-
Frederichs, A.: Natürlichsprachige Abfrage und 3-D-Visualisierung von Wissenszusammenhängen (2007)
0.03
0.029640239 = product of:
0.118560955 = sum of:
0.107850194 = weight(_text_:maschine in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107850194 = score(doc=566,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21420717 = queryWeight, product of:
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.50348544 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.010710761 = product of:
0.032132283 = sum of:
0.032132283 = weight(_text_:29 in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032132283 = score(doc=566,freq=4.0), product of:
0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Eine der größten Herausforderungen für alle technischen Anwendungen ist die sogenannte Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle, also der Problemkreis, wie der bedienende Mensch mit der zu bedienenden Technik kommunizieren kann. Waren die Benutzungsschnittstellen bis Ende der Achtziger Jahre vor allem durch die Notwendigkeit des Benutzers geprägt, sich an die Erfordernisse der Maschine anzupassen, so wurde mit Durchsetzung grafischer Benutzungsoberflächen zunehmend versucht, die Bedienbarkeit so zu gestalten, dass ein Mensch auch ohne größere Einarbeitung in die Lage versetzt werden sollte, seine Befehle der Technik - letztlich also dem Computer - zu übermitteln. Trotz aller Fortschritte auf diesem Gebiet blieb immer die Anforderung, der Mensch solle auf die ihm natürlichste Art und Weise kommunizieren können, mit menschlicher Sprache. Diese Anforderung gilt gerade auch für das Retrieval von Informationen: Warum ist es nötig, die Nutzung von Booleschen Operatoren zu erlernen, nur um eine Suchanfrage stellen zu können? Ein anderes Thema ist die Frage nach der Visualisierung von Wissenszusammenhängen, die sich der Herausforderung stellt, in einem geradezu uferlos sich ausweitenden Informationsangebot weiterhin den Überblick behalten und relevante Informationen schnellstmöglich finden zu können.
- Date
- 25.10.2007 9:51:29
- Source
- Wa(h)re Information: 29. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag Bregenz, 19.-23.9.2006. Hrsg.: Harald Weigel
-
Renker, L.: Exploration von Textkorpora : Topic Models als Grundlage der Interaktion (2015)
0.03
0.028616536 = product of:
0.114466146 = sum of:
0.006615948 = product of:
0.03307974 = sum of:
0.03307974 = weight(_text_:problem in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307974 = score(doc=2380,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.107850194 = weight(_text_:maschine in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107850194 = score(doc=2380,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21420717 = queryWeight, product of:
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.50348544 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Das Internet birgt schier endlose Informationen. Ein zentrales Problem besteht heutzutage darin diese auch zugänglich zu machen. Es ist ein fundamentales Domänenwissen erforderlich, um in einer Volltextsuche die korrekten Suchanfragen zu formulieren. Das ist jedoch oftmals nicht vorhanden, so dass viel Zeit aufgewandt werden muss, um einen Überblick des behandelten Themas zu erhalten. In solchen Situationen findet sich ein Nutzer in einem explorativen Suchvorgang, in dem er sich schrittweise an ein Thema heranarbeiten muss. Für die Organisation von Daten werden mittlerweile ganz selbstverständlich Verfahren des Machine Learnings verwendet. In den meisten Fällen bleiben sie allerdings für den Anwender unsichtbar. Die interaktive Verwendung in explorativen Suchprozessen könnte die menschliche Urteilskraft enger mit der maschinellen Verarbeitung großer Datenmengen verbinden. Topic Models sind ebensolche Verfahren. Sie finden in einem Textkorpus verborgene Themen, die sich relativ gut von Menschen interpretieren lassen und sind daher vielversprechend für die Anwendung in explorativen Suchprozessen. Nutzer können damit beim Verstehen unbekannter Quellen unterstützt werden. Bei der Betrachtung entsprechender Forschungsarbeiten fiel auf, dass Topic Models vorwiegend zur Erzeugung statischer Visualisierungen verwendet werden. Das Sensemaking ist ein wesentlicher Bestandteil der explorativen Suche und wird dennoch nur in sehr geringem Umfang genutzt, um algorithmische Neuerungen zu begründen und in einen umfassenden Kontext zu setzen. Daraus leitet sich die Vermutung ab, dass die Verwendung von Modellen des Sensemakings und die nutzerzentrierte Konzeption von explorativen Suchen, neue Funktionen für die Interaktion mit Topic Models hervorbringen und einen Kontext für entsprechende Forschungsarbeiten bieten können.
- RSWK
- Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation
- Subject
- Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation
-
Mandalka, M.: Open semantic search zum unabhängigen und datenschutzfreundlichen Erschliessen von Dokumenten (2015)
0.01
0.01278946 = product of:
0.10231568 = sum of:
0.10231568 = weight(_text_:maschine in 2133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10231568 = score(doc=2133,freq=10.0), product of:
0.21420717 = queryWeight, product of:
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.47764826 = fieldWeight in 2133, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2133)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Content
- "Open Semantic Desktop Search Zur Tagung des Netzwerk Recherche ist die Desktop Suchmaschine Open Semantic Desktop Search zum unabhängigen und datenschutzfreundlichen Erschliessen und Analysieren von Dokumentenbergen nun erstmals auch als deutschsprachige Version verfügbar. Dank mächtiger Open Source Basis kann die auf Debian GNU/Linux und Apache Solr basierende freie Software als unter Linux, Windows oder Mac lauffähige virtuelle Maschine kostenlos heruntergeladen, genutzt, weitergegeben und weiterentwickelt werden. Dokumentenberge erschliessen Ob grösserer Leak oder Zusammenwürfeln oder (wieder) Erschliessen umfangreicherer (kollaborativer) Recherche(n) oder Archive: Hin und wieder müssen größere Datenberge bzw. Dokumentenberge erschlossen werden, die so viele Dokumente enthalten, dass Mensch diese Masse an Dokumenten nicht mehr alle nacheinander durchschauen und einordnen kann. Auch bei kontinuierlicher Recherche zu Fachthemen sammeln sich mit der Zeit größere Mengen digitalisierter oder digitaler Dokumente zu grösseren Datenbergen an, die immer weiter wachsen und deren Informationen mit einer Suchmaschine für das Archiv leichter auffindbar bleiben. Moderne Tools zur Datenanalyse in Verbindung mit Enterprise Search Suchlösungen und darauf aufbauender Recherche-Tools helfen (halb)automatisch.
Virtuelle Maschine für mehr Plattformunabhängigkeit Die nun auch deutschsprachig verfügbare und mit deutschen Daten wie Ortsnamen oder Bundestagsabgeordneten vorkonfigurierte virtuelle Maschine Open Semantic Desktop Search ermöglicht nun auch auf einzelnen Desktop Computern oder Notebooks mit Windows oder iOS (Mac) die Suche und Analyse von Dokumenten mit der Suchmaschine Open Semantic Search. Als virtuelle Maschine (VM) lässt sich die Suchmaschine Open Semantic Search nicht nur für besonders sensible Dokumente mit dem verschlüsselten Live-System InvestigateIX als abgeschottetes System auf verschlüsselten externen Datenträgern installieren, sondern als virtuelle Maschine für den Desktop auch einfach unter Windows oder auf einem Mac in eine bzgl. weiterer Software und Daten bereits existierende Systemumgebung integrieren, ohne hierzu auf einen (für gemeinsame Recherchen im Team oder für die Redaktion auch möglichen) Suchmaschinen Server angewiesen zu sein. Datenschutz & Unabhängigkeit: Grössere Unabhängigkeit von zentralen IT-Infrastrukturen für unabhängigen investigativen Datenjournalismus Damit ist investigative Recherche weitmöglichst unabhängig möglich: ohne teure, zentrale und von Administratoren abhängige Server, ohne von der Dokumentenanzahl abhängige teure Software-Lizenzen, ohne Internet und ohne spionierende Cloud-Dienste. Datenanalyse und Suche finden auf dem eigenen Computer statt, nicht wie bei vielen anderen Lösungen in der sogenannten Cloud."
-
Context: nature, impact, and role : 5th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, CoLIS 2005, Glasgow 2005; Proceedings (2005)
0.01
0.010359693 = product of:
0.041438773 = sum of:
0.003307974 = product of:
0.01653987 = sum of:
0.01653987 = weight(_text_:problem in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01653987 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.11723843 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0381308 = weight(_text_:maschine in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0381308 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21420717 = queryWeight, product of:
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.17800899 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Mitt. VÖB 59(2006) H.3, S.100-103 (O. Oberhauser): "Dieses als Band 3507 der bekannten, seit 1973 erscheinenden Springer-Serie Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) publizierte Buch versammelt die Vorträge der 5. Tagung "Conceptions of Library and Information Science". CoLIS hat sich in den letzten anderthalb Jahrzehnten als internationales Forum für die Präsentation und Rezeption von Forschung auf den Fachgebieten Informatik und Informationswissenschaft etabliert. Auf die 1992 in Tampere (Finnland) anlässlich des damals 20jährigen Bestehens des dortigen Instituts für Informationswissenschaft abgehaltene erste Tagung folgten weitere in Kopenhagen (1996), Dubrovnik (1999) und Seattle, WA (2002). Die zuletzt an der Strathclyde University in Glasgow (2005) veranstaltete Konferenz war dem Thema "Context" im Rahmen der informationsbezogenen Forschung gewidmet, einem komplexen, dynamischen und multidimensionalen Begriff von grosser Bedeutung für das Verhalten und die Interaktion von Mensch und Maschine. . . .
Mehrere Beiträge befassen sich mit dem Problem der Relevanz. Erica Cosijn und Theo Bothma (Pretoria) argumentieren, dass für das Benutzerverhalten neben der thematischen Relevanz auch verschiedene andere Relevanzdimensionen eine Rolle spielen und schlagen auf der Basis eines (abermals auf Ingwersen zurückgehenden) erweiterten Relevanzmodells vor, dass IR-Systeme die Möglichkeit zur Abgabe auch kognitiver, situativer und sozio-kognitiver Relevanzurteile bieten sollten. Elaine Toms et al. (Kanada) berichten von einer Studie, in der versucht wurde, die schon vor 30 Jahren von Tefko Saracevic3 erstellten fünf Relevanzdimensionen (kognitiv, motivational, situativ, thematisch und algorithmisch) zu operationalisieren und anhand von Recherchen mit einer Web-Suchmaschine zu untersuchen. Die Ergebnisse zeigten, dass sich diese fünf Dimensionen in drei Typen vereinen lassen, die Benutzer, System und Aufgabe repräsentieren. Von einer völlig anderen Seite nähern sich Olof Sundin und Jenny Johannison (Boras, Schweden) der Relevanzthematik, indem sie einen kommunikationsorientierten, neo-pragmatistischen Ansatz (nach Richard Rorty) wählen, um Informationssuche und Relevanz zu analysieren, und dabei auch auf das Werk von Michel Foucault zurückgreifen. Weitere interessante Artikel befassen sich mit Bradford's Law of Scattering (Hjørland & Nicolaisen), Information Sharing and Timing (Widén-Wulff & Davenport), Annotations as Context for Searching Documents (Agosti & Ferro), sowie dem Nutzen von neuen Informationsquellen wie Web Links, Newsgroups und Blogs für die sozial- und informationswissenschaftliche Forschung (Thelwall & Wouters). In Summe liegt hier ein interessantes und anspruchsvolles Buch vor - inhaltlich natürlich nicht gerade einheitlich und geschlossen, doch dies darf man bei einem Konferenzband ohnedies nicht erwarten. Manche der abgedruckten Beiträge sind sicher nicht einfach zu lesen, lohnen aber die Mühe. Auch für Praktiker aus Bibliothek und Information ist einiges dabei, sofern sie sich für die wissenschaftliche Basis ihrer Tätigkeit interessieren. Fachlich einschlägige Spezial- und grössere Allgemeinbibliotheken sollten das Werk daher unbedingt führen.
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005)
0.00
0.0049425145 = product of:
0.019770058 = sum of:
0.009262327 = product of:
0.046311636 = sum of:
0.046311636 = weight(_text_:problem in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046311636 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.010507731 = product of:
0.03152319 = sum of:
0.03152319 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03152319 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Ontologien werden eingesetzt, um durch semantische Fundierung insbesondere für das Dokumentenretrieval eine grundlegend bessere Basis zu haben, als dies gegenwärtiger Stand der Technik ist. Vorgestellt wird eine an der FH Darmstadt entwickelte und eingesetzte Ontologie, die den Gegenstandsbereich Hochschule sowohl breit abdecken und gleichzeitig differenziert semantisch beschreiben soll. Das Problem der semantischen Suche besteht nun darin, dass sie für Informationssuchende so einfach wie bei gängigen Suchmaschinen zu nutzen sein soll, und gleichzeitig auf der Grundlage des aufwendigen Informationsmodells hochwertige Ergebnisse liefern muss. Es wird beschrieben, welche Möglichkeiten die verwendete Software K-Infinity bereitstellt und mit welchem Konzept diese Möglichkeiten für eine semantische Suche nach Dokumenten und anderen Informationseinheiten (Personen, Veranstaltungen, Projekte etc.) eingesetzt werden.
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:58
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005)
0.00
0.0049425145 = product of:
0.019770058 = sum of:
0.009262327 = product of:
0.046311636 = sum of:
0.046311636 = weight(_text_:problem in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046311636 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.010507731 = product of:
0.03152319 = sum of:
0.03152319 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03152319 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Ontologien werden eingesetzt, um durch semantische Fundierung insbesondere für das Dokumentenretrieval eine grundlegend bessere Basis zu haben, als dies gegenwärtiger Stand der Technik ist. Vorgestellt wird eine an der FH Darmstadt entwickelte und eingesetzte Ontologie, die den Gegenstandsbereich Hochschule sowohl breit abdecken und gleichzeitig differenziert semantisch beschreiben soll. Das Problem der semantischen Suche besteht nun darin, dass sie für Informationssuchende so einfach wie bei gängigen Suchmaschinen zu nutzen sein soll, und gleichzeitig auf der Grundlage des aufwendigen Informationsmodells hochwertige Ergebnisse liefern muss. Es wird beschrieben, welche Möglichkeiten die verwendete Software K-Infinity bereitstellt und mit welchem Konzept diese Möglichkeiten für eine semantische Suche nach Dokumenten und anderen Informationseinheiten (Personen, Veranstaltungen, Projekte etc.) eingesetzt werden.
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:25
-
Vechtomova, O.; Robertson, S.E.: ¬A domain-independent approach to finding related entities (2012)
0.00
0.00425688 = product of:
0.01702752 = sum of:
0.0079391375 = product of:
0.039695688 = sum of:
0.039695688 = weight(_text_:problem in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039695688 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.009088382 = product of:
0.027265146 = sum of:
0.027265146 = weight(_text_:29 in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027265146 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- We propose an approach to the retrieval of entities that have a specific relationship with the entity given in a query. Our research goal is to investigate whether related entity finding problem can be addressed by combining a measure of relatedness of candidate answer entities to the query, and likelihood that the candidate answer entity belongs to the target entity category specified in the query. An initial list of candidate entities, extracted from top ranked documents retrieved for the query, is refined using a number of statistical and linguistic methods. The proposed method extracts the category of the target entity from the query, identifies instances of this category as seed entities, and computes similarity between candidate and seed entities. The evaluation was conducted on the Related Entity Finding task of the Entity Track of TREC 2010, as well as the QA list questions from TREC 2005 and 2006. Evaluation results demonstrate that the proposed methods are effective in finding related entities.
- Date
- 27. 1.2016 18:44:29
-
Bando, L.L.; Scholer, F.; Turpin, A.: Query-biased summary generation assisted by query expansion : temporality (2015)
0.00
0.0035474 = product of:
0.0141896 = sum of:
0.006615948 = product of:
0.03307974 = sum of:
0.03307974 = weight(_text_:problem in 1820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307974 = score(doc=1820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 1820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1820)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.007573652 = product of:
0.022720955 = sum of:
0.022720955 = weight(_text_:29 in 1820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022720955 = score(doc=1820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Query-biased summaries help users to identify which items returned by a search system should be read in full. In this article, we study the generation of query-biased summaries as a sentence ranking approach, and methods to evaluate their effectiveness. Using sentence-level relevance assessments from the TREC Novelty track, we gauge the benefits of query expansion to minimize the vocabulary mismatch problem between informational requests and sentence ranking methods. Our results from an intrinsic evaluation show that query expansion significantly improves the selection of short relevant sentences (5-13 words) between 7% and 11%. However, query expansion does not lead to improvements for sentences of medium (14-20 words) and long (21-29 words) lengths. In a separate crowdsourcing study, we analyze whether a summary composed of sentences ranked using query expansion was preferred over summaries not assisted by query expansion, rather than assessing sentences individually. We found that participants chose summaries aided by query expansion around 60% of the time over summaries using an unexpanded query. We conclude that query expansion techniques can benefit the selection of sentences for the construction of query-biased summaries at the summary level rather than at the sentence ranking level.
-
Gnoli, C.; Santis, R. de; Pusterla, L.: Commerce, see also Rhetoric : cross-discipline relationships as authority data for enhanced retrieval (2015)
0.00
0.0035474 = product of:
0.0141896 = sum of:
0.006615948 = product of:
0.03307974 = sum of:
0.03307974 = weight(_text_:problem in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307974 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.007573652 = product of:
0.022720955 = sum of:
0.022720955 = weight(_text_:29 in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022720955 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Subjects in a classification scheme are often related to other subjects belonging to different hierarchies. This problem was identified already by Hugh of Saint Victor (1096?-1141). Still with present-time bibliographic classifications, a user browsing the class of architecture under the hierarchy of arts may miss relevant items classified in building or in civil engineering under the hierarchy of applied sciences. To face these limitations we have developed SciGator, a browsable interface to explore the collections of all scientific libraries at the University of Pavia. Besides showing subclasses of a given class, the interface points users to related classes in the Dewey Decimal Classification, or in other local schemes, and allows for expanded queries that include them. This is made possible by using a special field for related classes in the database structure which models classification authority data. Ontologically, many relationships between classes in different hierarchies are cases of existential dependence. Dependence can occur between disciplines in such disciplinary classifications as Dewey (e.g. architecture existentially depends on building), or between phenomena in such phenomenon-based classifications as the Integrative Levels Classification (e.g. fishing as a human activity existentially depends on fish as a class of organisms). We provide an example of its representation in OWL and discuss some details of it.
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
-
Brandão, W.C.; Santos, R.L.T.; Ziviani, N.; Moura, E.S. de; Silva, A.S. da: Learning to expand queries using entities (2014)
0.00
0.0035303675 = product of:
0.01412147 = sum of:
0.006615948 = product of:
0.03307974 = sum of:
0.03307974 = weight(_text_:problem in 1343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307974 = score(doc=1343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 1343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1343)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.007505522 = product of:
0.022516565 = sum of:
0.022516565 = weight(_text_:22 in 1343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022516565 = score(doc=1343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1343)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- A substantial fraction of web search queries contain references to entities, such as persons, organizations, and locations. Recently, methods that exploit named entities have been shown to be more effective for query expansion than traditional pseudorelevance feedback methods. In this article, we introduce a supervised learning approach that exploits named entities for query expansion using Wikipedia as a repository of high-quality feedback documents. In contrast with existing entity-oriented pseudorelevance feedback approaches, we tackle query expansion as a learning-to-rank problem. As a result, not only do we select effective expansion terms but we also weigh these terms according to their predicted effectiveness. To this end, we exploit the rich structure of Wikipedia articles to devise discriminative term features, including each candidate term's proximity to the original query terms, as well as its frequency across multiple article fields and in category and infobox descriptors. Experiments on three Text REtrieval Conference web test collections attest the effectiveness of our approach, with gains of up to 23.32% in terms of mean average precision, 19.49% in terms of precision at 10, and 7.86% in terms of normalized discounted cumulative gain compared with a state-of-the-art approach for entity-oriented query expansion.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:07:50
-
Jun, W.: ¬A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurus and metadata in a digital library (2003)
0.00
0.00283792 = product of:
0.01135168 = sum of:
0.0052927583 = product of:
0.026463792 = sum of:
0.026463792 = weight(_text_:problem in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026463792 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0060589216 = product of:
0.018176764 = sum of:
0.018176764 = weight(_text_:29 in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018176764 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Knowledge management in digital libraries is a universal problem. Keyword-based searching is applied everywhere no matter whether the resources are indexed databases or full-text Web pages. In keyword matching, the valuable content description and indexing of the metadata, such as the subject descriptors and the classification notations, are merely treated as common keywords to be matched with the user query. Without the support of vocabulary control tools, such as classification systems and thesauri, the intelligent labor of content analysis, description and indexing in metadata production are seriously wasted. New retrieval paradigms are needed to exploit the potential of the metadata resources. Could classification and thesauri, which contain the condensed intelligence of generations of librarians, be used in a digital library to organize the networked information, especially metadata, to facilitate their usability and change the digital library into a knowledge management environment? To examine that question, we designed and implemented a new paradigm that incorporates a classification system, a thesaurus and metadata. The classification and the thesaurus are merged into a concept network, and the metadata are distributed into the nodes of the concept network according to their subjects. The abstract concept node instantiated with the related metadata records becomes a knowledge node. A coherent and consistent knowledge network is thus formed. It is not only a framework for resource organization but also a structure for knowledge navigation, retrieval and learning. We have built an experimental system based on the Chinese Classification and Thesaurus, which is the most comprehensive and authoritative in China, and we have incorporated more than 5000 bibliographic records in the computing domain from the Peking University Library. The result is encouraging. In this article, we review the tools, the architecture and the implementation of our experimental system, which is called Vision.
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.24-28
-
Layfield, C.; Azzopardi, J,; Staff, C.: Experiments with document retrieval from small text collections using Latent Semantic Analysis or term similarity with query coordination and automatic relevance feedback (2017)
0.00
0.00283792 = product of:
0.01135168 = sum of:
0.0052927583 = product of:
0.026463792 = sum of:
0.026463792 = weight(_text_:problem in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026463792 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0060589216 = product of:
0.018176764 = sum of:
0.018176764 = weight(_text_:29 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018176764 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- One of the problems faced by users of databases containing textual documents is the difficulty in retrieving relevant results due to the diverse vocabulary used in queries and contained in relevant documents, especially when there are only a small number of relevant documents. This problem is known as the Vocabulary Gap. The PIKES team have constructed a small test collection of 331 articles extracted from a blog and a Gold Standard for 35 queries selected from the blog's search log so the results of different approaches to semantic search can be compared. So far, prior approaches include recognising Named Entities in documents and queries, and relations including temporal relations, and represent them as `semantic layers' in a retrieval system index. In this work, we take two different approaches that do not involve Named Entity Recognition. In the first approach, we process an unannotated version of the PIKES document collection using Latent Semantic Analysis and use a combination of query coordination and automatic relevance feedback with which we outperform prior work. However, this approach is highly dependent on the underlying collection, and is not necessarily scalable to massive collections. In our second approach, we use an LSA Model generated by SEMILAR from a Wikipedia dump to generate a Term Similarity Matrix (TSM). We automatically expand the queries in the PIKES test collection with related terms from the TSM and submit them to a term-by-document matrix derived by indexing the PIKES collection using the Vector Space Model. Coupled with a combination of query coordination and automatic relevance feedback we also outperform prior work with this approach. The advantage of the second approach is that it is independent of the underlying document collection.
- Date
- 10. 3.2017 13:29:57
-
Bradford, R.B.: Relationship discovery in large text collections using Latent Semantic Indexing (2006)
0.00
0.002824294 = product of:
0.011297176 = sum of:
0.0052927583 = product of:
0.026463792 = sum of:
0.026463792 = weight(_text_:problem in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026463792 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0060044173 = product of:
0.018013252 = sum of:
0.018013252 = weight(_text_:22 in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018013252 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This paper addresses the problem of information discovery in large collections of text. For users, one of the key problems in working with such collections is determining where to focus their attention. In selecting documents for examination, users must be able to formulate reasonably precise queries. Queries that are too broad will greatly reduce the efficiency of information discovery efforts by overwhelming the users with peripheral information. In order to formulate efficient queries, a mechanism is needed to automatically alert users regarding potentially interesting information contained within the collection. This paper presents the results of an experiment designed to test one approach to generation of such alerts. The technique of latent semantic indexing (LSI) is used to identify relationships among entities of interest. Entity extraction software is used to pre-process the text of the collection so that the LSI space contains representation vectors for named entities in addition to those for individual terms. In the LSI space, the cosine of the angle between the representation vectors for two entities captures important information regarding the degree of association of those two entities. For appropriate choices of entities, determining the entity pairs with the highest mutual cosine values yields valuable information regarding the contents of the text collection. The test database used for the experiment consists of 150,000 news articles. The proposed approach for alert generation is tested using a counterterrorism analysis example. The approach is shown to have significant potential for aiding users in rapidly focusing on information of potential importance in large text collections. The approach also has value in identifying possible use of aliases.
- Source
- Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism, and Security, SIAM Data Mining Conference, Bethesda, MD, 20-22 April, 2006. [http://www.siam.org/meetings/sdm06/workproceed/Link%20Analysis/15.pdf]
-
Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002)
0.00
0.0026536025 = product of:
0.02122882 = sum of:
0.02122882 = product of:
0.06368646 = sum of:
0.06368646 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06368646 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:17:40
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.00
0.0026269327 = product of:
0.021015462 = sum of:
0.021015462 = product of:
0.06304638 = sum of:
0.06304638 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06304638 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
-
Ross, J.: ¬A new way of information retrieval : 3-D indexing and concept mapping (2000)
0.00
0.0022720955 = product of:
0.018176764 = sum of:
0.018176764 = product of:
0.054530293 = sum of:
0.054530293 = weight(_text_:29 in 6171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054530293 = score(doc=6171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6171)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 25. 2.1997 10:29:16
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002)
0.00
0.0022720955 = product of:
0.018176764 = sum of:
0.018176764 = product of:
0.054530293 = sum of:
0.054530293 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054530293 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 18. 5.2002 17:29:00
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: ¬The effects of topic complexity and familiarity on cognitive and physical moves in a thesaurus-enhanced search environment (2003)
0.00
0.0022720955 = product of:
0.018176764 = sum of:
0.018176764 = product of:
0.054530293 = sum of:
0.054530293 = weight(_text_:29 in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054530293 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.6, S.517-
-
Stojanovic, N.: On the query refinement in the ontology-based searching for information (2005)
0.00
0.001893413 = product of:
0.015147304 = sum of:
0.015147304 = product of:
0.04544191 = sum of:
0.04544191 = weight(_text_:29 in 2907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04544191 = score(doc=2907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2907)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 5. 4.1996 15:29:15
-
Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016)
0.00
0.0018763805 = product of:
0.015011044 = sum of:
0.015011044 = product of:
0.04503313 = sum of:
0.04503313 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04503313 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03323817 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
