Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.009408668 = product of:
  0.02352167 = sum of:
    0.009978054 = product of:
      0.04989027 = sum of:
        0.04989027 = weight(_text_:problem in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04989027 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.013543615 = weight(_text_:of in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013543615 = score(doc=68,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04177434 = queryNorm
        0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Contrary to optimistic visions of a free internet for all, the problem of the 'digital divide' has persisted for close to twenty-five years. Jan van Dijk considers the state of digital inequality and what we can do to tackle it

Content

What is the digital divide? -- Research and theory of the digital divide -- Motivation and attitude -- Physical access -- Digital and 21st-century skills usage inequality -- Outcomes -- Social and digital inequality -- Solutions to soften the digital divide.

0.004002116 = product of:
  0.02001058 = sum of:
    0.02001058 = product of:
      0.04002116 = sum of:
        0.04002116 = weight(_text_:22 in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04002116 = score(doc=145,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

20.12.2006 18:22:32

Isbn

3-936931-22-4

0.0025538085 = product of:
  0.0127690425 = sum of:
    0.0127690425 = weight(_text_:of in 5364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0127690425 = score(doc=5364,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04177434 = queryNorm
        0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 5364, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5364)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

How sharing the mundane details of daily life did not start with Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube but with pocket diaries, photo albums, and baby books. Social critiques argue that social media have made us narcissistic, that Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube are all vehicles for me-promotion. In The Qualified Self, Lee Humphreys offers a different view. She shows that sharing the mundane details of our lives?what we ate for lunch, where we went on vacation, who dropped in for a visit?didn't begin with mobile devices and social media. People have used media to catalog and share their lives for several centuries. Pocket diaries, photo albums, and baby books are the predigital precursors of today's digital and mobile platforms for posting text and images. The ability to take selfies has not turned us into needy narcissists; it's part of a longer story about how people account for everyday life. Humphreys refers to diaries in which eighteenth-century daily life is documented with the brevity and precision of a tweet, and cites a nineteenth-century travel diary in which a young woman complains that her breakfast didn't agree with her. Diaries, Humphreys explains, were often written to be shared with family and friends. Pocket diaries were as mobile as smartphones, allowing the diarist to record life in real time. Humphreys calls this chronicling, in both digital and nondigital forms, media accounting. The sense of self that emerges from media accounting is not the purely statistics-driven ?quantified self,? but the more well-rounded qualified self. We come to understand ourselves in a new way through the representations of ourselves that we create to be consumed.

0.0013304072 = product of:
  0.0066520358 = sum of:
    0.0066520358 = product of:
      0.033260178 = sum of:
        0.033260178 = weight(_text_:problem in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033260178 = score(doc=3005,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Ein renommierter junger Autor zerpflückt kompetent die Dogmen des digitalen Zeitalters Dem Silicon Valley verdanken wir die technischen Errungenschaften, die unsere Welt so ganz anders machen, als sie einst war. Mehr noch, die Vordenker aus den Eckbüros von Google, Apple und Facebook lieferten die dazugehörige Philosophie gleich mit - und wir alle haben sie verinnerlicht. Das Internetzeitalter gilt als epochaler Einschnitt. Die digitale Revolution stellt die Daseinsberechtigung althergebrachter Strukturen und Institutionen infrage. Politik, Wirtschaft, Kultur und unsere Lebenswege sind heute transparent, individualisiert und jederzeit abrufbar. Evgeny Morozov hinterfragt diese smarte neue Welt mit Verve. Ist sie wirklich besser, sicherer, lebenswerter? Evgeny Morozov entlarvt diese digitale Utopie in seinem weitgreifenden Werk als gefährliche Ideologie. Durch die Brille der digitalen Utopisten sehen wir ineffizient, unberechenbar und ungenügend, kurz: nicht optimiert aus. Wir sind nicht smart genug. Und die Lösung für dieses vermeintliche Problem heißt: mehr Technik - mehr Daten, mehr Algorithmen, mehr Kontrolle. Mit »Smarte neue Welt« drängt Morozov darauf, diese Brille abzusetzen und differenziert darüber nachzudenken, wie wir das digitale Universum mit unserem analogen Dasein sinnvoll in Einklang bringen und Demokratie, Kreativität und Selbstbestimmung retten können.