Search (93 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Rusch-Feja, D.: ¬Die Open Archives Initiative (OAI) : Neue Zugangsformen zu wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten? (2001) 0.01
    0.013604898 = product of:
      0.06122204 = sum of:
        0.048625063 = weight(_text_:forschung in 1133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048625063 = score(doc=1133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15077418 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.32250258 = fieldWeight in 1133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1133)
        0.012596978 = product of:
          0.025193956 = sum of:
            0.025193956 = weight(_text_:22 in 1133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025193956 = score(doc=1133,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1133, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1133)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2002 12:23:54
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 25(2001) H.3, S.291-300
  2. Gradmann, S.: Container - Content - Context : zur Evolution bibliothekarischer Metadaten von Katalogdaten zu Library Linked Data (2012) 0.01
    0.010313188 = product of:
      0.09281869 = sum of:
        0.09281869 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09281869 = score(doc=1023,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14729895 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.6301382 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Handbuch Bibliothek: Geschichte, Aufgaben, Perspektiven. Hrsg.: Umlauf, K. u. S. Gradmann
  3. Biesenbender, S.; Tobias, R.: Rolle und Aufgaben von Bibliotheken im Umfeld des Kerndatensatz Forschung (2019) 0.01
    0.0093578985 = product of:
      0.08422109 = sum of:
        0.08422109 = weight(_text_:forschung in 5350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08422109 = score(doc=5350,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15077418 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.5585909 = fieldWeight in 5350, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5350)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel wird die Frage aufgegriffen, welche Auswirkungen der Kerndatensatz Forschung (KDSF) auf die aktuelle bibliothekarische Praxis haben kann. Dabei wird eine Bestandsaufnahme der (möglichen) Betätigungsfelder von Bibliotheken rund um den KDSF und die Einführung von Forschungsinformationssystemen (FIS) gezogen. Es sollen die Herausforderungen und das Potenzial des KDSF für die tägliche bibliothekarische Praxis im Rahmen einer modernen und integrierten Forschungsberichterstattung beleuchtet und Impulse für in der Zukunft erforderliche Anpassungsprozesse gegeben werden. Der Artikel stellt Aufbau und Konzept des KDSF vor. Der Fokus liegt dabei auf dem Kerndatensatz-Bereich "Publikationen". Bisherige Erfahrungen und Rückmeldungen an den "Helpdesk für die Einführung des Kerndatensatz Forschung" werden aus bibliothekarischer Sicht erörtert. Ein weiterer Teil zeigt beispielhafte Aktivitäten und Herangehensweisen, die sich für Bibliotheken im Umfeld der Einführung von FIS ergeben.
  4. Seaman, D.: Selection, access, and control in library of electronic texts (1996) 0.01
    0.007958171 = product of:
      0.035811767 = sum of:
        0.021115294 = product of:
          0.042230587 = sum of:
            0.042230587 = weight(_text_:1992 in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042230587 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13008796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.32463104 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014696474 = product of:
          0.029392948 = sum of:
            0.029392948 = weight(_text_:22 in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029392948 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The Electronic Text Center at the University of Virginia has been mounting SGML full-text databases on-line since 1992, and actively building a user community around this Internet resource. Conceiving of what we do as firmly a library operation, we have sought to integrate the electronic text databases into the training, cataloging, preservation, and collection development areas of our library. Central to our selection criteria is the desire for softwareand platform-independent textsif it's not SGML, it's ephermeraland central to our cataloging endeavors is on SGML bibliographic record such as the Text Encoding Initiative header.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.75-84
  5. Gartner, R.: Metadata : shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web (2016) 0.01
    0.0074429032 = product of:
      0.06698613 = sum of:
        0.06698613 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06698613 = score(doc=731,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14729895 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.4547631 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    RSWK
    Metadaten / Geschichte
    Subject
    Metadaten / Geschichte
    Theme
    Geschichte der Kataloge
  6. Handbook of metadata, semantics and ontologies (2014) 0.01
    0.0069394233 = product of:
      0.06245481 = sum of:
        0.06245481 = weight(_text_:intelligenz in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06245481 = score(doc=5134,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1759819 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.3548934 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    BK
    54.72 Künstliche Intelligenz
    Classification
    54.72 Künstliche Intelligenz
  7. Binz, V.; Rühle, S.: KIM - Das Kompetenzzentrum Interoperable Metadaten (2009) 0.01
    0.006303249 = product of:
      0.05672924 = sum of:
        0.05672924 = weight(_text_:forschung in 4559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05672924 = score(doc=4559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15077418 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.376253 = fieldWeight in 4559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4559)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 33(2009) H.3, S.370-374
  8. Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung (2021) 0.00
    0.0049069133 = product of:
      0.044162218 = sum of:
        0.044162218 = weight(_text_:intelligenz in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044162218 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1759819 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.2509475 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Editorial - Michael Franke-Maier, Anna Kasprzik, Andreas Ledl und Hans Schürmann Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung - Ein Überblick aus 50 Jahren (1970-2020) - Andreas Ledl Fit for Purpose - Standardisierung von inhaltserschließenden Informationen durch Richtlinien für Metadaten - Joachim Laczny Neue Wege und Qualitäten - Die Inhaltserschließungspolitik der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek - Ulrike Junger und Frank Scholze Wissensbasen für die automatische Erschließung und ihre Qualität am Beispiel von Wikidata - Lydia Pintscher, Peter Bourgonje, Julián Moreno Schneider, Malte Ostendorff und Georg Rehm Qualitätssicherung in der GND - Esther Scheven Qualitätskriterien und Qualitätssicherung in der inhaltlichen Erschließung - Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) Coli-conc - Eine Infrastruktur zur Nutzung und Erstellung von Konkordanzen - Uma Balakrishnan, Stefan Peters und Jakob Voß Methoden und Metriken zur Messung von OCR-Qualität für die Kuratierung von Daten und Metadaten - Clemens Neudecker, Karolina Zaczynska, Konstantin Baierer, Georg Rehm, Mike Gerber und Julián Moreno Schneider Datenqualität als Grundlage qualitativer Inhaltserschließung - Jakob Voß Bemerkungen zu der Qualitätsbewertung von MARC-21-Datensätzen - Rudolf Ungváry und Péter Király Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND - Das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten - Sina Menzel, Hannes Schnaitter, Josefine Zinck, Vivien Petras, Clemens Neudecker, Kai Labusch, Elena Leitner und Georg Rehm Ein Protokoll für den Datenabgleich im Web am Beispiel von OpenRefine und der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) - Fabian Steeg und Adrian Pohl Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen - Überlegungen zur Qualität - Heidrun Wiesenmüller Inhaltserschließung für Discovery-Systeme gestalten - Jan Frederik Maas Evaluierung von Verschlagwortung im Kontext des Information Retrievals - Christian Wartena und Koraljka Golub Die Qualität der Fremddatenanreicherung FRED - Cyrus Beck Quantität als Qualität - Was die Verbünde zur Verbesserung der Inhaltserschließung beitragen können - Rita Albrecht, Barbara Block, Mathias Kratzer und Peter Thiessen Hybride Künstliche Intelligenz in der automatisierten Inhaltserschließung - Harald Sack
  9. Neudecker, C.; Zaczynska, K.; Baierer, K.; Rehm, G.; Gerber, M.; Moreno Schneider, J.: Methoden und Metriken zur Messung von OCR-Qualität für die Kuratierung von Daten und Metadaten (2021) 0.00
    0.004502321 = product of:
      0.040520888 = sum of:
        0.040520888 = weight(_text_:forschung in 369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040520888 = score(doc=369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15077418 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.26875216 = fieldWeight in 369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=369)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Durch die systematische Digitalisierung der Bestände in Bibliotheken und Archiven hat die Verfügbarkeit von Bilddigitalisaten historischer Dokumente rasant zugenommen. Das hat zunächst konservatorische Gründe: Digitalisierte Dokumente lassen sich praktisch nach Belieben in hoher Qualität vervielfältigen und sichern. Darüber hinaus lässt sich mit einer digitalisierten Sammlung eine wesentlich höhere Reichweite erzielen, als das mit dem Präsenzbestand allein jemals möglich wäre. Mit der zunehmenden Verfügbarkeit digitaler Bibliotheks- und Archivbestände steigen jedoch auch die Ansprüche an deren Präsentation und Nachnutzbarkeit. Neben der Suche auf Basis bibliothekarischer Metadaten erwarten Nutzer:innen auch, dass sie die Inhalte von Dokumenten durchsuchen können. Im wissenschaftlichen Bereich werden mit maschinellen, quantitativen Analysen von Textmaterial große Erwartungen an neue Möglichkeiten für die Forschung verbunden. Neben der Bilddigitalisierung wird daher immer häufiger auch eine Erfassung des Volltextes gefordert. Diese kann entweder manuell durch Transkription oder automatisiert mit Methoden der Optical Character Recognition (OCR) geschehen (Engl et al. 2020). Der manuellen Erfassung wird im Allgemeinen eine höhere Qualität der Zeichengenauigkeit zugeschrieben. Im Bereich der Massendigitalisierung fällt die Wahl aus Kostengründen jedoch meist auf automatische OCR-Verfahren.
  10. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.00
    0.003958849 = product of:
      0.035629638 = sum of:
        0.035629638 = product of:
          0.071259275 = sum of:
            0.071259275 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071259275 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  11. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.00
    0.003732438 = product of:
      0.03359194 = sum of:
        0.03359194 = product of:
          0.06718388 = sum of:
            0.06718388 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06718388 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  12. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.00
    0.003732438 = product of:
      0.03359194 = sum of:
        0.03359194 = product of:
          0.06718388 = sum of:
            0.06718388 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06718388 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  13. ISO 8459: Bibliographic data element directory : Pt.1: Interloan applications (ISO 8459-1:1988). - Pt.2: Acquisition applications (ISO 8459-2:1992). - Pt.3: Information retrieval applications (ISO 8459-3:1994). - Pt.4: Circulation applications (ISO/CD 8459-4:1996) - Pt.5: Data elements for the exchange of cataloguing and metadata (ISO/DIS 8459-5:2000) (1988-) 0.00
    0.0033516341 = product of:
      0.030164707 = sum of:
        0.030164707 = product of:
          0.060329415 = sum of:
            0.060329415 = weight(_text_:1992 in 4439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060329415 = score(doc=4439,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13008796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.46375865 = fieldWeight in 4439, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
  14. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.00
    0.003265883 = product of:
      0.029392948 = sum of:
        0.029392948 = product of:
          0.058785897 = sum of:
            0.058785897 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058785897 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  15. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.00
    0.003265883 = product of:
      0.029392948 = sum of:
        0.029392948 = product of:
          0.058785897 = sum of:
            0.058785897 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058785897 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  16. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.00
    0.003265883 = product of:
      0.029392948 = sum of:
        0.029392948 = product of:
          0.058785897 = sum of:
            0.058785897 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058785897 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  17. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.00
    0.0027993284 = product of:
      0.025193956 = sum of:
        0.025193956 = product of:
          0.05038791 = sum of:
            0.05038791 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05038791 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  18. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.00
    0.0026392322 = product of:
      0.02375309 = sum of:
        0.02375309 = product of:
          0.04750618 = sum of:
            0.04750618 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04750618 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  19. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.00
    0.0026392322 = product of:
      0.02375309 = sum of:
        0.02375309 = product of:
          0.04750618 = sum of:
            0.04750618 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04750618 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  20. Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998) 0.00
    0.002332774 = product of:
      0.020994965 = sum of:
        0.020994965 = product of:
          0.04198993 = sum of:
            0.04198993 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04198993 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030992035 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 18:45:36

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 78
  • d 13
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 82
  • s 7
  • el 5
  • m 5
  • b 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…