Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.04 
    0.04424707 = product of:
  0.08849414 = sum of:
    0.009164219 = weight(_text_:information in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009164219 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
    0.0671744 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0671744 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.36758062 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
    0.012155517 = product of:
      0.03646655 = sum of:
        0.03646655 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03646655 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    This paper maps the concepts "space" and "dimensionality" in classifications, in particular in visualizations hereof, from a historical perspective. After a historical excursion in the domain of classification theory of what in mathematics is known as dimensionality reduction in representations of a single universe of knowledge, its potentiality will be explored for information retrieval and navigation in the multiverse of the World Wide Web.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  2. Krishnamurthy, M.; Satija, M.P.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: Classification of classifications : species of library classifications (2024) 0.02 
    0.021811035 = product of:
  0.0654331 = sum of:
    0.007855045 = weight(_text_:information in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007855045 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
    0.057578053 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057578053 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3150691 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Acknowledging the importance of classification not only for library and information science but also for the study and mapping of the world phenomena, in this paper we revisit and systematize the main types of classifications and focus on the species of classification mainly drawing on the work of S. R. Ranganathan. We trace the evolution of library classification systems by their structures and modes of design of various shades of classification systems and make a comparative study of enumerative and faceted species of library classifications. The value of this paper is to have a picture of the whole spectrum of existing classifications, which may serve for the study of future developments and constructions of new systems. This paper updates previous works by Comaromi and Ranganathan and is also theoretically inspired by them.
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  3. Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017) 0.02 
    0.018914348 = product of:
  0.05674304 = sum of:
    0.047981713 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047981713 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.2625576 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
    0.008761327 = product of:
      0.02628398 = sum of:
        0.02628398 = weight(_text_:29 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02628398 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    29. 9.2017 18:58:02
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  4. Tennis, J.T.: Never facets alone : the evolving thought and persistent problems in Ranganathan's theories of classification (2017) 0.02 
    0.018175863 = product of:
  0.054527584 = sum of:
    0.00654587 = weight(_text_:information in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00654587 = score(doc=5800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
    0.047981713 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047981713 = score(doc=5800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.2625576 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan's theory of classification spans a number of works over a number of decades. And while he was devoted to solving many problems in the practice of librarianship, and is known as the father of library science in India (Garfield, 1984), his work in classification revolves around one central concern. His classification research addressed the problems that arose from introducing new ideas into a scheme for classification, while maintaining a meaningful hierarchical and systematically arranged order of classes. This is because hierarchical and systematically arranged classes are the defining characteristic of useful classification. To lose this order is to through the addition of new classes is to introduce confusion, if not chaos, and to move toward a useless classification - or at least one that requires complete revision. In the following chapter, I outline the stages, and the elements of those stages, in Ranganathan's thought on classification from 1926-1972, as well as posthumous work that continues his agenda. And while facets figure prominently in all of these stages; but for Ranganathan to achieve his goal, he must continually add to this central feature of his theory of classification. I will close this chapter with an outline of persistent problems that represent research fronts for the field. Chief among these are what to do about scheme change and the open question about the rigor of information modeling in light of semantic web developments.
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  5. Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing (1985) 0.02 
    0.015263725 = product of:
  0.045791175 = sum of:
    0.007405807 = weight(_text_:information in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007405807 = score(doc=571,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
    0.03838537 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03838537 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.21004607 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    A native of Germany and a former teacher of languages and music, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927) came to the Philadelphia Commercial Museum to be its librarian in 1896. Faced with the problem of making "information" accessible, he developed a method of indexing he called systematic indexing. The first draft of his scheme, published in 1896-97, was an important landmark in the history of subject analysis. R. K. Olding credits Kaiser with making the greatest single advance in indexing theory since Charles A. Cutter and John Metcalfe eulogizes him by observing that "in sheer capacity for really scientific and logical thinking, Kaiser's was probably the best mind that has ever applied itself to subject indexing." Kaiser was an admirer of "system." By systematic indexing he meant indicating information not with natural language expressions as, for instance, Cutter had advocated, but with artificial expressions constructed according to formulas. Kaiser grudged natural language its approximateness, its vagaries, and its ambiguities. The formulas he introduced were to provide a "machinery for regularising or standardising language" (paragraph 67). Kaiser recognized three categories or "facets" of index terms: (1) terms of concretes, representing things, real or imaginary (e.g., money, machines); (2) terms of processes, representing either conditions attaching to things or their actions (e.g., trade, manufacture); and (3) terms of localities, representing, for the most part, countries (e.g., France, South Africa). Expressions in Kaiser's index language were called statements. Statements consisted of sequences of terms, the syntax of which was prescribed by formula. These formulas specified sequences of terms by reference to category types. Only three citation orders were permitted: a term in the concrete category followed by one in the process category (e.g., Wool-Scouring); (2) a country term followed by a process term (e.g., Brazil - Education); and (3) a concrete term followed by a country term, followed by a process term (e.g., Nitrate-Chile-Trade). Kaiser's system was a precursor of two of the most significant developments in twentieth-century approaches to subject access-the special purpose use of language for indexing, thus the concept of index language, which was to emerge as a generative idea at the time of the second Cranfield experiment (1966) and the use of facets to categorize subject indicators, which was to become the characterizing feature of analytico-synthetic indexing methods such as the Colon classification. In addition to its visionary quality, Kaiser's work is notable for its meticulousness and honesty, as can be seen, for instance, in his observations about the difficulties in facet definition.
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  6. Rodriguez, R.D.: Kaiser's systematic indexing (1984) 0.01 
    0.012795123 = product of:
  0.07677074 = sum of:
    0.07677074 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07677074 = score(doc=4521,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.42009214 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  7. Tomlinson, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme (1969) 0.01 
    0.0122457575 = product of:
  0.03673727 = sum of:
    0.01571009 = weight(_text_:information in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01571009 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
    0.021027183 = product of:
      0.06308155 = sum of:
        0.06308155 = weight(_text_:29 in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06308155 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Pages
    S.29-41
    Source
    Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
  8. Dahlberg, I.: Towards a future for knowledge organization (2006) 0.01 
    0.010719523 = product of:
  0.03215857 = sum of:
    0.018140448 = weight(_text_:information in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018140448 = score(doc=1476,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
    0.014018122 = product of:
      0.042054366 = sum of:
        0.042054366 = weight(_text_:29 in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042054366 = score(doc=1476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Discusses the origin and evolution of the Information Coding Classification (ICC); its theoretical basis, and structure and advantageous attributes for organizing knowledge. Pleads that the considerable work already done on the system should be taken up and developed by interested research groups through collaborative effort. Concludes with some thoughts on the future of knowledge organization for information retrieval and other applications
    Date
    29. 2.2008 13:41:01
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Eds.: K.S. Raghavan u. K.N. Prasad
  9. Dahlberg, I.: Information Coding Classification : Geschichtliches, Prinzipien, Inhaltliches (2010) 0.01 
    0.010719523 = product of:
  0.03215857 = sum of:
    0.018140448 = weight(_text_:information in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018140448 = score(doc=4057,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
    0.014018122 = product of:
      0.042054366 = sum of:
        0.042054366 = weight(_text_:29 in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042054366 = score(doc=4057,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag umfasst eine Einführung in das Verständnis der Information Coding Classification (ICC), einer Universalklassifikation von Wissensgebieten. Er enthält (1) Entstehungsgeschichte (1970 bis 1977), (2) ihre Prinzipien: Begriffe, Begriffsbeziehungen, Notation, Hauptklassen als Objektbereiche in Integrationsstufen, Systemstellenplan als Systematifikator mit neun Aspekten zur Untergliederung, Verbindungsmöglichkeiten mit anderen Systemen, Systemstellen zur Darstellung von Inter- und Transdisziplinarität. Verwendungsmöglichkeiten. (3) Erläuterung ihres Inhalts und kurze Erörterung der Probleme bei der Konzeption und Erarbeitung.
    Date
    6. 1.2011 18:29:20
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.8, S.449-454
  10. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.01 
    0.010161318 = product of:
  0.030483954 = sum of:
    0.018328438 = weight(_text_:information in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018328438 = score(doc=4227,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
    0.012155517 = product of:
      0.03646655 = sum of:
        0.03646655 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03646655 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    We present three fundamental, interrelated approaches to support multiple access paths to each terminal object in information hierarchies: faceted classification, faceted search, and web directories with embedded symbolic links. This survey aims to demonstrate how each approach supports users who seek information from multiple perspectives. We achieve this by exploring each approach, the relationships between these approaches, including tradeoffs, and how they can be used in concert, while focusing on a core set of hypermedia elements common to all. This approach provides a foundation from which to study, understand, and synthesize applications which employ these techniques. This survey does not aim to be comprehensive, but rather focuses on thematic issues.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
  11. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.01 
    0.005076128 = product of:
  0.015228383 = sum of:
    0.00654587 = weight(_text_:information in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00654587 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
    0.008682513 = product of:
      0.026047537 = sum of:
        0.026047537 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026047537 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The Integrative Level Classification (ILC) research project is experimenting with a knowledge organization system based on phenomena rather than disciplines. Each phenomenon has a constant notation, which can be combined with that of any other phenomenon in a freely faceted structure. Citation order can express differential focality of the facets. Very specific subjects can have long classmarks, although their complexity is reduced by various devices. Freely faceted classification is being tested by indexing a corpus of about 3300 papers in the interdisciplinary domain of bioacoustics. The subjects of these papers often include phenomena from a wide variety of integrative levels (mechanical waves, animals, behaviour, vessels, fishing, law, ...) as well as information about the methods of study, as predicted in the León Manifesto. The archive is recorded in a MySQL database, and can be fed and searched through PHP Web interfaces. Indexer's work is made easier by mechanisms that suggest possible classes on the basis of matching title words with terms in the ILC schedules, and synthesize automatically the verbal caption corresponding to the classmark being edited. Users can search the archive by selecting and combining values in each facet. Search refinement should be improved, especially for the cases where no record, or too many records, match the faceted query. However, experience is being gained progressively, showing that freely faceted classification by phenomena, theories, and methods is feasible and successfully working.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  12. Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014) 0.01 
    0.005076128 = product of:
  0.015228383 = sum of:
    0.00654587 = weight(_text_:information in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00654587 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
    0.008682513 = product of:
      0.026047537 = sum of:
        0.026047537 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026047537 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Categories, or concepts of high generality representing the most basic kinds of entities in the world, have long been understood to be a fundamental element in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs), particularly faceted ones. Commentators on facet analysis have tended to foreground the role of categories in the structuring of controlled vocabularies and the construction of compound index terms, and the implications of this for subject representation and information retrieval. Less attention has been paid to the variety of ways in which categories can shape the overall architectonic framework of a KOS. This case study explores the range of functions that categories took in structuring various aspects of an early analytico-synthetic KOS, Julius Otto Kaiser's method of Systematic Indexing (SI). Within SI, categories not only functioned as mechanisms to partition an index vocabulary into smaller groupings of terms and as elements in the construction of compound index terms but also served as means of defining the units of indexing, or index items, incorporated into an index; determining the organization of card index files and the articulation of the guide card system serving as a navigational aids thereto; and setting structural constraints to the establishment of cross-references between terms. In all these ways, Kaiser's system of categories contributed to the general systematicity of SI.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  13. Austin, D.: Development of a new general classification : a progress report (1969) 0.00 
    0.0034911307 = product of:
  0.020946784 = sum of:
    0.020946784 = weight(_text_:information in 4972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020946784 = score(doc=4972,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4972, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4972)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Information scientist. 3(1969) no.3, S.95-115
  14. Ranganathan, S.R.: ¬The Colon Classification (1965) 0.00 
    0.0030547397 = product of:
  0.018328438 = sum of:
    0.018328438 = weight(_text_:information in 3417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018328438 = score(doc=3417,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3417, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3417)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Series
    Rutgers series on systems for the intellectual organization of information;4
  15. LaBarre, K.: Facet analysis (2010) 0.00 
    0.0030547397 = product of:
  0.018328438 = sum of:
    0.018328438 = weight(_text_:information in 1596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018328438 = score(doc=1596,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1596, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1596)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.243-284
  16. Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004) 0.00 
    0.0029274025 = product of:
  0.017564414 = sum of:
    0.017564414 = weight(_text_:information in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017564414 = score(doc=831,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
    Footnote
    Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
  17. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.00 
    0.002894171 = product of:
  0.017365025 = sum of:
    0.017365025 = product of:
      0.052095074 = sum of:
        0.052095074 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052095074 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  18. Broughton, V.: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (2006) 0.00 
    0.0026723405 = product of:
  0.016034042 = sum of:
    0.016034042 = weight(_text_:information in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016034042 = score(doc=2874,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of this article is to estimate the impact of faceted classification and the faceted analytical method on the development of various information retrieval tools over the latter part of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Design/methodology/approach - The article presents an examination of various subject access tools intended for retrieval of both print and digital materials to determine whether they exhibit features of faceted systems. Some attention is paid to use of the faceted approach as a means of structuring information on commercial web sites. The secondary and research literature is also surveyed for commentary on and evaluation of facet analysis as a basis for the building of vocabulary and conceptual tools. Findings - The study finds that faceted systems are now very common, with a major increase in their use over the last 15 years. Most LIS subject indexing tools (classifications, subject heading lists and thesauri) now demonstrate features of facet analysis to a greater or lesser degree. A faceted approach is frequently taken to the presentation of product information on commercial web sites, and there is an independent strand of theory and documentation related to this application. There is some significant research on semi-automatic indexing and retrieval (query expansion and query formulation) using facet analytical techniques. Originality/value - This article provides an overview of an important conceptual approach to information retrieval, and compares different understandings and applications of this methodology.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: UK library & information schools: UCL SLAIS.
  19. Austin, D.: ¬The theory of integrative levels reconsidered as the basis of a general classification (1969) 0.00 
    0.0026183482 = product of:
  0.01571009 = sum of:
    0.01571009 = weight(_text_:information in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01571009 = score(doc=1286,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
  20. Wilson, T.D.: ¬The work of the British Classification Research Group (1972) 0.00 
    0.0026183482 = product of:
  0.01571009 = sum of:
    0.01571009 = weight(_text_:information in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01571009 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Series
    Contributions in librarianship and information science; 3

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 56
  • d 3
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 55
  • el 4
  • m 3
  • s 3
  • More… Less…

Themes