Search (162 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.03
    0.03314684 = product of:
      0.099440515 = sum of:
        0.01571009 = weight(_text_:information in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01571009 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
        0.08373042 = product of:
          0.12559563 = sum of:
            0.06308155 = weight(_text_:29 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06308155 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
            0.06251409 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06251409 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.3, S.45-48
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  2. Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992) 0.01
    0.013299245 = product of:
      0.039897736 = sum of:
        0.0111087095 = weight(_text_:information in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0111087095 = score(doc=2072,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
        0.028789027 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028789027 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.15753455 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This volume deals with both theoretical and empirical research in classification and encompasses universal classification systems, special classification systems, thesauri and the place of classification in a broad spectrum of document and information systems. Papers fall into one or three major areas as follows: 1) general principles and policies 2) structure and logic in classification; and empirical investigation; classification in the design of various types of document/information systems. The papers originate from the ISCCR '91 conference and have been selected according to the following criteria: relevance to the conference theme; importance of the topic in the representation and organization of knowledge; quality; and originality in terms of potential contribution to research and new knowledge.
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  3. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01
    0.010677489 = product of:
      0.032032467 = sum of:
        0.018140448 = weight(_text_:information in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018140448 = score(doc=4869,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
        0.01389202 = product of:
          0.04167606 = sum of:
            0.04167606 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04167606 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.46-48
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  4. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.01
    0.010161318 = product of:
      0.030483954 = sum of:
        0.018328438 = weight(_text_:information in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018328438 = score(doc=2509,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
        0.012155517 = product of:
          0.03646655 = sum of:
            0.03646655 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03646655 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22
  5. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.01
    0.010152256 = product of:
      0.030456766 = sum of:
        0.01309174 = weight(_text_:information in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01309174 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
        0.017365025 = product of:
          0.052095074 = sum of:
            0.052095074 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052095074 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
  6. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.01
    0.010152256 = product of:
      0.030456766 = sum of:
        0.01309174 = weight(_text_:information in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01309174 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
        0.017365025 = product of:
          0.052095074 = sum of:
            0.052095074 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052095074 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Präsentation zum Vortrag anlässlich des 98. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Erfurt: Ein neuer Blick auf Bibliotheken; TK10: Information erschließen und recherchieren Inhalte erschließen - mit neuen Tools
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  7. Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998) 0.01
    0.009342804 = product of:
      0.02802841 = sum of:
        0.015872892 = weight(_text_:information in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015872892 = score(doc=2342,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
        0.012155517 = product of:
          0.03646655 = sum of:
            0.03646655 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03646655 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  8. Schallier, W.: Why organize information if you can find it? : UDC and libraries in an Internet world (2007) 0.01
    0.009091947 = product of:
      0.027275842 = sum of:
        0.018514516 = weight(_text_:information in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018514516 = score(doc=549,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
        0.008761327 = product of:
          0.02628398 = sum of:
            0.02628398 = weight(_text_:29 in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02628398 = score(doc=549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The Belgians Otlet and LaFontaine created the Universal Decimal Classification in order to collect and organize the world's knowledge. This happened in an age when information was almost exclusively made available by libraries. Since the internet, the quantity of information outside libraries is enormous and keeps growing every day. The internet is accessible to anybody, it is fundamentally unorganized and its content changes constantly. Collecting and organizing the world's knowledge seem to have become an impossible ambition. Perhaps it is even unnecessary, since search engines make information retrievable now. And why would we organize information if we can find it? So what will be the role of UDC and libraries in this internet environment? Libraries can still play a role as a major information provider, if they adapt fully to the expectations of a modern end user. The design and the functionalities of online catalogues should allow maximal accessibility, usability and active participation of the end user in the internet environment. Metadata, like UDC, should maximize the visibility of information, enrich it and invite the end user to assign metadata himself.
    Content
    Beitrag anlässlich des 'UDC Seminar: Information Access for the Global Community, The Hague, 4-5 June 2007'. - http://www.udcc.org/seminar07/presentations/schallier.pdf.
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 29(2007), S.183-190
  9. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.01
    0.008709702 = product of:
      0.026129104 = sum of:
        0.01571009 = weight(_text_:information in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01571009 = score(doc=3697,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
        0.010419015 = product of:
          0.031257045 = sum of:
            0.031257045 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031257045 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
  10. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.01
    0.008416101 = product of:
      0.050496608 = sum of:
        0.050496608 = product of:
          0.07574491 = sum of:
            0.031540774 = weight(_text_:29 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031540774 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
            0.04420414 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04420414 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  11. McAllister-Harper, D.: Dewey Decimal Classification in the online environment : a study of libraries in North Carolina (1990) 0.01
    0.008408673 = product of:
      0.02522602 = sum of:
        0.012960162 = weight(_text_:information in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012960162 = score(doc=3574,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3574)
        0.012265856 = product of:
          0.03679757 = sum of:
            0.03679757 = weight(_text_:29 in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679757 = score(doc=3574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3574)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Results of a survey of North Carolina Libraries revealed that of 91 respondents, 29 had on-line catalogues. Of the libraries with on-line catalogues, 11 used the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Survey findings indicate that the DDC has limited use in on-line searching today.
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium on Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment, held at the School of Library and Information Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
  12. LaBarre, K.: Adventures in faceted classification: a brave new world or a world of confusion? (2004) 0.01
    0.008408673 = product of:
      0.02522602 = sum of:
        0.012960162 = weight(_text_:information in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012960162 = score(doc=2634,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
        0.012265856 = product of:
          0.03679757 = sum of:
            0.03679757 = weight(_text_:29 in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679757 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:42:50
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  13. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.01
    0.008371893 = product of:
      0.02511568 = sum of:
        0.012960162 = weight(_text_:information in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012960162 = score(doc=1673,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
        0.012155517 = product of:
          0.03646655 = sum of:
            0.03646655 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03646655 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The Wolverhampton Web Library (WWLib) is a WWW search engine that provides access to UK based information. The experimental version developed in 1995, was a success but highlighted the need for a much higher degree of automation. An interesting feature of the experimental WWLib was that it organised information according to DDC. Discusses the advantages of classification and describes the automatic classifier that is being developed in Java as part of the new, fully automated WWLib
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  14. Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003) 0.01
    0.008121804 = product of:
      0.024365412 = sum of:
        0.010473392 = weight(_text_:information in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010473392 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
        0.01389202 = product of:
          0.04167606 = sum of:
            0.04167606 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04167606 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Van Dijck builds up an example of actual XFML by showing how to organize tourist information about what restaurants in what cities feature which kind of music: <facet id="city">City</facet> and <topic id="ny" facetid="city"><name>New York</name></topic> combine to mean that New York is the name of a city internally represented as "ny". It is written in the usual clear and practical style of articles on xml.com. Highly recommended as an introduction for anyone interested in XFML.
    Source
    http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
  15. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.01
    0.008008117 = product of:
      0.02402435 = sum of:
        0.013605336 = weight(_text_:information in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013605336 = score(doc=4189,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
        0.010419015 = product of:
          0.031257045 = sum of:
            0.031257045 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031257045 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Eine ganze Anzahl von Bibliotheken in Europa befaßt sich mit der Entwicklung von Internet Subject Gateways - einer Serviceleistung, die den Nutzern helfen soll, qualitativ hochwertige Internetquellen zu finden. Subject Gateways wie SOSIG (The Social Science Information Gateway) sind bereits seit einigen Jahren im Internet verfügbar und stellen eine Alternative zu Internet-Suchmaschinen wie AltaVista und Verzeichnissen wie Yahoo dar. Bezeichnenderweise stützen sich Subject Gateways auf die Fertigkeiten, Verfahrensweisen und Standards der internationalen Bibliothekswelt und wenden diese auf Informationen aus dem Internet an. Dieses Referat will daher betonen, daß Bibliothekare/innen idealerweise eine vorherrschende Rolle im Aufbau von Suchservices für Internetquellen spielen und daß Information Gateways eine Möglichkeit dafür darstellen. Es wird einige der Subject Gateway-Initiativen in Europa umreißen und die Werkzeuge und Technologien beschreiben, die vom Projekt DESIRE entwickelt wurden, um die Entwicklung neuer Gateways in anderen Ländern zu unterstützen. Es wird auch erörtert, wie IMesh, eine Gruppe für Gateways aus der ganzen Welt eine internationale Strategie für Gateways anstrebt und versucht, Standards zur Umsetzung dieses Projekts zu entwickeln
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  16. Chowdhury, S.; Chowdhury, G.G.: Using DDC to create a visual knowledge map as an aid to online information retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.0075730495 = product of:
      0.022719149 = sum of:
        0.015710087 = weight(_text_:information in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015710087 = score(doc=2643,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
        0.007009061 = product of:
          0.021027183 = sum of:
            0.021027183 = weight(_text_:29 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021027183 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction Web search engines and digital libraries usually expect the users to use search terms that most accurately represent their information needs. Finding the most appropriate search terms to represent an information need is an age old problem in information retrieval. Keyword or phrase search may produce good search results as long as the search terms or phrase(s) match those used by the authors and have been chosen for indexing by the concerned information retrieval system. Since this does not always happen, a large number of false drops are produced by information retrieval systems. The retrieval results become worse in very large systems that deal with millions of records, such as the Web search engines and digital libraries. Vocabulary control tools are used to improve the performance of text retrieval systems. Thesauri, the most common type of vocabulary control tool used in information retrieval, appeared in the late fifties, designed for use with the emerging post-coordinate indexing systems of that time. They are used to exert terminology control in indexing, and to aid in searching by allowing the searcher to select appropriate search terms. A large volume of literature exists describing the design features, and experiments with the use, of thesauri in various types of information retrieval systems (see for example, Furnas et.al., 1987; Bates, 1986, 1998; Milstead, 1997, and Shiri et al., 2002).
    Date
    29. 8.2004 13:37:50
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  17. LaBarre, K.; Cochrane, P.A.: Facet analysis as a knowledge management tool on the Internet (2006) 0.01
    0.007284356 = product of:
      0.021853067 = sum of:
        0.01309174 = weight(_text_:information in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01309174 = score(doc=1489,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
        0.008761327 = product of:
          0.02628398 = sum of:
            0.02628398 = weight(_text_:29 in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02628398 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In 2001, a group of information architects involved in designing websites, and knowledge management specialists involved in creating access to corporate knowledge bases appeared to have re-discovered facet analysis and faceted classification. These groups have been instrumental in creating new and different ways of handling digital content of the Internet. Some of these practitioners explicitly use the forms and language of facet analysis and faceted classification, while others seem to do so implicitly. Following a brief overview of the work and discussions on facets and faceted classification in recent years, we focus on our observations about new information resources which seem more in line with the Fourth law of Library Science ("Save the time of the reader") than most library OPACs today. These new developments on the Internet point to a partial grasp of a disciplined approach to subject access. This is where Ranganathan and Neelameghan's approach needs to be reviewed for the new audience of information system designers. A report on the work undertaken by us forms a principal part of this paper.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 15:46:43
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
  18. Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004) 0.01
    0.0072074337 = product of:
      0.0216223 = sum of:
        0.0111087095 = weight(_text_:information in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0111087095 = score(doc=2651,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
        0.010513592 = product of:
          0.031540774 = sum of:
            0.031540774 = weight(_text_:29 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031540774 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The paper analyses the importance of data presentation and modelling and its role in improving the management, use and exchange of analytico-synthetic classifications in automated systems. Inefficiencies, in this respect, hinder the automation of classification systems that offer the possibility of building compound index/search terms. The lack of machine readable data expressing the semantics and structure of a classification vocabulary has negative effects on information management and retrieval, thus restricting the potential of both automated systems and classifications themselves. The authors analysed the data representation structure of three general analytico-synthetic classification systems (BC2-Bliss Bibliographic Classification; BSO-Broad System of Ordering; UDC-Universal Decimal Classification) and put forward some core requirements for classification data representation
    Date
    29. 8.2004 14:20:40
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  19. Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998) 0.01
    0.0071759084 = product of:
      0.021527724 = sum of:
        0.0111087095 = weight(_text_:information in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0111087095 = score(doc=4190,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.010419015 = product of:
          0.031257045 = sum of:
            0.031257045 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031257045 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Creates an open, metadata aware system for distributed, collaborative WWW indexing. The system has 3 main components: a harvester (for collecting information), a database (for making the collection searchable), and a user interface (for making the information available). all components can be distributed across networked computers, thus supporting scalability. The system is metadata aware and thus allows searches on several fields including title, document author and URL. Nordic Web Index (NWI) is an application using this system to create a regional Nordic Web-indexing service. NWI is built using 5 collaborating service points within the Nordic countries. The NWI databases can be used to build additional services
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  20. Santoro, M.; Spinelli, S.: Non solo numeri (1995) 0.01
    0.0071433587 = product of:
      0.021430075 = sum of:
        0.009164219 = weight(_text_:information in 3124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009164219 = score(doc=3124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3124)
        0.012265856 = product of:
          0.03679757 = sum of:
            0.03679757 = weight(_text_:29 in 3124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679757 = score(doc=3124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03845047 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3124)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The interfaculty centre of Bologna University began 2 years ago a project to 'translate' UDC codes into a user friendly thesaurus, with the object of creating an accurate, easy to use tool for online researches, especially those relating to periodical titles. The UDC numerical codes have been linked by a method based on synonyms to a series of corresponding verbal indices which express in natural language the concepts expressed by the codes. Thus researchers can retrieve information not only through UDC codes but also through their analogous verbal descriptors. Describes the progress of the UDC project so far, and some problems encountered
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 138
  • el 15
  • s 8
  • m 7
  • d 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…