Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Blandford, A."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Gow, J.; Blandford, A.; Cunningham, S.J.: Special issue on digital libraries in the context of users' broader activities (2008) 0.01
    0.006929282 = product of:
      0.020787846 = sum of:
        0.020787846 = product of:
          0.06236354 = sum of:
            0.06236354 = weight(_text_:29 in 6060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06236354 = score(doc=6060,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1337172 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6060, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6060)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2008 18:41:20
  2. Blandford, A.; Adams, A.; Attfield, S.; Buchanan, G.; Gow, J.; Makri, S.; Rimmer, J.; Warwick, C.: ¬The PRET A Rapporter framework : evaluating digital libraries from the perspective of information work (2008) 0.01
    0.00538952 = product of:
      0.016168559 = sum of:
        0.016168559 = product of:
          0.032337118 = sum of:
            0.032337118 = weight(_text_:28 in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032337118 = score(doc=2021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1361719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2008 14:31:25
  3. Makri, S.; Blandford, A.: Coming across information serendipitously : Part 1: A process model (2012) 0.01
    0.00538952 = product of:
      0.016168559 = sum of:
        0.016168559 = product of:
          0.032337118 = sum of:
            0.032337118 = weight(_text_:28 in 644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032337118 = score(doc=644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1361719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This research seeks to gain a detailed understanding of how researchers come across information serendipitously, grounded in real-world examples. This research was undertaken to enrich the theoretical understanding of this slippery phenomenon. Design/methodology/approach - Semi-structured critical incident interviews were conducted with 28 interdisciplinary researchers. Interviewees were asked to discuss memorable examples of coming across information serendipitously from their research or everyday life. The data collection and analysis process followed many of the core principles of grounded theory methodology. Findings - The examples provided were varied, but shared common elements (they involved a mix of unexpectedness and insight and led to a valuable, unanticipated outcome). These elements form part of an empirically grounded process model of serendipity. In this model, a new connection is made that involves a mix of unexpectedness and insight and has the potential to lead to a valuable outcome. Projections are made on the potential value of the outcome and actions are taken to exploit the connection, leading to an (unanticipated) valuable outcome. Originality/value - The model provides researchers across disciplines with a structured means of understanding and describing serendipitous experiences.
  4. Makri, S.; Blandford, A.: Coming across information serendipitously : Part 2: A classification framework (2012) 0.00
    0.004491267 = product of:
      0.013473799 = sum of:
        0.013473799 = product of:
          0.026947599 = sum of:
            0.026947599 = weight(_text_:28 in 396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026947599 = score(doc=396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1361719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=396)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - In "Coming across information serendipitously - Part 1: a process model" the authors identified common elements of researchers' experiences of "coming across information serendipitously". These experiences involve a mix of unexpectedness and insight and lead to a valuable, unanticipated outcome. In this article, the authors aim to show how the elements of unexpectedness, insight and value form a framework for subjectively classifying whether a particular experience might be considered serendipitous and, if so, just how serendipitous. Design/methodology/approach - The classification framework was constructed by analysing 46 experiences of coming across information serendipitously provided by 28 interdisciplinary researchers during critical incident interviews. "Serendipity stories" were written to summarise each experience and to facilitate their comparison. The common elements of unexpectedness, insight and value were identified in almost all the experiences. Findings - The presence of different mixes of unexpectedness, insight and value in the interviewees' experiences define a multi-dimensional conceptual space (which the authors call the "serendipity space"). In this space, different "strengths" of serendipity exist. The classification framework can be used to reason about whether an experience falls within the serendipity space and, if so, how "pure" or "dilute" it is. Originality/value - The framework provides researchers from various disciplines with a structured means of reasoning about and classifying potentially serendipitous experiences.
  5. Makri, S.; Blandford, A.; Cox, A.L.: Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of academic lawyers : from Ellis's model to design (2008) 0.00
    0.004083119 = product of:
      0.012249356 = sum of:
        0.012249356 = product of:
          0.036748067 = sum of:
            0.036748067 = weight(_text_:29 in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036748067 = score(doc=2052,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1337172 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2008 19:29:44
  6. Pontis, S.; Blandford, A.; Greifeneder, E.; Attalla, H.; Neal, D.: Keeping up to date : an academic researcher's information journey (2017) 0.00
    0.0028612288 = product of:
      0.008583686 = sum of:
        0.008583686 = product of:
          0.025751058 = sum of:
            0.025751058 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025751058 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1331144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038012814 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.22-35