Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Weibel, S.L."
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Weibel, S.L.: Border crossings : reflections on a decade of metadata consensus building (2005) 0.01
    0.0063561117 = product of:
      0.03813667 = sum of:
        0.03813667 = product of:
          0.07627334 = sum of:
            0.07627334 = weight(_text_:evolution in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07627334 = score(doc=1187,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034800336 = queryNorm
                0.41379923 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In June of this year, I performed my final official duties as part of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative management team. It is a happy irony to affix a seal on that service in this journal, as both D-Lib Magazine and the Dublin Core celebrate their tenth anniversaries. This essay is a personal reflection on some of the achievements and lessons of that decade. The OCLC-NCSA Metadata Workshop took place in March of 1995, and as we tried to understand what it meant and who would care, D-Lib magazine came into being and offered a natural venue for sharing our work. I recall a certain skepticism when Bill Arms said "We want D-Lib to be the first place people look for the latest developments in digital library research." These were the early days in the evolution of electronic publishing, and the goal was ambitious. By any measure, a decade of high-quality electronic publishing is an auspicious accomplishment, and D-Lib (and its host, CNRI) deserve congratulations for having achieved their goal. I am grateful to have been a contributor. That first DC workshop led to further workshops, a community, a variety of standards in several countries, an ISO standard, a conference series, and an international consortium. Looking back on this evolution is both satisfying and wistful. While I am pleased that the achievements are substantial, the unmet challenges also provide a rich till in which to cultivate insights on the development of digital infrastructure.
  2. Weibel, S.L.: Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) : a personal history (2009) 0.01
    0.005393339 = product of:
      0.032360032 = sum of:
        0.032360032 = product of:
          0.064720064 = sum of:
            0.064720064 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064720064 = score(doc=3772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034800336 = queryNorm
                0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 3772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This entry is a personal remembrance of the emergence and evolution of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative from its inception in a 1994 invitational workshop to its current state as an international open standards community. It describes the context of resource description in the early days of the World Wide Web, and discusses both social and technical engineering brought to bear on its development. Notable in this development is the international character of the workshop and conference series, and the diverse spectrum of expertise from many countries that contributed to the effort. The Dublin Core began as a consensus-driven community that elaborated a set of resource description principles that served a broad spectrum of users and applications. The result has been an architecture for metadata that informs most Web-based resource description efforts. Equally important, the Dublin Core has become the leading community of expertise, practice, and discovery that continues to explore the borders between the ideal and the practical in the description of digital information assets.

Types