Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996) 0.01
    0.009287993 = product of:
      0.06965995 = sum of:
        0.03890422 = weight(_text_:software in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03890422 = score(doc=6050,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
        0.030755727 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030755727 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
  2. Krömmelbein, U.: Natürliche Sprache und Strukturprinzipien von Dokumentationssprachen : eine vergleichende Analyse (1981) 0.01
    0.00517575 = product of:
      0.07763624 = sum of:
        0.07763624 = product of:
          0.15527248 = sum of:
            0.15527248 = weight(_text_:analyse in 1372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15527248 = score(doc=1372,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.93139786 = fieldWeight in 1372, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1372)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
  3. Maniez, J.: Actualité des langages documentaires : fondements théoriques de la recherche d'information (2002) 0.00
    0.004108201 = product of:
      0.061623007 = sum of:
        0.061623007 = product of:
          0.123246014 = sum of:
            0.123246014 = weight(_text_:recherche in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.123246014 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17150146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.71862954 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
  4. Barite, M.G.: ¬The notion of "category" : its implications in subject analysis and in the construction and evaluation of indexing languages (2000) 0.00
    0.0040595494 = product of:
      0.060893238 = sum of:
        0.060893238 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 6036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060893238 = score(doc=6036,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.4587954 = fieldWeight in 6036, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6036)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    The notion of category, from Aristotle and Kant to the present time, has been used as a basic intellectual tool for the analysis of the existence and changeableness of things. Ranganathan was the first to extrapolate the concept into the Theory of Classification, placing it as an essential axis for the logical organization of knowledge and the construction of indexing languages. This paper proposes a conceptual and methodological reexamination of the notion of category from a functional and instrumental perspective, and tries to clarify the essential characters of categories in that context, and their present implications regarding the construction and evaluation of indexing languages
  5. Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021) 0.00
    0.0039111464 = product of:
      0.029333597 = sum of:
        0.01861633 = weight(_text_:web in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01861633 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
        0.010717267 = product of:
          0.021434534 = sum of:
            0.021434534 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021434534 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the concepts, component parts and relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (KGs) from the perspectives of data and knowledge transitions. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses conceptual analysis methods. This study focuses on distinguishing concepts and analyzing composition and intercorrelations to explore data and knowledge transitions. Findings Vocabularies are the cornerstone for accurately building understanding of the meaning of data. Vocabularies provide for a data-sharing model and play an important role in supporting the semantic expression of linked data and defining the schema layer; they are also used for entity recognition, alignment and linkage for KGs. KGs, which consist of a schema layer and a data layer, are presented as cubes that organically combine vocabularies, linked data and big data. Originality/value This paper first describes the composition of vocabularies, linked data and KGs. More importantly, this paper innovatively analyzes and summarizes the interrelatedness of these factors, which comes from frequent interactions between data and knowledge. The three factors empower each other and can ultimately empower the Semantic Web.
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:24:32
  6. Winograd, T.: Software für Sprachverarbeitung (1984) 0.00
    0.003667925 = product of:
      0.055018872 = sum of:
        0.055018872 = weight(_text_:software in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055018872 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
  7. Wu, Y.; Yang, L.: Construction and evaluation of an oil spill semantic relation taxonomy for supporting knowledge discovery (2015) 0.00
    0.0034796137 = product of:
      0.052194204 = sum of:
        0.052194204 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052194204 = score(doc=2202,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.3932532 = fieldWeight in 2202, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2202)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    The paper presents the rationale, significance, method and procedure of building a taxonomy of semantic relations in the oil spill domain for supporting knowledge discovery through inference. Difficult problems during the development of the taxonomy are discussed and partial solutions are proposed. A preliminary functional evaluation of the taxonomy for supporting knowledge discovery was performed. Durability an expansibility of the taxonomy were evaluated by using the taxonomy to classifying the terms in a biomedical relation ontology. The taxonomy was found to have full expansibility and high degree of durability. The study proposes more research problems than solutions.
  8. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Formalizing terminology-based knowledge for an ontology independently of a particular language (2008) 0.00
    0.002200755 = product of:
      0.033011325 = sum of:
        0.033011325 = weight(_text_:software in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033011325 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Last word ontological thought and practice is exemplified on an axiomatic framework [a model for an Integrative Cross-Language Ontology (ICLO), cf. Poli, R., Schmitz-Esser, W., forthcoming 2007] that is highly general, based on natural language, multilingual, can be implemented as topic maps and may be openly enhanced by software available for particular languages. Basics of ontological modelling, conditions for construction and maintenance, and the most salient points in application are addressed, such as cross-language text mining and knowledge generation. The rationale is to open the eyes for the tremendous potential of terminology-based ontologies for principled Knowledge Organization and the interchange and reuse of formalized knowledge.
  9. Zhou, G.D.; Zhang, M.: Extracting relation information from text documents by exploring various types of knowledge (2007) 0.00
    0.0020503819 = product of:
      0.030755727 = sum of:
        0.030755727 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030755727 = score(doc=927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=927)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Extracting semantic relationships between entities from text documents is challenging in information extraction and important for deep information processing and management. This paper investigates the incorporation of diverse lexical, syntactic and semantic knowledge in feature-based relation extraction using support vector machines. Our study illustrates that the base phrase chunking information is very effective for relation extraction and contributes to most of the performance improvement from syntactic aspect while current commonly used features from full parsing give limited further enhancement. This suggests that most of useful information in full parse trees for relation extraction is shallow and can be captured by chunking. This indicates that a cheap and robust solution in relation extraction can be achieved without decreasing too much in performance. We also demonstrate how semantic information such as WordNet, can be used in feature-based relation extraction to further improve the performance. Evaluation on the ACE benchmark corpora shows that effective incorporation of diverse features enables our system outperform previously best-reported systems. It also shows that our feature-based system significantly outperforms tree kernel-based systems. This suggests that current tree kernels fail to effectively explore structured syntactic information in relation extraction.
  10. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.00
    0.0020005566 = product of:
      0.030008348 = sum of:
        0.030008348 = product of:
          0.060016695 = sum of:
            0.060016695 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060016695 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  11. Engerer, V.: Thesauri, Terminologien, Lexika, Fachsprachen : Kontrolle, physische Verortung und das Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung von Vokabularen (2014) 0.00
    0.001940906 = product of:
      0.029113589 = sum of:
        0.029113589 = product of:
          0.058227178 = sum of:
            0.058227178 = weight(_text_:analyse in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058227178 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.3492742 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Ich unternehme in diesem Beitrag den Versuch, die Informationswissenschaft - hier gedeutet als 'Information Retrieval'- Disziplin - einer synchronen Querschnittsanalyse zu unterziehen, welche die aktuelle Position dieser Disziplin im Feld anderer zeichen- und wortschatzorientierter Disziplinen (neben der Linguistik die Terminologielehre und die Fachsprachenforschung) näher bestimmen soll. Im Rahmen der Analyse wird von einem Information Retrieval-Kern der Informationswissenschaft ausgegangen, welcher den Informationssuchkontext sowie die Konzepte des Informationsbedarfs und der Relevanz als für diese Disziplin zentrale Komponenten ansieht. Synchron wird das Verhältnis der Informationswissenschaft zu benachbarten Disziplinen durch eine Reihe disziplinspezifischer Zeichenanforderungen erklärt, wodurch ein systemischer Zusammenhang entsteht, der die Informationswissenschaft mit den drei anderen zeichenbezogenen und vokabularorientierten Disziplinen in Beziehung setzt. Das Verhältnis zwischen diesen Disziplinen wird anhand der Dimensionen Kontrolle/Verbindlichkeit sowie Verortung des Vokabulars ("im Kopf" vs. in externen Dokumenten) aufgezeigt, und es wird ein übergeordnetes Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung, welches die beiden Dimensionen vereint, vorgeschlagen.
  12. Fugmann, R.: ¬Der Mangel an Grammatik bei Indexsprachen und seine Folgen (1987) 0.00
    0.001821454 = product of:
      0.02732181 = sum of:
        0.02732181 = product of:
          0.05464362 = sum of:
            0.05464362 = weight(_text_:online in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05464362 = score(doc=257,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.569044 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    9. Online-Frühjahrstagung der Online-Benutzergruppe der DGD, Frankfurt am Main, 12.-14.5.1987: Vorträge
  13. Panzer, M.: Semantische Integration heterogener und unterschiedlichsprachiger Wissensorganisationssysteme : CrissCross und jenseits (2008) 0.00
    0.0016174216 = product of:
      0.024261324 = sum of:
        0.024261324 = product of:
          0.048522647 = sum of:
            0.048522647 = weight(_text_:analyse in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048522647 = score(doc=4335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Klassische bibliothekarische Indexierungswerkzeuge werden bis heute nur selten fürs Retrieval nutzbar gemacht; die Wichtigkeit, verschiedene dieser Vokabularien zu harmonisieren und integriert zu verwenden, ist noch immer keine Selbstverständlichkeit. Im Rahmen des DFG-Projektes "CrissCross" wird, ausgehend von der deutschen Ausgabe der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation, eine Verknüpfung zwischen der DDC und der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) aufgebaut, um eine verbale Suche über klassifikatorisch erschlossene Bestände zu ermöglichen. Als Verbreiterung der Basis des verbalen Zugriffs wird außerdem das Mapping der amerikanischen LCSH und des französischen RAMEAU angestrebt. Nach einer kurzen Vorstellung von CrissCross und der Abgrenzung gegenüber ähnlichen Unterfangen werden Rückwirkungen semantischer Integration auf die verknüpften Vokabulare diskutiert. Wie müssen und können sich z.B. Thesauri verändern, wenn sie mit anderen (strukturheterologen) Systemen verknüpft sind? Dabei liegt ein Schwerpunkt der Analyse auf dem semantischen Verhältnis üblicher Mappingrelationen zu den verknüpften Begriffen (besonders im Hinblick auf Polysemie). Außerdem wird der Mehrwert fürs Retrieval auf der Basis solcher Wissensorganisationssysteme, z.B. durch automatisierten Zugriff über Ontologien, diskutiert.
  14. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.00
    0.001616694 = product of:
      0.024250409 = sum of:
        0.024250409 = product of:
          0.048500817 = sum of:
            0.048500817 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048500817 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  15. Takeda, N.: Problems in hierarchical structures in thesauri : their influences on the results of information retrieval (1994) 0.00
    0.0014872111 = product of:
      0.022308165 = sum of:
        0.022308165 = product of:
          0.04461633 = sum of:
            0.04461633 = weight(_text_:online in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04461633 = score(doc=2642,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.4646225 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    In online retrieval search results do not always match the intent in spite of using correct keywords (descriptors). One of the causes of this problem is found in the hierarchical structures of the thesaurus, which often contains relations between broader and narrower concepts, the opposite of which is not necessarily true. Some examples are described from 2 thesauri, MeSH and JICST. In these cases searchers need to make an effort to increase precision
    Source
    Online Kensaku. 15(1994) no.4, S.183-186
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  16. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.00
    0.0014289691 = product of:
      0.021434534 = sum of:
        0.021434534 = product of:
          0.04286907 = sum of:
            0.04286907 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04286907 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  17. Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Zoeken met woorden : hergebruik van onderwerpsontsluiting (1998) 0.00
    0.001073302 = product of:
      0.01609953 = sum of:
        0.01609953 = product of:
          0.03219906 = sum of:
            0.03219906 = weight(_text_:online in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03219906 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  18. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.00
    0.0010002783 = product of:
      0.015004174 = sum of:
        0.015004174 = product of:
          0.030008348 = sum of:
            0.030008348 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030008348 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  19. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.00
    0.0010002783 = product of:
      0.015004174 = sum of:
        0.015004174 = product of:
          0.030008348 = sum of:
            0.030008348 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030008348 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  20. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.00
    0.0010002783 = product of:
      0.015004174 = sum of:
        0.015004174 = product of:
          0.030008348 = sum of:
            0.030008348 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030008348 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031640913 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

Years

Languages

  • e 22
  • d 6
  • f 3
  • ja 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 25
  • s 4
  • m 3
  • el 2
  • d 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…