Search (53 results, page 1 of 3)

0.016743787 = product of:
  0.05023136 = sum of:
    0.025920324 = weight(_text_:information in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025920324 = score(doc=7322,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
    0.024311034 = product of:
      0.0729331 = sum of:
        0.0729331 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0729331 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22

0.016230557 = product of:
  0.04869167 = sum of:
    0.00654587 = weight(_text_:information in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00654587 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
    0.0421458 = product of:
      0.0632187 = sum of:
        0.03717116 = weight(_text_:29 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03717116 = score(doc=160,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
        0.026047537 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026047537 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date

29. 5.2012 13:58:08
29. 5.2012 14:10:14

Source

¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a

0.015110459 = product of:
  0.045331378 = sum of:
    0.03838537 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03838537 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.21004607 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
    0.00694601 = product of:
      0.02083803 = sum of:
        0.02083803 = weight(_text_:22 in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02083803 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Quantitativer Umfang des Bestandes Dass die Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München (BSB) eine bedeutende Sammlung an Handschriften besitzt und die an Exemplaren reichste Inkunabelsammlung aufzuweisen hat, ist allgemein bekannt. Demgegenüber weit weniger bekannt dürfte die Tatsache sein, dass dort auch umfangreiche Bestände anderer Bibliotheken auf Mikrofilm bzw. Mikrofiche vorhanden sind, die in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten von Firmen wie World Microfilm Publications kommerziell vertrieben und von der BSB erworben wurden. Dabei handelt es sich - grob geschätzt - um 6.000 Handschriften (ohne Musikhandschriften) und über 5.000 Inkunabeln auf insgesamt ca. 1.850 Filmrollen und knapp 25.000 Mikrofiches. Listenartige Erfassungsmöglichkeiten Die frühesten Erwerbungen wurden in der Handschriftenabteilung im Freihandmagazin aufgestellt; ein Nachweis im Katalog war seinerzeit nicht erfolgt. Der größere - katalogisierte - Teil befand sich hingegen, räumlich getrennt, im allgemeinen Magazin; dieser wurde nach und nach in die Handbibliothek der Handschriftenabteilung (Hbh) verbracht und - zusammen mit den bereits in der Abteilung befindlichen Filmen - mit entsprechenden Signaturen versehen. Am Ende stand der katalogmäßige Nachweis der gesamten Mikroformen. Aufgrund der ursprünglich disparaten Aufstellung und unterschiedlichen Erschließung war es teilweise recht schwierig gewesen, die entsprechenden Verfilmungen (zumal Sammlungen) ausfindig zu machen. Auf der Basis einer bereits vorhandenen Liste wurde daher ein "Verzeichnis der Mikrofilmsammlungen in der Handschriftenabteilung der BSB" analog den Verzeichnissen der Mikroformen zur Geschichte bzw. zur Musikwissenschaft ins Netz gestellt. Unter der Adresse http://www.bsb-muenchen.de/mikro/hand.htm kann man sich einen nach Provenienzen geordneten Überblick über diese wichtigen, bis dato aber zu wenig genutzten Bestände verschaffen.

Date

22. 5.2007 11:19:21

0.011584498 = product of:
  0.034753494 = sum of:
    0.010473392 = weight(_text_:information in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010473392 = score(doc=2234,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
    0.024280101 = product of:
      0.0728403 = sum of:
        0.0728403 = weight(_text_:29 in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0728403 = score(doc=2234,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.5385337 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Analysis of research to date on improving subject access by including contents tables in bibliographic records. Results indicate the need for clear methodology (criteria for selecting notoces for enrichment, manual and semi automated methods, cost). Evaluations, based on recall, precision and rate of circulation, indicate manifest benefits, especially in virtual libraries where information is superabundant; but enrichment is a complex process

Date

29. 1.1996 16:50:24
14. 4.2000 11:29:29

0.009609912 = product of:
  0.028829735 = sum of:
    0.014811614 = weight(_text_:information in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014811614 = score(doc=3730,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
    0.014018122 = product of:
      0.042054366 = sum of:
        0.042054366 = weight(_text_:29 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042054366 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Imprint

Medford, NJ : Learned Information Inc.

Source

Annual review of information science and technology. 29(1994), S.219-242

0.008741228 = product of:
  0.026223682 = sum of:
    0.01571009 = weight(_text_:information in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01571009 = score(doc=3571,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
    0.010513592 = product of:
      0.031540774 = sum of:
        0.031540774 = weight(_text_:29 in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031540774 = score(doc=3571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Bibliotheken sind nicht chaotische Sammlungen von Medien, sondern werden stets als Information-Retrieval-Systeme implementiert, denn das Wiederfinden bei exakten und vor allem bei vagen Anfragen ist von Anfang an das Sammlungsziel. Niemand kennt zum Zeitpunkt der Sammlung die Fragestellung, die einen zukünftigen Benutzer zu diesem Medium führen wird. Die Art der Sammlungsorganisation bestimmt in hohem Maße die zukünftig mögliche Antwortmenge und deren informatorische Qualität. Der Siegeszug der digitalen Information-Retrieval-Systeme im Internet hat in den letzten zehn Jahren Erwartungen und Märkte geschaffen, die weder Karteikarten, noch deren digitales Ebenbild, die heutigen Bibliotheksmanagement-Systeme befriedigen können. Es genügt nicht mehr, dass Google und andere kostenlos das aufsammeln und nachweisen, was im Internet frei zugänglich ist. Alte, noch »marktfähige« Inhalte werden neu aufbereitet, mit neuen Inhalten kombiniert, um neue Geschäftsfelder zu schaffen. Es geht um Verdrängung und Neuverteilung, und die älteren Inhalte der Bibliotheken sind meist noch hinreichend »marktfähig«.

Date

3. 6.2010 10:29:09

Series

Lesesaal: Information digital

0.008163839 = product of:
  0.024491515 = sum of:
    0.010473392 = weight(_text_:information in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010473392 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
    0.014018122 = product of:
      0.042054366 = sum of:
        0.042054366 = weight(_text_:29 in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042054366 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This paper analyzes proposals for augmenting library bibliographic records for improved subject searching in online catalogs. Possible fields for enrichment are described and their likely value assessed. The assessment determines that the main value of enriched records would be to provide access to parts of books. The paper presents arguments for and against adding book content indexing to the online catalog and analyzes the feasibility of eleven alternatives for providing such information

Source

Library resources and technical services. 29(1985), S.5-15

0.008163839 = product of:
  0.024491515 = sum of:
    0.010473392 = weight(_text_:information in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010473392 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
    0.014018122 = product of:
      0.042054366 = sum of:
        0.042054366 = weight(_text_:29 in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042054366 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Footnote

Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) nos.3/4, S.29-51

0.008039642 = product of:
  0.024118926 = sum of:
    0.013605336 = weight(_text_:information in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013605336 = score(doc=5421,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
    0.010513592 = product of:
      0.031540774 = sum of:
        0.031540774 = weight(_text_:29 in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031540774 = score(doc=5421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This article describes our efforts in supporting information retrieval from OCR degraded text. In particular, we report our approach to an automatic cataloging and searching contest for books in multiple languages. In this contest, 500 books in English, German, French, and Italian published during the 1770s to 1970s are scanned into images and OCRed to digital text. The goal is to use only automatic ways to extract information for sophisticated searching. We adopted the vector space retrieval model, an n-gram indexing method, and a special weighting scheme to tackle this problem. Although the performance by this approach is slightly inferior to the best approach, which is mainly based on regular expression match, one advantage of our approach is that it is less language dependent and less layout sensitive, thus is readily applicable to other languages and document collections. Problems of OCR text retrieval for some Asian languages are also discussed in this article, and solutions are suggested

Date

29. 9.2001 13:58:18

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.5, S.378-390

0.0071433587 = product of:
  0.021430075 = sum of:
    0.009164219 = weight(_text_:information in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009164219 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
    0.012265856 = product of:
      0.03679757 = sum of:
        0.03679757 = weight(_text_:29 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679757 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Describes an approach to indexing which seeks to eliminate the shortcoming of the representation of information in existing bibliographic catalogues: Subject Access Project (SAP) indexing which has been used successfully at Lund University and elsewhere. Existing catalogue records have been enriched with terms selected from lists of contents and indexes in books thus facilitating access to specific parts of documents and smaller semantic entites such as chapter titles, subject titles and data in graphic or tabulated form available in a wide range of publications

Date

29. 1.1996 16:01:59

0.006591081 = product of:
  0.019773243 = sum of:
    0.012827233 = weight(_text_:information in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012827233 = score(doc=520,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
    0.00694601 = product of:
      0.02083803 = sum of:
        0.02083803 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02083803 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Myriad new information resources are available to contemporary library users. While print remains the foundation of most collections, libraries are also beginning to provide access to an array of bibliographic, numeric, and full-text databases. As more and more information is produced in electronic form and presented at computer workstations, the library catalog is being given an expanded role. The expanded catalog will play a crucial part in organizing information in electronic libraries, and in providing navigational assistance to library users. Like the traditional card catalog, the expanded catalog will not only lead to specific items or groups of sources, but also will provide connections to related materials. These connections will uses standard data elements to link the results of a search in one database with related material in another. For example, links will show local library holdings of sources in citation databases. Cornell University's Mann Library serves the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the College of Human Ecology, and the Division of Biological Sciences. As part of electronic library development, Mann staff have been analyzing issues involved in making it possible for Agricola and BIOSIS users to see, automatically, which of their retrieved citations are from sources available in the Cornell libraries. Samples of citations from Agricola and BIOSIS were drawn, and data elements present in these records were compared with bibliographic records of the library's holdings. In some cases, links would be provided by ISSNs. The study shows, however, that the presence of standard identifiers such as ISSN, USBN, or CODEN cannot be assumed, and other linking algorithms must be developed. This article presents study results, provides an overview of several linking systems, and identifies some of the difficulties caused by lack of standardization between different bibliographic databases. It is clear that the concept of an expanded catalog will require not only links between information resources but agreements among information professionals on standard data elements.

Date

8. 1.2007 17:22:25

Footnote

Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century

0.0063975616 = product of:
  0.03838537 = sum of:
    0.03838537 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 1844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03838537 = score(doc=1844,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.21004607 = fieldWeight in 1844, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1844)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.0060913535 = product of:
  0.01827406 = sum of:
    0.007855045 = weight(_text_:information in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007855045 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
    0.010419015 = product of:
      0.031257045 = sum of:
        0.031257045 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031257045 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Imprint

Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science

0.0059799235 = product of:
  0.01793977 = sum of:
    0.009257258 = weight(_text_:information in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009257258 = score(doc=1942,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
    0.008682513 = product of:
      0.026047537 = sum of:
        0.026047537 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026047537 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Vom verflixten siebten Jahr kann man in Bregenz bisher nicht sprechen, im Gegenteil: Die Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (VLB) hat kurz vor Ostern 2008 ihr 100.000. Inhaltsverzeichnis mit intelligentCAPTURE gescannt. Damit ist der Katalogeintrag von etwa 70 Prozent des betroffenen Freihandbestandes und sämtlicher Neuzugänge ab 2002 zusätzlich mit dem Inhaltsverzeichnis und zum Teil mit der Abbildung des Buchdeckels versehen. Die derzeitige Durchsatzrate beträgt pro Jahr 30.000 bibliographische Einheiten bei einem Personaleinsatz von 40 Stunden pro Woche. Die vollständige Erschließung des Buchbestandes in der Freihandaufstellung ist in Reichweite; ganz ohne Fördermittel im laufenden Betrieb; eine schlanke Lösung sowohl organisatorisch als auch finanziell. Da im Rahmen der Zusammenarbeit mit dandelon.com inzwischen weitere Bibliotheken in einem elegant gelösten Arbeitsablauf kooperativ erschließen, können wir bei Neuerscheinungen bereits die Hälfte als Fremddaten übernehmen. Die VLB hat mit der Digitalisierung, OCR-Konvertierung und maschinellen Indexierung von Inhaltsverzeichnissen und dem mehrsprachigen, semantischen Retrieval in der Suchmaschine dandelon.com zusammen mit der Firma AGI. Information Management Consultants Impulse im Bibliothekswesen gesetzt. Wer 2002 noch bezweifelte, dass dieser Ansatz erfolgreich sein wurde, wurde inzwischen eines Besseren belehrt. Zu offensichtlich ist der Mehrwert, den allein die Moglichkeit der entscheidend verbesserten Relevanzbeurteilung uber den OPAC bietet (http://vlb-katalog.vorarlberg.de). Er erfordert von einer zeitgemasen Bibliothek geradezu das Angebot solcher Zusatzinformationen. Aber die Anreicherung mit den Angaben aus den Inhaltsverzeichnissen bieten weit mehr, denn es entsteht durch die maschinelle Indexierung eine vollig neue Dimension an Retrievalmoglichkeiten. Die vollständige Erfassung unseres Bestandes war immer erklärtes Ziel unseres Projektes, weil wir gesehen haben, dass wir den Nutzern dadurch einen erheblichen Zusatznutzen bieten können, der in einem unbeschreiblich günstigen Verhältnis zum personellen und finanziellen Einsatz steht. Damit, dass wir dieses Ziel so schnell erreichen könnten, hatten wir nicht gerechnet.

Date

22. 6.2008 17:14:24

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.4, S.241-242

0.0051023993 = product of:
  0.015307197 = sum of:
    0.00654587 = weight(_text_:information in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00654587 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
    0.008761327 = product of:
      0.02628398 = sum of:
        0.02628398 = weight(_text_:29 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02628398 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date

4. 7.2006 20:29:31

Series

Information digital

0.0049372045 = product of:
  0.029623227 = sum of:
    0.029623227 = weight(_text_:information in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029623227 = score(doc=3901,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Information retrieval. 2(2000), S.165-176

0.0046727075 = product of:
  0.028036244 = sum of:
    0.028036244 = product of:
      0.08410873 = sum of:
        0.08410873 = weight(_text_:29 in 390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08410873 = score(doc=390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=390)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Database. 5(1982), S.29(?)-(?)

0.004051839 = product of:
  0.024311034 = sum of:
    0.024311034 = product of:
      0.0729331 = sum of:
        0.0729331 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0729331 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22

0.0035045305 = product of:
  0.021027183 = sum of:
    0.021027183 = product of:
      0.06308155 = sum of:
        0.06308155 = weight(_text_:29 in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06308155 = score(doc=3645,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

23.10.1996 17:26:29

0.0034911307 = product of:
  0.020946784 = sum of:
    0.020946784 = weight(_text_:information in 389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020946784 = score(doc=389,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 389, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=389)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Journal of information science. 3(1981), S.39-43