Search (120 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.30 
    0.29732174 = product of:
  0.69375074 = sum of:
    0.23125026 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23125026 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30859807 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03639982 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.23125026 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23125026 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30859807 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03639982 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.23125026 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23125026 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30859807 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03639982 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  2. Härder, T.; Poetzsch-Heffter, A.: Bibliometrie: ein zweischneidiges Schwert (2013) 0.02 
    0.015554063 = product of:
  0.10887843 = sum of:
    0.10887843 = product of:
      0.21775687 = sum of:
        0.21775687 = weight(_text_:leistungsbewertung in 3979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21775687 = score(doc=3979,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.345786 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.6297446 = fieldWeight in 3979, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3979)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag "Drei von Fünfundzwanzigtausend" des UniSpectrums 3/2012 berichtete, dass drei Veröffentlichungen, an denen Wissenschaftler der TU Kaiserslautern beteiligt waren, gemäß der Datenbank "Web of Knowledge" die "magische Schwelle von 1.000 Zitierungen erreicht und überschritten" haben. Dies ist ein beachtenswerter Erfolg der Autoren und eine gute Nachricht für die Universität, denn bibliometrische Daten werden immer stärker zur Beurteilung von Wissenschaftlern und für das Ranking von Fachbereichen und ganzen Hochschulen herangezogen. Auch die Zuteilung von Forschungsgeldern wird mittlerweile in einigen Ländern von bibliometrischen Daten abhängig gemacht (z.B. in Italien) und vermutlich wird dies auch bei uns demnächst in die Diskussion kommen. Spätestens dann aber wird es wichtig, über die Objektivität und Genauigkeit der Messungen sowie über deren Aussagekraft und Relevanz nachzudenken. Insbesondere wird es wichtig, auch die problematischen Aspekte dieser scheinbar einfachen Form der Leistungsbewertung zu thematisieren. Dazu möchten wir in diesem Beitrag Anstöße geben.
  3. Maier, S.: Wie Wissenschaftler berühmt werden : Anzahl der Veröffentlichungen zählt - "Google" ist das Maß aller Dinge (2004) 0.01 
    0.009183896 = product of:
  0.06428727 = sum of:
    0.06428727 = weight(_text_:suchmaschine in 2901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06428727 = score(doc=2901,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20581384 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03639982 = queryNorm
        0.31235638 = fieldWeight in 2901, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2901)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    "Eine Gruppe von Physikern der Clarkson-Universität in den Vereinigten Staaten ist der Frage nachgegangen, wie Wissenschaftler berühmt werden. Der Studie zu Folge ist der Bekanntheitsgrad eines Forschers, ausgedrückt durch die Anzahl der Treffer bei einer Suche in der Internet-Suchmaschine Google, der Anzahl der Veröffentlichungen des Forschers proportional. Die Studie ist auf dem arXiv-Server einsehbar (http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0404515). Daniel ben-Avraham und seine Kollegen recherchierten zunächst den Bekanntheitsgrad von 449 Forschern auf dem Gebiet der Festkörperphysik mit Hilfe des Internet-Suchdienstes Google. Den Bekanntheitsgrad eines Forschers definierten sie so durch die Anzahl der lnternetseiten, die seinen Namen erwähnen. Diese Zahl wurde dann mit der Anzahl der Veröffentlichungen des Forschers auf dem Los Alamos Server seit dem Jahre 1991 verglichen. Dabei stellte sich heraus, dass der Bekanntheitsgrad in einem linearen Zusammenhang mit der Zahl der Veröffentlichungen des jeweiligen Forschers steht. Für Filmstars und Sportler hingegen wächst die Berühmtheit exponentiell mit der Anzahl erfolgreicher Filme oder Medaillen an, so ben-Avraham. Diese unterschiedlichen Gesetzmäßigkeiten könnten damit zusammenhängen, dass der Erfolg eines Forschers in der Regel nur von dessen Fachkollegen wahrgenommen wird, nicht abervon einem breiteren Publikum. Die Verfasser der Studie hoffen, dass ihre Ergebnisse für Sozialwissenschaftler und Psychologen interessant sind - und dass auf diese Weise auch Physiker außerhalb ihres Fachgebiets berühmt werden können."
  4. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.01 
    0.005636198 = product of:
  0.039453384 = sum of:
    0.039453384 = product of:
      0.07890677 = sum of:
        0.07890677 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07890677 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  5. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01 
    0.005636198 = product of:
  0.039453384 = sum of:
    0.039453384 = product of:
      0.07890677 = sum of:
        0.07890677 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07890677 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  6. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.01 
    0.005636198 = product of:
  0.039453384 = sum of:
    0.039453384 = product of:
      0.07890677 = sum of:
        0.07890677 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07890677 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  7. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.00 
    0.0049817422 = product of:
  0.034872193 = sum of:
    0.034872193 = product of:
      0.069744386 = sum of:
        0.069744386 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069744386 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  8. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00 
    0.0049817422 = product of:
  0.034872193 = sum of:
    0.034872193 = product of:
      0.069744386 = sum of:
        0.069744386 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069744386 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  9. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.00 
    0.004931673 = product of:
  0.03452171 = sum of:
    0.03452171 = product of:
      0.06904342 = sum of:
        0.06904342 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06904342 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  10. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.00 
    0.004931673 = product of:
  0.03452171 = sum of:
    0.03452171 = product of:
      0.06904342 = sum of:
        0.06904342 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06904342 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  11. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.00 
    0.004931673 = product of:
  0.03452171 = sum of:
    0.03452171 = product of:
      0.06904342 = sum of:
        0.06904342 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06904342 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  12. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.00 
    0.0042271484 = product of:
  0.029590037 = sum of:
    0.029590037 = product of:
      0.059180073 = sum of:
        0.059180073 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059180073 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  13. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.00 
    0.0042271484 = product of:
  0.029590037 = sum of:
    0.029590037 = product of:
      0.059180073 = sum of:
        0.059180073 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059180073 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  14. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.00 
    0.0029890456 = product of:
  0.020923318 = sum of:
    0.020923318 = product of:
      0.041846637 = sum of:
        0.041846637 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041846637 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  15. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00 
    0.0029890456 = product of:
  0.020923318 = sum of:
    0.020923318 = product of:
      0.041846637 = sum of:
        0.041846637 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041846637 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  16. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.00 
    0.002818099 = product of:
  0.019726692 = sum of:
    0.019726692 = product of:
      0.039453384 = sum of:
        0.039453384 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039453384 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  17. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.00 
    0.002818099 = product of:
  0.019726692 = sum of:
    0.019726692 = product of:
      0.039453384 = sum of:
        0.039453384 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039453384 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  18. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.00 
    0.002818099 = product of:
  0.019726692 = sum of:
    0.019726692 = product of:
      0.039453384 = sum of:
        0.039453384 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039453384 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  19. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.00 
    0.002818099 = product of:
  0.019726692 = sum of:
    0.019726692 = product of:
      0.039453384 = sum of:
        0.039453384 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039453384 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  20. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.00 
    0.002818099 = product of:
  0.019726692 = sum of:
    0.019726692 = product of:
      0.039453384 = sum of:
        0.039453384 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039453384 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12746596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03639982 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 108
  • d 11
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 118
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications