Spink, A.; Greisdorf, H.: Users' partial relevance judgements during online searching (1997)
0.00
0.002005353 = product of:
0.016042825 = sum of:
0.016042825 = product of:
0.08021412 = sum of:
0.08021412 = weight(_text_:problem in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08021412 = score(doc=623,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.5685763 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Reports results of research to examine users conducting their initial online search on a particular information problem. Findings from 3 separate studies of relevance judgements by 44 initial search users were examined, including 2 studies of 13 end users and a study of 18 user engaged in mediated online searches. Number of items was judged on the scale 'relevant', 'patially relevant' and 'not rlevant'. Results suggest that: a relationship exists between partially rlevant items retrieved anch changes in the users' information problem or question during an information seeking process; partial relevance judgements play an important role for users in the early stages of seeking information on a particular information problem; and 'highly' relevant items may or may not be the only items useful at the early stages of users' information seeking processes
