Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"dk"
  1. Christensen, F.H.: Publikations- og citationsanalyser (1997) 0.01 
    0.0072436924 = product of:
  0.05432769 = sum of:
    0.011269671 = product of:
      0.022539342 = sum of:
        0.022539342 = weight(_text_:online in 837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022539342 = score(doc=837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.04305802 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04305802 = score(doc=837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.32441732 = fieldWeight in 837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=837)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Within informetry publication and citation analyses stand out. The former are defined as quantitative studies of the content of the bibliographic fields, e.g. authors, in a defined document collection, the latter deal with the documents' literature lists and can be citations fron or to a document. Gives examples of how the RANK command in DIALOG can be used to count information units in phrase indexed fields enabling ranked lists of publications to be produced. DIALOG is best for analysing citations 'from'. A citation analysis 'to' is used for research evaluation, although it is agreed that it can only supplement, not supplant peer review. The Danish Library School's Centre for Informetric Studies researches online analysis and other other informetric questions
  2. Madsen, M.; Strunck, K.: Bibliografiske posters funktionaliatet : funktionaliatet som mal for kvalitet og kvantitet i bibliografiske data (1997) 0.00 
    0.0028705348 = product of:
  0.04305802 = sum of:
    0.04305802 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04305802 = score(doc=689,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.32441732 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    The 1992 IFLA Study Group issued its report functional requirements for bibliographic records in mid 96. The investigation's method was based on the entity/relation analysis technique. The 1st step in this model is identification of entities, and for each entity a set of attributes. Finally the relations between the entities are analyzed, and evaluation of the relevance of attributes and relations connected with user tasks is carried out. With these analyses the report recommended basic functional requirements for national bibliographic records. The matrix of attributes, relations and user tasks provides a useful tool for determining the cataloguing level
  3. Skogmar, G.: Z39.50 i praktiken (1998) 0.00 
    6.439812E-4 = product of:
  0.009659718 = sum of:
    0.009659718 = product of:
      0.019319436 = sum of:
        0.019319436 = weight(_text_:online in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019319436 = score(doc=325,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    Z39.50 is a standard protocal for database searching. LIBRIS, BIBSYS and DANBIB use Z39.50 servers and many suppliers of local library systems have Z39.50 functions in their online catalogues. Lists the protocol's advantages for librarians and its most important functions. Version 3 was adopted in 1995 and contains many new functions and attribute sets. When attribute sets are used, profiles are necessary. Most Nordic profiles are based in the ONE profile, while the European national libraries use the CENL profile. The ILL protocol is used in preference to Z39.50's Item Order function for interlending. the simplest way of searching with Z39.50 is probably with a WWW gateway. Its greatest potential is as a protocol for searching in databases from libraries, museums, archives and othe cultural institutions

Authors

Themes