Search (40 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.02 
    0.02066886 = product of:
  0.124013156 = sum of:
    0.124013156 = sum of:
      0.08629343 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08629343 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
            0.034800336 = queryNorm
          0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
      0.037719723 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037719723 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.034800336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This case study details the evolution of descriptive practices and standards used in the Mount Holyoke College Archives and the Five College Finding Aids Access Project, discusses the relationship of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and the MARC standard in reference to archival description, and addresses the challenges and opportunities of transferring data from one metadata standard to another. The study demonstrates that greater standardization in archival description allows archivists to respond more effectively to technological change.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  2. Sandberg-Fox, A.M.: ¬The microcomputer revolution (2001) 0.01 
    0.006292229 = product of:
  0.037753373 = sum of:
    0.037753373 = product of:
      0.07550675 = sum of:
        0.07550675 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07550675 = score(doc=5409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 5409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5409)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    With the introduction of the microcomputer in the 1980s, a revolution of sorts was initiated. In libraries this was evidenced by the acquisition of personal computers and the software to run on them. All that catalogers needed were cataloging rules and a MARC format to ensure their bibliographic control. However, little did catalogers realize they were dealing with an industry that introduced rapid technological changes, which effected continual revision of existing rules and the formulation of special guidelines to deal with the industry's innovative products. This article focuses on the attempts of libraries and organized cataloging groups to develop the Chapter 9 descriptive cataloging rules in AACR2; it highlights selected events and includes cataloging examples that illustrate the evolution of the chapter.
  3. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.0062866206 = product of:
  0.037719723 = sum of:
    0.037719723 = product of:
      0.075439446 = sum of:
        0.075439446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075439446 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  4. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.005500793 = product of:
  0.033004757 = sum of:
    0.033004757 = product of:
      0.066009514 = sum of:
        0.066009514 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066009514 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  5. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01 
    0.005500793 = product of:
  0.033004757 = sum of:
    0.033004757 = product of:
      0.066009514 = sum of:
        0.066009514 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066009514 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  6. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.01 
    0.005500793 = product of:
  0.033004757 = sum of:
    0.033004757 = product of:
      0.066009514 = sum of:
        0.066009514 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066009514 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  7. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01 
    0.005500793 = product of:
  0.033004757 = sum of:
    0.033004757 = product of:
      0.066009514 = sum of:
        0.066009514 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066009514 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  8. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.00 
    0.004445312 = product of:
  0.026671872 = sum of:
    0.026671872 = product of:
      0.053343743 = sum of:
        0.053343743 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053343743 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  9. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.00 
    0.0039291377 = product of:
  0.023574825 = sum of:
    0.023574825 = product of:
      0.04714965 = sum of:
        0.04714965 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04714965 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
  10. Salgáné, M.M.: Our electronic era and bibliographic informations computer-related bibliographic data formats, metadata formats and BDML (2005) 0.00 
    0.0035955596 = product of:
  0.021573357 = sum of:
    0.021573357 = product of:
      0.043146715 = sum of:
        0.043146715 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043146715 = score(doc=3005,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.23408018 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Using new communication technologies libraries must face continuously new questions, possibilities and expectations. This study discusses library-related aspects of our electronic era and how computer-related data formats affect bibliographic dataprocessing to give a summary of the most important results. First bibliographic formats for the exchange of bibliographic and related information in the machine-readable form between different types of computer systems were created more than 30 years ago. The evolution of information technologies leads to the improvement of computer systems. In addition to the development of computers and media types Internet has a great influence on data structure as well. Since the introduction of MARC bibliographic format, technology of data exchange between computers and between different computer systems has reached a very sophisticated stage and has contributed to the creation of new standards in this field. Today libraries work with this new infrastructure that induces many challenges. One of the most significant challenges is moving from a relatively homogenous bibliographic environment to a diverse one. Despite these challenges such changes are achievable and necessary to exploit possibilities of new metadata and technologies like the Internet and XML (Extensible Markup Language). XML is an open standard, a universal language for data on the Web. XML is nearly six-years-old standard designed for the description and computer-based management of (semi)-structured data and structured texts. XML gives developers the power to deliver structured data from a wide variety of applications and it is also an ideal format from server-to-server transfer of structured data. XML also isn't limited for Internet use and is an especially valuable tool in the field of library. In fact, XML's main strength - organizing information - makes it perfect for exchanging data between different systems. Tools that work with the XML can be used to process XML records without incurring additional costs associated with one's own software development. In addition, XML is also a suitable format for library web services. The Department of Computer-related Graphic Design and Library and Information Sciences of Debrecen University launched the BDML (Bibliographic Description Markup Language) development project in order to standardize bibliogrphic description with the help of XML.
  11. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.00 
    0.0031433103 = product of:
  0.018859861 = sum of:
    0.018859861 = product of:
      0.037719723 = sum of:
        0.037719723 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037719723 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  12. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.00 
    0.0031433103 = product of:
  0.018859861 = sum of:
    0.018859861 = product of:
      0.037719723 = sum of:
        0.037719723 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037719723 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
  13. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.00 
    0.0031433103 = product of:
  0.018859861 = sum of:
    0.018859861 = product of:
      0.037719723 = sum of:
        0.037719723 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037719723 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
  14. Jacobs, J.W.; Summers, E.; Ankersen, E.: Cyril: expanding the horizons of MARC21 (2004) 0.00 
    0.0031433103 = product of:
  0.018859861 = sum of:
    0.018859861 = product of:
      0.037719723 = sum of:
        0.037719723 = weight(_text_:22 in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037719723 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.8-17
  15. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.00 
    0.0031433103 = product of:
  0.018859861 = sum of:
    0.018859861 = product of:
      0.037719723 = sum of:
        0.037719723 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037719723 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.00 
    0.0031433103 = product of:
  0.018859861 = sum of:
    0.018859861 = product of:
      0.037719723 = sum of:
        0.037719723 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037719723 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
  17. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.00 
    0.0031433103 = product of:
  0.018859861 = sum of:
    0.018859861 = product of:
      0.037719723 = sum of:
        0.037719723 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037719723 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.00 
    0.0031433103 = product of:
  0.018859861 = sum of:
    0.018859861 = product of:
      0.037719723 = sum of:
        0.037719723 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037719723 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  19. Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004) 0.00 
    0.0027503965 = product of:
  0.016502379 = sum of:
    0.016502379 = product of:
      0.033004757 = sum of:
        0.033004757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033004757 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
  20. Smith, J.K.; Cunningham, R.L.; Sarapata, S.P.: MARC to ENC MARC : bringing the collection forward (2004) 0.00 
    0.0027503965 = product of:
  0.016502379 = sum of:
    0.016502379 = product of:
      0.033004757 = sum of:
        0.033004757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033004757 = score(doc=2844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.28-39

Authors

Languages

  • e 29
  • d 11

Types

  • a 37
  • s 3
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes