Search (246 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.59 
    0.5940175 = product of:
  0.99002916 = sum of:
    0.05025416 = product of:
      0.15076247 = sum of:
        0.15076247 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.022339594 = weight(_text_:web in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022339594 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.01286072 = product of:
      0.02572144 = sum of:
        0.02572144 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02572144 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(9/15)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.51 
    0.5131278 = product of:
  0.96211463 = sum of:
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.044679187 = weight(_text_:web in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044679187 = score(doc=563,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.01286072 = product of:
      0.02572144 = sum of:
        0.02572144 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02572144 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.53333336 = coord(8/15)
    Abstract
    In this thesis we propose three new word association measures for multi-word term extraction. We combine these association measures with LocalMaxs algorithm in our extraction model and compare the results of different multi-word term extraction methods. Our approach is language and domain independent and requires no training data. It can be applied to such tasks as text summarization, information retrieval, and document classification. We further explore the potential of using multi-word terms as an effective representation for general web-page summarization. We extract multi-word terms from human written summaries in a large collection of web-pages, and generate the summaries by aligning document words with these multi-word terms. Our system applies machine translation technology to learn the aligning process from a training set and focuses on selecting high quality multi-word terms from human written summaries to generate suitable results for web-page summarization.
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  3. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.45 
    0.4455868 = product of:
  0.95482886 = sum of:
    0.05025416 = product of:
      0.15076247 = sum of:
        0.15076247 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15076247 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.46666667 = coord(7/15)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  4. Sagawe, H.: Einfluß 'intelligenter' Maschinen auf menschliches Verhalten (1994) 0.02 
    0.024734834 = product of:
  0.18551125 = sum of:
    0.13049237 = weight(_text_:soziale in 1714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13049237 = score(doc=1714,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.19331455 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.6750261 = fieldWeight in 1714, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1714)
    0.055018872 = weight(_text_:software in 1714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055018872 = score(doc=1714,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 1714, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1714)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Classification
    CV 3500 Psychologie / Sozialpsychologie / Kommunikation, Massenmedien, soziale Beeinflussung, soziale Macht
    ST 278 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation Software-Ergonomie
    RVK
    CV 3500 Psychologie / Sozialpsychologie / Kommunikation, Massenmedien, soziale Beeinflussung, soziale Macht
    ST 278 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation Software-Ergonomie
  5. Lezius, W.: Morphy - Morphologie und Tagging für das Deutsche (2013) 0.02 
    0.020792881 = product of:
  0.1559466 = sum of:
    0.0440151 = weight(_text_:software in 1490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0440151 = score(doc=1490,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 1490, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1490)
    0.111931495 = sum of:
      0.07763624 = weight(_text_:analyse in 1490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07763624 = score(doc=1490,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031640913 = queryNorm
          0.46569893 = fieldWeight in 1490, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1490)
      0.034295253 = weight(_text_:22 in 1490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034295253 = score(doc=1490,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031640913 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1490, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1490)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Morphy ist ein frei verfügbares Softwarepaket für die morphologische Analyse und Synthese und die kontextsensitive Wortartenbestimmung des Deutschen. Die Verwendung der Software unterliegt keinen Beschränkungen. Da die Weiterentwicklung eingestellt worden ist, verwenden Sie Morphy as is, d.h. auf eigenes Risiko, ohne jegliche Haftung und Gewährleistung und vor allem ohne Support. Morphy ist nur für die Windows-Plattform verfügbar und nur auf Standalone-PCs lauffähig.
    Date
    22. 3.2015 9:30:24
  6. Schneider, R.: Web 3.0 ante portas? : Integration von Social Web und Semantic Web (2008) 0.02 
    0.01904594 = product of:
  0.0952297 = sum of:
    0.011269671 = product of:
      0.022539342 = sum of:
        0.022539342 = weight(_text_:online in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022539342 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.06895585 = weight(_text_:web in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06895585 = score(doc=4184,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
    0.015004174 = product of:
      0.030008348 = sum of:
        0.030008348 = weight(_text_:22 in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030008348 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Das Medium Internet ist im Wandel, und mit ihm ändern sich seine Publikations- und Rezeptionsbedingungen. Welche Chancen bieten die momentan parallel diskutierten Zukunftsentwürfe von Social Web und Semantic Web? Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage beschäftigt sich der Beitrag mit den Grundlagen beider Modelle unter den Aspekten Anwendungsbezug und Technologie, beleuchtet darüber hinaus jedoch auch deren Unzulänglichkeiten sowie den Mehrwert einer mediengerechten Kombination. Am Beispiel des grammatischen Online-Informationssystems grammis wird eine Strategie zur integrativen Nutzung der jeweiligen Stärken skizziert.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 10:38:28
    Source
    Kommunikation, Partizipation und Wirkungen im Social Web, Band 1. Hrsg.: A. Zerfaß u.a
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  7. Schürmann, H.: Software scannt Radio- und Fernsehsendungen : Recherche in Nachrichtenarchiven erleichtert (2001) 0.02 
    0.018835273 = product of:
  0.09417636 = sum of:
    0.017973376 = product of:
      0.035946753 = sum of:
        0.035946753 = weight(_text_:recherche in 5759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035946753 = score(doc=5759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17150146 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.20960028 = fieldWeight in 5759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.027232954 = weight(_text_:software in 5759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027232954 = score(doc=5759,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.21695362 = fieldWeight in 5759, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5759)
    0.04897003 = sum of:
      0.033965856 = weight(_text_:analyse in 5759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033965856 = score(doc=5759,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031640913 = queryNorm
          0.20374328 = fieldWeight in 5759, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5759)
      0.015004174 = weight(_text_:22 in 5759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015004174 = score(doc=5759,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031640913 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 5759, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5759)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Content
    Um Firmen und Agenturen die Beobachtungen von Medien zu erleichtern, entwickeln Forscher an der Duisburger Hochschule zurzeit ein System zur automatischen Themenerkennung in Rundfunk und Fernsehen. Das so genannte Alert-System soll dem Nutzer helfen, die für ihn relevanten Sprachinformationen aus Nachrichtensendungen herauszufiltem und weiterzuverarbeiten. Durch die automatische Analyse durch den Computer können mehrere Programme rund um die Uhr beobachtet werden. Noch erfolgt die Informationsgewinnung aus TV- und Radiosendungen auf klassischem Wege: Ein Mensch sieht, hört, liest und wertet aus. Das ist enorm zeitaufwendig und für eine Firma, die beispielsweise die Konkurrenz beobachten oder ihre Medienpräsenz dokumentieren lassen möchte, auch sehr teuer. Diese Arbeit ließe sich mit einem Spracherkenner automatisieren, sagten sich die Duisburger Forscher. Sie arbeiten nun zusammen mit Partnern aus Deutschland, Frankreich und Portugal in einem europaweiten Projekt an der Entwicklung einer entsprechenden Technologie (http://alert.uni-duisburg.de). An dem Projekt sind auch zwei Medienbeobachtungsuntemehmen beteiligt, die Oberserver Argus Media GmbH aus Baden-Baden und das französische Unternehmen Secodip. Unsere Arbeit würde schon dadurch erleichtert, wenn Informationen, die über unsere Kunden in den Medien erscheinen, vorselektiert würden", beschreibt Simone Holderbach, Leiterin der Produktentwicklung bei Oberserver, ihr Interesse an der Technik. Und wie funktioniert Alert? Das Spracherkennungssystem wird darauf getrimmt, Nachrichtensendungen in Radio und Fernsehen zu überwachen: Alles, was gesagt wird - sei es vom Nachrichtensprecher, Reporter oder Interviewten -, wird durch die automatische Spracherkennung in Text umgewandelt. Dabei werden Themen und Schlüsselwörter erkannt und gespeichert. Diese werden mit den Suchbegriffen des Nutzers verglichen. Gefundene Übereinstimmungen werden angezeigt und dem Benutzer automatisch mitgeteilt. Konventionelle Spracherkennungstechnik sei für die Medienbeobachtung nicht einsetzbar, da diese für einen anderen Zweck entwickelt worden sei, betont Prof. Gerhard Rigoll, Leiter des Fachgebiets Technische Informatik an der Duisburger Hochschule. Für die Umwandlung von Sprache in Text wurde die Alert-Software gründlich trainiert. Aus Zeitungstexten, Audio- und Video-Material wurden bislang rund 3 50 Millionen Wörter verarbeitet. Das System arbeitet in drei Sprachen. Doch so ganz fehlerfrei sei der automatisch gewonnene Text nicht, räumt Rigoll ein. Zurzeit liegt die Erkennungsrate bei 40 bis 70 Prozent. Und das wird sich in absehbarer Zeit auch nicht ändern." Musiküberlagerungen oder starke Hintergrundgeräusche bei Reportagen führen zu Ungenauigkeiten bei der Textumwandlung. Deshalb haben die, Duisburger Wissenschaftler Methoden entwickelt, die über die herkömmliche Suche nach Schlüsselwörtern hinausgehen und eine inhaltsorientierte Zuordnung ermöglichen. Dadurch erhält der Nutzer dann auch solche Nachrichten, die zwar zum Thema passen, in denen das Stichwort aber gar nicht auftaucht", bringt Rigoll den Vorteil der Technik auf den Punkt. Wird beispielsweise "Ölpreis" als Suchbegriff eingegeben, werden auch solche Nachrichten angezeigt, in denen Olkonzerne und Energieagenturen eine Rolle spielen. Rigoll: Das Alert-System liest sozusagen zwischen den Zeilen!' Das Forschungsprojekt wurde vor einem Jahr gestartet und läuft noch bis Mitte 2002. Wer sich über den Stand der Technik informieren möchte, kann dies in dieser Woche auf der Industriemesse in Hannover. Das Alert-System wird auf dem Gemeinschaftsstand "Forschungsland NRW" in Halle 18, Stand M12, präsentiert
    Source
    Handelsblatt. Nr.79 vom 24.4.2001, S.22
  8. Schwarz, C.: THESYS: Thesaurus Syntax System : a fully automatic thesaurus building aid (1988) 0.02 
    0.01819377 = product of:
  0.13645327 = sum of:
    0.03851321 = weight(_text_:software in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03851321 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
    0.09794006 = sum of:
      0.06793171 = weight(_text_:analyse in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06793171 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031640913 = queryNorm
          0.40748656 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
      0.030008348 = weight(_text_:22 in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030008348 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.031640913 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    THESYS is based on the natural language processing of free-text databases. It yields statistically evaluated correlations between words of the database. These correlations correspond to traditional thesaurus relations. The person who has to build a thesaurus is thus assisted by the proposals made by THESYS. THESYS is being tested on commercial databases under real world conditions. It is part of a text processing project at Siemens, called TINA (Text-Inhalts-Analyse). Software from TINA is actually being applied and evaluated by the US Department of Commerce for patent search and indexing (REALIST: REtrieval Aids by Linguistics and STatistics)
    Date
    6. 1.1999 10:22:07
  9. Schmolz, H.: Anaphora resolution and text retrieval : a lnguistic analysis of hypertexts (2013) 0.01 
    0.014671214 = product of:
  0.1100341 = sum of:
    0.061511453 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061511453 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.4634533 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
    0.048522647 = product of:
      0.097045295 = sum of:
        0.097045295 = weight(_text_:analyse in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097045295 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.58212364 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Content
    Trägerin des VFI-Dissertationspreises 2014: "Überzeugende gründliche linguistische und quantitative Analyse eines im Information Retrieval bisher wenig beachteten Textelementes anhand eines eigens erstellten grossen Hypertextkorpus, einschliesslich der Evaluation selbsterstellter Auflösungsregeln für die Nutzung in künftigen IR-Systemen.".
  10. Yang, C.C.; Luk, J.: Automatic generation of English/Chinese thesaurus based on a parallel corpus in laws (2003) 0.01 
    0.014100276 = product of:
  0.07050138 = sum of:
    0.026062861 = weight(_text_:web in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026062861 = score(doc=1616,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
    0.036936436 = weight(_text_:site in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036936436 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1738463 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.21246605 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
    0.007502087 = product of:
      0.015004174 = sum of:
        0.015004174 = weight(_text_:22 in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015004174 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    The information available in languages other than English in the World Wide Web is increasing significantly. According to a report from Computer Economics in 1999, 54% of Internet users are English speakers ("English Will Dominate Web for Only Three More Years," Computer Economics, July 9, 1999, http://www.computereconomics. com/new4/pr/pr990610.html). However, it is predicted that there will be only 60% increase in Internet users among English speakers verses a 150% growth among nonEnglish speakers for the next five years. By 2005, 57% of Internet users will be non-English speakers. A report by CNN.com in 2000 showed that the number of Internet users in China had been increased from 8.9 million to 16.9 million from January to June in 2000 ("Report: China Internet users double to 17 million," CNN.com, July, 2000, http://cnn.org/2000/TECH/computing/07/27/ china.internet.reut/index.html). According to Nielsen/ NetRatings, there was a dramatic leap from 22.5 millions to 56.6 millions Internet users from 2001 to 2002. China had become the second largest global at-home Internet population in 2002 (US's Internet population was 166 millions) (Robyn Greenspan, "China Pulls Ahead of Japan," Internet.com, April 22, 2002, http://cyberatias.internet.com/big-picture/geographics/article/0,,5911_1013841,00. html). All of the evidences reveal the importance of crosslingual research to satisfy the needs in the near future. Digital library research has been focusing in structural and semantic interoperability in the past. Searching and retrieving objects across variations in protocols, formats and disciplines are widely explored (Schatz, B., & Chen, H. (1999). Digital libraries: technological advances and social impacts. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, February, 32(2), 45-50.; Chen, H., Yen, J., & Yang, C.C. (1999). International activities: development of Asian digital libraries. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, 32(2), 48-49.). However, research in crossing language boundaries, especially across European languages and Oriental languages, is still in the initial stage. In this proposal, we put our focus an cross-lingual semantic interoperability by developing automatic generation of a cross-lingual thesaurus based an English/Chinese parallel corpus. When the searchers encounter retrieval problems, Professional librarians usually consult the thesaurus to identify other relevant vocabularies. In the problem of searching across language boundaries, a cross-lingual thesaurus, which is generated by co-occurrence analysis and Hopfield network, can be used to generate additional semantically relevant terms that cannot be obtained from dictionary. In particular, the automatically generated cross-lingual thesaurus is able to capture the unknown words that do not exist in a dictionary, such as names of persons, organizations, and events. Due to Hong Kong's unique history background, both English and Chinese are used as official languages in all legal documents. Therefore, English/Chinese cross-lingual information retrieval is critical for applications in courts and the government. In this paper, we develop an automatic thesaurus by the Hopfield network based an a parallel corpus collected from the Web site of the Department of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government. Experiments are conducted to measure the precision and recall of the automatic generated English/Chinese thesaurus. The result Shows that such thesaurus is a promising tool to retrieve relevant terms, especially in the language that is not the same as the input term. The direct translation of the input term can also be retrieved in most of the cases.
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes: "Web retrieval and mining: A machine learning perspective"
  11. Sprachtechnologie, mobile Kommunikation und linguistische Ressourcen : Beiträge zur GLDV Tagung 2005 in Bonn (2005) 0.01 
    0.013173148 = product of:
  0.06586574 = sum of:
    0.03196229 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 3578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03196229 = score(doc=3578,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.24081743 = fieldWeight in 3578, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3578)
    0.019346658 = weight(_text_:web in 3578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019346658 = score(doc=3578,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.18735787 = fieldWeight in 3578, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3578)
    0.014556794 = product of:
      0.029113589 = sum of:
        0.029113589 = weight(_text_:analyse in 3578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029113589 = score(doc=3578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.1746371 = fieldWeight in 3578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3578)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Content
    INHALT: Chris Biemann/Rainer Osswald: Automatische Erweiterung eines semantikbasierten Lexikons durch Bootstrapping auf großen Korpora - Ernesto William De Luca/Andreas Nürnberger: Supporting Mobile Web Search by Ontology-based Categorization - Rüdiger Gleim: HyGraph - Ein Framework zur Extraktion, Repräsentation und Analyse webbasierter Hypertextstrukturen - Felicitas Haas/Bernhard Schröder: Freges Grundgesetze der Arithmetik: Dokumentbaum und Formelwald - Ulrich Held/ Andre Blessing/Bettina Säuberlich/Jürgen Sienel/Horst Rößler/Dieter Kopp: A personalized multimodal news service -Jürgen Hermes/Christoph Benden: Fusion von Annotation und Präprozessierung als Vorschlag zur Behebung des Rohtextproblems - Sonja Hüwel/Britta Wrede/Gerhard Sagerer: Semantisches Parsing mit Frames für robuste multimodale Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation - Brigitte Krenn/Stefan Evert: Separating the wheat from the chaff- Corpus-driven evaluation of statistical association measures for collocation extraction - Jörn Kreutel: An application-centered Perspective an Multimodal Dialogue Systems - Jonas Kuhn: An Architecture for Prallel Corpusbased Grammar Learning - Thomas Mandl/Rene Schneider/Pia Schnetzler/Christa Womser-Hacker: Evaluierung von Systemen für die Eigennamenerkennung im crosslingualen Information Retrieval - Alexander Mehler/Matthias Dehmer/Rüdiger Gleim: Zur Automatischen Klassifikation von Webgenres - Charlotte Merz/Martin Volk: Requirements for a Parallel Treebank Search Tool - Sally YK. Mok: Multilingual Text Retrieval an the Web: The Case of a Cantonese-Dagaare-English Trilingual e-Lexicon -
    Darja Mönke: Ein Parser für natürlichsprachlich formulierte mathematische Beweise - Martin Müller: Ontologien für mathematische Beweistexte - Moritz Neugebauer: The status of functional phonological classification in statistical speech recognition - Uwe Quasthoff: Kookkurrenzanalyse und korpusbasierte Sachgruppenlexikographie - Reinhard Rapp: On the Relationship between Word Frequency and Word Familiarity - Ulrich Schade/Miloslaw Frey/Sebastian Becker: Computerlinguistische Anwendungen zur Verbesserung der Kommunikation zwischen militärischen Einheiten und deren Führungsinformationssystemen - David Schlangen/Thomas Hanneforth/Manfred Stede: Weaving the Semantic Web: Extracting and Representing the Content of Pathology Reports - Thomas Schmidt: Modellbildung und Modellierungsparadigmen in der computergestützten Korpuslinguistik - Sabine Schröder/Martina Ziefle: Semantic transparency of cellular phone menus - Thorsten Trippel/Thierry Declerck/Ulrich Held: Standardisierung von Sprachressourcen: Der aktuelle Stand - Charlotte Wollermann: Evaluation der audiovisuellen Kongruenz bei der multimodalen Sprachsynsthese - Claudia Kunze/Lothar Lemnitzer: Anwendungen des GermaNet II: Einleitung - Claudia Kunze/Lothar Lemnitzer: Die Zukunft der Wortnetze oder die Wortnetze der Zukunft - ein Roadmap-Beitrag -
    Karel Pala: The Balkanet Experience - Peter M. Kruse/Andre Nauloks/Dietmar Rösner/Manuela Kunze: Clever Search: A WordNet Based Wrapper for Internet Search Engines - Rosmary Stegmann/Wolfgang Woerndl: Using GermaNet to Generate Individual Customer Profiles - Ingo Glöckner/Sven Hartrumpf/Rainer Osswald: From GermaNet Glosses to Formal Meaning Postulates -Aljoscha Burchardt/ Katrin Erk/Anette Frank: A WordNet Detour to FrameNet - Daniel Naber: OpenThesaurus: ein offenes deutsches Wortnetz - Anke Holler/Wolfgang Grund/Heinrich Petith: Maschinelle Generierung assoziativer Termnetze für die Dokumentensuche - Stefan Bordag/Hans Friedrich Witschel/Thomas Wittig: Evaluation of Lexical Acquisition Algorithms - Iryna Gurevych/Hendrik Niederlich: Computing Semantic Relatedness of GermaNet Concepts - Roland Hausser: Turn-taking als kognitive Grundmechanik der Datenbanksemantik - Rodolfo Delmonte: Parsing Overlaps - Melanie Twiggs: Behandlung des Passivs im Rahmen der Datenbanksemantik- Sandra Hohmann: Intention und Interaktion - Anmerkungen zur Relevanz der Benutzerabsicht - Doris Helfenbein: Verwendung von Pronomina im Sprecher- und Hörmodus - Bayan Abu Shawar/Eric Atwell: Modelling turn-taking in a corpus-trained chatbot - Barbara März: Die Koordination in der Datenbanksemantik - Jens Edlund/Mattias Heldner/Joakim Gustafsson: Utterance segmentation and turn-taking in spoken dialogue systems - Ekaterina Buyko: Numerische Repräsentation von Textkorpora für Wissensextraktion - Bernhard Fisseni: ProofML - eine Annotationssprache für natürlichsprachliche mathematische Beweise - Iryna Schenk: Auflösung der Pronomen mit Nicht-NP-Antezedenten in spontansprachlichen Dialogen - Stephan Schwiebert: Entwurf eines agentengestützten Systems zur Paradigmenbildung - Ingmar Steiner: On the analysis of speech rhythm through acoustic parameters - Hans Friedrich Witschel: Text, Wörter, Morpheme - Möglichkeiten einer automatischen Terminologie-Extraktion.
  12. Peis, E.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, J.C.: On the evaluation of XML documents using Fuzzy linguistic techniques (2003) 0.01 
    0.012820447 = product of:
  0.09615335 = sum of:
    0.07381375 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07381375 = score(doc=2778,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.556144 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
    0.022339594 = weight(_text_:web in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022339594 = score(doc=2778,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Recommender systems evaluate and filter the great amount of information available an the Web to assist people in their search processes. A fuzzy evaluation method of XML documents based an computing with words is presented. Given an XML document type (e.g. scientific article), we consider that its elements are not equally informative. This is indicated by the use of a DTD and defining linguistic importance attributes to the more meaningful elements of the DTD designed. Then, the evaluation method generates linguistic recommendations from linguistic evaluation judgements provided by different recommenders an meaningful elements of DTD.
  13. Paice, C.D.: Method for evaluation of stemming algorithms based on error counting (1996) 0.01 
    0.012429901 = product of:
  0.09322426 = sum of:
    0.0440151 = weight(_text_:software in 5799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0440151 = score(doc=5799,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 5799, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5799)
    0.049209163 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 5799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049209163 = score(doc=5799,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.37076265 = fieldWeight in 5799, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5799)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Assesses the effectiveness of stemming algorithms by counting the number of identifiable errors during the stemming of words from various text samples. This entails manual groupings of the words in each sample using software developed for this purpose, stemming the words and computing indeices which represent the rate of understemming and overstemming. Presents the results for 3 stemmers (Lovins, Porter, and Paice/Husk), in each case using 3 text samples
  14. Schmidt, R.: Maschinelle Text-Ton-Synchronisation in Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft (2000) 0.01 
    0.011934335 = product of:
  0.08950751 = sum of:
    0.06524619 = weight(_text_:soziale in 5559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06524619 = score(doc=5559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19331455 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.33751306 = fieldWeight in 5559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1096387 = idf(docFreq=266, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5559)
    0.024261324 = product of:
      0.048522647 = sum of:
        0.048522647 = weight(_text_:analyse in 5559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048522647 = score(doc=5559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 5559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5559)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Tonmaterial in Form von Audio- oder Videoaufnahmen spielt in Bereichen der Wissenschaft, die sich mit verbaler Interaktion beschäftigen, eine bedeutende Rolle. Solche Gebiete sind u,a. die Linguistik, Psychologie, Soziologie und Kriminalistik. Gegenstand der Untersuchung können dabei z.B. die Formen des sprachlichen Handelns und der Sprachvariation in Abhängigkeit von der Situation oder die Ausprägung und Entwicklung von Sprachunterschieden vor dem sozialen Hintergrund sein. Im Rahmen der Analyse eines Gesprächsverlaufs kann beispielsweise die Form der Rederechtsicherung von Interesse sein. In diesem Zusammenhang stellen sich Fragen wie z.B. "Wie bringen Gesprächsteilnehrner Gesprächsbeteiligte dazu, ihre Rede zu unterbrechen?" oder "Wie wehren Gesprächsteilnehmer Unterbrechungsversuche voll anderen Teilnehmern ab?". Denkbar ist hier u.a. nach dem Vorkommen von "ausreden lassen" zu suchen, wobei diese beiden Wörter nicht unbedingt nebeneinander auftreten müssen. Bei der Suche nach Stellen an denen ein Gesprächsteilnehmer Ansprüche oder Forderungen an einen Gesprächspartner stellt, können die flektierten Formen der Modalverben wie z.B. "müssen", "sollen" oder "dürfen" für die Anfrage wichtig sein, während Konnektiva wie "aber", "ja aber" oder "doch" auf oppositive Gesprächsabschnitte verweisen können. Näheres zur gesprächsanalytischen Methodik kann Deppermann (1999) und Brünner et al. (1999) entnommen werden. In dem Bereich der Linguistik, die den Gebrauch von gesprochener Sprache in offiziellen und privaten Situationen zum Gegenstand hat, sind u.a. auch Aussprachevarianten von großem Interesse. Von der Untersuchung der Sprachfärbungen erhofft man sich detaillierte Aussagen über die Sprechersituation und die regionale (König (1988)) und soziale Herkunft des Sprechers machen zu können. In der Kriminalistik wirken solche Ergebnisse unterstützend bei der Identifizierung von Personen
  15. Weiß, E.-M.: ChatGPT soll es richten : Microsoft baut KI in Suchmaschine Bing ein (2023) 0.01 
    0.011662631 = product of:
  0.17493945 = sum of:
    0.17493945 = weight(_text_:suchmaschine in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17493945 = score(doc=866,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.17890577 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.9778302 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    ChatGPT, die künstliche Intelligenz der Stunde, ist von OpenAI entwickelt worden. Und OpenAI ist in der Vergangenheit nicht unerheblich von Microsoft unterstützt worden. Nun geht es ums Profitieren: Die KI soll in die Suchmaschine Bing eingebaut werden, was eine direkte Konkurrenz zu Googles Suchalgorithmen und Intelligenzen bedeutet. Bing war da bislang nicht sonderlich erfolgreich. Wie "The Information" mit Verweis auf zwei Insider berichtet, plant Microsoft, ChatGPT in seine Suchmaschine Bing einzubauen. Bereits im März könnte die neue, intelligente Suche verfügbar sein. Microsoft hatte zuvor auf der hauseigenen Messe Ignite zunächst die Integration des Bildgenerators DALL·E 2 in seine Suchmaschine angekündigt - ohne konkretes Startdatum jedoch. Fragt man ChatGPT selbst, bestätigt der Chatbot seine künftige Aufgabe noch nicht. Weiß aber um potentielle Vorteile.
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/news/ChatGPT-soll-es-richten-Microsoft-baut-KI-in-Suchmaschine-Bing-ein-7447837.html
  16. Doszkocs, T.E.; Zamora, A.: Dictionary services and spelling aids for Web searching (2004) 0.01 
    0.01109014 = product of:
  0.055450696 = sum of:
    0.008049765 = product of:
      0.01609953 = sum of:
        0.01609953 = weight(_text_:online in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01609953 = score(doc=2541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.03224443 = weight(_text_:web in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03224443 = score(doc=2541,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
    0.015156505 = product of:
      0.03031301 = sum of:
        0.03031301 = weight(_text_:22 in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03031301 = score(doc=2541,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    The Specialized Information Services Division (SIS) of the National Library of Medicine (NLM) provides Web access to more than a dozen scientific databases on toxicology and the environment on TOXNET . Search queries on TOXNET often include misspelled or variant English words, medical and scientific jargon and chemical names. Following the example of search engines like Google and ClinicalTrials.gov, we set out to develop a spelling "suggestion" system for increased recall and precision in TOXNET searching. This paper describes development of dictionary technology that can be used in a variety of applications such as orthographic verification, writing aid, natural language processing, and information storage and retrieval. The design of the technology allows building complex applications using the components developed in the earlier phases of the work in a modular fashion without extensive rewriting of computer code. Since many of the potential applications envisioned for this work have on-line or web-based interfaces, the dictionaries and other computer components must have fast response, and must be adaptable to open-ended database vocabularies, including chemical nomenclature. The dictionary vocabulary for this work was derived from SIS and other databases and specialized resources, such as NLM's Unified Medical Language Systems (UMLS) . The resulting technology, A-Z Dictionary (AZdict), has three major constituents: 1) the vocabulary list, 2) the word attributes that define part of speech and morphological relationships between words in the list, and 3) a set of programs that implements the retrieval of words and their attributes, and determines similarity between words (ChemSpell). These three components can be used in various applications such as spelling verification, spelling aid, part-of-speech tagging, paraphrasing, and many other natural language processing functions.
    Date
    14. 8.2004 17:22:56
    Source
    Online. 28(2004) no.3, S.22-29
  17. Bian, G.-W.; Chen, H.-H.: Cross-language information access to multilingual collections on the Internet (2000) 0.01 
    0.010822679 = product of:
  0.054113396 = sum of:
    0.009659718 = product of:
      0.019319436 = sum of:
        0.019319436 = weight(_text_:online in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019319436 = score(doc=4436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.031592958 = weight(_text_:web in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031592958 = score(doc=4436,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
    0.01286072 = product of:
      0.02572144 = sum of:
        0.02572144 = weight(_text_:22 in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02572144 = score(doc=4436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Language barrier is the major problem that people face in searching for, retrieving, and understanding multilingual collections on the Internet. This paper deals with query translation and document translation in a Chinese-English information retrieval system called MTIR. Bilingual dictionary and monolingual corpus-based approaches are adopted to select suitable tranlated query terms. A machine transliteration algorithm is introduced to resolve proper name searching. We consider several design issues for document translation, including which material is translated, what roles the HTML tags play in translation, what the tradeoff is between the speed performance and the translation performance, and what from the translated result is presented in. About 100.000 Web pages translated in the last 4 months of 1997 are used for quantitative study of online and real-time Web page translation
    Date
    16. 2.2000 14:22:39
  18. Ferret, O.; Grau, B.; Masson, N.: Utilisation d'un réseau de cooccurences lexikales pour a méliorer une analyse thématique fondée sur la distribution des mots (1999) 0.01 
    0.010653351 = product of:
  0.07990013 = sum of:
    0.041082006 = product of:
      0.08216401 = sum of:
        0.08216401 = weight(_text_:recherche in 6295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08216401 = score(doc=6295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17150146 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.47908637 = fieldWeight in 6295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6295)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.03881812 = product of:
      0.07763624 = sum of:
        0.07763624 = weight(_text_:analyse in 6295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07763624 = score(doc=6295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.46569893 = fieldWeight in 6295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6295)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Source
    Organisation des connaissances en vue de leur intégration dans les systèmes de représentation et de recherche d'information. Ed.: J. Maniez, et al
  19. Helbig, H.: Wissensverarbeitung und die Semantik der natürlichen Sprache : Wissensrepräsentation mit MultiNet (2008) 0.01 
    0.010137612 = product of:
  0.07603209 = sum of:
    0.027509436 = weight(_text_:software in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027509436 = score(doc=2731,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
    0.048522647 = product of:
      0.097045295 = sum of:
        0.097045295 = weight(_text_:analyse in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097045295 = score(doc=2731,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.58212364 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Das Buch gibt eine umfassende Darstellung einer Methodik zur Interpretation und Bedeutungsrepräsentation natürlichsprachlicher Ausdrücke. Diese Methodik der "Mehrschichtigen Erweiterten Semantischen Netze", das sogenannte MultiNet-Paradigma, ist sowohl für theoretische Untersuchungen als auch für die automatische Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache auf dem Rechner geeignet. Im ersten Teil des zweiteiligen Buches werden grundlegende Probleme der semantischen Repräsentation von Wissen bzw. der semantischen Interpretation natürlichsprachlicher Phänomene behandelt. Der zweite Teil enthält eine systematische Zusammenstellung des gesamten Repertoires von Darstellungsmitteln, die jeweils nach einem einheitlichen Schema beschrieben werden. Er dient als Kompendium der im Buch verwendeten formalen Beschreibungsmittel von MultiNet. Die vorgestellten Ergebnisse sind eingebettet in ein System von Software-Werkzeugen, die eine praktische Nutzung der MultiNet-Darstellungsmittel als Formalismus zur Bedeutungsrepräsentation im Rahmen der automatischen Sprachverarbeitung sichern. Hierzu gehören: eine Werkbank für den Wissensingenieur, ein Übersetzungssystem zur automatischen Gewinnung von Bedeutungsdarstellungen natürlichsprachlicher Sätze und eine Werkbank für den Computerlexikographen. Der Inhalt des Buches beruht auf jahrzehntelanger Forschung auf dem Gebiet der automatischen Sprachverarbeitung und wurde mit Vorlesungen zur Künstlichen Intelligenz und Wissensverarbeitung an der TU Dresden und der FernUniversität Hagen wiederholt in der Hochschullehre eingesetzt. Als Vorkenntnisse werden beim Leser lediglich Grundlagen der traditionellen Grammatik und elementare Kenntnisse der Prädikatenlogik vorausgesetzt.
    RSWK
    Wissensrepräsentation / Semantisches Netz / Natürliche Sprache / Semantische Analyse / Syntaktische Analyse / Formale Beschreibungstechnik
    Subject
    Wissensrepräsentation / Semantisches Netz / Natürliche Sprache / Semantische Analyse / Syntaktische Analyse / Formale Beschreibungstechnik
  20. Jensen, N.: Evaluierung von mehrsprachigem Web-Retrieval : Experimente mit dem EuroGOV-Korpus im Rahmen des Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF) (2006) 0.01 
    0.010080026 = product of:
  0.07560019 = sum of:
    0.036906876 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 5964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036906876 = score(doc=5964,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.278072 = fieldWeight in 5964, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5964)
    0.038693316 = weight(_text_:web in 5964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038693316 = score(doc=5964,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 5964, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5964)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Der vorliegende Artikel beschreibt die Experimente der Universität Hildesheim im Rahmen des ersten Web Track der CLEF-Initiative (WebCLEF) im Jahr 2005. Bei der Teilnahme konnten Erfahrungen mit einem multilingualen Web-Korpus (EuroGOV) bei der Vorverarbeitung, der Topic- bzw. Query-Entwicklung, bei sprachunabhängigen Indexierungsmethoden und multilingualen Retrieval-Strategien gesammelt werden. Aufgrund des großen Um-fangs des Korpus und der zeitlichen Einschränkungen wurden multilinguale Indizes aufgebaut. Der Artikel beschreibt die Vorgehensweise bei der Teilnahme der Universität Hildesheim und die Ergebnisse der offiziell eingereichten sowie weiterer Experimente. Für den Multilingual Task konnte das beste Ergebnis in CLEF erzielt werden.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 164
  • d 74
  • f 4
  • m 3
  • ru 2
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 191
  • el 33
  • m 28
  • s 13
  • x 7
  • p 3
  • d 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications