Search (229 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Kiem, C.M.; Middleton, M.: ¬An evaluation of textual storage and retrieval software : CDS/ISIS and InMagic (1998) 0.04 
    0.03703213 = product of:
  0.18516065 = sum of:
    0.098420754 = weight(_text_:software in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.098420754 = score(doc=1974,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.7840772 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
    0.06959227 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06959227 = score(doc=1974,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.5243376 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
    0.017147627 = product of:
      0.034295253 = sum of:
        0.034295253 = weight(_text_:22 in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034295253 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    A comparison was made between CDS/ISIS, ist Windows version WINISIS, and InMagic's INMAGIC and DB/TextWorks software. Packages were evaluated for their database creation, information retrieval and report production capabilities. Windows versions were found to provide significant enhancements over DOS versions of software. The evaluation aimed to determine the advantages to a developing country of creating bibliographic databases using commercial software
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:54:49
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  2. Hauke, P.; Rumler, J.; Hötzeldt, A.: Open Access - nutzerfreundlich!? (2010) 0.04 
    0.035249602 = product of:
  0.17624801 = sum of:
    0.10376895 = sum of:
      0.031875446 = weight(_text_:online in 4209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031875446 = score(doc=4209,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031640913 = queryNorm
          0.33194235 = fieldWeight in 4209, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4209)
      0.071893506 = weight(_text_:recherche in 4209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.071893506 = score(doc=4209,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17150146 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031640913 = queryNorm
          0.41920057 = fieldWeight in 4209, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4209)
    0.03851321 = weight(_text_:software in 4209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03851321 = score(doc=4209,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 4209, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4209)
    0.033965856 = product of:
      0.06793171 = sum of:
        0.06793171 = weight(_text_:analyse in 4209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06793171 = score(doc=4209,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.40748656 = fieldWeight in 4209, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4209)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Dieser Fachbeitrag behandelt die Nachweise paralleler Druck- und Online-Ausgaben in Bibliothekskatalogen und Dokumenten-Suchmaschinen. Der Nachweis hybrider Publikationen, d. h. von parallel als Druck- und als Online-Ausgabe erschienenen Veröffentlichungen in Bibliothekskatalogen und Datenbanken ist von großer Diversität gekennzeichnet. Auch der direkte Zugang über die Kataloge zum im Netz frei verfügbaren elektronischen Gegenstück einer Printpublikation ist nicht selbstverständlich. Am Beispiel ausgewählter hybrider Publikationen wird gezeigt, wie Bibliotheken, Verbünde und Suchmaschinen in Deutschland und weltweit damit umgehen. In einer weitreichenden Analyse haben die Autorinnen die unterschiedlichen Handhabungen analysiert und kritisch bewertet. Die Arbeit gibt einerseits die Ergebnisse der Recherche wieder und richtet andererseits das Augenmerk auf die Notwendigkeit einheitlicher Katalogisierungsrichtlinien für hybride Publikationen.
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  3. Schäfer, M.: Dokumentenerfassungs- und Retrievalsysteme unter software-ergonomischen Gesichtspunkten : eine Evaluation der Bibliothekssoftware LIDOS (1991) 0.03 
    0.029721579 = product of:
  0.22291183 = sum of:
    0.1244935 = weight(_text_:software in 8858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1244935 = score(doc=8858,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.99178797 = fieldWeight in 8858, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8858)
    0.098418325 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 8858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.098418325 = score(doc=8858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.7415253 = fieldWeight in 8858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8858)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  4. Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993) 0.03 
    0.028518636 = product of:
  0.14259318 = sum of:
    0.07623639 = weight(_text_:software in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07623639 = score(doc=561,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.6073436 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
    0.049209163 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049209163 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.37076265 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
    0.017147627 = product of:
      0.034295253 = sum of:
        0.034295253 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034295253 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Presents a summary of a more detailed study made of evaluation versions of these 2 US software packages, due to appear in 'C and L applications'. The packages are aimed at individual researchers, students and lecturers rather than libraries. Concludes that the cheaper package, EndNote, appears better suited to the students with occasional need for bibliographies, whereas the more complex (and expensive) Pro-Cite would suit a researcher or writer with a high output of professional papers. Pro-Cite could probably also be used by a small library as a means of creating a database
    Source
    Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  5. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.03 
    0.027793327 = product of:
  0.13896663 = sum of:
    0.06224675 = weight(_text_:software in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06224675 = score(doc=2878,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
    0.059572253 = weight(_text_:web in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059572253 = score(doc=2878,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
    0.017147627 = product of:
      0.034295253 = sum of:
        0.034295253 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034295253 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Library software review. 17(1998) no.1, S.14-23
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  6. Valas, G.: Comparison of some widespread CD-ROM information retrieval software packages (1994) 0.03 
    0.026270822 = product of:
  0.13135411 = sum of:
    0.011269671 = product of:
      0.022539342 = sum of:
        0.022539342 = weight(_text_:online in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022539342 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.07702642 = weight(_text_:software in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07702642 = score(doc=2419,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.61363745 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
    0.04305802 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04305802 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.32441732 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a study, conducted at the National Technical Information Centre and Library (OMIKK), Hungary, to compare 5 popular proprietary CD-ROM searching software packages: OPTIWARE; BRS/Search; ProQuest; SPIRS; and Dialog OnDisc Manager. Software evaluation was based on analysis of a range of CD-ROM bibliographic databases (with the exception of BRS/Search for which the library held no bibliographic databases) and focused on: response times for various activities (logging on, searching, retrieval, display); other performance factors; direct searching features (Boolean operators, proximity operators, arithmetic relations, truncation); index browsing; search strategy handling; display possibilities; output possibilities; and ergonomic and user friendliness factors. No general conclusions are drawn and users are left to draw their own conclusions
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 18(1994) no.4, S.211-227
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  7. Endnote X2 für Mac OS X : bibliographies made easy ; search online bibliographic database, organize references, images, and PDFs easily, cite while you write (patent pending) in 3,000+styles, collaborate with others using EndNote Web (2008) 0.02 
    0.021670213 = product of:
  0.10835106 = sum of:
    0.01609953 = product of:
      0.03219906 = sum of:
        0.03219906 = weight(_text_:online in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03219906 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.055018872 = weight(_text_:software in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055018872 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
    0.03723266 = weight(_text_:web in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03723266 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  8. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.02 
    0.021265706 = product of:
  0.10632853 = sum of:
    0.05446591 = weight(_text_:software in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05446591 = score(doc=679,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
    0.036858454 = weight(_text_:web in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036858454 = score(doc=679,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
    0.015004174 = product of:
      0.030008348 = sum of:
        0.030008348 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030008348 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Library software review. 16(1997) no.3, S.124-136
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  9. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.02 
    0.021171834 = product of:
  0.15878876 = sum of:
    0.1244935 = weight(_text_:software in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1244935 = score(doc=3254,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.99178797 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
    0.034295253 = product of:
      0.06859051 = sum of:
        0.06859051 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06859051 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  10. McMahon, T.E.: Procite 4: a look at the latest release in bibliographic management software (1998) 0.02 
    0.020244595 = product of:
  0.10122297 = sum of:
    0.06602265 = weight(_text_:software in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06602265 = score(doc=2810,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.525975 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
    0.022339594 = weight(_text_:web in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022339594 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
    0.01286072 = product of:
      0.02572144 = sum of:
        0.02572144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02572144 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    On Nov 26, 1997, Research Information Systems released its newest version of the ProCite bibliographic management software. The most notable change to the programme is the retooling for compatibility with Windows 95 and NT. In addition to the Windows 95 upgrade, ProCite added 2 new workforms. These forms allow users to capture information about Web pages and e-mail messages. This latest release builds on the Cite While You Write feature that allows users to link citations in a single manuscript to records in multiple databases. The program simplifies the generation of bibliographies and endnotes while allowing users to create bibliographic databases using 28 distinct workforms. Workforms cover a wide range of materials to patents. While there are a few idiosyncrasies users should be aware of, this product is a solid addition to the librarian's toolkit and should be considered by those libraries that have a need for a small but powerful programme to catalogue resources and create bibliographies
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Library software review. 17(1998) no.1, S.4-13
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  11. Hertramph, H.: Ihr Internet-Archiv : askSam Online (1996) 0.02 
    0.019221878 = product of:
  0.09610939 = sum of:
    0.022308165 = product of:
      0.04461633 = sum of:
        0.04461633 = weight(_text_:online in 6001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04461633 = score(doc=6001,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.4646225 = fieldWeight in 6001, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0440151 = weight(_text_:software in 6001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0440151 = score(doc=6001,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 6001, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6001)
    0.029786127 = weight(_text_:web in 6001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029786127 = score(doc=6001,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 6001, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6001)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Das Internet explodiert - und mit ihm die Informationsflut auf der Festplatte des eigenen PCs: E-Mails aus verschiedenen Online-Diensten, gespeicherte Web-Seiten, Texte und Zahlen aus Archiven ... Wer die Informationen des Internet systematisch auswerten möchte, verzweifelt angesichts dieses Chaos. Hilfe verspricht ein Programm, das gerade auf den Markt gkommen ist: das 'askSam Internet-Online-Paket'
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  12. Chowdhury, S.; Chowdhury, G.G.: Text retrieval system : an overview (1992) 0.02 
    0.018575987 = product of:
  0.1393199 = sum of:
    0.07780844 = weight(_text_:software in 6508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07780844 = score(doc=6508,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.6198675 = fieldWeight in 6508, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6508)
    0.061511453 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 6508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061511453 = score(doc=6508,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.4634533 = fieldWeight in 6508, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6508)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Presents general guidelines for the evaluation of commercial text retrieval software packages: BASIS, BRS/SEARCH, CAIRS, CDS/ISIS, ideaList and STATUS
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  13. SilverPlatter unveils new Internet database gateway (1996) 0.02 
    0.018359689 = product of:
  0.09179844 = sum of:
    0.011269671 = product of:
      0.022539342 = sum of:
        0.022539342 = weight(_text_:online in 6644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022539342 = score(doc=6644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 6644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.05446591 = weight(_text_:software in 6644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05446591 = score(doc=6644,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 6644, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6644)
    0.026062861 = weight(_text_:web in 6644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026062861 = score(doc=6644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 6644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6644)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Announces WebSPIRS v3.0, an enhanced version of the Web gateway form SilverPlatter Information, Inc. The update is an http gateway that provides access to the WWW via SilverPlatter's Internet Subscription Service on the librar's ERL network, using any forms-capable browser. This eliminates the need to install individual search software at workstations. Features in the updated version include: a new, simplified interface; search history capabilities; record selection and marking capabilities; enhancements to the thesaurus; point and click record display options; 'message of the day' option; and enhanced online help. WebSPIRS is a good introduction to database searching for novices and is IP filtered and password protected
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  14. Jayakanth, F.; Aswath, L.: ¬A PFT-based approach to make CDS/ISIS data based OAI-compliant (2006) 0.02 
    0.017588388 = product of:
  0.08794194 = sum of:
    0.008049765 = product of:
      0.01609953 = sum of:
        0.01609953 = weight(_text_:online in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01609953 = score(doc=1495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.047647744 = weight(_text_:software in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047647744 = score(doc=1495,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.37958977 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
    0.03224443 = weight(_text_:web in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03224443 = score(doc=1495,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    CDS/ISIS is a powerful and popular software package for managing computerized bibliographic data. It is developed and maintained by UNESCO since 1985. It is free software available in binary form for MS-DOS, MS-Windows, Unix, and Unix-based operating systems like Linux. It is used by many libraries and organizations in many countries to maintain their Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) and other bibliographic databases. With the advent of the Internet and Web technologies, publishing the content of databases on the Web provides a round the clock access to the content from any PC with Internet access. Some CDS-ISIS databases are published on the Web, but many are still on standalone systems or on local area networks. Interoperability is the key for the efficient dissemination of information to end-users. The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) provides a technical framework for interoperability of OAI-compliant digital libraries (UNESCO. 2004). However, CDS/ISIS databases are not OAI-compliant. In this paper, we describe a simple approach, to make CDS/ISIS OAI-compliant. It is based on printing CDS/ISIS records in an OAI static repository format.
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  15. Retrieval-Spezialist FAUST : dynamisches Archivierungssystem beschleunigt die Recherche (1993) 0.02 
    0.01722146 = product of:
  0.12916094 = sum of:
    0.051352505 = product of:
      0.10270501 = sum of:
        0.10270501 = weight(_text_:recherche in 5351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10270501 = score(doc=5351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17150146 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.59885794 = fieldWeight in 5351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5351)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.07780844 = weight(_text_:software in 5351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07780844 = score(doc=5351,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.6198675 = fieldWeight in 5351, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5351)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Eine Bewertung des Retrieval-Systems Faust der Fa. Land Software. Vor allem für Großunternehmen des wissenschaftlichen Sektors, Behörden und Institutionen mit umfassenden Retrieval-Aufgaben scheint das System geeignet zu sein. Zu seinen Stärken gehören: Dynamische Objektverwaltung, ein hierarchischer Thesaurus, Makroprogrammierung und Dublettenprüfung
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  16. Swiss Academic Software: Citavi - neue Funktionen im neuen Kleid (2010) 0.02 
    0.016651416 = product of:
  0.12488562 = sum of:
    0.07097835 = sum of:
      0.012879624 = weight(_text_:online in 3668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012879624 = score(doc=3668,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031640913 = queryNorm
          0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 3668, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3668)
      0.05809873 = weight(_text_:recherche in 3668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05809873 = score(doc=3668,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17150146 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031640913 = queryNorm
          0.33876523 = fieldWeight in 3668, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3668)
    0.053907264 = weight(_text_:software in 3668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053907264 = score(doc=3668,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.42945677 = fieldWeight in 3668, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3668)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Citavi ist die an deutschen Hochschulen am weitesten verbreitete Software für Literaturverwaltung und Wissensorganisation. In der neuen Version 3 erweitert der Hersteller Swiss Academic Software die Möglichkeiten zur Recherche, inhaltlichen Erschließung und Strukturierung des aus der Literatur gewonnenen Wissens.
    Content
    "Sichtbarste Änderung bei Citavi 3 ist die neue Aufteilung in drei Arbeitsbereiche - links die Navigation, in der Mitte Werkzeuge für die inhaltliche Arbeit und rechts die Schnellhilfe oder wahlweise die neue Vorschau. Diese zeigt nicht nur PDF-, Word-, Writer- oder Internet-Texte direkt an, sondern erlaubt auch deren inhaltliche Bearbeitung im Handumdrehen: Text markieren, auf »Zitieren« klicken sowie Schlagwörter oder Kategorien hinzufügen. Neu ist die Unterscheidung zwischen direkten und indirekten Zitaten, umfangreicheren Exzerpten und persönlichen Kommentaren. Komfortabel gestaltet Citavi 3 die Erfassung digitaler Dokumente, die sich auf Wunsch ordnerweise importieren lassen. Anhand der enthaltenen DOI oder PubMed-ID recherchiert die Software die bibliografischen Daten und verknüpft sie mit dem Dokument. Besonders bequem ist die Beschaffung der Originalliteratur. Citavi 3 sucht für Zeitschriftenaufsätze oder Zeitungsartikel den Volltext in mehreren großen Archiven und lädt die entsprechenden PDF-Dateien automatisch herunter. Bemerkenswert ist auch die Funktion zum Import unstrukturierter Literaturdaten, die dem Citavi-Anwender ein umständliches »Eintippen« bibliografischer Daten erspart. Anstelle eines »citation parsings« wählt Citavi einen anderen Weg: Jeder identifizier« Titeldatensatz wird mit mehreren Datenbanken abgeglichen. bevor die Treffer anschließend importiert werden.
    Für den internationalen Einsatz wechselt Citavi 3 im laufenden Betrieb zwischen der deutschen und englischen Oberfläche - besonders praktisch für mehrsprachige Teams, die für ihre gemeinsameArbeitan einem Thema auch die neue Team-Version nutzen können. Hier werden Citavi-Projekte auf einem Netzlaufwerk gespeichert und können von mehreren Personen gleichzeitig bearbeitet werden. Professionelle Rechercheure werden Citavis erweiterte Online-Suche zu schätzen wissen: Die Software bildet für jede der über 4400 Informationsquellen deren spezifische Suchmöglichkeiten ab und kombiniert sie zu einer Schnittmenge, wenn gleichzeitig in mehreren Datenbanken oder Bibliothekskatalogen gesucht werden soll. Die Recherche-Strategie lässt sich speichern, damit jederzeit nachvollziehbar ist, wann in welcher Datenbank mit welchem Suchstring recherchiert wurde."
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  17. Bjorner, S.: EndNote Plus und EndLink : Bibliography formatting software for managing search results (1995) 0.02 
    0.015741823 = product of:
  0.118063666 = sum of:
    0.022768175 = product of:
      0.04553635 = sum of:
        0.04553635 = weight(_text_:online in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04553635 = score(doc=3381,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.47420335 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.09529549 = weight(_text_:software in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09529549 = score(doc=3381,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.75917953 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Part 1 of 2 part article examining the use of bibliography formatting software for managing online search output. Looks at the use of EndNote Plus 2 and its companion program EndLink. Gives examples of the difficulties encountered in importing references from ABI/INFORM and IAC databases
    Source
    Online. 19(1995) no.5, S.38-43
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  18. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.02 
    0.015564003 = product of:
  0.11673002 = sum of:
    0.09529549 = weight(_text_:software in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09529549 = score(doc=3074,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.75917953 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
    0.021434534 = product of:
      0.04286907 = sum of:
        0.04286907 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04286907 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Content
    Vorstellung von integrierten Bibliothekssystemen auf PC-Basis: PrecisionOne; INMAGIC Plus; Professional Software; SydneyPlus Library Management; TLC; ResourceLibrarian; BiblioTrac; Image2; MOLLI
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Object
    Professional Software
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  19. Stöber, T.; Teichert, A.: Webbasierte Literaturverwaltung : neue Kooperationsformen und Anwendungsszenarien (2008) 0.02 
    0.015250091 = product of:
  0.076250456 = sum of:
    0.006439812 = product of:
      0.012879624 = sum of:
        0.012879624 = weight(_text_:online in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012879624 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0440151 = weight(_text_:software in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0440151 = score(doc=2564,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
    0.025795544 = weight(_text_:web in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025795544 = score(doc=2564,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.24981049 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Der Bereich der Literaturverwaltung ist in den letzten Jahren stark in Bewegung geraten. Wurde der Markt über lange Jahre durch Anwendungen wie Endnote und Reference Manager dominiert, sind nun in kurzer Zeit neben diese etablierten Produkte zahlreiche neue Softwares und Tools getreten. So gibt es seit 2002 mit RefWorks ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm, das vollkommen webbasiert arbeitet; im Bereich der Social Software sind Anwendungen wie BibSonomy, CiteULike und Connotea entstanden; und das vielbeachtete Tool Zotero4 beschreitet gänzlich neue Wege, indem es sich als Add-On direkt in den Browser integriert. Ein umfangreicher Vergleich wichtiger aktueller Literaturverwaltungsprogramme bzw. -dienste, der im Rahmen eines DFG-Projekts an der UB Augsburg entstanden ist, hat dabei gezeigt, dass die verglichenen kommerziellen Programme (Citavi, Endnote mit Endnote Web, RefWorks) mittlerweile kaum mehr Unterschiede beim Leistungsumfang aufweisen. Der zentrale Unterschied liegt vielmehr in der zugrundeliegenden Arbeitsphilosophie: während Anwendungen wie Citavi und Endnote als Einzelplatzlösungen konzipiert sind und eher auf einen individuellen Datenpool abzielen, arbeiten Endnote Web und RefWorks webbasiert und können dadurch auch eine Reihe zusätzlicher Kooperationsfunktionalitäten bereitstellen. Ebenfalls webbasiert arbeiten Dienste wie BibSonomy und Connotea, die in den letzten Jahren neben diese kommerziellen Produkte getreten sind und das Prinzip der Social Software auf den Bereich der Literaturverwaltung übertragen. Auf diese Entwicklung haben bereits erste Bibliotheken reagiert und diese Dienste in ihre Angebote eingebunden. So kann beispielsweise im Kölner Universitäts-Gesamtkatalog aus der Trefferanzeige heraus über einen entsprechenden Button ein Treffer direkt an BibSonomy gesendet werden; die Metadaten der im Dokumentenserver der LMU München gespeicherten Dokumente werden automatisch in Connotea eingespeist. Diese Beispiele machen deutlich, dass wir es derzeit mit einer sehr dynamischen Entwicklung zu tun haben, die zugleich offenbar zu einem qualitativen Sprung im Bereich der Literaturverwaltungsprogramme bzw. -dienste geführt hat. Um diesen qualitativen Sprung etwas genauer zu beschreiben, möchten wir im Folgenden eine Typologie vorstellen mit dem Ziel, die einzelnen Entwicklungstendenzen besser sichtbar zu machen. Im Anschluss möchten wir auf die Frage eingehen, welche konkreten neuen Anwendungsszenarien des wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens sich aus diesen Entwicklungen ableiten lassen. Wir unterscheiden in diesem Sinne drei Arten von Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen: 1. die "traditionelle" Literaturverwaltung, die wesentlich auf einen einzelnen Nutzer und seine Daten bezogen ist ("geschlossenes System") 2. die webbasierte Literaturverwaltung I, die Online-Accounts bereitstellt mit der Möglichkeit von begrenzten Freigaben für andere Nutzer ("halboffenes System") 3. die webbasierte Literaturverwaltung II, die - ganz im Sinne der Social Software - auf einen gemeinsamen Datenpool abzielt ("offenes System").
    Object
    Endnote Web
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software
  20. Text retrieval: the next steps (1996) 0.01 
    0.01485267 = product of:
  0.11139502 = sum of:
    0.01609953 = product of:
      0.03219906 = sum of:
        0.03219906 = weight(_text_:online in 5570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03219906 = score(doc=5570,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 5570, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5570)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.09529549 = weight(_text_:software in 5570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09529549 = score(doc=5570,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.75917953 = fieldWeight in 5570, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5570)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Reviews a selection of currently available text retrieval software: Dataware; Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum Technology (http://www.fulcrum.com); Information Dimensions (http://idi-london.co.uk); Personal Library Software (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com)
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 20(1996) no.3, S.150-152
    Theme
    Bibliographische Software

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 153
  • d 54
  • i 5
  • f 3
  • nl 3
  • ru 2
  • m 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 184
  • m 24
  • el 10
  • s 5
  • x 4
  • h 2
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • i 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications