Search (313 results, page 1 of 16)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchoberflächen"
  1. The, K.H.; Wong, S.F.: Developing a CDS/ISIS-based online cataloguing and information retrieval interface for use in small libraries (1996) 0.03
    0.034088366 = product of:
      0.08522091 = sum of:
        0.070290476 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070290476 = score(doc=2736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.30488142 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
        0.014930432 = weight(_text_:of in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014930432 = score(doc=2736,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the development, by the Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Malaya University, of ONLIS (Online Library Information System), a customized user interface for coputerized MARC cataloguing and information retrieval, targeted for use in small libraries and information centres. Micro CDS/ISIS ver. 3.07 software package and its built in PAscal language were used for the design process and development. Design philosophy centres on the development of a very user friendly and simple interface, capable of mimicking the salient features of a contemporary commercial library package, yet easy to implement and maintain in a small library environment requiring little or no technical expertise. The system incorporates many new features and comprises 2 main components: data entry and file maintenace; and information retrieval. A security system is incorporated into the former environment to ensure data integrity and regulate important file maintenance tasks. While the system is ready for immediate implementation in libraries, modifications and enhancements are currently being undertaken to make it a truly reliable product. Concludes that some degree of user training in MARC and cataloguing using AACR2 is necessary to get the maximum benefits from the systems
    Source
    Malaysian journal of library and information science. 1(1996) no.1, S.1-20
  2. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.02
    0.022167925 = product of:
      0.05541981 = sum of:
        0.015800884 = weight(_text_:of in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015800884 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
        0.039618924 = product of:
          0.07923785 = sum of:
            0.07923785 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07923785 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.367-430
  3. Poynder, R.: WinSPIRS from SilverPlatter (1994) 0.02
    0.021245057 = product of:
      0.05311264 = sum of:
        0.019153563 = weight(_text_:of in 8113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019153563 = score(doc=8113,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 8113, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8113)
        0.033959076 = product of:
          0.06791815 = sum of:
            0.06791815 = weight(_text_:22 in 8113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06791815 = score(doc=8113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the new Windows search interface to SilverPlatter's CD-ROM database products. Introduces the functions of the software. Reports on the experiences of those involved in beta testing the product
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:32:22
  4. Marchionini, G.: Interfaces for end-user information seeking (1992) 0.02
    0.01871911 = product of:
      0.046797775 = sum of:
        0.026608143 = product of:
          0.13304071 = sum of:
            0.13304071 = weight(_text_:problem in 3672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13304071 = score(doc=3672,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.750326 = fieldWeight in 3672, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3672)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.02018963 = weight(_text_:of in 3672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018963 = score(doc=3672,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3672, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3672)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses and illustrates the essential features of user-system interfaces designed to support end user searching. Presents examples of interfaces to support the following basic information seeking functions are presented: problem definition, source selection, problem articulation, examination of results, and information extraction. Argues that present interfaces focus on problem articulation and examination of results functions, and research and development are needed to support the problem definition and information extraction functions
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43(1992), S.156-163
  5. Davis, L.: Designing a search user interface for a digital library (2006) 0.02
    0.017131606 = product of:
      0.042829014 = sum of:
        0.02018963 = weight(_text_:of in 5294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018963 = score(doc=5294,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 5294, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5294)
        0.022639386 = product of:
          0.045278773 = sum of:
            0.045278773 = weight(_text_:22 in 5294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045278773 = score(doc=5294,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5294, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5294)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The author describes some of the challenges, decisions, and processes that affected the design and development of the search user interface for Version 2 of the Digital Library for Earth System Education (DLESE; www.dlese.org), released July 29, 2003. The DLESE is a community-led effort funded by the National Science Foundation and is part of the National Science Digital Library (NSDL).
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:48:54
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.788-791
  6. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.02
    0.016862115 = product of:
      0.04215529 = sum of:
        0.022345824 = weight(_text_:of in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022345824 = score(doc=6958,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
        0.019809462 = product of:
          0.039618924 = sum of:
            0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039618924 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  7. Rose, D.E.: Reconciling information-seeking behavior with search user interfaces for the Web (2006) 0.02
    0.016862115 = product of:
      0.04215529 = sum of:
        0.022345824 = weight(_text_:of in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022345824 = score(doc=5296,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
        0.019809462 = product of:
          0.039618924 = sum of:
            0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039618924 = score(doc=5296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    User interfaces of Web search engines reflect attributes of the underlying tools used to create them, rather than what we know about how people look for information. In this article, the author examines several characteristics of user search behavior: the variety of information-seeking goals, the cultural and situational context of search, and the iterative nature of the search task. An analysis of these characteristics suggests ways that interfaces can be redesigned to make searching more effective for users.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:58:06
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.797-799
  8. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.02
    0.01667951 = product of:
      0.041698776 = sum of:
        0.013683967 = weight(_text_:of in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013683967 = score(doc=5295,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
        0.02801481 = product of:
          0.05602962 = sum of:
            0.05602962 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05602962 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.792-796
  9. Hawk, W.B.; Wang, P.: Users' interaction with the World Wide Web : problems and problem solving (1999) 0.02
    0.016592976 = product of:
      0.041482437 = sum of:
        0.020367617 = product of:
          0.10183808 = sum of:
            0.10183808 = weight(_text_:problem in 6714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10183808 = score(doc=6714,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.5743487 = fieldWeight in 6714, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6714)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.02111482 = weight(_text_:of in 6714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02111482 = score(doc=6714,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 6714, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6714)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we report on the second part of an empirical study designed to observe how users interact with World Wide Web resources. Applying a holistic approach, the researches examine users' cognitive, affective, and physical behaviors during user-Web interaction in order to understand better the nature of information retrieval on the Web, the needs of Web users, and the problem-solving strategies Web users employ. From analyses and the participant verbalizations collected during monitored searches, the researchers developed a taxonomy of problem solving strategies. The coding scheme was developed based on a content analysis of the integrated process data. Information from triangulation follow-up with participants via anonymously completed questionnaires, the taxonomy, and analyses of search transcripts were collected to determine 1) what problems users encountered during the interaction and how users solved these problems; and 2) which problem-solving strategies Web users considered and selected for finding factual information. The focus of the coding was on the participants' cognitive, affective, and physical behaviors in response to the components of the problems encountered, which included problems of the following types: Web interfaces, users' mental models, and the Web information sources. Searching behavior and problem-solving patterns are described and interpreted within the relevant situational context and the problems users encountered are identified and analyzed. Both the problems users faced and their problem-solving approaches endeavored evidence a strong reliance on mental models of the features available on sites, the location of those features, and other interface design concepts
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  10. Dillon, A.; Vaughan, M.: "It's the journey and the destination" : shape and the emergent property of genre in evaluating digital documents (1997) 0.02
    0.016284827 = product of:
      0.040712066 = sum of:
        0.020902606 = weight(_text_:of in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020902606 = score(doc=2889,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
        0.019809462 = product of:
          0.039618924 = sum of:
            0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039618924 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Navigation is a limited metaphor for hypermedia and website use that potentially constraints our understanding of human-computer interaction. Traces the emergence of the navigation metaphor and the emprical analysis of navigation measures in usability evaluation before suggesting an alternative concept to consider: shape. The shape concept affords a richer analytic tool for considering humans' use of digital documents and invokes social level analysis of meaning that are shared among discourse communities who both produce and consume the information resources
    Date
    6. 2.1999 20:10:22
    Source
    New review of hypermedia and multimedia. 1997, no.3, S.91-106
  11. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.02
    0.016279016 = product of:
      0.040697537 = sum of:
        0.018058153 = weight(_text_:of in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018058153 = score(doc=2878,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
        0.022639386 = product of:
          0.045278773 = sum of:
            0.045278773 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045278773 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  12. Lee, D.; Srivastava, S.; Vista, D.: Generating advanced query interfaces (1998) 0.02
    0.016279016 = product of:
      0.040697537 = sum of:
        0.018058153 = weight(_text_:of in 3607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018058153 = score(doc=3607,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3607, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3607)
        0.022639386 = product of:
          0.045278773 = sum of:
            0.045278773 = weight(_text_:22 in 3607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045278773 = score(doc=3607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the design and implementation of an interface generator for constructing advanced visual query WWW interfaces that allow the specification of complex queries. The generated inerfaces share a consistent look and feel. The tool accepts as input a high-level specification of the interface and produces as output its implementation
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
  13. Allen, B.L.: Designing information systems for user abilities and tasks : an experimental study (1998) 0.02
    0.016175106 = product of:
      0.040437765 = sum of:
        0.02345823 = weight(_text_:of in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02345823 = score(doc=2664,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
        0.016979538 = product of:
          0.033959076 = sum of:
            0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033959076 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    With the many choices that can be built into information systems, it is possible to customize such systems for users, based on the tasks that users are accomplishing, on the personal characteristics of users, or a combination of these factors. Reports results of an experiment which detailed logging of use of experimental information systems and was used to determine the optimal configuration of these systems for each user. 4 experimental systems were specially designed and all used a single database of 668 bibliographic records. Tasks were varied, and the cognitive abilities of users were tested to assess one important personal characteristic. Results showed that it was possible to create an optimal configuration to match the cognitive abilities of users, but that it was more difficult to assess which configuration was the best match for specific tasks. The person in task interaction proved to be the least powerful indicator of design configurations. These results suggest that usable information systems can be created for users by careful analysis of the interaction of design features with personal characteristics such as cognitive abilities
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.139-153
  14. Vaughan, M.W.; Resnick, M.L.: Search user interfaces : best practices and future visions (2006) 0.02
    0.015834233 = product of:
      0.03958558 = sum of:
        0.011286346 = weight(_text_:of in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011286346 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
        0.028299233 = product of:
          0.056598466 = sum of:
            0.056598466 = weight(_text_:22 in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056598466 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:37:31
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.777-780
  15. Mochel, K.: Search in the Web shopping environment (2006) 0.02
    0.015664605 = product of:
      0.03916151 = sum of:
        0.01935205 = weight(_text_:of in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01935205 = score(doc=5301,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
        0.019809462 = product of:
          0.039618924 = sum of:
            0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039618924 = score(doc=5301,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The author presents a design case study of a search user interface for Web catalogs in the context of online shopping for consumer products such as clothing, furniture, and sporting goods. The case study provides a review of the user data for the user interface (UI), and the resulting redesign recommendations. Based on the case study and its user data, a set of common user requirements for searching in the context of online shopping is provided.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:23:19
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.819-824
  16. Wildemuth, B.M.: Evidence-based practice in search interface design (2006) 0.01
    0.014990156 = product of:
      0.03747539 = sum of:
        0.017665926 = weight(_text_:of in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017665926 = score(doc=5302,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
        0.019809462 = product of:
          0.039618924 = sum of:
            0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039618924 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    An evidence-based practice approach to search interface design is proposed, with the goal of designing interfaces that adequately support search strategy formulation and reformulation. Relevant findings from studies of information professionals' searching behaviors, end users' searching of bibliographic databases, and search behaviors on the Web are highlighted. Three brief examples are presented to illustrate the ways in which findings from such studies can be used to make decisions about the design of search interfaces. If academic research can be effectively connected with design practice, we can discover which design practices truly are best practices and incorporate them into future search interfaces.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:30:09
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.825-828
  17. Dorner, D.G.; Curtis, A.M.: ¬A comparative review of common user interface products (2004) 0.01
    0.014244139 = product of:
      0.035610348 = sum of:
        0.015800884 = weight(_text_:of in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015800884 = score(doc=2851,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
        0.019809462 = product of:
          0.039618924 = sum of:
            0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039618924 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A common user interface replaces the multiple interfaces found among individual electronic library resources, reducing the time and effort spent by the user in both searching and learning to use a range of databases. Although the primary function of a common user interface is to simplify the search process, such products can be holistic solutions designed to address requirements other than searching, such as user authentication and site branding. This review provides a detailed summary of software currently on the market. The products reviewed were EnCompass, MetaLib, Find-It-All OneSearch, ZPORTAL, CPORTAL, InfoTrac Total Access, MetaFind, MuseSearch, SiteSearch, Single Search, Chameleon Gateway, and WebFeat.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.182-197
  18. Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006) 0.01
    0.014244139 = product of:
      0.035610348 = sum of:
        0.015800884 = weight(_text_:of in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015800884 = score(doc=5287,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
        0.019809462 = product of:
          0.039618924 = sum of:
            0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039618924 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Almost all Web searches are carried out while the user is sitting at a conventional desktop computer connected to the Internet. Although online, handheld, mobile search offers new possibilities, the fast-paced, focused style of interaction may not be appropriate for all user search needs. The authors explore an alternative, relaxed style for Web searching that asynchronously combines an offline handheld computer and an online desktop personal computer. They discuss the role and utility of such an approach, present a tool to meet these user needs, and discuss its relation to other systems.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:37:49
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.838-842
  19. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A framework for indexing and representation of information based on work domain analysis : a fiction classification example (1994) 0.01
    0.014210174 = product of:
      0.035525434 = sum of:
        0.014111101 = product of:
          0.0705555 = sum of:
            0.0705555 = weight(_text_:problem in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0705555 = score(doc=5838,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.39792046 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.021414334 = weight(_text_:of in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021414334 = score(doc=5838,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information retrieval and exploration of work domains through databases and integrated information systems has become increasingly important in many modern work settings (as well as in libraries). The problem space of the users is defined on occasion by the dynamically changing requirements from their tasks and goals. it is argued that IR system design should be based on an analysis of the properties of the work domain, the task situation and the user characteristics. The paper describes a general framework for IR system design that has been used in the design of a library system. A special problem identified from use of the framework in domain analysis of fiction retrieval is treated in more detail: mapping the authors' domain structures to the domain structures expressed in users' needs in indexing and representation of fiction
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  20. Groeninger, B.J.J.O.: On-line / off-line interfaces en gebruikers- (on)vriendelijkheid (1993) 0.01
    0.01416828 = product of:
      0.0354207 = sum of:
        0.0133040715 = product of:
          0.066520356 = sum of:
            0.066520356 = weight(_text_:problem in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.066520356 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.375163 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.02211663 = weight(_text_:of in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02211663 = score(doc=2111,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Modern online information systems have been criticized as being too complicated for the average information seeker. To overcome this problem interfaces have been developed to assist users at all stages of the information transfer process from searching to analysis and evaluation of retrieval data. However, the effectiveness of an interface will depend on the skills of the user. Further development of interfaces will be aided by the use of Windows and mouse controlled systems

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 284
  • m 17
  • s 6
  • r 4
  • el 3
  • p 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications