiten Wissens-"Netzes". Er versuchte, kaum dass Radio und Fernsehen erfunden waren, Multimedia-Konzepte zu entwickeln, um die Kooperationsmöglichkeiten für Forscher zu verbessern. Otlet zerbrach sich den Kopf darüber, wie Wissen über große Distanzen zugänglich gemacht werden kann. Er entwickelte Multimedia-Arbeitsmöbel, die mit Karteikästen, Telefonen und anderen Features das versuchten, was heute an jedem Rechner möglich ist. Auch ohne die Hilfe elektronischer Datenverarbeitung entwickelte er Ideen, deren Umsetzung wir heute unter Begriffen wie Web 2.0 oder Wikipedia kennen. Trotzdem sind sein Name und seine Arbeit heute weitgehend in Vergessenheit geraten. Als Vordenker von Hypertext und Internet gelten die US-Amerikaner Vannevar Bush, Ted Nelson und Douglas Engelbart. Die Überbleibsel der Mundaneum-Sammlung vermoderten jahrzehntelang auf halb verfallenen Dachböden.
Der Traum vom dynamischen, ständig wachsenden Wissensnetz Auch, weil Otlet bereits darüber nachdachte, wie in seinem vernetzten Wissenskatalog Anmerkungen einfließen könnten, die Fehler korrigieren oder Widerspruch abbilden. Vor dieser Analogie warnt jedoch Charles van den Heuvel von der Königlichen Niederländischen Akademie der Künste und Wissenschaften: Seiner Interpretation zufolge schwebte Otlet ein System vor, in dem Wissen hierarchisch geordnet ist: Nur eine kleine Gruppe von Wissenschaftlern sollte an der Einordnung von Wissen arbeiten; Bearbeitungen und Anmerkungen sollten, anders etwa als bei der Wikipedia, nicht mit der Information verschmelzen, sondern sie lediglich ergänzen. Das Netz, das Otlet sich ausmalte, ging weit über das World Wide Web mit seiner Hypertext-Struktur hinaus. Otlet wollte nicht nur Informationen miteinander verbunden werden - die Links sollten noch zusätzlich mit Bedeutung aufgeladen werden. Viele Experten sind sich einig, dass diese Idee von Otlet viele Parallelen zu dem Konzept des "semantischen Netz" aufweist. Dessen Ziel ist es, die Bedeutung von Informationen für Rechner verwertbar zu machen - so dass Informationen von ihnen interpretiert werden und maschinell weiterverarbeitet werden können. Projekte, die sich an einer Verwirklichung des semantischen Netzes versuchen, könnten von einem Blick auf Otlets Konzepte profitieren, so van den Heuvel, von dessen Überlegungen zu Hierarchie und Zentralisierung in dieser Frage. Im Mundaneum in Mons arbeitet man derzeit daran, Otlets Arbeiten zu digitalisieren, um sie ins Netz zu stellen. Das dürfte zwar noch ziemlich lange dauern, warnt Archivar Gillen. Aber wenn es soweit ist, wird sich endlich Otlets Vision erfüllen: Seine Sammlung des Wissens wird der Welt zugänglich sein. Papierlos, für jeden abrufbar."
- Date
- 24.10.2008 14:19:22
- Footnote
- Vgl. unter: http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,768312,00.html.
-
Buizza, P.: Bibliographic control and authority control from Paris principles to the present (2004)
0.05
0.04980643 = product of:
0.13281715 = sum of:
0.03966674 = weight(_text_:world in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03966674 = score(doc=5667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
0.05270967 = weight(_text_:wide in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05270967 = score(doc=5667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
0.040440746 = weight(_text_:web in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040440746 = score(doc=5667,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Forty years ago the ICCP in Paris laid the foundations of international co-operation in descriptive cataloging without explicitly speaking of authority control. Some of the factors in the evolution of authority control are the development of catalogs (from card catalog to local automation, to today's OPAC on the Web) and services provided by libraries (from individual service to local users to system networks, to the World Wide Web), as well as international agreements on cataloging (from Paris Principles to the UBC programme, to the report on Mandatory data elements for internationally shared resource authority records). This evolution progressed from the principle of uniform heading to the definition of authority entries and records, and from the responsibility of national bibliographic agencies for the form of the names of their own authors to be shared internationally to the concept of authorized equivalent heading. Some issues of the present state are the persisting differences among national rules and the aim of respecting both local culture and language and international readability.
-
Gartner, R.: Metadata : shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web (2016)
0.02
0.023601893 = product of:
0.09440757 = sum of:
0.0467477 = weight(_text_:world in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0467477 = score(doc=731,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.30028677 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.047659878 = weight(_text_:web in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047659878 = score(doc=731,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This book offers a comprehensive guide to the world of metadata, from its origins in the ancient cities of the Middle East, to the Semantic Web of today. The author takes us on a journey through the centuries-old history of metadata up to the modern world of crowdsourcing and Google, showing how metadata works and what it is made of. The author explores how it has been used ideologically and how it can never be objective. He argues how central it is to human cultures and the way they develop. Metadata: Shaping Knowledge from Antiquity to the Semantic Web is for all readers with an interest in how we humans organize our knowledge and why this is important. It is suitable for those new to the subject as well as those know its basics. It also makes an excellent introduction for students of information science and librarianship.
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Mulsow, M.: Jede, Autor seine Maske : Die Bibliothek als Theater: Vincentius Placcius erfindet 1708 das Karteikastensystem (2002)
0.01
0.012348711 = product of:
0.049394842 = sum of:
0.032867033 = weight(_text_:recherche in 523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032867033 = score(doc=523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21953142 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.14971448 = fieldWeight in 523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=523)
0.01652781 = weight(_text_:world in 523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01652781 = score(doc=523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.10616741 = fieldWeight in 523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=523)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Content
- ""Larvatus prodeo": Mit diesen Worten erklärt Descartes 1619 gegenüber Beeckmann, er wolle seinen Untersuchungen nur versteckt und hinter einer Maske nachgehen. Simulation und Dissimulation waren in dieser Zeit fast unabdingbare Tugenden für denjenigen, der innovativ und jenseits der gängigen Pfade forschen und veröffentlichen wollte. Um so mehr, wurde es allerdings im Verlauf des siebzehnten Jahrhunderts zu einer Dringlichkeit für die "Historia litteraria", für die Orientierung in den Wissensbeständen also, den Autoren ihre Larven abzunehmen: zumindest post festum, nach dem Abflauen der jeweiligen stürmischen Kontroversen, die ihre Schriften ausgelöst hatten. Man empfand die Masse der nicht zuschreibbaren Titel als ein "Chaos", einen "Orcus", der zu bändigen sei. Diesem Bedarf kam schließlich 1708 der Hamburger Vincentius Placcius nach, mit dem ersten umfassenden Lexikon in dieser Sache, dem monumentalen "Theatrum anonymorum et pseudonymorum". Placcius ist auch der erste gewesen, der die Technik des Karteikastenschrankes publik gemacht hat; er kannte sich also aus mit der Bändigung von Wissen. Helmut Zedelmaier hat jüngst an Placcius erinnert, der als Schüler des Naturwissenschaftlers Joachim Jungius eine "Ars Excerpendi" geschrieben und darin die Entwürfe seines Lehrers veröffentlicht hat (Helmut Zedelmaier, "De ratione excerpendi: Daniel Georg Morhof und das Exzerpieren", in Francoise Waquet, Hrsg., Mapping the World of Learning: The "Polyhistor" of Daniel Georg Morhof, Wiesbaden 2000). Nach Zedelmaier war das Besondere an der von Jungius und Placcius verwendeten Methode, daß sie provisorisch war. Nicht mehr in Bücher mit festgefügten thematischen "Loci" schrieb man jetzt, sondern auf Zettel, die mit einer Halteklammer an metallene Registerkarten geheftet wurden. So konnten die Zettel nach Belieben umsortiert werden, wenn sich neue Bezüge für sie ergaben. Ein solches provisorisches Ordnen mag auch beim Aufspüren von larvierten Autoren geholfen haben. Der gelehrte Detektiv, der sich an ihre Fersen heftete, hatte immer neue Indizien zu kombinieren, bis sich das Rätsel um die Identität des Verfassers lüftete. Was heute die Recherche im Internet leistet, war damals noch Handarbeit. Anonymen- und Pseudonymenkataloge anzulegen ist im späten siebzehnten und frühen achtzehnten Jahrhundert fast zum Modephänomen unter wohlhabenden Gelehrtenavanciert. Wohlhabend: weil zu dieser Tätigkeit eine große Privatbibliothek gehörte, die sich nur mit beträchtlichen finanziellen Mitteln aufbauen ließ, zumal wenn sie seltene Texte oder gar Manuskripte enthalten sollte. Placcius' Buch ist ein Titelkupfer vorangestellt, auf dem ein Gelehrter in seiner detektivischen Tätigkeit mehreren Autoren die Masken vom Gesicht nimmt, so daß ihr wahres Antlitz sichtbar wird. Über der Szenerie hängen bereits eine ganze Reihe von Masken, die von erbrachten Sherlock-Holmes-Leistungen zeugen. Das "Theater", in dem sich diese Demaskierung vollzieht, ist natürlich die Gelehrtenbibliothek, und zwar eine Bibliothek hinter jener Bühne, auf der die larvierten Autoren aufgetreten sind. Im Hintergrund sind ein Merkur und eine Minerva sichtbar, Zeichen der Verbindung von Rhetorik und Vernunft in den Artes, und im tiefsten Hintergrund scheint die ephesinische Artemis auf, die Göttin der Natur, als letzter Referenzpunkt aller Künste. "Jedem das Seine" (suum cuique) steht als Motto über der Darstellung.
-
Panizzi, A.K.C.B.: Passages in my official life (1871)
0.01
0.00679041 = product of:
0.05432328 = sum of:
0.05432328 = product of:
0.10864656 = sum of:
0.10864656 = weight(_text_:22 in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10864656 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14183156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 22. 7.2007 12:05:26
22. 7.2007 12:08:24
-
Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: From bibliographic models to cataloguing rules : remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the relationships between them (2009)
0.01
0.005784733 = product of:
0.046277866 = sum of:
0.046277866 = weight(_text_:world in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046277866 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- This article discusses the changes that are occurring in the world of cataloguing. It argues that these changes need to be coordinated. It also discusses the feature of current OPACs, FRBR, the Paris Principles and its proposed replacement (ICP), AACR2 and its proposed replacement (RDA), ISBD, and the relationships between and among these standards. It argues that the syntax of ISBD is an essential component of RDA and all future international and national cataloguing codes.
-
Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993)
0.01
0.0053606774 = product of:
0.04288542 = sum of:
0.04288542 = product of:
0.12865625 = sum of:
0.12865625 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12865625 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34337753 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
-
Liu, S.; Shen, Z.: ¬The development of cataloging in China (2002)
0.00
0.0049583423 = product of:
0.03966674 = sum of:
0.03966674 = weight(_text_:world in 5486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03966674 = score(doc=5486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 5486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5486)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- With a long history, cataloging has evolved with changes in society, economy, and technology in China. This paper presents Chinese cataloging history in four parts, with emphasis on the last two parts: the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949 and the development of cataloging after 1979 when China opened its doors to the world. Particularly important has been the rapid growth of online cataloging in recent years. The China Academic Library and Information System (CALIS), as a successful online cataloging model, is emphasized. Through investigation of the entire history of Chinese cataloging, three distinct features can be stated: (1) Standardization- switching from the Chinese traditional way to aligning with international standards, (2) Cooperation-from decentralized and self-supporting systems to sharing systems, (3) Computerization and networking-from manual operation to computer-based online operation. At the end of this paper, a set of means by which to enhance online cataloging and resource sharing is suggested.
-
Takawashi, T.: Cataloging in Japan : relationship between Japanese and Western cataloging rules (2002)
0.00
0.0049583423 = product of:
0.03966674 = sum of:
0.03966674 = weight(_text_:world in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03966674 = score(doc=5490,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- In 1943 the Japanese League of Young Librarians published Nippon Catalog Rules (NCR1942) based on ALA 1908, and adopted the author main-entry system for Japanese and Western materials. After World War II, the Japan Library Association (JLA) compiled and published NCR1952, based on ALA 1949 and LC 1949 but maintained the author main-entry system. The main-entry system was then replaced by an alternative heading method, which came to be known as the Description-Independent-System (DIS). NCR1965 adopted the main entry principle, which was based on the Paris Principles of 1961. NCR1977 was compiled and published by the JLA Cataloging Committee and based upon a "no-main-entry principle." Then in 1987, the Committee published the standard edition of the rules, which was completely compatible with the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD). NCR1987R was published in 1994 and NCR1987R01 in 2001, which included revised "Chapter 9: Computer Files," devised according to ISBD(ER).
-
Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : On an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017)
0.00
0.0037630405 = product of:
0.030104324 = sum of:
0.030104324 = product of:
0.06020865 = sum of:
0.06020865 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06020865 = score(doc=3859,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23490155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.2563144 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographical Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data - modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid - 1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early 20th - century British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911 - 1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can conceivably be classified. These he first divided into accidental and inseparable attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition - level and copy - level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into physical and non - physical attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstraction hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity - the book - , whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
-
Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : on an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017)
0.00
0.0037630405 = product of:
0.030104324 = sum of:
0.030104324 = product of:
0.06020865 = sum of:
0.06020865 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06020865 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23490155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.2563144 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data-modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid-1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early twentiethcentury British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911-1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can be classified. These he first divided into "accidental" and "inseparable" attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition-level and copy-level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into "physical" and "non-physical" attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstract hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity-the book-whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
-
Miksa, S.D.: Cataloging principles and objectives : history and development (2021)
0.00
0.0035744905 = product of:
0.028595924 = sum of:
0.028595924 = weight(_text_:web in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028595924 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Cataloging principles and objectives guide the formation of cataloging rules governing the organization of information within the library catalog, as well as the function of the catalog itself. Changes in technologies wrought by the internet and the web have been the driving forces behind shifting cataloging practice and reconfigurations of cataloging rules. Modern cataloging principles and objectives started in 1841 with the creation of Panizzi's 91 Rules for the British Museum and gained momentum with Charles Cutter's Rules for Descriptive Cataloging (1904). The first Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) was adopted in 1961, holding their place through such codifications as AACR and AACR2 in the 1970s and 1980s. Revisions accelerated starting in 2003 with the three original FR models. The Library Reference Model (LRM) in 2017 acted as a catalyst for the evolution of principles and objectives culminating in the creation of Resource Description and Access (RDA) in 2013.
-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003)
0.00
0.0034296748 = product of:
0.027437398 = sum of:
0.027437398 = product of:
0.054874796 = sum of:
0.054874796 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054874796 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14183156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Pages
- S.3-22
-
Steinhagen, E.N.: Historical perspective of a union catalog in Chile : authorities and periodicals (2003)
0.00
0.0034296748 = product of:
0.027437398 = sum of:
0.027437398 = product of:
0.054874796 = sum of:
0.054874796 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054874796 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14183156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 29. 7.2006 20:06:22
-
Dobreski, B.; Kwasnik, B.: Changing depictions of persons in library practice : spirits, pseudonyms, and human books (2017)
0.00
0.0029787424 = product of:
0.023829939 = sum of:
0.023829939 = weight(_text_:web in 4140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023829939 = score(doc=4140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 4140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4140)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Among knowledge organizing institutions, libraries have a rich history of depicting persons as information. From personal authority records to descriptions of oral history interviews, libraries have amassed data on persons from a variety of perspectives. Within this set of traditions, however, subtle but significant shifts in practice and conception have occurred, particularly concerning how persons are interpreted and depicted and how such depictions are justified. To explore these issues, we looked to four specific library traditions: authority work, community information, oral history, and "human library" events. Within these traditions, we identified six standards guiding the representation of persons. We performed a content analysis of these standards, along with a semantic alignment and comparison of descriptive elements. From this analysis, we reconstructed an historical timeline and a set of narratives capturing changing definitions of people, a shifting focus from names to identities, and an increasing acceptance of varied sources of justification. Findings show not only a number of critical variations within library practices but also practical and ethical issues concerning the responsibility of libraries as well as the redistribution and reuse of library data on the web.
-
Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975)
0.00
0.0027437399 = product of:
0.021949919 = sum of:
0.021949919 = product of:
0.043899838 = sum of:
0.043899838 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043899838 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14183156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002)
0.00
0.0024007724 = product of:
0.01920618 = sum of:
0.01920618 = product of:
0.03841236 = sum of:
0.03841236 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03841236 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14183156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
-
Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985)
0.00
0.0013718699 = product of:
0.0109749595 = sum of:
0.0109749595 = product of:
0.021949919 = sum of:
0.021949919 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021949919 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14183156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04050213 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Footnote
- Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
