Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    0.0036774296 = product of:
      0.0147097185 = sum of:
        0.0026463792 = product of:
          0.013231896 = sum of:
            0.013231896 = weight(_text_:problem in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013231896 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.09379075 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.012063339 = product of:
          0.018095009 = sum of:
            0.009088382 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009088382 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
            0.009006626 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009006626 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Bade begins his discussion of errors in subject analysis by summarizing the contents of seven records containing what he considers to be egregious errors. The examples were drawn only from items that he has encountered in the course of his work. Five of the seven records were full-level ("I" level) records for Eastern European materials created between 1996 and 2000 in the OCLC WorldCat database. The final two examples were taken from records created by Bade himself over an unspecified period of time. Although he is to be commended for examining the actual items cataloged and for examining mostly items that he claims to have adequate linguistic and subject expertise to evaluate reliably, Bade's methodology has major flaws. First and foremost, the number of examples provided is completely inadequate to draw any conclusions about the extent of the problem. Although an in-depth qualitative analysis of a small number of records might have yielded some valuable insight into factors that contribute to errors in subject analysis, Bade provides no Information about the circumstances under which the live OCLC records he critiques were created. Instead, he offers simplistic explanations for the errors based solely an his own assumptions. He supplements his analysis of examples with an extremely brief survey of other studies regarding errors in subject analysis, which consists primarily of criticism of work done by Sheila Intner. In the end, it is impossible to draw any reliable conclusions about the nature or extent of errors in subject analysis found in records in shared bibliographic databases based an Bade's analysis. In the final third of the essay, Bade finally reveals his true concern: the deintellectualization of cataloging. It would strengthen the essay tremendously to present this as the primary premise from the very beginning, as this section offers glimpses of a compelling argument. Bade laments, "Many librarians simply do not sec cataloging as an intellectual activity requiring an educated mind" (p. 20). Commenting an recent trends in copy cataloging practice, he declares, "The disaster of our time is that this work is being done more and more by people who can neither evaluate nor correct imported errors and offen are forbidden from even thinking about it" (p. 26). Bade argues that the most valuable content found in catalog records is the intellectual content contributed by knowledgeable catalogers, and he asserts that to perform intellectually demanding tasks such as subject analysis reliably and effectively, catalogers must have the linguistic and subject knowledge required to gain at least a rudimentary understanding of the materials that they describe. He contends that requiring catalogers to quickly dispense with materials in unfamiliar languages and subjects clearly undermines their ability to perform the intellectual work of cataloging and leads to an increasing number of errors in the bibliographic records contributed to shared databases.
    Arguing that catalogers need to work both quickly and accurately, Bade maintains that employing specialists is the most efficient and effective way to achieve this outcome. Far less compelling than these arguments are Bade's concluding remarks, in which he offers meager suggestions for correcting the problems as he sees them. Overall, this essay is little more than a curmudgeon's diatribe. Addressed primarily to catalogers and library administrators, the analysis presented is too superficial to assist practicing catalogers or cataloging managers in developing solutions to any systemic problems in current cataloging practice, and it presents too little evidence of pervasive problems to convince budget-conscious library administrators of a need to alter practice or to increase their investment in local cataloging operations. Indeed, the reliance upon anecdotal evidence and the apparent nit-picking that dominate the essay might tend to reinforce a negative image of catalogers in the minds of some. To his credit, Bade does provide an important reminder that it is the intellectual contributions made by thousands of erudite catalogers that have made shared cataloging a successful strategy for improving cataloging efficiency. This is an important point that often seems to be forgotten in academic libraries when focus centers an cutting costs. Had Bade focused more narrowly upon the issue of deintellectualization of cataloging and written a carefully structured essay to advance this argument, this essay might have been much more effective." - KO 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.236-237 (A. Sauperl)
  2. Laffal, J.: ¬A concept analysis of Jonathan Swift's 'Tale of a tub' and 'Gulliver's travels' (1995) 0.00
    0.0032132284 = product of:
      0.025705827 = sum of:
        0.025705827 = product of:
          0.07711748 = sum of:
            0.07711748 = weight(_text_:29 in 6362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07711748 = score(doc=6362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 6362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6362)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:05:29
    Source
    Computers and the humanities. 29(1995) no.5, S.339-361
  3. Martindale, C.; McKenzie, D.: On the utility of content analysis in author attribution : 'The federalist' (1995) 0.00
    0.0032132284 = product of:
      0.025705827 = sum of:
        0.025705827 = product of:
          0.07711748 = sum of:
            0.07711748 = weight(_text_:29 in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07711748 = score(doc=822,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:05:29
    Source
    Computers and the humanities. 29(1995) no.4, S.259-270
  4. Gardin, J.C.: Document analysis and linguistic theory (1973) 0.00
    0.0030294608 = product of:
      0.024235686 = sum of:
        0.024235686 = product of:
          0.07270706 = sum of:
            0.07270706 = weight(_text_:29 in 2387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07270706 = score(doc=2387,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2387, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2387)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 29(1973) no.2, S.137-168
  5. Belkin, N.J.: ¬The problem of 'matching' in information retrieval (1980) 0.00
    0.0019847844 = product of:
      0.015878275 = sum of:
        0.015878275 = product of:
          0.079391375 = sum of:
            0.079391375 = weight(_text_:problem in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079391375 = score(doc=1329,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.5627445 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  6. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.00
    0.0018763805 = product of:
      0.015011044 = sum of:
        0.015011044 = product of:
          0.04503313 = sum of:
            0.04503313 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04503313 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  7. Shaw, R.: Information organization and the philosophy of history (2013) 0.00
    0.0016373637 = product of:
      0.0130989095 = sum of:
        0.0130989095 = product of:
          0.065494545 = sum of:
            0.065494545 = weight(_text_:problem in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065494545 = score(doc=946,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.46424055 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The philosophy of history can help articulate problems relevant to information organization. One such problem is "aboutness": How do texts relate to the world? In response to this problem, philosophers of history have developed theories of colligation describing how authors bind together phenomena under organizing concepts. Drawing on these ideas, I present a theory of subject analysis that avoids the problematic illusion of an independent "landscape" of subjects. This theory points to a broad vision of the future of information organization and some specific challenges to be met.
  8. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.00
    0.0015011043 = product of:
      0.012008835 = sum of:
        0.012008835 = product of:
          0.036026504 = sum of:
            0.036026504 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036026504 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  9. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.00
    0.0015011043 = product of:
      0.012008835 = sum of:
        0.012008835 = product of:
          0.036026504 = sum of:
            0.036026504 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036026504 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  10. Sauperl, A.: Catalogers' common ground and shared knowledge (2004) 0.00
    0.001432395 = product of:
      0.01145916 = sum of:
        0.01145916 = product of:
          0.0572958 = sum of:
            0.0572958 = weight(_text_:problem in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0572958 = score(doc=2069,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.4061259 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The problem of multiple interpretations of meaning in the indexing process has been mostly avoided by information scientists. Among the few who have addressed this question are Clare Beghtol and Jens Erik Mai. Their findings and findings of other researchers in the area of information science, social psychology, and psycholinguistics indicate that the source of the problem might lie in the background and culture of each indexer or cataloger. Are the catalogers aware of the problem? A general model of the indexing process was developed from observations and interviews of 12 catalogers in three American academic libraries. The model is illustrated with a hypothetical cataloger's process. The study with catalogers revealed that catalogers are aware of the author's, the user's, and their own meaning, but do not try to accommodate them all. On the other hand, they make every effort to build common ground with catalog users by studying documents related to the document being cataloged, and by considering catalog records and subject headings related to the subject identified in the document being cataloged. They try to build common ground with other catalogers by using cataloging tools and by inferring unstated rules of cataloging from examples in the catalogs.
  11. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.00
    0.0013268013 = product of:
      0.01061441 = sum of:
        0.01061441 = product of:
          0.03184323 = sum of:
            0.03184323 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03184323 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  12. Hjoerland, B.: Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance (2001) 0.00
    0.0013253891 = product of:
      0.010603113 = sum of:
        0.010603113 = product of:
          0.031809337 = sum of:
            0.031809337 = weight(_text_:29 in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031809337 = score(doc=6032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:03:14
  13. Chen, H.: ¬An analysis of image queries in the field of art history (2001) 0.00
    0.0013253891 = product of:
      0.010603113 = sum of:
        0.010603113 = product of:
          0.031809337 = sum of:
            0.031809337 = weight(_text_:29 in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031809337 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Chen arranged with an Art History instructor to require 20 medieval art images in papers received from 29 students. Participants completed a self administered presearch and postsearch questionnaire, and were interviewed after questionnaire analysis, in order to collect both the keywords and phrases they planned to use, and those actually used. Three MLIS student reviewers then mapped the queries to Enser and McGregor's four categories, Jorgensen's 12 classes, and Fidel's 12 feature data and object poles providing a degree of match on a seven point scale (one not at all to 7 exact). The reviewers give highest scores to Enser and McGregor;'s categories. Modifications to both the Enser and McGregor and Jorgensen schemes are suggested
  14. Marshall, L.: Specific and generic subject headings : increasing subject access to library materials (2003) 0.00
    0.0013253891 = product of:
      0.010603113 = sum of:
        0.010603113 = product of:
          0.031809337 = sum of:
            0.031809337 = weight(_text_:29 in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031809337 = score(doc=5497,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    30. 7.2006 14:29:04
  15. Shatford, S.: Analyzing the subject of a picture : a theoretical approach (1986) 0.00
    0.0013253891 = product of:
      0.010603113 = sum of:
        0.010603113 = product of:
          0.031809337 = sum of:
            0.031809337 = weight(_text_:29 in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031809337 = score(doc=354,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:00:29
  16. Beghtol, C.: ¬The classification of fiction : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (1994) 0.00
    0.0011577909 = product of:
      0.009262327 = sum of:
        0.009262327 = product of:
          0.046311636 = sum of:
            0.046311636 = weight(_text_:problem in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046311636 = score(doc=3413,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The work is an adaptation of the author's dissertation and has the following chapters: (1) background and introduction; (2) a problem in classification theory; (3) previous fiction analysis theories and systems and 'The left hand of darkness'; (4) fiction warrant and critical warrant; (5) experimental fiction analysis system (EFAS); (6) application and evaluation of EFAS. Appendix 1 gives references to fiction analysis systems and appendix 2 lists EFAS coding sheets
  17. Morehead, D.R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Rouse, W.B.: ¬The value of information and computer-aided information seeking : problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval (1984) 0.00
    0.0011577909 = product of:
      0.009262327 = sum of:
        0.009262327 = product of:
          0.046311636 = sum of:
            0.046311636 = weight(_text_:problem in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046311636 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  18. Früh, W.: Inhaltsanalyse (2001) 0.00
    0.0011360478 = product of:
      0.009088382 = sum of:
        0.009088382 = product of:
          0.027265146 = sum of:
            0.027265146 = weight(_text_:29 in 1751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027265146 = score(doc=1751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1751)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    24. 3.2008 12:29:34
  19. Greisdorf, H.; O'Connor, B.: Modelling what users see when they look at images : a cognitive viewpoint (2002) 0.00
    0.0011360478 = product of:
      0.009088382 = sum of:
        0.009088382 = product of:
          0.027265146 = sum of:
            0.027265146 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027265146 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.1, S.6-29
  20. Caldera-Serrano, J.: Thematic description of audio-visual information on television (2010) 0.00
    0.0011360478 = product of:
      0.009088382 = sum of:
        0.009088382 = product of:
          0.027265146 = sum of:
            0.027265146 = weight(_text_:29 in 3953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027265146 = score(doc=3953,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03323817 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3953, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3953)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:40:35

Languages

  • e 28
  • d 5

Types

  • a 27
  • m 4
  • x 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…