Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01
    0.013078149 = product of:
      0.0784689 = sum of:
        0.0784689 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0784689 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  2. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01
    0.013078149 = product of:
      0.0784689 = sum of:
        0.0784689 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0784689 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  3. Tkalac, S.; Mateljan, V.: Neke karakteristike notacijskih shema (1996) 0.01
    0.0128089925 = product of:
      0.07685395 = sum of:
        0.07685395 = weight(_text_:problem in 655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07685395 = score(doc=655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485485 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.375163 = fieldWeight in 655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=655)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a short review of fundamental knowledge representation methods: logical, graphical, structured and procedural notational schemes. Special attention is given to notational schemes' classifications and the characteristics on which classifications were done. Knowledge representation is one of the central problems in artificial intelligence, but a complete theory of it does not exist, and it remains a set of methods that are used, with more or less success, in attempts to solve a given problem. The characteristics of knowledge schemes play a significant role
  4. Star, S.L.: Grounded classification : grounded theory and faceted classification (1998) 0.01
    0.011207869 = product of:
      0.06724721 = sum of:
        0.06724721 = weight(_text_:problem in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06724721 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485485 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    This article compares the qualitative method of grounded theory (GT) with Ranganathan's construction of faceted classifications (FC) in library and information science. Both struggle with a core problem-i.e., the representation of vernacular words and processes, empirically discovered, which will, although ethnographically faithful, be powerful beyond the single instance or case study. The article compares Glaser and Strauss's (1967) work with that of Ranganathan(1950).
  5. Garcia Marco, F.J.; Esteban Navarro, M.A.: On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification (1993) 0.01
    0.009606745 = product of:
      0.05764047 = sum of:
        0.05764047 = weight(_text_:problem in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05764047 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485485 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Intended is first of all a preliminary review of the implications that the new approaches to the theory of classification, mainly from cognitive psychology and epistemology may have for information work and research. As a secondary topic the scientific relations existing among information science, epistemology and the cognitive sciences are discussed. Classification is seen as a central activity in all daily and scientific activities, and, of course, of knowledge organization in information services. There is a mutual implication between classification and conceptualization, as the former moves in a natural way to the latter and the best result elaborated for classification is the concept. Research in concept theory is a need for a theory of classification. In this direction it is of outstanding importance to integrate the achievements of 'natural concept formation theory' (NCFT) as an alternative approach to conceptualization different from the traditional one of logicians and problem solving researchers. In conclusion both approaches are seen as being complementary: the NCFT approach being closer to the user and the logical one being more suitable for experts, including 'expert systems'
  6. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.008718766 = product of:
      0.052312598 = sum of:
        0.052312598 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052312598 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  7. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.008718766 = product of:
      0.052312598 = sum of:
        0.052312598 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052312598 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  8. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.0076289205 = product of:
      0.04577352 = sum of:
        0.04577352 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04577352 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  9. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.0065390747 = product of:
      0.03923445 = sum of:
        0.03923445 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03923445 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  10. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.01
    0.0054492294 = product of:
      0.032695375 = sum of:
        0.032695375 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032695375 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22