Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  • × language_ss:"f"
  1. Neet, H.: ¬A-la recherche du mot clé : analyse documentaire et l'indexation alphabétique (1989) 0.03 
    0.026293628 = product of:
  0.21034902 = sum of:
    0.21034902 = weight(_text_:recherche in 2120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21034902 = score(doc=2120,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21953142 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.95817274 = fieldWeight in 2120, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2120)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
  2. Chartron, G.; Dalbin, S.; Monteil, M.-G.; Verillon, M.: Indexation manuelle et indexation automatique : dépasser les oppositions (1989) 0.01 
    0.007686827 = product of:
  0.061494615 = sum of:
    0.061494615 = weight(_text_:wide in 3516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061494615 = score(doc=3516,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 3516, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3516)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Report of a study comparing 2 methods of indexing: LEXINET, a computerised system for indexing titles and summaries only; and manual indexing of full texts, using the thesaurus developed by French Electricity (EDF). Both systems were applied to a collection of approximately 2.000 documents on artifical intelligence from the EDF data base. The results were then analysed to compare quantitative performance (number and range of terms) and qualitative performance (ambiguity of terms, specificity, variability, consistency). Overall, neither system proved ideal: LEXINET was deficient as regards lack of accessibility and excessive ambiguity; while the manual system gave rise to an over-wide variation of terms. The ideal system would appear to be a combination of automatic and manual systems, on the evidence produced here.
  3. Schéma directeur de l'information bibliographique de la Culture : étape no.1 (1988) 0.01 
    0.005784733 = product of:
  0.046277866 = sum of:
    0.046277866 = weight(_text_:world in 1548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046277866 = score(doc=1548,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 1548, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1548)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Extracts from the official report of a study investigating the situation in French public libraries, The main reason for this evaluation is th proposed review of the role of the Bibliothèque Nationale, in relation to developing the role of France in the world information market. The results reported here cover the production and diffusion of bibliographic information. The overall picture is of a lack of coordination between products available and user needs, failure to establish standards for formats and for information technology equioment. The concluding recommendations emphaisis the need for coordinating initiatives by the various organisations involved in producing/diffusing bibliographic information, and establishing common standards to allow free exchange between bibliographic networks. Further studies are in hand to establish guidelines for future policies in more specialised library sectors.
  4. Mitev, N.; Hildreth, C.R.: ¬Les catalogues interactifs en Grande-Bretagne et aux Etats-Unis (1989) 0.00 
    0.004801545 = product of:
  0.03841236 = sum of:
    0.03841236 = product of:
      0.07682472 = sum of:
        0.07682472 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07682472 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14183156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04050213 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 34(1989) no.1, S.22-47

Authors

Types

Themes