Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Semantics (Philosophy)"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Nirenburg, S.; Raskin, V.: Ontological semantics (2004) 0.08
    0.083194494 = product of:
      0.20798624 = sum of:
        0.19681333 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19681333 = score(doc=1437,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.853668 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
        0.011172912 = weight(_text_:of in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011172912 = score(doc=1437,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Is an integrated complex of theories, methodologies, descriptions, and implementations, attempts to systematize ideas about both semantic description as representation and manipulation of meaning by computer programs.
    LCSH
    Linguistics / Philosophy
    Semantics (Philosophy)
    Subject
    Linguistics / Philosophy
    Semantics (Philosophy)
  2. Brandom, R.B.: Expressive Vernunft : Begründung, Repräsentation und diskursive Festlegung (2000) 0.06
    0.06189223 = product of:
      0.15473057 = sum of:
        0.14058095 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14058095 = score(doc=489,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.60976285 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
        0.0141496165 = product of:
          0.028299233 = sum of:
            0.028299233 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028299233 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Frankfurter Rundschau Nr.141 vom 20.6.2000, S.22 (J. Habermas)
    LCSH
    Semantics (Philosophy)
    Representation (Philosophy)
    Subject
    Semantics (Philosophy)
    Representation (Philosophy)
  3. Maasen, S.; Weingart, P.: Metaphors and the dynamics of knowledge (2000) 0.06
    0.0582056 = product of:
      0.145514 = sum of:
        0.119286895 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119286895 = score(doc=2,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.5174009 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
        0.0262271 = weight(_text_:of in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0262271 = score(doc=2,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.4014868 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A striking characteristic of modern knowledge society is the rapid spread of certain ideas and concepts back and forth from everyday to scientific discourses, and across many different contexts of meaning. This book opens up a new road to the study of these 'dynamics of knowledge'. Sociologists of knowledge and recently evolutionary theorists have offered explanations that either attribute social attention to particular ideas or shifts of meaning to the predominance of certain groups. Maasen and Weingart, however, offer a radical new explanation that explains knowledge dynamics by reference to the interaction between metaphors and discourses. The study focuses on three major case studies: - The spread of Darwin's phrase 'struggle for existence'; - the reception of Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions in the sciences and humanities; - the diffusion of the concept of 'chaos' from scientific to everyday discourses. In its innovative theoretical approach (called 'metaphor analysis') and rich empirical analysis the book will be of interest for social and cognitive scientists alike
    LCSH
    Semantics (Philosophy)
    Subject
    Semantics (Philosophy)