Search (201 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Cawkell, A.E.: Indexing collections of electronic images : a review (1993) 0.05
    0.053832557 = product of:
      0.13458139 = sum of:
        0.11246476 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 8313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11246476 = score(doc=8313,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.48781028 = fieldWeight in 8313, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8313)
        0.02211663 = weight(_text_:of in 8313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02211663 = score(doc=8313,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 8313, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8313)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses articles in which indexing of image collections receives virtually no mention and continues with comments about articles in which indexing receives special attention. Describes four major indexing systems: Library of Congress, AAT, ICONCLASS and TELCLASS. Discusses new indexing approaches where the use of descriptive words is being replaced by other methods of retrieval. Describes indexing by content (attempting to match an input image to a database collection) and by using a visual thesaurus. Raises questions about indexing for various kinds of collections and discusses indexing philosophy
  2. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.02
    0.022966921 = product of:
      0.057417303 = sum of:
        0.02345823 = weight(_text_:of in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02345823 = score(doc=6158,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
        0.033959076 = product of:
          0.06791815 = sum of:
            0.06791815 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06791815 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
    Imprint
    Cranfield : College of Aeronautics
  3. Wheelbarger, J.J.; Clouse, R.W.: ¬A comparision of a manual library reclassification project with a computer automated library reclassification project (1975) 0.02
    0.022167925 = product of:
      0.05541981 = sum of:
        0.015800884 = weight(_text_:of in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015800884 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
        0.039618924 = product of:
          0.07923785 = sum of:
            0.07923785 = weight(_text_:22 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07923785 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  4. Information for a new age : redefining the librarian (1995) 0.02
    0.019001076 = product of:
      0.04750269 = sum of:
        0.013543615 = weight(_text_:of in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013543615 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
        0.033959076 = product of:
          0.06791815 = sum of:
            0.06791815 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06791815 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.2, S.147 (A. Schultis)
  5. ¬The future of national bibliography (1997) 0.02
    0.019001076 = product of:
      0.04750269 = sum of:
        0.013543615 = weight(_text_:of in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013543615 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
        0.033959076 = product of:
          0.06791815 = sum of:
            0.06791815 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06791815 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Select newsletter 1998, no.22, S.8 (P. Robinson)
  6. Carey, K.; Stringer, R.: ¬The power of nine : a preliminary investigation into navigation strategies for the new library with special reference to disabled people (2000) 0.02
    0.019001076 = product of:
      0.04750269 = sum of:
        0.013543615 = weight(_text_:of in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013543615 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
        0.033959076 = product of:
          0.06791815 = sum of:
            0.06791815 = weight(_text_:22 in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06791815 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  7. Intellectual property and the National Information Infrastructure : a preliminary draft of the report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (1994) 0.02
    0.017704215 = product of:
      0.044260535 = sum of:
        0.015961302 = weight(_text_:of in 7306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015961302 = score(doc=7306,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 7306, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7306)
        0.028299233 = product of:
          0.056598466 = sum of:
            0.056598466 = weight(_text_:22 in 7306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056598466 = score(doc=7306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7306)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.1996 19:53:48
  8. Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015) 0.02
    0.016284827 = product of:
      0.040712066 = sum of:
        0.020902606 = weight(_text_:of in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020902606 = score(doc=2092,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
        0.019809462 = product of:
          0.039618924 = sum of:
            0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039618924 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The object of this literature review is to provide a historical perspective of R and D work in the area of Knowledge Organization (KO). This overview/summarization will provide information on major areas of KO. Journal articles published in core areas of KO: (Classification, Indexing, Thesauri and Taxonomies, Internet and Subject approach to information in the electronic era and Ontologies will be predominantly covered in this literature review. Coverage in this overview may not be completely exhaustive, but it succinctly showcases major developments in the area of KO. This review is a good source of additional reading material on KO apart from prescribed reading material on KO
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:13:38
  9. McCormick, A.; Sutton, A.: Open learning and the Internet in public libraries (1998) 0.02
    0.015357548 = product of:
      0.03839387 = sum of:
        0.021414334 = weight(_text_:of in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021414334 = score(doc=3685,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
        0.016979538 = product of:
          0.033959076 = sum of:
            0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033959076 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents the findings of the South Ayrshire Libraries OPen Learning and the Internet project, Sep 1997 to Oct 1998. The objective was to demonstrate how open learning materials available on the Internet could be integrated with the provision of local open learning resources to provide an enhanced learning environment in public libraries. The main areas of concentration within the project were information skills support to public library users and the provision of WWW based independent materials to learners. The organisation and retrieval of Web based resources for local use was a major issue throughout the project. Recommends the adoption of Dublin Core metadata standards, the connection of databases of resources with searchable wen pages, and the development of thesauri of terms used to index the Web based resources locally. Sstaff training, and the new skills which will need to be developed, were identified as issues. Cost was also identified as a related issue, extending to issues such as access to open learning material and the Internet
    Date
    22. 5.1999 18:55:19
  10. Murphy, F.J.; Pollitt, A.S.; White, P.R.: Matching OPAC user interfaces to user needs (1991) 0.01
    0.01297504 = product of:
      0.0324376 = sum of:
        0.009978054 = product of:
          0.04989027 = sum of:
            0.04989027 = weight(_text_:problem in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04989027 = score(doc=2772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.022459546 = weight(_text_:of in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022459546 = score(doc=2772,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a research project, conducted by the School of Computing and Mathematics and the Library of Huddersfield Polytechnic, into the problem of matching the user interface of OPACs to the needs of users. The project brought together issues involving: Human Computer Instruction (HCI); system methods in the determinination of user requirements; and user centred design, and prototyping in a sequence of design and evaluation cycles. These cycles applied appropriate HCI styles, techniques and equipment (such as Graphical User Interface (GUI) and a mouse pointing device) and incorporated the lessons of each evaluation, to produce an OPAC user interface, ICARUS, which differs considerably in style, behaviour and characteristcs from those commonly encountered in academic and public libraries. The project concluded by evaluating ICARUS, against the BLCMP OPAC with 38 subjects in the Library of Huddersfield Polytechnic, and demonstrating a significant improvement in performance for different tasks for the ICARUS interface
    Imprint
    Huddersfield : The Polytechnic of Huddersfield
  11. ELINOR : Electronic Library Project (1998) 0.01
    0.012209262 = product of:
      0.030523153 = sum of:
        0.013543615 = weight(_text_:of in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013543615 = score(doc=1404,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
        0.016979538 = product of:
          0.033959076 = sum of:
            0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033959076 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the final phase of the work on the ELINOR (Electronic Library INformation Online Retrieval) project at De Montfort University, Leicester, which concluded in 1996. ELINOR was 2 phase project with 3 overall goals: to create a practical pilot system based on a commercial product (Excalibur EFS); to investigate the expansion of a small scale electronic library to a larger, distributed library system; and to develop a more efficient and effective means of accessing and sharing resources within a networked multi campus institution. ELINOR was successful in demonstrating that libraries may conveniently digitize and supply smal collections of high demand materials over a campus network in text anf TIFF format. Operational conditions have so far indicated that the barriers are not technological but involve copyright, use issues and sustainability
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
  12. Koch, T.; Ardö, A.; Brümmer, A.: ¬The building and maintenance of robot based internet search services : A review of current indexing and data collection methods. Prepared to meet the requirements of Work Package 3 of EU Telematics for Research, project DESIRE. Version D3.11v0.3 (Draft version 3) (1996) 0.01
    0.011689891 = product of:
      0.029224727 = sum of:
        0.0066520358 = product of:
          0.033260178 = sum of:
            0.033260178 = weight(_text_:problem in 1669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033260178 = score(doc=1669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 1669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1669)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.022572692 = weight(_text_:of in 1669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022572692 = score(doc=1669,freq=50.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 1669, product of:
              7.071068 = tf(freq=50.0), with freq of:
                50.0 = termFreq=50.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1669)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    After a short outline of problems, possibilities and difficulties of systematic information retrieval on the Internet and a description of efforts for development in this area, a specification of the terminology for this report is required. Although the process of retrieval is generally seen as an iterative process of browsing and information retrieval and several important services on the net have taken this fact into consideration, the emphasis of this report lays on the general retrieval tools for the whole of Internet. In order to be able to evaluate the differences, possibilities and restrictions of the different services it is necessary to begin with organizing the existing varieties in a typological/ taxonomical survey. The possibilities and weaknesses will be briefly compared and described for the most important services in the categories robot-based WWW-catalogues of different types, list- or form-based catalogues and simultaneous or collected search services respectively. It will however for different reasons not be possible to rank them in order of "best" services. Still more important are the weaknesses and problems common for all attempts of indexing the Internet. The problems of the quality of the input, the technical performance and the general problem of indexing virtual hypertext are shown to be at least as difficult as the different aspects of harvesting, indexing and information retrieval. Some of the attempts made in the area of further development of retrieval services will be mentioned in relation to descriptions of the contents of documents and standardization efforts. Internet harvesting and indexing technology and retrieval software is thoroughly reviewed. Details about all services and software are listed in analytical forms in Annex 1-3.
  13. Phillips, J.P.H.: Information services to science parks : the cooperative approach at Belasis Hall Technology Park (1995) 0.01
    0.010048111 = product of:
      0.025120277 = sum of:
        0.009978054 = product of:
          0.04989027 = sum of:
            0.04989027 = weight(_text_:problem in 3331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04989027 = score(doc=3331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 3331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3331)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.015142222 = weight(_text_:of in 3331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015142222 = score(doc=3331,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 3331, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3331)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a project aimed at setting up a 1 stop scientific, technical and commerical information service for technical companies at Belasis Hall Technology Park, Cleveland, UK. The project accomplished this by: identifying the information needs of the existing and potential tenants; establishing how best to meet those needs (paying a special attention to the role of online information) and setting up a 1 year pilot project: disseminating the results of the project for replication elsewhere and making information provision an integral part of science park design; promoting information as a basis for problem solving and decision making; promoting close links with the users; determining which sources and methods of delivery are most relevant (patents, trade directories, market research reports, online searches); developing a charging policy for the service with a view to the service becoming self financing; increasing the partners' experience in resource sharing; developing a training needs analysis for both providers and users; developing performance indicators; and monitoring the service provided
  14. Kaytoue, M.; Kuznetsov, S.O.; Assaghir, Z.; Napoli, A.: Embedding tolerance relations in concept lattices : an application in information fusion (2010) 0.01
    0.009710538 = product of:
      0.024276346 = sum of:
        0.008315044 = product of:
          0.041575223 = sum of:
            0.041575223 = weight(_text_:problem in 4843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041575223 = score(doc=4843,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 4843, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4843)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.015961302 = weight(_text_:of in 4843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015961302 = score(doc=4843,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4843, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4843)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) is a well founded mathematical framework used for conceptual classication and knowledge management. Given a binary table describing a relation between objects and attributes, FCA consists in building a set of concepts organized by a subsumption relation within a concept lattice. Accordingly, FCA requires to transform complex data, e.g. numbers, intervals, graphs, into binary data leading to loss of information and poor interpretability of object classes. In this paper, we propose a pre-processing method producing binary data from complex data taking advantage of similarity between objects. As a result, the concept lattice is composed of classes being maximal sets of pairwise similar objects. This method is based on FCA and on a formalization of similarity as a tolerance relation (reexive and symmetric). It applies to complex object descriptions and especially here to interval data. Moreover, it can be applied to any kind of structured data for which a similarity can be dened (sequences, graphs, etc.). Finally, an application highlights that the resulting concept lattice plays an important role in information fusion problem, as illustrated with a real-world example in agronomy.
  15. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.01
    0.009055755 = product of:
      0.045278773 = sum of:
        0.045278773 = product of:
          0.090557545 = sum of:
            0.090557545 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.090557545 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  16. Clavel, G.; Dale, P.; Heiner-Freiling, M.; Kunz, M.; Landry, P.; MacEwan, A.; Naudi, M.; Oddy, P.; Saget, A.: CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access : final report (1999) 0.01
    0.008648566 = product of:
      0.021621415 = sum of:
        0.005820531 = product of:
          0.029102655 = sum of:
            0.029102655 = weight(_text_:problem in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029102655 = score(doc=6067,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.1641338 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.015800884 = weight(_text_:of in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015800884 = score(doc=6067,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This final report defines the problem of multilingual subject access, summarises the work carried out by the CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access from autumn 1997 until February 1999 and its results, identifies and discusses issues to be resolved, and presents a proposal for a prototype to the directors of the institutions concerned. For a summary of results, and the proposal, see 'CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access: proposals for discussion, March 18th 1999. This report will be distributed to members of the CENL and posted on the GABRIEL website. Genevieve Clavel has compiled it on the basis of the group's reports, discussions within the group and comments provided by the partners.
    Content
    Backgrund to the study: The question of multilingual access to bibliographic databases affects not only searchers in countries in which several languages are spoken such as Switzerland, but also all those who search material in databases containing material in more than one language, which is the case in the majority of scientific or research databases. he growth of networks means that we can easily access catalogues outside our own immediate circle - in another town, another country, another continent. In doing so we encounter problems concerning not only search interfaces, but also concerning subject access or even author access in another language. In France for example, each document, independently of the language in which it has been written, is indexed using a French-language subject heading language. Thus, in order to search by subject headings for documents written in English or German, held in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, the researcher from abroad has to master the French language. In theory, the indexer should be able to analyse a document and assign headings in his/her native language, while the user should be able to search in his/her native language. The language of the document itself should have no influence on the language of the subject heading language used for indexing nor on the language used for searching. (Practically speaking of course, there are restrictions, since there is a limit to the number of languages in which subject headings languages could be maintained and thus in which the user may search.) In the example below, we are concerned with three languages: German, French and English. If we can imagine a system in which there are equivalents among subject headings in these three languages, the following scenario may be envisaged: a German-speaking indexer will use German-language subject headings to index all the documents received, regardless of the language in which they are written. The user may search for these documents by entering subject headings in German, but also in French or in English, thanks to the equivalents that have been established, in French or in English without the necessity to know the other languages or the structure of the other SHLs. Ideally, this approach should not be confined to one database, but would allow the different databases to be brought together in virtual system: an English-speaking user in London should be able to search the database of the Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt using English-language headings, and retrieving documents which have been indexed using the German subject headings' list.
  17. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Local Area Networks and Wide Area Networks for libraries (1995) 0.01
    0.007923785 = product of:
      0.039618924 = sum of:
        0.039618924 = product of:
          0.07923785 = sum of:
            0.07923785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07923785 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04177434 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  18. University of California users look at MELVYL : results of a survey of users of the University of California prototype online union catalog (1983) 0.01
    0.006634989 = product of:
      0.033174943 = sum of:
        0.033174943 = weight(_text_:of in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033174943 = score(doc=2423,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.50784504 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Editor
    University of California, Systemwide administration, Library Studies and Research Division
  19. Larson, R.R.: Users look at online catalogs : results of a national survey of users and non-users of online public access catalogs (1982) 0.01
    0.006634989 = product of:
      0.033174943 = sum of:
        0.033174943 = weight(_text_:of in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033174943 = score(doc=2972,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.50784504 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Imprint
    Berkeley, Calif. : Division of Library Automation and Library Research and Analysis Group, Univ. of California
    Issue
    Pt.1 of 2
  20. Ellis, D.; Furner-Hines, J.; Willett, P.: ¬The creation of hypertext links in full-text documents (1994) 0.01
    0.006206464 = product of:
      0.03103232 = sum of:
        0.03103232 = weight(_text_:of in 1084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03103232 = score(doc=1084,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04177434 = queryNorm
            0.47504556 = fieldWeight in 1084, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1084)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An important stage in the process of retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objetcs; an operation that is usually undertaken manually such as the allocation of subject index terms to documents. Reports results of a study in which several different sets of hypertext links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full text documents. The similarity between the members of each pair of link sets was then evaluated. Results indicated that little similarity existed among the link sets, a finding comparable with those of studies of inter indexer consistency, which suggests that there is generally only a low level of agreemenet between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by indexers. Concludes with that part of the study designed to test the validity of making these kinds of assumptions in the context of hypertext link sets

Authors

Languages

  • e 182
  • d 17
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 25
  • m 3
  • s 1
  • More… Less…