Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Stock, W.G.: Publikation und Zitat : Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung (2001) 0.00
    0.0035474 = product of:
      0.0141896 = sum of:
        0.006615948 = product of:
          0.03307974 = sum of:
            0.03307974 = weight(_text_:problem in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03307974 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.007573652 = product of:
          0.022720955 = sum of:
            0.022720955 = weight(_text_:29 in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022720955 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Die empirische Wissenschaftsforschung arbeitet bei den Indikatoren wissenschaftlicher Leistung und wissenschaftlicher Wirkung mit Publikations- und Zitationsraten. Die vorliegende Arbeit befaßt sich mit dabei auftretenden methodischen Problemen. Was ist überhaupt eine Publikation? Was heißt Zitation? Zentral ist auch die Zählbasis, d.h. die Einheitenbildung: Was ist 1 Publikation? und: Was ist 1 Zitation? Bei Printpublikationen gibt es eine Reihe von beachtenswerten Faktoren (u.a. Mehrautorenwerke, Gewichtungsfaktoren wie den Impact Factor, Dokumenttypen). Bei elektronischen Publikationen im Internet mit ihrem dynamischen Charakter ist die Einheitenbildung noch weitaus problematischer. Zitationen, verstanden als zitierte Publikationen, werfen alle methodischen Probleme der Publikationseinheiten auf, hinzu kommen weitere, spezifische Probleme. Lösungsmöglichkeiten im syntaktischen Bereich (Relativierung auf Textseiten oder Zeichen) ändern am grundlegenden Problem nur wenig, Lösungsversuche im semantischen Bereich (etwa im Rahmen der semantischen Informationstheorie) sind im Rahmen der Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen nicht durchführbar und verweisen sowohl auf themenanalytische Methoden als auch auf die Wissenschaftstheorie. Mit diesem Working Paper wollen wir vor allem auf offene Probleme hinweisen; "endgültige" Lösungen wird der Leser nicht finden, wohl aber Lösungsvorschläge, die meist durchaus noch diskussionswürdig sind. In der Informationswissenschaft wie in der Wissenschaftsforschung sind wir bisher viel zu sicher davon ausgegangen, daß wir wissen, was Publikationen und Zitationen sind
    Series
    Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.29
  2. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.00
    0.0030022087 = product of:
      0.02401767 = sum of:
        0.02401767 = product of:
          0.07205301 = sum of:
            0.07205301 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07205301 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  3. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00
    0.0026536025 = product of:
      0.02122882 = sum of:
        0.02122882 = product of:
          0.06368646 = sum of:
            0.06368646 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06368646 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  4. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00
    0.0015921616 = product of:
      0.012737293 = sum of:
        0.012737293 = product of:
          0.03821188 = sum of:
            0.03821188 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03821188 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  5. Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003) 0.00
    0.0015147304 = product of:
      0.012117843 = sum of:
        0.012117843 = product of:
          0.03635353 = sum of:
            0.03635353 = weight(_text_:29 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03635353 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:52:23
  6. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.00
    0.0015147304 = product of:
      0.012117843 = sum of:
        0.012117843 = product of:
          0.03635353 = sum of:
            0.03635353 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03635353 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    27.12.2007 17:16:29
  7. Morris, S.A.; Yen, G.; Wu, Z.; Asnake, B.: Time line visualization of research fronts (2003) 0.00
    0.0013253891 = product of:
      0.010603113 = sum of:
        0.010603113 = product of:
          0.031809337 = sum of:
            0.031809337 = weight(_text_:29 in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031809337 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:51:59
  8. Spasser, M.A.: ¬The enacted fate of undiscovered public knowledge (1997) 0.00
    0.0011577909 = product of:
      0.009262327 = sum of:
        0.009262327 = product of:
          0.046311636 = sum of:
            0.046311636 = weight(_text_:problem in 198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046311636 = score(doc=198,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 198, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=198)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In a series of articles, Don Swanson explores the problem of associating two or more literatures that are logically, or substantively, related, but bibliographically noninteractive. He has called these implicit links among published literatures undicovered public knowledge. This article explores the fate of Swanson's ideas, using citation content analysis both to determine which authors have utilized Swanson's ideas and to examine the uses to which they have been put. The results suggest that while Swanson has received significant attention from the library and information science community, his ideas have not been widely cited in biomedical disciplines, and, when cited, only with rhetorically dismissive qualifications that detracts from their facticity. These results are interpreted as a failed instance of interdisciplinarity communication, and several explanations of this failure are discussed
  9. Chen, C.; Paul, R.J.; O'Keefe, B.: Fitting the Jigsaw of citation : information visualization in domain analysis (2001) 0.00
    0.0011360478 = product of:
      0.009088382 = sum of:
        0.009088382 = product of:
          0.027265146 = sum of:
            0.027265146 = weight(_text_:29 in 5766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027265146 = score(doc=5766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5766)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:00:53
  10. Davis, P.M.; Cohen, S.A.: ¬The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999 (2001) 0.00
    0.0011360478 = product of:
      0.009088382 = sum of:
        0.009088382 = product of:
          0.027265146 = sum of:
            0.027265146 = weight(_text_:29 in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027265146 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:01:09
  11. Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.: Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods (2005) 0.00
    0.0011360478 = product of:
      0.009088382 = sum of:
        0.009088382 = product of:
          0.027265146 = sum of:
            0.027265146 = weight(_text_:29 in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027265146 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2005 10:29:08
  12. Aksnes, D.W.: Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution (2006) 0.00
    0.0011360478 = product of:
      0.009088382 = sum of:
        0.009088382 = product of:
          0.027265146 = sum of:
            0.027265146 = weight(_text_:29 in 4925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027265146 = score(doc=4925,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4925, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4925)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2006 17:52:29
  13. González, L.; Campanario, J.M.: Structure of the impact factor of journals included in the Social Sciences Citation Index : citations from documents labeled "Editorial Material" (2007) 0.00
    0.0011360478 = product of:
      0.009088382 = sum of:
        0.009088382 = product of:
          0.027265146 = sum of:
            0.027265146 = weight(_text_:29 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027265146 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    3. 3.2007 18:29:17
  14. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.00
    0.0011258282 = product of:
      0.009006626 = sum of:
        0.009006626 = product of:
          0.027019877 = sum of:
            0.027019877 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027019877 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  15. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.00
    0.0011258282 = product of:
      0.009006626 = sum of:
        0.009006626 = product of:
          0.027019877 = sum of:
            0.027019877 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027019877 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  16. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.00
    0.0011258282 = product of:
      0.009006626 = sum of:
        0.009006626 = product of:
          0.027019877 = sum of:
            0.027019877 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027019877 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  17. Prime-Claverie, C.; Beigbeder, M.; Lafouge, T.: Transposition of the cocitation method with a view to classifying Web pages (2004) 0.00
    9.923922E-4 = product of:
      0.0079391375 = sum of:
        0.0079391375 = product of:
          0.039695688 = sum of:
            0.039695688 = weight(_text_:problem in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039695688 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The Web is a huge source of information, and one of the main problems facing users is finding documents which correspond to their requirements. Apart from the problem of thematic relevance, the documents retrieved by search engines do not always meet the users' expectations. The document may be too general, or conversely too specialized, or of a different type from what the user is looking for, and so forth. We think that adding metadata to pages can considerably improve the process of searching for information an the Web. This article presents a possible typology for Web sites and pages, as weIl as a method for propagating metadata values, based an the study of the Web graph and more specifically the method of cocitation in this graph.
  18. Case, D.O.; Higgins, G.M.: How can we investigate citation behavior? : A study of reasons for citing literature in communication (2000) 0.00
    9.467065E-4 = product of:
      0.007573652 = sum of:
        0.007573652 = product of:
          0.022720955 = sum of:
            0.022720955 = weight(_text_:29 in 4775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022720955 = score(doc=4775,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4775, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4775)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    19. 5.2000 20:15:29
  19. Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001) 0.00
    9.467065E-4 = product of:
      0.007573652 = sum of:
        0.007573652 = product of:
          0.022720955 = sum of:
            0.022720955 = weight(_text_:29 in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022720955 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:01:01
  20. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.00
    9.3819026E-4 = product of:
      0.007505522 = sum of:
        0.007505522 = product of:
          0.022516565 = sum of:
            0.022516565 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022516565 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12