Search (11443 results, page 1 of 573)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.26
    0.25700098 = product of:
      0.42833495 = sum of:
        0.07112973 = product of:
          0.21338919 = sum of:
            0.21338919 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21338919 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.055427346 = weight(_text_:der in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055427346 = score(doc=484,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.55406165 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.30177787 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30177787 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Eine der wesentlichen Aufgaben als Fachreferent*in ist die inhaltliche Erschließung der neuerworbenen Literatur, sowie die Begutachtung und Auswahl der neu erschienenen Werke in den jeweiligen Fachgebieten hinsichtlich der Relevanz für die eigenen Sammlungen gemäß dem Sammlungsprofil der TU Wien Bibliothek. Im Zuge der Corona-Krise wurde die herkömmliche Arbeitsweise in der Sacherschließung beeinträchtigt, und es haben sich neue Herausforderungen, aber auch Möglichkeiten ergeben. Neben der fehlenden Autopsie der Literatur leidet auch die Sichtung und Erwerbung neuer Literatur unter der physischen Abwesenheit vom Arbeitsplatz bzw. der entsprechenden technischen Infrastruktur. Auch der persönliche Austausch mit den Kolleg*innen wurde deutlich erschwert. Neben den Schwierigkeiten wurden aber auch die neuen Handlungsoptionen auf beruflicher und individueller Ebene positiv gesehen. In dem Artikel werden unsere individuellen Erfahrungen an der TU Wien Bibliothek sowie Ausblicke in die Zukunft wiedergegeben.
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 73(2020) H.3/4, S.496-503
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.18
    0.18163319 = product of:
      0.30272198 = sum of:
        0.07112973 = product of:
          0.21338919 = sum of:
            0.21338919 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21338919 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21338919 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21338919 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.018203063 = product of:
          0.036406126 = sum of:
            0.036406126 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036406126 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.16
    0.16320905 = product of:
      0.27201506 = sum of:
        0.059274778 = product of:
          0.17782433 = sum of:
            0.17782433 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17782433 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.03491595 = weight(_text_:der in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03491595 = score(doc=5895,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.17782433 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17782433 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Das Problem der Wahrnehmung und Darstellung von Wahrheit durch die Medien führt zu vier zentralen Fragen: Wie viel Wahrheit gibt es in der Welt, über die Journalisten berichten müssen? Wie ermittelt oder recherchiert man diese Wahrheit? Wie trennt man die Spreu vom Weizen? Und wie geht man als Journalist mit dem um, was man als Wahrheit erkannt hat oder erkannt zu haben glaubt? Hier gibt es ganz offensichtlich eine Parallele zwischen Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern. Journalisten und Wissenschaftler brauchen erstens Hypothesen, zweitens geeignete Hypothesentests, drittens ein gutes Abgrenzungs-Kriterium und viertens Verfahren, um die erkannten Sachverhalte auf angemessene Weise für eine Kommunikation mit anderen zu repräsentieren, das heißt sie darzustellen. Es gibt zwei große Unterschiede zwischen Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern: Journalisten sind in der Regel auf raum-zeitlich begrenzte Aussagen aus, Wissenschaftler in der Regel auf raumzeitlich unbegrenzte Gesetze. Aber diese Unterschiede sind fließend, weil Wissenschaftler raum-zeitlich begrenzte Aussagen brauchen, um ihre All-Aussagen zu überprüfen, und Journalisten sich immer häufiger auf das Feld der allgemeinen Gesetzes-Aussagen wagen oder doch zumindest Kausalinterpretationen für soziale Phänomene anbieten. Der zweite Unterschied besteht darin, dass die Wissenschaft weitgehend professionalisiert ist (zumindest gilt dies uneingeschränkt für die Naturwissenschaften und die Medizin), was ihr relativ klare Abgrenzungs- und Güte-Kriterien beschert hat. Diese fehlen weitgehend im Journalismus.
    Content
    Der Beitrag basiert auf einem Vortrag beim 9. Ethiktag "Wissenschaft und Medien" am Zentrum für Ethik und Recht in der Medizin des Universitätsklinikums Freiburg im Februar 2001.
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  4. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.15
    0.1546557 = product of:
      0.38663924 = sum of:
        0.034565028 = weight(_text_:der in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034565028 = score(doc=4031,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.3520742 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3520742 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Als Erfinder des «Allgemeinen» gilt, gemäß dem Bericht des Aristoteles und seit diesem Bericht, Sokrates. Er ist es, der nicht mehr danach suchte, woraus ein Ding zu dem geworden ist, was es ist, oder wie es entstanden ist, sondern danach, «was [ein Ding] ist», und somit ist Sokrates der erste gewesen, der die Herausarbeitung des Allgemeinen (?a?????) forderte und mit seinen Fragen seine Gesprächspartner zu dieser Herausarbeitung trieb bzw. lockte; die Definition (???sµ??) war das Ziel des sokratischen Gesprächs, und die sokratische Aporie war das Vehikel.
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
    Source
    Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Hrsg.: J. Ritter, K. Gründer u. G. Gabriel
  5. Genies (2005) 0.15
    0.15321632 = product of:
      0.2553605 = sum of:
        0.017282514 = weight(_text_:der in 1317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017282514 = score(doc=1317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 1317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1317)
        0.21684109 = weight(_text_:dinge in 1317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21684109 = score(doc=1317,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29797226 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.653462 = idf(docFreq=154, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.7277224 = fieldWeight in 1317, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.653462 = idf(docFreq=154, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1317)
        0.021236908 = product of:
          0.042473815 = sum of:
            0.042473815 = weight(_text_:22 in 1317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042473815 = score(doc=1317,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1317, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1317)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Warum fallen genialen Menschen so viele tolle Dinge ein, die anderen Menschen nicht in den sinn kommen? Was haben die Gehirne gemeinsam, die die Relativitätstheorie oder die Post-it-Zettel entwickelten? Wichtig scheinen Offenheit des Geistes und ein kreatives Chaos im Gehirn zu sein. wie Forscher herausfanden, fehlen Genies - genau wie Wahnsinnigen - "Filter" im Gehirn. So erkennen sie Dinge, die anderen verborgen bleiben. Nun arbeiten die Forscher an Methoden, um auch bei ganz normalen Menschen solche Fähigkeiten freizulegen
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Paulus, J.: Tanzende Gedanken (S.22-27) - Rauch, J.: Genial daneben (S.28-33) - Paulus, J.: Die kleinen Helfer (S.36-39)
    Source
    Bild der Wissenschaft. 2005, H.1, S.20-39
  6. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.15
    0.15174344 = product of:
      0.3793586 = sum of:
        0.09483965 = product of:
          0.28451893 = sum of:
            0.28451893 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28451893 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.28451893 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28451893 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  7. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.15
    0.15174344 = product of:
      0.3793586 = sum of:
        0.09483965 = product of:
          0.28451893 = sum of:
            0.28451893 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28451893 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.28451893 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28451893 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  8. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.15
    0.14966626 = product of:
      0.24944377 = sum of:
        0.059274778 = product of:
          0.17782433 = sum of:
            0.17782433 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17782433 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.012344652 = weight(_text_:der in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012344652 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.17782433 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17782433 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  9. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.15
    0.14916305 = product of:
      0.3729076 = sum of:
        0.07112973 = product of:
          0.21338919 = sum of:
            0.21338919 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21338919 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.30177787 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30177787 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  10. Kübler, H.-D.: Digitale Vernetzung (2018) 0.14
    0.14355706 = product of:
      0.23926175 = sum of:
        0.051847544 = weight(_text_:der in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051847544 = score(doc=4279,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.5182773 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
        0.1533298 = weight(_text_:dinge in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1533298 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29797226 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.653462 = idf(docFreq=154, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.51457745 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.653462 = idf(docFreq=154, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
        0.034084402 = product of:
          0.068168804 = sum of:
            0.068168804 = weight(_text_:gesellschaft in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068168804 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19868058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.34310755 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Vernetzung und Netzwerke finden sich allerorten, haben vielerlei Qualität und Materialität, erfüllen diverse Zwecke und Funktionen und konstituieren unterschiedliche Infrastrukturen, nicht nur kommunikativer und sozialer Art. Mit der Entwicklung und Verbreitung der Informationstechnik, der globalen Transport- und Vermittlungssysteme und endlich der anhaltenden Digitalisierung werden der Begriff und die damit bezeichnete Konnektivität omnipräsent und auf digitale Netze fokussiert, die im Internet als dem Netz der Netze seinen wichtigsten und folgenreichsten Prototypen findet. Dessen Entwicklung wird kompakt dargestellt. Die bereits vorhandenen und verfügbaren Anwendungsfelder sowie die künftigen (Industrie 4.0, Internet der Dinge) lassen revolutionäre Umbrüche in allen Segmenten der Gesellschaft erahnen, die von der nationalstaatlichen Gesetzgebung und Politik kaum mehr gesteuert und kontrolliert werden, neben unbestreitbar vielen Vorzügen und Verbesserungen aber auch Risiken und Benachteiligungen zeitigen können.
  11. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.13
    0.13277552 = product of:
      0.33193877 = sum of:
        0.08298469 = product of:
          0.24895407 = sum of:
            0.24895407 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24895407 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.24895407 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24895407 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  12. Bennett, C.H.; Li, M.; Ma, B.: ¬Die Evolution der Kettenbriefe (2004) 0.13
    0.12566674 = product of:
      0.31416684 = sum of:
        0.051315762 = weight(_text_:der in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051315762 = score(doc=2418,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.5129615 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
        0.2628511 = weight(_text_:dinge in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2628511 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29797226 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.653462 = idf(docFreq=154, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.88213277 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.653462 = idf(docFreq=154, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Ein neues Verfahren findet Verwandtschaftsrelationen für die vershiedensten Dinge: Genome in der Biologie, Sprachen, Hausaufgaben - und Kettenbriefe
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2004, H.1, S.78-83
  13. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.12
    0.12498068 = product of:
      0.3124517 = sum of:
        0.02793276 = weight(_text_:der in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02793276 = score(doc=2188,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.28451893 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28451893 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftliche Karrieren und Publikationen benötigen Reputation und möglichst viel Beachtung. Literatur, die diese Aufmerksamkeit findet, wird - so die gängige Annahme - häufig zitiert. Ausgehend von dieser Überlegung wurden Verfahren der Zitationsmessung entwickelt, die Auskunft über die Relevanz oder (wie im- und explizit oft auch postuliert wird) gar die Qualität einer Publikation oder eines Wissenschaftlers geben sollen.
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  14. Freistetter, F.: Ist gleich immer gleich gleich? (2022) 0.12
    0.1219001 = product of:
      0.30475023 = sum of:
        0.04189914 = weight(_text_:der in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04189914 = score(doc=906,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
        0.2628511 = weight(_text_:dinge in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2628511 = score(doc=906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29797226 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.653462 = idf(docFreq=154, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.88213277 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.653462 = idf(docFreq=154, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Das Gleichheitszeichen spielt eine zentrale Rolle in der Mathematik. Aber wann sind zwei Dinge wirklich identisch?
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2022, H.12, S.59
  15. Streri, A.: Wie wir lernen, die Welt zu begreifen (2004) 0.12
    0.116991304 = product of:
      0.29247826 = sum of:
        0.029627165 = weight(_text_:der in 1109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029627165 = score(doc=1109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 1109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1109)
        0.2628511 = weight(_text_:dinge in 1109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2628511 = score(doc=1109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29797226 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.653462 = idf(docFreq=154, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.88213277 = fieldWeight in 1109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.653462 = idf(docFreq=154, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1109)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Durch Vergleichen von Eindrücken auf die verschiedenen Sinnesorgane lernen schon Neugeborene die Dinge um sich herum kennen - und sich selbst
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2004, H.2, S.52-57
  16. Beling, G.: ¬Die Problematik universeller Ordnungssysteme (1975) 0.12
    0.11696013 = product of:
      0.29240033 = sum of:
        0.03950289 = weight(_text_:der in 5214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03950289 = score(doc=5214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 5214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5214)
        0.25289744 = sum of:
          0.15581442 = weight(_text_:gesellschaft in 5214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15581442 = score(doc=5214,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19868058 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044784546 = queryNorm
              0.78424585 = fieldWeight in 5214, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5214)
          0.097083 = weight(_text_:22 in 5214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.097083 = score(doc=5214,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044784546 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5214, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5214)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaues. 1975, H.22, S.5-20
  17. Haendler, H.: Vorstellungen über die Funktion von Dokumentationssprachen in Informationsverbundsystemen (1975) 0.12
    0.11696013 = product of:
      0.29240033 = sum of:
        0.03950289 = weight(_text_:der in 5264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03950289 = score(doc=5264,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 5264, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5264)
        0.25289744 = sum of:
          0.15581442 = weight(_text_:gesellschaft in 5264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15581442 = score(doc=5264,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19868058 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044784546 = queryNorm
              0.78424585 = fieldWeight in 5264, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5264)
          0.097083 = weight(_text_:22 in 5264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.097083 = score(doc=5264,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044784546 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5264, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5264)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaues. 1975, H.22, S.21-39
  18. Lorenz, B.: Inhalterschliessung 2006 : Sitzungen der bibliothekarischen Artbeitsgruppen bei der Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation an der FU Berlin, 8. und 9. März 2006 (2006) 0.12
    0.116166115 = product of:
      0.2904153 = sum of:
        0.069130056 = weight(_text_:der in 4480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069130056 = score(doc=4480,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10003823 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.69103634 = fieldWeight in 4480, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4480)
        0.22128524 = sum of:
          0.13633761 = weight(_text_:gesellschaft in 4480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13633761 = score(doc=4480,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19868058 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044784546 = queryNorm
              0.6862151 = fieldWeight in 4480, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.4363647 = idf(docFreq=1422, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4480)
          0.08494763 = weight(_text_:22 in 4480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08494763 = score(doc=4480,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044784546 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4480, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4480)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    28.12.2007 19:22:52
  19. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.11
    0.113807574 = product of:
      0.28451893 = sum of:
        0.07112973 = product of:
          0.21338919 = sum of:
            0.21338919 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21338919 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21338919 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21338919 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  20. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.11
    0.113807574 = product of:
      0.28451893 = sum of:
        0.07112973 = product of:
          0.21338919 = sum of:
            0.21338919 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21338919 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044784546 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21338919 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21338919 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37968388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044784546 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

Authors

Languages

Types

  • el 488
  • b 35
  • p 2
  • More… Less…

Themes