Search (66 results, page 1 of 4)

Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.04

0.039698616 = product of:
  0.11909584 = sum of:
    0.106064 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.106064 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.6910734 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
    0.01303184 = product of:
      0.0651592 = sum of:
        0.0651592 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0651592 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date: 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
Theme: Suchmaschinen

Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.02

0.022771776 = product of:
  0.06831533 = sum of:
    0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045456 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
    0.022859324 = product of:
      0.057148308 = sum of:
        0.02922294 = weight(_text_:28 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02922294 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
        0.02792537 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02792537 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date: 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
11. 9.2004 17:32:22
Theme: Suchmaschinen

Weinstein, A.: Hochprozentig : Tipps and tricks für ein Top-Ranking (2002) 0.02

0.02187003 = product of:
  0.13122018 = sum of:
    0.13122018 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13122018 = score(doc=1083,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.85498166 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract: Die Suchmaschinen haben in den letzten Monaten an ihren Ranking-Algorithmen gefeilt, um Spamern das Handwerk zu erschweren. Internet Pro beleuchtet die Trends im Suchmaschinen-Marketing
Theme: Suchmaschinen

Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.02

0.019849308 = product of:
  0.05954792 = sum of:
    0.053032 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053032 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.3455367 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
    0.00651592 = product of:
      0.0325796 = sum of:
        0.0325796 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0325796 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120295025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date: 20. 3.2005 16:23:22
Theme: Suchmaschinen

Zhang, D.; Dong, Y.: ¬An effective algorithm to rank Web resources (2000) 0.02

0.017677333 = product of:
  0.106064 = sum of:
    0.106064 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.106064 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.6910734 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Theme: Suchmaschinen

Notess, G.R.: Search engine relevance : the never-ending quest (2000) 0.02

0.017677333 = product of:
  0.106064 = sum of:
    0.106064 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 4797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.106064 = score(doc=4797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.6910734 = fieldWeight in 4797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4797)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Theme: Suchmaschinen

Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Internet-Suchwerkzeuge im Vergleich (IV) : Relevance Ranking nach "Popularität" von Webseiten: Google (2001) 0.02

0.017100196 = product of:
  0.05130059 = sum of:
    0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 5771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045456 = score(doc=5771,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 5771, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5771)
    0.005844588 = product of:
      0.02922294 = sum of:
        0.02922294 = weight(_text_:28 in 5771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02922294 = score(doc=5771,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 5771, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5771)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date: 28. 4.2001 14:47:21
Theme: Suchmaschinen

Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: New versions of PageRank employing alternative Web document models (2004) 0.02

0.017100196 = product of:
  0.05130059 = sum of:
    0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045456 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
    0.005844588 = product of:
      0.02922294 = sum of:
        0.02922294 = weight(_text_:28 in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02922294 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date: 20. 1.2007 18:32:28
Theme: Suchmaschinen

Agosti, M.; Pretto, L.: ¬A theoretical study of a generalized version of kleinberg's HITS algorithm (2005) 0.01

0.014192159 = product of:
  0.042576477 = sum of:
    0.03788 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03788 = score(doc=4,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.24681194 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
    0.0046964767 = product of:
      0.023482382 = sum of:
        0.023482382 = weight(_text_:29 in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023482382 = score(doc=4,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date: 31.12.1996 19:29:41
Theme: Suchmaschinen

Wills, R.S.: Google's PageRank : the math behind the search engine (2006) 0.01

0.0114001315 = product of:
  0.034200393 = sum of:
    0.030304 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 5954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030304 = score(doc=5954,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.19744955 = fieldWeight in 5954, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5954)
    0.0038963922 = product of:
      0.01948196 = sum of:
        0.01948196 = weight(_text_:28 in 5954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01948196 = score(doc=5954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 5954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5954)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Source: Mathematical intelligencer. 28(2006) no.4, S.6-11
Theme: Suchmaschinen

Marcus, S.: Textvergleich mit mehreren Mustern (2005) 0.01

0.011353727 = product of:
  0.034061182 = sum of:
    0.030304 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030304 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.19744955 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.003757181 = product of:
      0.018785905 = sum of:
        0.018785905 = weight(_text_:29 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018785905 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12083977 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03435205 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Content: Ausarbeitung im Rahmen des Seminars Suchmaschinen und Suchalgorithmen, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik Praktische Informatik in der Wirtschaft, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. - Vgl.: http://www-wi.uni-muenster.de/pi/lehre/ss05/seminarSuchen/Ausarbeitungen/SandraMarcus.pdf
Date: 13. 2.2007 20:56:29

0.008928402 = product of:
  0.053570412 = sum of:
    0.053570412 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053570412 = score(doc=868,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.3490448 = fieldWeight in 868, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=868)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content: Ausarbeitung im Rahmen des Seminars Suchmaschinen und Suchalgorithmen, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik Praktische Informatik in der Wirtschaft, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. - Vgl.: http://www-wi.uni-muenster.de/pi/lehre/ss05/seminarSuchen/Ausarbeitungen/BurkhardWei%DF.pdf
Theme: Suchmaschinen

Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen : Informationsstand und Perspektiven (2003) 0.01
```
0.008838667 = product of:
  0.053032 = sum of:
    0.053032 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053032 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.3455367 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Abstract

Bekanntlich führen Suchmaschinen wie Google &Co. beider Auflistung der Suchergebnisse ein "Ranking" nach "Relevanz" durch, d.h. die Dokumente werden in absteigender Reihenfolge entsprechend ihrer Erfüllung von Relevanzkriterien ausgeben. In Online-Katalogen (OPACs) ist derlei noch nicht allgemein übliche Praxis, doch bietet etwa das im Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbund eingesetzte System Aleph 500 tatsächlich eine solche Ranking-Option an (die im Verbundkatalog auch implementiert ist). Bislang liegen allerdings kaum Informationen zur Funktionsweise dieses Features, insbesondere auch im Hinblick auf eine Hilfestellung für Benutzer, vor. Daher möchten wir mit diesem Beitrag versuchen, den in unserem Verbund bestehenden Informationsstand zum Thema "Relevance Ranking" zu erweitern. Sowohl die Verwendung einer Ranking-Option in OPACs generell als auch die sich unter Aleph 500 konkret bietenden Möglichkeiten sollen im folgenden näher betrachtet werden.

Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.; Foo, S.: Organsising keywords in a Web search environment : a methodology based on co-word analysis (2000) 0.01

0.007576 = product of:
  0.045456 = sum of:
    0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045456 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Theme: Suchmaschinen

Dominich, S.; Skrop, A.: PageRank and interaction information retrieval (2005) 0.01

0.007576 = product of:
  0.045456 = sum of:
    0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 3268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045456 = score(doc=3268,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 3268, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3268)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Theme: Suchmaschinen

Radev, D.; Fan, W.; Qu, H.; Wu, H.; Grewal, A.: Probabilistic question answering on the Web (2005) 0.01

0.007576 = product of:
  0.045456 = sum of:
    0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 3455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045456 = score(doc=3455,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 3455, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3455)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Theme: Suchmaschinen

Thelwall, M.: Can Google's PageRank be used to find the most important academic Web pages? (2003) 0.01

0.007576 = product of:
  0.045456 = sum of:
    0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 4457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045456 = score(doc=4457,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 4457, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4457)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Theme: Suchmaschinen

Fichtner, K.: Boyer-Moore Suchalgorithmus (2005) 0.01

0.007576 = product of:
  0.045456 = sum of:
    0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045456 = score(doc=864,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 864, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=864)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content: Ausarbeitung im Rahmen des Seminars Suchmaschinen und Suchalgorithmen, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik Praktische Informatik in der Wirtschaft, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. - Vgl.: http://www-wi.uni-muenster.de/pi/lehre/ss05/seminarSuchen/Ausarbeitungen/KristoferFichtner.pdf

Ding, Y.; Yan, E.; Frazho, A.; Caverlee, J.: PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks (2009) 0.01

0.007576 = product of:
  0.045456 = sum of:
    0.045456 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045456 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.29617432 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Theme: Suchmaschinen

Lanvent, A.: Licht im Daten Chaos (2004) 0.01
```
0.0071427217 = product of:
  0.04285633 = sum of:
    0.04285633 = weight(_text_:suchmaschinen in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04285633 = score(doc=2806,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15347718 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03435205 = queryNorm
        0.27923584 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4677734 = idf(docFreq=1378, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Content

"Bitte suchen Sie alle Unterlagen, die im PC zum Ibelshäuser-Vertrag in Sprockhövel gespeichert sind. Finden Sie alles, was wir haben - Dokumente, Tabellen, Präsentationen, Scans, E-Mails. Und erledigen Sie das gleich! « Wer diese Aufgabe an das Windows-eigene Suchmodul vergibt, wird zwangsläufig enttäuscht. Denn das Betriebssystem beherrscht weder die formatübergreifende Recherche noch die Kontextsuche, die für solche komplexen Aufträge nötig sind. Professionelle Desktop-Suchmaschinen erledigen Aufgaben dieser Art jedoch im Handumdrehen - genauer gesagt in einer einzigen Sekunde. Spitzenprogramme wie Global Brain benötigen dafür nicht einmal umfangreiche Abfrageformulare. Es genügt, einen Satz im Eingabefeld zu formulieren, der das Thema der gewünschten Dokumente eingrenzt. Dabei suchen die Programme über alle Laufwerke, die sich auf dem System einbinden lassen - also auch im Netzwerk-Ordner (Shared Folder), sofern dieser freigegeben wurde. Allen Testkandidaten - mit Ausnahme von Search 32 - gemeinsam ist, dass sie weitaus bessere Rechercheergebnisse abliefern als Windows, deutlich schneller arbeiten und meist auch in den Online-Postfächern stöbern. Wer schon öfter vergeblich über die Windows-Suche nach wichtigen Dokumenten gefahndet hat, kommt angesichts der Qualität der Search-Engines kaum mehr um die Anschaffung eines Desktop-Suchtools herum. Aber Microsoft will nachbessern. Für den Windows-XP-Nachfolger Longhorn wirbt der Hersteller vor allem mit dem Hinweis auf das neue Dateisystem WinFS, das sämtliche Files auf der Festplatte über Meta-Tags indiziert und dem Anwender damit lange Suchläufe erspart. So sollen sich anders als bei Windows XP alle Dateien zu bestimmten Themen in wenigen Sekunden auflisten lassen - unabhängig vom Format und vom physikalischen Speicherort der Files. Für die Recherche selbst ist dann weder der Dateiname noch das Erstelldatum ausschlaggebend. Anhand der kontextsensitiven Suche von WinFS kann der Anwender einfach einen Suchbefehl wie »Vertragsabschluss mit Firma XYZ, Neunkirchen/Saar« eingeben, der dann ohne Umwege zum Ziel führt."

Theme

Suchmaschinen

Search (66 results, page 1 of 4)

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications