Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × author_ss:"Thelwall, M."
  1. Thelwall, M.: Directing students to new information types : a new role for Google in literature searches? (2005) 0.02
    0.019869022 = product of:
      0.059607066 = sum of:
        0.053032 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053032 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.3455367 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
        0.0065750666 = product of:
          0.032875333 = sum of:
            0.032875333 = weight(_text_:29 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032875333 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    3. 6.2007 16:37:29
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  2. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: New versions of PageRank employing alternative Web document models (2004) 0.02
    0.017100196 = product of:
      0.05130059 = sum of:
        0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045456 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
        0.005844588 = product of:
          0.02922294 = sum of:
            0.02922294 = weight(_text_:28 in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02922294 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:32:28
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  3. Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Search engine coverage bias : evidence and possible causes (2004) 0.02
    0.017030591 = product of:
      0.05109177 = sum of:
        0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045456 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
        0.0056357714 = product of:
          0.028178858 = sum of:
            0.028178858 = weight(_text_:29 in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028178858 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2004 10:30:29
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  4. Thelwall, M.: Web impact factors and search engine coverage (2000) 0.01
    0.010101333 = product of:
      0.060608 = sum of:
        0.060608 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 4539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060608 = score(doc=4539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.3948991 = fieldWeight in 4539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4539)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  5. Thelwall, M.; Stuart, D.: Web crawling ethics revisited : cost, privacy, and denial of service (2006) 0.01
    0.008838667 = product of:
      0.053032 = sum of:
        0.053032 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 6098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053032 = score(doc=6098,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.3455367 = fieldWeight in 6098, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6098)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  6. Thelwall, M.: Can Google's PageRank be used to find the most important academic Web pages? (2003) 0.01
    0.007576 = product of:
      0.045456 = sum of:
        0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 4457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045456 = score(doc=4457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 4457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4457)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  7. Thelwall, M.: Extracting accurate and complete results from search engines : case study windows live (2008) 0.01
    0.007576 = product of:
      0.045456 = sum of:
        0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045456 = score(doc=1338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  8. Thelwall, M.; Binns, R.; Harries, G.; Page-Kennedy, T.; Price, L.; Wilkinson, D.: Custom interfaces for advanced queries in search engines (2001) 0.01
    0.0063133333 = product of:
      0.03788 = sum of:
        0.03788 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03788 = score(doc=697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.24681194 = fieldWeight in 697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=697)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  9. Thelwall, M.: Quantitative comparisons of search engine results (2008) 0.01
    0.0063133333 = product of:
      0.03788 = sum of:
        0.03788 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03788 = score(doc=2350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.24681194 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Theme
    Suchmaschinen
  10. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.00
    0.0012411277 = product of:
      0.007446766 = sum of:
        0.007446766 = product of:
          0.03723383 = sum of:
            0.03723383 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03723383 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  11. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009) 0.00
    0.0010970123 = product of:
      0.0065820734 = sum of:
        0.0065820734 = product of:
          0.032910366 = sum of:
            0.032910366 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032910366 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:51
  12. Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Scholarly use of the Web : what are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? (2003) 0.00
    7.827461E-4 = product of:
      0.0046964767 = sum of:
        0.0046964767 = product of:
          0.023482382 = sum of:
            0.023482382 = weight(_text_:29 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023482382 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.1, S.29-38
  13. Thelwall, M.; Prabowo, R.; Fairclough, R.: Are raw RSS feeds suitable for broad issue scanning? : a science concern case study (2006) 0.00
    7.827461E-4 = product of:
      0.0046964767 = sum of:
        0.0046964767 = product of:
          0.023482382 = sum of:
            0.023482382 = weight(_text_:29 in 6116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023482382 = score(doc=6116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 6116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6116)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    21.10.2006 19:29:49
  14. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007) 0.00
    7.757048E-4 = product of:
      0.0046542287 = sum of:
        0.0046542287 = product of:
          0.023271143 = sum of:
            0.023271143 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023271143 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03435205 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.