Search (129 results, page 2 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Vegt, A. van der; Zuccon, G.; Koopman, B.: Do better search engines really equate to better clinical decisions? : If not, why not? (2021) 0.01
    0.0063133333 = product of:
      0.03788 = sum of:
        0.03788 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03788 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.24681194 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  2. Womser-Hacker, C.: Theorie des Information Retrieval III : Evaluierung (2004) 0.01
    0.0050506666 = product of:
      0.030304 = sum of:
        0.030304 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030304 = score(doc=2919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.19744955 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Information-Retrieval-Systeme wurden bereits sehr früh aus einer bewertenden Perspektive betrachtet. Jede neu entwickelte Komponente sollte effektivitätssteigernd für das gesamte System wirken und musste ihre Funktionalität unter Beweis stellen oder den Vergleich zu existierenden Verfahren antreten (z.B. automatische Indexierung vs. manuelle Erschließung von Informationsobjekten). 1963 fanden die Cranfield-II-Experimente statt und begründeten die Evaluierungsprinzipien im Information Retrieval. Somit haben auch Bewertungsverfahren, -ansätze und -methoden bereits eine lange Tradition. Die von Sparck Jones eingebrachte Feststellung, dass die genauen Gründe für das Verhalten von Information-Retrieval-Systemen oft im Dunklen lägen, führte zu der Forderung nach einer exakten und expliziten Evaluierungsmethodologie und experimentellen Überprüfbarkeit. Als generelle Herangehensweise hat sich ein indirektes Verfahren zur Bewertung von InformationRetrieval-Systemen etabliert, bei welchem das System an sich als black box gesehen und nur der Retrievaloutput als Grundlage für die Bewertung herangezogen wird. In den Experimenten stand die Systemperspektive im Vordergrund, um zu einer bewertenden Aussage zu gelangen. Es wurde gemessen, wie gut die Systeme in der Lage sind, die an sie gestellten Anforderungen zu erfüllen, relevante Dokumente zu liefern und nicht-relevante zurückzuhalten. Durch die zunehmende Komplexität der Systeme sowie die immer stärkere Einbeziehung von Benutzern, die nicht über die Kompetenz und Professionalität von Informationsfachleuten verfügen, wurde es immer schwieriger, Einzeleigenschaften vom Gesamtsystem zu isolieren und experimentell zu bewerten. Erst im Zeitalter der Suchmaschinen ist man zu der Ansicht gelangt, dass den Benutzern der Systeme eine entscheidende Rolle bei der Bewertung zukommt. Die Verfahren der Qualitätsbewertung müssen - wie dieses Beispiel zeigt - ständig weiterentwickelt werden. Die Benutzermerkmale können heterogen sein und sich einer genauen Kenntnis entziehen, was eine vollständige Formalisierung bzw. Quantifizierung erschwert. Neueren Datums sind Studien, die sich auf interaktive Information-Retrieval-Systeme oder auf die Qualitätsbestimmung bestimmter Teilkomponenten spezialisiert haben wie z.B. die Erschließungsoder Visualisierungskomponente, die Gestaltung der Benutzungsschnittstelle aus softwareergonomischer Sicht oder auch die Multilingua-Fähigkeit.
  3. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.00
    0.004987043 = product of:
      0.029922256 = sum of:
        0.029922256 = product of:
          0.07480564 = sum of:
            0.03757181 = weight(_text_:29 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03757181 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
            0.03723383 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03723383 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 29(1973) no.3, S.251-257
  4. Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval : Evaluation and implications (1986) 0.00
    0.0038267868 = product of:
      0.02296072 = sum of:
        0.02296072 = product of:
          0.0574018 = sum of:
            0.02922294 = weight(_text_:28 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02922294 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
            0.028178858 = weight(_text_:29 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028178858 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: An evaluation ... Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299; Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.648-656; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  5. Alemayehu, N.: Analysis of performance variation using quey expansion (2003) 0.00
    0.0038267868 = product of:
      0.02296072 = sum of:
        0.02296072 = product of:
          0.0574018 = sum of:
            0.02922294 = weight(_text_:28 in 1454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02922294 = score(doc=1454,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 1454, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1454)
            0.028178858 = weight(_text_:29 in 1454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028178858 = score(doc=1454,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1454, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1454)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:28:33
  6. Ferret, O.; Grau, B.; Hurault-Plantet, M.; Illouz, G.; Jacquemin, C.; Monceaux, L.; Robba, I.; Vilnat, A.: How NLP can improve question answering (2002) 0.00
    0.0038267868 = product of:
      0.02296072 = sum of:
        0.02296072 = product of:
          0.0574018 = sum of:
            0.02922294 = weight(_text_:28 in 1850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02922294 = score(doc=1850,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 1850, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1850)
            0.028178858 = weight(_text_:29 in 1850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028178858 = score(doc=1850,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1850, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1850)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    6. 1.1997 18:30:28
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.135-155
  7. Petrelli, D.: On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval (2008) 0.00
    0.0031749066 = product of:
      0.01904944 = sum of:
        0.01904944 = product of:
          0.047623597 = sum of:
            0.024352452 = weight(_text_:28 in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024352452 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
            0.023271143 = weight(_text_:22 in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023271143 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2008 14:31:02
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.22-38
  8. Chu, H.: Factors affecting relevance judgment : a report from TREC Legal track (2011) 0.00
    0.0031169017 = product of:
      0.01870141 = sum of:
        0.01870141 = product of:
          0.046753526 = sum of:
            0.023482382 = weight(_text_:29 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023482382 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
            0.023271143 = weight(_text_:22 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023271143 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:29:22
  9. Larsen, B.; Ingwersen, P.; Lund, B.: Data fusion according to the principle of polyrepresentation (2009) 0.00
    0.0025399253 = product of:
      0.015239551 = sum of:
        0.015239551 = product of:
          0.038098875 = sum of:
            0.01948196 = weight(_text_:28 in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01948196 = score(doc=2752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
            0.018616915 = weight(_text_:22 in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018616915 = score(doc=2752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:48:28
  10. Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis : ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005 (2006) 0.00
    0.0025253333 = product of:
      0.015152 = sum of:
        0.015152 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015152 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.098724775 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Information Retrieval hat sich zu einer Schlüsseltechnologie in der Wissensgesellschaft entwickelt. Die Anzahl der täglichen Anfragen an Internet-Suchmaschinen bildet nur einen Indikator für die große Bedeutung dieses Themas. Der Sammelbandband informiert über Themen wie Information Retrieval-Grundlagen, Retrieval Systeme, Digitale Bibliotheken, Evaluierung und Multilinguale Systeme, beschreibt Anwendungsszenarien und setzt sich mit neuen Herausforderungen an das Information Retrieval auseinander. Die Beiträge behandeln aktuelle Themen und neue Herausforderungen an das Information Retrieval. Die intensive Beteiligung der Informationswissenschaft der Universität Hildesheim am Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF), einer europäischen Evaluierungsinitiative zur Erforschung mehrsprachiger Retrieval Systeme, berührt mehrere der Beiträge. Ebenso spielen Anwendungsszenarien und die Auseinandersetzung mit aktuellen und praktischen Fragestellungen eine große Rolle.
  11. Hofstede, M.: Literatuur over onderwerpen zoeken in de OPC (1994) 0.00
    0.0025047874 = product of:
      0.015028724 = sum of:
        0.015028724 = product of:
          0.07514362 = sum of:
            0.07514362 = weight(_text_:29 in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07514362 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    CRI bulletin. 29(1994), Sept., S.14-15
  12. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; McKenzie, L.; Irving, A.: Evaluative protocols for searching behaviour in online library catalogues (1991) 0.00
    0.0021916889 = product of:
      0.013150133 = sum of:
        0.013150133 = product of:
          0.065750666 = sum of:
            0.065750666 = weight(_text_:29 in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065750666 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:52:29
  13. Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC test collections (2005) 0.00
    0.0021916889 = product of:
      0.013150133 = sum of:
        0.013150133 = product of:
          0.065750666 = sum of:
            0.065750666 = weight(_text_:29 in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065750666 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:16:49
  14. Buckley, C.; Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval system evaluation (2005) 0.00
    0.0021916889 = product of:
      0.013150133 = sum of:
        0.013150133 = product of:
          0.065750666 = sum of:
            0.065750666 = weight(_text_:29 in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065750666 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:16:49
  15. Voiskunskii, V.G.: Evaluation of search results (2000) 0.00
    0.0021916889 = product of:
      0.013150133 = sum of:
        0.013150133 = product of:
          0.065750666 = sum of:
            0.065750666 = weight(_text_:29 in 4670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065750666 = score(doc=4670,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4670, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4670)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.66, [=Suppl.29]
  16. Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC ad hoc experiments (2005) 0.00
    0.0021916889 = product of:
      0.013150133 = sum of:
        0.013150133 = product of:
          0.065750666 = sum of:
            0.065750666 = weight(_text_:29 in 5711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065750666 = score(doc=5711,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5711, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5711)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:16:49
  17. Robertson, S.; Callan, J.: Routing and filtering (2005) 0.00
    0.0021916889 = product of:
      0.013150133 = sum of:
        0.013150133 = product of:
          0.065750666 = sum of:
            0.065750666 = weight(_text_:29 in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065750666 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:16:49
  18. Beaulieu, M.: Approaches to user-based studies in information seeking and retrieval : a Sheffield perspective (2003) 0.00
    0.0021916889 = product of:
      0.013150133 = sum of:
        0.013150133 = product of:
          0.065750666 = sum of:
            0.065750666 = weight(_text_:29 in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065750666 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.4, S.239-248
  19. Harman, D.K.: Beyond English (2005) 0.00
    0.0021916889 = product of:
      0.013150133 = sum of:
        0.013150133 = product of:
          0.065750666 = sum of:
            0.065750666 = weight(_text_:29 in 4850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065750666 = score(doc=4850,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4850, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4850)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:16:49
  20. Voorhees, E.M.; Garofolo, J.S.: Retrieving noisy text (2005) 0.00
    0.0021916889 = product of:
      0.013150133 = sum of:
        0.013150133 = product of:
          0.065750666 = sum of:
            0.065750666 = weight(_text_:29 in 5084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065750666 = score(doc=5084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5084)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:16:49

Languages

Types

  • a 118
  • s 6
  • el 4
  • m 4
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • More… Less…