-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.20
0.20427395 = product of:
0.34045658 = sum of:
0.03980924 = product of:
0.19904618 = sum of:
0.19904618 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19904618 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35416332 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.28149378 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28149378 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.35416332 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.019153563 = weight(_text_:of in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019153563 = score(doc=2514,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
- Source
- WWW '02: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 7-11, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
-
Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Rahman, T.: Design criteria for children's Web portals : the users speak out (2002)
0.06
0.061428476 = product of:
0.15357119 = sum of:
0.011729115 = weight(_text_:of in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011729115 = score(doc=197,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
0.14184207 = sum of:
0.10788299 = weight(_text_:mind in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10788299 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.41376126 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Four focus groups were held with young Web users (10 to 13 years of age) to explore design criteria for Web portals. The focus group participants commented upon four existing portals designed with young users in mind: Ask Jeeves for Kids, KidsClick, Lycos Zone, and Yahooligans! This article reports their first impressions on using these portals, their likes and dislikes, and their suggestions for improvements. Design criteria for children's Web portals are elaborated based upon these comments under four headings: portal goals, visual design, information architecture, and personalization. An ideal portal should cater for both educational and entertainment needs, use attractive screen designs based especially on effective use of color, graphics, and animation, provide both keyword search facilities and browsable subject categories, and allow individual user personalization in areas such as color and graphics
- Date
- 2. 6.2005 10:34:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.2, S.79-94
-
Zeynali-Tazehkandi, M.; Nowkarizi, M.: ¬ A dialectical approach to search engine evaluation (2020)
0.05
0.054881364 = product of:
0.13720341 = sum of:
0.119286895 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.119286895 = score(doc=185,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.5174009 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
0.01791652 = weight(_text_:of in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01791652 = score(doc=185,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Evaluation of information retrieval systems is a fundamental topic in Library and Information Science. The aim of this paper is to connect the system-oriented and the user-oriented approaches to relevant philosophical schools. By reviewing the related literature, it was found that the evaluation of information retrieval systems is successful if it benefits from both system-oriented and user-oriented approaches (composite). The system-oriented approach is rooted in Parmenides' philosophy of stability (immovable) which Plato accepts and attributes to the world of forms; the user-oriented approach is rooted in Heraclitus' flux philosophy (motion) which Plato defers and attributes to the tangible world. Thus, using Plato's theory is a comprehensive approach for recognizing the concept of relevance. The theoretical and philosophical foundations determine the type of research methods and techniques. Therefore, Plato's dialectical method is an appropriate composite method for evaluating information retrieval systems.
-
Gorbunov, A.L.: Relevance of Web documents : ghosts consensus method (2002)
0.05
0.05242667 = product of:
0.08737778 = sum of:
0.009978054 = product of:
0.04989027 = sum of:
0.04989027 = weight(_text_:problem in 1005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04989027 = score(doc=1005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 1005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1005)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.02345823 = weight(_text_:of in 1005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02345823 = score(doc=1005,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1005, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1005)
0.053941496 = product of:
0.10788299 = sum of:
0.10788299 = weight(_text_:mind in 1005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10788299 = score(doc=1005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.41376126 = fieldWeight in 1005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1005)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The dominant method currently used to improve the quality of Internet search systems is often called "digital democracy." Such an approach implies the utilization of the majority opinion of Internet users to determine the most relevant documents: for example, citation index usage for sorting of search results (google.com) or an enrichment of a query with terms that are asked frequently in relation with the query's theme. "Digital democracy" is an effective instrument in many cases, but it has an unavoidable shortcoming, which is a matter of principle: the average intellectual and cultural level of Internet users is very low- everyone knows what kind of information is dominant in Internet query statistics. Therefore, when one searches the Internet by means of "digital democracy" systems, one gets answers that reflect an underlying assumption that the user's mind potential is very low, and that his cultural interests are not demanding. Thus, it is more correct to use the term "digital ochlocracy" to refer to Internet search systems with "digital democracy." Based an the well-known mathematical mechanism of linear programming, we propose a method to solve the indicated problem.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.10, S.783-788
-
Drabenstott, K.M.: Web search strategies (2000)
0.04
0.043242 = product of:
0.108105 = sum of:
0.013543614 = weight(_text_:of in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013543614 = score(doc=1188,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.20732687 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.09456138 = sum of:
0.071922 = weight(_text_:mind in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071922 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.27584085 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.022639386 = weight(_text_:22 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022639386 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Surfing the World Wide Web used to be cool, dude, real cool. But things have gotten hot - so hot that finding something useful an the Web is no longer cool. It is suffocating Web searchers in the smoke and debris of mountain-sized lists of hits, decisions about which search engines they should use, whether they will get lost in the dizzying maze of a subject directory, use the right syntax for the search engine at hand, enter keywords that are likely to retrieve hits an the topics they have in mind, or enlist a browser that has sufficient functionality to display the most promising hits. When it comes to Web searching, in a few short years we have gone from the cool image of surfing the Web into the frying pan of searching the Web. We can turn down the heat by rethinking what Web searchers are doing and introduce some order into the chaos. Web search strategies that are tool-based-oriented to specific Web searching tools such as search en gines, subject directories, and meta search engines-have been widely promoted, and these strategies are just not working. It is time to dissect what Web searching tools expect from searchers and adjust our search strategies to these new tools. This discussion offers Web searchers help in the form of search strategies that are based an strategies that librarians have been using for a long time to search commercial information retrieval systems like Dialog, NEXIS, Wilsonline, FirstSearch, and Data-Star.
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler
-
Langville, A.N.; Meyer, C.D.: Google's PageRank and beyond : the science of search engine rankings (2006)
0.04
0.03760769 = product of:
0.06267948 = sum of:
0.004989027 = product of:
0.024945134 = sum of:
0.024945134 = weight(_text_:problem in 6) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024945134 = score(doc=6,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.14068612 = fieldWeight in 6, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.042174287 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 6) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042174287 = score(doc=6,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.18292886 = fieldWeight in 6, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6)
0.01551616 = weight(_text_:of in 6) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01551616 = score(doc=6,freq=42.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23752278 = fieldWeight in 6, product of:
6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
42.0 = termFreq=42.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Why doesn't your home page appear on the first page of search results, even when you query your own name? How do other Web pages always appear at the top? What creates these powerful rankings? And how? The first book ever about the science of Web page rankings, "Google's PageRank and Beyond" supplies the answers to these and other questions and more. The book serves two very different audiences: the curious science reader and the technical computational reader. The chapters build in mathematical sophistication, so that the first five are accessible to the general academic reader. While other chapters are much more mathematical in nature, each one contains something for both audiences. For example, the authors include entertaining asides such as how search engines make money and how the Great Firewall of China influences research. The book includes an extensive background chapter designed to help readers learn more about the mathematics of search engines, and it contains several MATLAB codes and links to sample Web data sets. The philosophy throughout is to encourage readers to experiment with the ideas and algorithms in the text. Any business seriously interested in improving its rankings in the major search engines can benefit from the clear examples, sample code, and list of resources provided. It includes: many illustrative examples and entertaining asides; MATLAB code; accessible and informal style; and complete and self-contained section for mathematics review.
- Content
- Inhalt: Chapter 1. Introduction to Web Search Engines: 1.1 A Short History of Information Retrieval - 1.2 An Overview of Traditional Information Retrieval - 1.3 Web Information Retrieval Chapter 2. Crawling, Indexing, and Query Processing: 2.1 Crawling - 2.2 The Content Index - 2.3 Query Processing Chapter 3. Ranking Webpages by Popularity: 3.1 The Scene in 1998 - 3.2 Two Theses - 3.3 Query-Independence Chapter 4. The Mathematics of Google's PageRank: 4.1 The Original Summation Formula for PageRank - 4.2 Matrix Representation of the Summation Equations - 4.3 Problems with the Iterative Process - 4.4 A Little Markov Chain Theory - 4.5 Early Adjustments to the Basic Model - 4.6 Computation of the PageRank Vector - 4.7 Theorem and Proof for Spectrum of the Google Matrix Chapter 5. Parameters in the PageRank Model: 5.1 The a Factor - 5.2 The Hyperlink Matrix H - 5.3 The Teleportation Matrix E Chapter 6. The Sensitivity of PageRank; 6.1 Sensitivity with respect to alpha - 6.2 Sensitivity with respect to H - 6.3 Sensitivity with respect to vT - 6.4 Other Analyses of Sensitivity - 6.5 Sensitivity Theorems and Proofs Chapter 7. The PageRank Problem as a Linear System: 7.1 Properties of (I - alphaS) - 7.2 Properties of (I - alphaH) - 7.3 Proof of the PageRank Sparse Linear System Chapter 8. Issues in Large-Scale Implementation of PageRank: 8.1 Storage Issues - 8.2 Convergence Criterion - 8.3 Accuracy - 8.4 Dangling Nodes - 8.5 Back Button Modeling
Chapter 9. Accelerating the Computation of PageRank: 9.1 An Adaptive Power Method - 9.2 Extrapolation - 9.3 Aggregation - 9.4 Other Numerical Methods Chapter 10. Updating the PageRank Vector: 10.1 The Two Updating Problems and their History - 10.2 Restarting the Power Method - 10.3 Approximate Updating Using Approximate Aggregation - 10.4 Exact Aggregation - 10.5 Exact vs. Approximate Aggregation - 10.6 Updating with Iterative Aggregation - 10.7 Determining the Partition - 10.8 Conclusions Chapter 11. The HITS Method for Ranking Webpages: 11.1 The HITS Algorithm - 11.2 HITS Implementation - 11.3 HITS Convergence - 11.4 HITS Example - 11.5 Strengths and Weaknesses of HITS - 11.6 HITS's Relationship to Bibliometrics - 11.7 Query-Independent HITS - 11.8 Accelerating HITS - 11.9 HITS Sensitivity Chapter 12. Other Link Methods for Ranking Webpages: 12.1 SALSA - 12.2 Hybrid Ranking Methods - 12.3 Rankings based on Traffic Flow Chapter 13. The Future of Web Information Retrieval: 13.1 Spam - 13.2 Personalization - 13.3 Clustering - 13.4 Intelligent Agents - 13.5 Trends and Time-Sensitive Search - 13.6 Privacy and Censorship - 13.7 Library Classification Schemes - 13.8 Data Fusion Chapter 14. Resources for Web Information Retrieval: 14.1 Resources for Getting Started - 14.2 Resources for Serious Study Chapter 15. The Mathematics Guide: 15.1 Linear Algebra - 15.2 Perron-Frobenius Theory - 15.3 Markov Chains - 15.4 Perron Complementation - 15.5 Stochastic Complementation - 15.6 Censoring - 15.7 Aggregation - 15.8 Disaggregation
-
Wills, R.S.: Google's PageRank : the math behind the search engine (2006)
0.04
0.03605866 = product of:
0.060097765 = sum of:
0.0066520358 = product of:
0.033260178 = sum of:
0.033260178 = weight(_text_:problem in 5954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033260178 = score(doc=5954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 5954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5954)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.017484732 = weight(_text_:of in 5954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017484732 = score(doc=5954,freq=30.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.26765788 = fieldWeight in 5954, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5954)
0.035961 = product of:
0.071922 = sum of:
0.071922 = weight(_text_:mind in 5954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071922 = score(doc=5954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.27584085 = fieldWeight in 5954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5954)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Approximately 91 million American adults use the Internet on a typical day The number-one Internet activity is reading and writing e-mail. Search engine use is next in line and continues to increase in popularity. In fact, survey findings indicate that nearly 60 million American adults use search engines on a given day. Even though there are many Internet search engines, Google, Yahoo!, and MSN receive over 81% of all search requests. Despite claims that the quality of search provided by Yahoo! and MSN now equals that of Google, Google continues to thrive as the search engine of choice, receiving over 46% of all search requests, nearly double the volume of Yahoo! and over four times that of MSN. I use Google's search engine on a daily basis and rarely request information from other search engines. One day, I decided to visit the homepages of Google. Yahoo!, and MSN to compare the quality of search results. Coffee was on my mind that day, so I entered the simple query "coffee" in the search box at each homepage. Table 1 shows the top ten (unsponsored) results returned by each search engine. Although ordered differently, two webpages, www.peets.com and www.coffeegeek.com, appear in all three top ten lists. In addition, each pairing of top ten lists has two additional results in common. Depending on the information I hoped to obtain about coffee by using the search engines, I could argue that any one of the three returned better results: however, I was not looking for a particular webpage, so all three listings of search results seemed of equal quality. Thus, I plan to continue using Google. My decision is indicative of the problem Yahoo!, MSN, and other search engine companies face in the quest to obtain a larger percentage of Internet search volume. Search engine users are loyal to one or a few search engines and are generally happy with search results. Thus, as long as Google continues to provide results deemed high in quality, Google likely will remain the top search engine. But what set Google apart from its competitors in the first place? The answer is PageRank. In this article I explain this simple mathematical algorithm that revolutionized Web search.
-
Vaughan-Nichols, S.J.: Find it faster (1997)
0.04
0.035024326 = product of:
0.08756082 = sum of:
0.01563882 = weight(_text_:of in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01563882 = score(doc=538,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.071922 = product of:
0.143844 = sum of:
0.143844 = weight(_text_:mind in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.143844 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.5516817 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Presents useful advice on performing searches on the WWW using the major search engines. Recommends that users get to know their sources and subjects and bear in mind the limitations of search sites. Pays particular attention to the use of Boolean searching and notes AltaVista's new approach: Live Topics; as a variation on Boolean searching. Concludes with a brief note on the use of specialized search engines and methods for searching for graphics
-
Fluhr, C.: Crosslingual access to photo databases (2012)
0.03
0.03204936 = product of:
0.0534156 = sum of:
0.017282499 = product of:
0.08641249 = sum of:
0.08641249 = weight(_text_:problem in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08641249 = score(doc=93,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.48735106 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.019153563 = weight(_text_:of in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019153563 = score(doc=93,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
0.016979538 = product of:
0.033959076 = sum of:
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=93,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This paper is about search of photos in photo databases of agencies which sell photos over the Internet. The problem is far from the behavior of photo databases managed by librarians and also far from the corpora generally used for research purposes. The descriptions use mainly single words and it is well known that it is not the best way to have a good search. This increases the problem of semantic ambiguity. This problem of semantic ambiguity is crucial for cross-language querying. On the other hand, users are not aware of documentation techniques and use generally very simple queries but want to get precise answers. This paper gives the experience gained in a 3 year use (2006-2008) of a cross-language access to several of the main international commercial photo databases. The languages used were French, English, and German.
- Date
- 17. 4.2012 14:25:22
-
Waller, V.: Not just information : who searches for what on the search engine Google? (2011)
0.03
0.03134304 = product of:
0.07835759 = sum of:
0.024416098 = weight(_text_:of in 4373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024416098 = score(doc=4373,freq=26.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 4373, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4373)
0.053941496 = product of:
0.10788299 = sum of:
0.10788299 = weight(_text_:mind in 4373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10788299 = score(doc=4373,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.41376126 = fieldWeight in 4373, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4373)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on a transaction log analysis of the type and topic of search queries entered into the search engine Google (Australia). Two aspects, in particular, set this apart from previous studies: the sampling and analysis take account of the distribution of search queries, and lifestyle information of the searcher was matched with each search query. A surprising finding was that there was no observed statistically significant difference in search type or topics for different segments of the online population. It was found that queries about popular culture and Ecommerce accounted for almost half of all search engine queries and that half of the queries were entered with a particular Website in mind. The findings of this study also suggest that the Internet search engine is not only an interface to information or a shortcut to Websites, it is equally a site of leisure. This study has implications for the design and evaluation of search engines as well as our understanding of search engine use.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.4, S.761-775
-
Schultheiß, G.F.: Google, Goggle, Google, ... : Whose Mind is it Anywhere? Identifying and Meeting Divers User Needs in the Ongoing Sattle for Mindshare - NFAIS 47th Annual Conference, Philadelphia, USA vom 27. Februar bis 1. März 2005 (2005)
0.03
0.028368413 = product of:
0.14184207 = sum of:
0.14184207 = sum of:
0.10788299 = weight(_text_:mind in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10788299 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.41376126 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 5.2005 13:38:26
-
Bilal, D.: Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine : III. Cognitive and physical behaviors on fully self-generated search tasks (2002)
0.03
0.027666694 = product of:
0.046111155 = sum of:
0.009978054 = product of:
0.04989027 = sum of:
0.04989027 = weight(_text_:problem in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04989027 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.019153563 = weight(_text_:of in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019153563 = score(doc=5228,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
0.016979538 = product of:
0.033959076 = sum of:
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Bilal, in this third part of her Yahooligans! study looks at children's performance with self-generated search tasks, as compared to previously assigned search tasks looking for differences in success, cognitive behavior, physical behavior, and task preference. Lotus ScreenCam was used to record interactions and post search interviews to record impressions. The subjects, the same 22 seventh grade children in the previous studies, generated topics of interest that were mediated with the researcher into more specific topics where necessary. Fifteen usable sessions form the basis of the study. Eleven children were successful in finding information, a rate of 73% compared to 69% in assigned research questions, and 50% in assigned fact-finding questions. Eighty-seven percent began using one or two keyword searches. Spelling was a problem. Successful children made fewer keyword searches and the number of search moves averaged 5.5 as compared to 2.4 on the research oriented task and 3.49 on the factual. Backtracking and looping were common. The self-generated task was preferred by 47% of the subjects.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.13, S.1170-1183
-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The quest for correct information on the Web : hyper search engines (1997)
0.03
0.027080696 = product of:
0.045134492 = sum of:
0.011641062 = product of:
0.05820531 = sum of:
0.05820531 = weight(_text_:problem in 7453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05820531 = score(doc=7453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 7453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7453)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.013683967 = weight(_text_:of in 7453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013683967 = score(doc=7453,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 7453, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7453)
0.019809462 = product of:
0.039618924 = sum of:
0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 7453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039618924 = score(doc=7453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Presents a novel method to extract from a web object its hyper informative content, in contrast with current search engines, which only deal with the textual information content. This method is not only valuable per se, but it is shown to be able to considerably increase the precision of current search engines. It integrates with existing search engine technology since it can be implemented on top of every search engine, acting as a post-processor, thus automatically transforming a search engine into its corresponding hyper version. Shows how the hyper information can be usefully employed to face the search engines persuasion problem
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue of papers from the 6th International World Wide Web conference, held 7-11 Apr 1997, Santa Clara, California
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, C.: Known-item searching on the World Wide Web (1997)
0.03
0.026994044 = product of:
0.06748511 = sum of:
0.013543615 = weight(_text_:of in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013543615 = score(doc=160,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
0.053941496 = product of:
0.10788299 = sum of:
0.10788299 = weight(_text_:mind in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10788299 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.41376126 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Aims to discover whether known item searches are possible with some of the most popular search engines on the WWW and if the results retrieved using such a search would be satisfactory to users. 4 major search engines (InfoSeek, Excite, AltaVista and Lycos) were tested and compared, using the most sophisticated search techniques available. 39 Web sites were selected and searched by title, and ranked according to the relevance and order of the displayed results. Concludes that these search engines were clearly not designed with known item searches in mind and most users searching the Web are unschooled in the intricacies of database searching and do not know how to construct complex search queries or used advanced searching techniques to the fullest potential. Infoseek Guide was rated the best with Excite and AltaVista also achieving satisfactory results. Lycos A2Z was not ot rated as being well equipped for this type of searching
-
Bouidghaghen, O.; Tamine, L.: Spatio-temporal based personalization for mobile search (2012)
0.03
0.026127039 = product of:
0.043545064 = sum of:
0.009978054 = product of:
0.04989027 = sum of:
0.04989027 = weight(_text_:problem in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04989027 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.016587472 = weight(_text_:of in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016587472 = score(doc=108,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.016979538 = product of:
0.033959076 = sum of:
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The explosion of the information available on the Internet has made traditional information retrieval systems, characterized by one size fits all approaches, less effective. Indeed, users are overwhelmed by the information delivered by such systems in response to their queries, particularly when the latter are ambiguous. In order to tackle this problem, the state-of-the-art reveals that there is a growing interest towards contextual information retrieval (CIR) which relies on various sources of evidence issued from the user's search background and environment, in order to improve the retrieval accuracy. This chapter focuses on mobile context, highlights challenges they present for IR, and gives an overview of CIR approaches applied in this environment. Then, the authors present an approach to personalize search results for mobile users by exploiting both cognitive and spatio-temporal contexts. The experimental evaluation undertaken in front of Yahoo search shows that the approach improves the quality of top search result lists and enhances search result precision.
- Date
- 20. 4.2012 13:19:22
-
Mukherjea, S.; Hirata, K.; Hara, Y.: Towards a multimedia World-Wide Web information retrieval engine (1997)
0.03
0.02525989 = product of:
0.042099815 = sum of:
0.009978054 = product of:
0.04989027 = sum of:
0.04989027 = weight(_text_:problem in 2678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04989027 = score(doc=2678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 2678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2678)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.015142222 = weight(_text_:of in 2678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015142222 = score(doc=2678,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 2678, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2678)
0.016979538 = product of:
0.033959076 = sum of:
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 2678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=2678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2678)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Describes a search engine that integrate text and image search. 1 or more Web site can be indexed for both textual and image information, allowing the user to search based on keywords or images or both. Another problem with the current search engines is that they show the results as pages of scrolled lists; this is not very user-friendly. The search engine allows the user to visualise to results in various ways. Explains the indexing and searching techniques of the search engine and highlights several features of the querying interface to make the retrieval process more efficient. Use examples to show the usefulness of the technology
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue of papers from the 6th International World Wide Web conference, held 7-11 Apr 1997, Santa Clara, California
-
Loia, V.; Pedrycz, W.; Senatore, S.; Sessa, M.I.: Web navigation support by means of proximity-driven assistant agents (2006)
0.03
0.025207913 = product of:
0.042013187 = sum of:
0.008315044 = product of:
0.041575223 = sum of:
0.041575223 = weight(_text_:problem in 5283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041575223 = score(doc=5283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 5283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5283)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.019548526 = weight(_text_:of in 5283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019548526 = score(doc=5283,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 5283, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5283)
0.0141496165 = product of:
0.028299233 = sum of:
0.028299233 = weight(_text_:22 in 5283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028299233 = score(doc=5283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5283)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The explosive growth of the Web and the consequent exigency of the Web personalization domain have gained a key position in the direction of customization of the Web information to the needs of specific users, taking advantage of the knowledge acquired from the analysis of the user's navigational behavior (usage data) in correlation with other information collected in the Web context, namely, structure, content, and user profile data. This work presents an agent-based framework designed to help a user in achieving personalized navigation, by recommending related documents according to the user's responses in similar-pages searching mode. Our agent-based approach is grounded in the integration of different techniques and methodologies into a unique platform featuring user profiling, fuzzy multisets, proximity-oriented fuzzy clustering, and knowledge-based discovery technologies. Each of these methodologies serves to solve one facet of the general problem (discovering documents relevant to the user by searching the Web) and is treated by specialized agents that ultimately achieve the final functionality through cooperation and task distribution.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:59:13
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.4, S.515-527
-
Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008)
0.02
0.0247859 = product of:
0.06196475 = sum of:
0.022345824 = weight(_text_:of in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022345824 = score(doc=844,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
0.039618924 = product of:
0.07923785 = sum of:
0.07923785 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07923785 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 7. 6.2008 16:22:20
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.3, S.xxx
-
MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000)
0.02
0.022392986 = product of:
0.055982463 = sum of:
0.015961302 = weight(_text_:of in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015961302 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
0.04002116 = product of:
0.08004232 = sum of:
0.08004232 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08004232 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Describes the development of EEVL and outlines the services offered. The potential market for EEVL is discussed, and a case study of promotional activities is presented
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:40:22
-
Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999)
0.02
0.022167925 = product of:
0.05541981 = sum of:
0.015800884 = weight(_text_:of in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015800884 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.039618924 = product of:
0.07923785 = sum of:
0.07923785 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07923785 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28
