Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"m"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis : ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005 (2006) 0.00
    0.0025253333 = product of:
      0.015152 = sum of:
        0.015152 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015152 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.098724775 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Information Retrieval hat sich zu einer Schlüsseltechnologie in der Wissensgesellschaft entwickelt. Die Anzahl der täglichen Anfragen an Internet-Suchmaschinen bildet nur einen Indikator für die große Bedeutung dieses Themas. Der Sammelbandband informiert über Themen wie Information Retrieval-Grundlagen, Retrieval Systeme, Digitale Bibliotheken, Evaluierung und Multilinguale Systeme, beschreibt Anwendungsszenarien und setzt sich mit neuen Herausforderungen an das Information Retrieval auseinander. Die Beiträge behandeln aktuelle Themen und neue Herausforderungen an das Information Retrieval. Die intensive Beteiligung der Informationswissenschaft der Universität Hildesheim am Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF), einer europäischen Evaluierungsinitiative zur Erforschung mehrsprachiger Retrieval Systeme, berührt mehrere der Beiträge. Ebenso spielen Anwendungsszenarien und die Auseinandersetzung mit aktuellen und praktischen Fragestellungen eine große Rolle.
  2. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.00
    0.0012411277 = product of:
      0.007446766 = sum of:
        0.007446766 = product of:
          0.03723383 = sum of:
            0.03723383 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03723383 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
  3. ¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003) 0.00
    0.0012411277 = product of:
      0.007446766 = sum of:
        0.007446766 = product of:
          0.03723383 = sum of:
            0.03723383 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03723383 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
  4. TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (2005) 0.00
    3.9137306E-4 = product of:
      0.0023482384 = sum of:
        0.0023482384 = product of:
          0.011741191 = sum of:
            0.011741191 = weight(_text_:29 in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011741191 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.097163305 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:16:49