-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.22
0.21678177 = product of:
0.2709772 = sum of:
0.03980924 = product of:
0.19904618 = sum of:
0.19904618 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19904618 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35416332 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.19904618 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19904618 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35416332 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.015142222 = weight(_text_:of in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015142222 = score(doc=562,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.016979538 = product of:
0.033959076 = sum of:
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8 = coord(4/5)
- Abstract
- Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
- Source
- Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2004), 1-4 November 2004, Brighton, UK
-
Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009)
0.21
0.21045999 = product of:
0.35076663 = sum of:
0.18860914 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18860914 = score(doc=1858,freq=10.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.8180827 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.02031542 = weight(_text_:of in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02031542 = score(doc=1858,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.14184207 = sum of:
0.10788299 = weight(_text_:mind in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10788299 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.41376126 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The verification of the functionality of the Philosophy classification schema adopted at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore needs to take into account the context: the Library is both a special and a multidisciplinary library; its collections reflect the history of the SNS. The philosophy collection has a specialized and selective nature, as do others within the same Library; the Library is open shelves, and classification is used as a shelving and location device. Bearing in mind the above conditions, the second part of this paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of the schema in order to highlight its suitability to match a coherent classification of documents with the effective fruition by the users.
- Date
- 9. 1.2010 14:22:20
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The philosophy of classifying philosophy"
-
Searle, J.R.: Geist : eine Einführung (2006)
0.20
0.20377822 = product of:
0.25472277 = sum of:
0.052817684 = product of:
0.13204421 = sum of:
0.09878404 = weight(_text_:seele in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09878404 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3055735 = queryWeight, product of:
7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.32327422 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.033260178 = weight(_text_:problem in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033260178 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.11246476 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11246476 = score(doc=4506,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.48781028 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.009029076 = weight(_text_:of in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009029076 = score(doc=4506,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.08041125 = product of:
0.1608225 = sum of:
0.1608225 = weight(_text_:mind in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1608225 = score(doc=4506,freq=10.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.61679894 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8 = coord(4/5)
- Abstract
- Kaum ein Gebiet der modernen Philosophie ist komplexer, kaum eines wird kontroverser diskutiert als die Philosophie des Geistes. Wie in keiner anderen philosophischen Disziplin manifestieren sich hier zudem die Konflikte zwischen zwei scheinbar unversöhnlichen Welten: der Welt des Geistes bzw. der Geisteswissenschaften und der Welt des Gehirns bzw. der modernen Naturwissenschaften. Mit John R. Searle hat nun einer der Großmeister des Fachs eine historisch-systematische Einführung geschrieben, die zugleich eine neue Sicht auf dieses "wichtigste Thema der gegenwärtigen Philosophie" bietet. Ausgehend von "Descartes und anderen Katastrophen", präpariert Searle zwölf zentrale Probleme der Philosophie des Geistes, verwirft selbst die einflußreichsten Theorien und schlägt eigene Lösungen jenseits der Zwei-Welten-Lehre vor. Entstanden sind provozierende Analysen etwa des klassischen Leib- Seele-Problems und des Zusammenhangs zwischen Bewußtsein und Neurobiologie. Dem Unbewußten ist ebenso ein eigenes Kapitel gewidmet wie der Wahrnehmung und dem schwierigen Problem der mentalen Verursachung. Searles temperamentvoll geschriebenes Buch, das nicht mit Kritik an eingefahrenen Denkmustern geizt und mit einem Minimum an philosophischem Jargon auskommt, ist eine umfassende Einführung in die Philosophie des Geistes für Studierende und ein Lesevergnügen für jeden, der sich für die tiefen Fragen der Philosophie interessiert. "Die zeitgenössische Philosophie des Geistes ist insofern einzigartig, als die berühmtesten und einflußreichsten Theorien auf diesem Gebiet falsch sind."
- Footnote
- Originaltitel: Mind
- LCSH
- Philosophy of Mind
- RSWK
- Philosophy of Mind / Einführung
- Subject
- Philosophy of Mind / Einführung
Philosophy of Mind
-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.18
0.17974035 = product of:
0.29956725 = sum of:
0.04644411 = product of:
0.23222055 = sum of:
0.23222055 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23222055 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35416332 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.23222055 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23222055 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35416332 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.020902606 = weight(_text_:of in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020902606 = score(doc=306,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Bettella, C.; Carrara, M.: Classifications: on philosophers and librarians (2009)
0.18
0.17770977 = product of:
0.22213721 = sum of:
0.009978054 = product of:
0.04989027 = sum of:
0.04989027 = weight(_text_:problem in 3265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04989027 = score(doc=3265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 3265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3265)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.119286895 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 3265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.119286895 = score(doc=3265,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.5174009 = fieldWeight in 3265, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3265)
0.016587472 = weight(_text_:of in 3265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016587472 = score(doc=3265,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 3265, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3265)
0.0762848 = product of:
0.1525696 = sum of:
0.1525696 = weight(_text_:mind in 3265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1525696 = score(doc=3265,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.58514684 = fieldWeight in 3265, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8 = coord(4/5)
- Abstract
- Consider the following argument: (Premise 1) If a librarian is a classifier and (Premise 2) a librarian classifies (among the other things) the documents of a library, and (Premise 3) to classify documents is equivalent to classifying the objects of a knowledge base, but (Premise 4) to classify the objects of a knowledge base is equivalent to producing an ontology, or is equivalent to doing some ontological engineering, then (Conclusion) a classifier- i.e. a librarian-is an ontologist. The same train of thought can be followed for those disciplinary experts who support librarians in activities like classification. Thus, librarians and experts are classifiers, and if classifiers are ontologists, librarians and experts are ontologists. Here the problem arises: which specific kind of ontology is in the librarian's mind? Which one in the expert's mind? We argue that the librarians' ontology is completely different from the expert's. Experts' ontology is a thematic ontology, librarians' ontology is generalistic. This conclusion is particularly clear in the philosophical case.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The philosophy of classifying philosophy"
-
Intentionalität zwischen Subjektivität und Weltbezug (2003)
0.18
0.17635785 = product of:
0.2204473 = sum of:
0.008315044 = product of:
0.041575223 = sum of:
0.041575223 = weight(_text_:problem in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041575223 = score(doc=508,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14058095 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14058095 = score(doc=508,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.60976285 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
0.007980651 = weight(_text_:of in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007980651 = score(doc=508,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.12216854 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
0.06357067 = product of:
0.12714134 = sum of:
0.12714134 = weight(_text_:mind in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12714134 = score(doc=508,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.48762235 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8 = coord(4/5)
- Abstract
- Die Intentionalität bzw. der repräsentationale Gehalt mentaler Zustände und sprachlicher Äußerungen steht nach wie vor im Zentrum der Sprachphilosophie und der Philosophie des Geistes. Auf das Problem der Naturalisierbarkeit von Intentionalität ist heute der Funktionalismus die vorherrschende Antwort, der jedoch von zwei Seiten her in Frage gestellt wird: zum einen von jenen, die eine externalistische Individuierung mentaler Zustände propagieren und damit einer intern-funktionalistischen Individuierung widersprechen, und zum andern von jenen, die argumentieren, dass sich der phänomenale Charakter mentaler Zustände funktionalistisch nicht beschreiben lässt. Die Erörterung dieser Fragen wird zudem von der Schwierigkeit überlagert, dass sich nur über eine Untersuchung der komplexen Formen der Zuschreibung intentionaler Zustände erschließt, wovon bei intentionalen Zuständen die Rede ist. Die im Band versammelten Beiträge kreisen um die genannten Probleme und legen die aktuellen Auffassungen prominenter deutscher Philosophen zu diesen Fragen dar. Mit Beiträgen von: A. Beckermann, D. Bodrozic, U. Haas-Spohn, H.-D. Heckmann, F. Hofmann, H Kamp, A. Kemmerling, N. Kompa, M. Kupffer, T. Metzinger, U. Meyer, A. Newen, M. Nida-Rümelin, K. Saporiti, M. Siebel, W. Spohn, M. Textor.
- LCSH
- Intentionality (Philosophy) / Congresses ; Subjectivity / Congresses
- RSWK
- Intentionalität / Subjektivität / Philosophy of Mind
- Subject
- Intentionalität / Subjektivität / Philosophy of Mind
Intentionality (Philosophy) / Congresses ; Subjectivity / Congresses
-
Jacob, E.K.: ¬The legacy of pragmatism : implications for knowledge organization in a pluralistic universe (2000)
0.17
0.1733235 = product of:
0.28887248 = sum of:
0.098406665 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098406665 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.426834 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.024983391 = weight(_text_:of in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024983391 = score(doc=119,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.16548242 = sum of:
0.12586349 = weight(_text_:mind in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12586349 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.48272148 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039618924 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Although postmodernist philosophy is frequently characterized as unconstrained relativism and radical skepticism, It shares with pragmatism a strong antipathy to modernity's separation of mind and body, of subject and object, of the human and the material. The criticisms raised by postmodernism have significant implications for current understandings of classification theory and practice. The critical tenets of pragmatism provide an epistemological framework for the development of classificatory structures that will address current failings and respond to the demands of an increasingly interdisciplinary store of knowledge
- Pages
- S.16-22
- Source
- Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
-
Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008)
0.16
0.1592644 = product of:
0.398161 = sum of:
0.13276611 = product of:
0.33191526 = sum of:
0.2653949 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2653949 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35416332 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.066520356 = weight(_text_:problem in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066520356 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.375163 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.2653949 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2653949 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35416332 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- "Wer überhaupt spricht oder schreibt, sollte sich verständlich ausdrücken. Das ist eine auf den ersten Blick einleuchtende Forderung. denn wozu äußert er sich, wenn er nicht verstanden werden will?" (Luhmann 2005, 193) So einfach scheint unser Problem zu sein - doch so einfach ist es nicht.
- Content
- Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.15
0.15326574 = product of:
0.2554429 = sum of:
0.03980924 = product of:
0.19904618 = sum of:
0.19904618 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19904618 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35416332 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.19904618 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19904618 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35416332 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.016587472 = weight(_text_:of in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016587472 = score(doc=2918,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Robinson, G.: Time out of mind : a critical consideration of Table 1g (2000)
0.14
0.14132427 = product of:
0.35331064 = sum of:
0.022345824 = weight(_text_:of in 369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022345824 = score(doc=369,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 369, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=369)
0.33096483 = sum of:
0.25172698 = weight(_text_:mind in 369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25172698 = score(doc=369,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.96544296 = fieldWeight in 369, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=369)
0.07923785 = weight(_text_:22 in 369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07923785 = score(doc=369,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 369, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=369)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.28-31
-
Thornley, C.; Gibb, F.: Meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR) (2009)
0.13
0.13443762 = product of:
0.2240627 = sum of:
0.18597113 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18597113 = score(doc=2682,freq=14.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.80664045 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.023941955 = weight(_text_:of in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023941955 = score(doc=2682,freq=36.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.36650562 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.0141496165 = product of:
0.028299233 = sum of:
0.028299233 = weight(_text_:22 in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028299233 = score(doc=2682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the question of whether the differences between meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR) have implications for the use of philosophy in supporting research in IR. Design/methodology/approach - The approach takes the form of a conceptual analysis and literature review. Findings - There are some differences in the role of meaning in terms of purpose, content and use which should be clarified in order to assist a productive relationship between the philosophy of language and IR. Research limitations/implications - This provides some new theoretical insights into the philosophical context of IR. It suggests that further productive work on the central concepts within IR could be achieved through the use of a methodology which analyses how exactly these concepts are discussed in other disciplines and the implications of any differences in the way in which they may operate in IR. Originality/value - The paper suggests a new perspective on the relationship between philosophy and IR by exploring the role of meaning in these respective disciplines and highlighting differences, as well as similarities, with particular reference to the role of information as well as meaning in IR. This contributes to an understanding of two of the central concepts in IR, meaning and information, and the ways in which they are related. There is a history of work in IR and information science (IS) examining dilemmas and the paper builds on this work by relating it to some similar dilemmas in philosophy. Thus it develops the theory and conceptual understanding of IR by suggesting that philosophy could be used as a way of exploring intractable dilemmas in IR.
- Date
- 23. 2.2009 17:22:29
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.1, S.133-150
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.13
0.13028319 = product of:
0.21713865 = sum of:
0.06638306 = product of:
0.16595763 = sum of:
0.13269745 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13269745 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35416332 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.033260178 = weight(_text_:problem in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033260178 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.13269745 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13269745 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35416332 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.018058153 = weight(_text_:of in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018058153 = score(doc=701,freq=32.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Blair, D.: Wittgenstein, language and information : "Back to the Rough Ground!" (2006)
0.13
0.12971117 = product of:
0.21618526 = sum of:
0.1590492 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1590492 = score(doc=828,freq=16.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.6898679 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.021175062 = weight(_text_:of in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021175062 = score(doc=828,freq=44.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.3241498 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
44.0 = termFreq=44.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.035961 = product of:
0.071922 = sum of:
0.071922 = weight(_text_:mind in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071922 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.27584085 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This book is an extension of the discussions presented in Blair's 1990 book "Language and Representation in Information Retrieval", which was selected as the "Best Information Science Book of the Year" by the American Society for Information Science (ASIS). That work stated that the Philosophy of Language had the best theory for understanding meaning in language, and within the Philosophy of Language, the work of philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein was found to be most perceptive. The success of that book provided an incentive to look more deeply into Wittgenstein's philosophy of language, and how it can help us to understand how to represent the intellectual content of information. This is what the current title does, and by using this theory it creates a firm foundation for future Information Retrieval research. The work consists of four related parts. Firstly, a brief overview of Wittgenstein's philosophy of language and its relevance to information systems. Secondly, a detailed explanation of Wittgenstein's late philosophy of language and mind. Thirdly, an extended discussion of the relevance of his philosophy to understanding some of the problems inherent in information systems, especially those systems which rely on retrieval based on some representation of the intellectual content of that information. And, fourthly, a series of detailed footnotes which cite the sources of the numerous quotations and provide some discussion of the related issues that the text inspires.
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of Documentation 63(2007) no.2, S.xxx-xxx (B. Hjoerland)
- LCSH
- Language and languages / Philosophy
- Subject
- Language and languages / Philosophy
-
Floridi, L.: Open problems in the philosophy of information (2004)
0.12
0.124973536 = product of:
0.20828922 = sum of:
0.011641062 = product of:
0.05820531 = sum of:
0.05820531 = weight(_text_:problem in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05820531 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.17044537 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17044537 = score(doc=2635,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.7392982 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
0.026202802 = weight(_text_:of in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026202802 = score(doc=2635,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The philosophy of information (PI) is a new area of research with its own field of investigation and methodology. This article, based an the Herbert A. Simon Lecture of Computing and Philosophy I gave at Carnegie Mellon University in 2001, analyses the eighteen principal open problems in PI. Section 1 introduces the analysis by outlining Herbert Simon's approach to PI. Section 2 discusses some methodological considerations about what counts as a good philosophical problem. The discussion centers an Hilbert's famous analysis of the central problems in mathematics. The rest of the article is devoted to the eighteen problems. These are organized into five sections: problems in the analysis of the concept of information, in semantics, in the study of intelligence, in the relation between information and nature, and in the investigation of values.
-
Bettella, C.; Carrara, M.: ¬The philosophy of classifying philosophy : preface to special issue (2009)
0.12
0.11968403 = product of:
0.29921007 = sum of:
0.26673362 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26673362 = score(doc=3264,freq=20.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
1.1569437 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
0.032476448 = weight(_text_:of in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032476448 = score(doc=3264,freq=46.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.4971524 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
46.0 = termFreq=46.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Most of the articles published in this special issue are a selection of the talks given at the workshop on Classifying the Human Sciences: The Case of Philosophy held on February 2, 2007, at the University of Padua (Padua, Italy). The conference has been organized by the Library of the Department of Philosophy (University of Padua), in association with the Italian ISKO Chapter, and sponsored by the University Library System of the University of Padua. The aim of the workshop was to discuss themes of knowledge organization for philosophy and classification of philosophical data, specifically in libraries of philosophy. For these reasons experts on classification theory, philosophers, and philosophy librarians were invited to the event. We would like to thank the participants and the organizers of the workshop; special thanks to Prof. Francesca Menegoni and Prof. Luca Illetterati, Directors of the Library of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Padua; Claudio Gnoli, chair of the Italian ISKO Chapter, and Pio Liverotti, Coordinator of theHumanities Libraries at the University of Padua.
- Footnote
- Einführung in ein Themenheft "The philosophy of classifying philosophy"
-
Lemos, N.M.: ¬An introduction to the theory of knowledge (2007)
0.12
0.11569425 = product of:
0.19282374 = sum of:
0.02231161 = product of:
0.11155804 = sum of:
0.11155804 = weight(_text_:problem in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11155804 = score(doc=63,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.6291675 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14609602 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14609602 = score(doc=63,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.63368416 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
0.024416098 = weight(_text_:of in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024416098 = score(doc=63,freq=26.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Epistemology or the theory of knowledge is one of the cornerstones of analytic philosophy, and this book provides a clear and accessible introduction to the subject. It discusses some of the main theories of justification, including foundationalism, coherentism, reliabilism, and virtue epistemology. Other topics include the Gettier problem, internalism and externalism, skepticism, the problem of epistemic circularity, the problem of the criterion, a priori knowledge, and naturalized epistemology. Intended primarily for students taking a first class in epistemology, this lucid and well-written text would also provide an excellent introduction for anyone interested in knowing more about this important area of philosophy.
- Content
- Knowledge, truth, and justification -- The traditional analysis and the Gettier problem -- Foundationalism -- The coherence theory of justification -- Reliabilism and virtue epistemology -- Internalism, externalism, and epistemic circularity -- Skepticism -- The problem of the criterion -- The a priori -- Naturalized epistemology
- LCSH
- Knowledge, Theory of
- Series
- Cambridge introductions to philosophy
- Subject
- Knowledge, Theory of
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.11
0.113057226 = product of:
0.1884287 = sum of:
0.14058095 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14058095 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.60976285 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.019548526 = weight(_text_:of in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019548526 = score(doc=613,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.028299233 = product of:
0.056598466 = sum of:
0.056598466 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056598466 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Content
- Abschnitte zu: The origins of citation indexing in science - Citation analysis in sociology, history and philosophy of science - From ASIS to ASIST
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Hjoerland, B.: Arguments for philosophical realism in library and information science (2004)
0.11
0.109595545 = product of:
0.18265924 = sum of:
0.12174669 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12174669 = score(doc=832,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.52807015 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.015961302 = weight(_text_:of in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015961302 = score(doc=832,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.04495125 = product of:
0.0899025 = sum of:
0.0899025 = weight(_text_:mind in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0899025 = score(doc=832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.34480107 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The basic realist claim is that a mind-independent reality exists. It should be common sense knowledge to accept this claim, just as any theories that try to deny it soon become inconsistent because reality strikes back. In spite of this, antirealist philosophies flourish, not only in philosophy but also in the behavioral and cognitive sciences and in information science. This is highly problematic because it removes the attention from reality to subjective phenomena with no real explanatory power. Realism should not be confused with the view that all scientific claims are true or with any other kind of naiveté concerning knowledge claims. The opposite of realism may be termed antirealism, idealism, or nominalism. Although many people confuse empiricism and positivism with realism, these traditions are by nature strongly antirealist, which is why a sharp distinction should be made between empiricism and realism. Empirical research should not be founded on assumptions about "the given" of observations, but should recognize the theory-laden nature of observations. Domain analysis represents an attempt to reintroduce a realist perspective in library and information science. A realist conception of relevance, information seeking, information retrieval, and knowledge organization is outlined. Information systems of all kinds, including research libraries and public libraries, should be informed by a realist philosophy and a realist information science.
- Footnote
- Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
-
Bewußtsein : Beiträge aus der Gegenwartsphilosophie (2005)
0.11
0.10839319 = product of:
0.13549149 = sum of:
0.005820531 = product of:
0.029102655 = sum of:
0.029102655 = weight(_text_:problem in 4381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029102655 = score(doc=4381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.1641338 = fieldWeight in 4381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4381)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.06958402 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 4381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06958402 = score(doc=4381,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.3018172 = fieldWeight in 4381, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4381)
0.005586456 = weight(_text_:of in 4381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005586456 = score(doc=4381,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.08551798 = fieldWeight in 4381, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4381)
0.054500498 = product of:
0.109000996 = sum of:
0.109000996 = weight(_text_:mind in 4381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109000996 = score(doc=4381,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.4180491 = fieldWeight in 4381, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8 = coord(4/5)
- Abstract
- DAS STANDARDWERK in der Philosophie des Geistes seit 10 Jahren - jetzt in 5. Auflage mit einer um mehr als 60 Seiten erweiterten Bibliographie, die Publikationen zur Philosophie des Geistes und angrenzender Disziplinen von 1970-2004 erfaßt (über 2700 Titel). Kann man sich vorstellen, dass so etwas wie bewusstes Erleben auf der Grundlage physikalischer Vorgänge entstehen konnte? Sind subjektives Empfinden und das Entstehen einer Innenperspektive überhaupt als Bestandteil der natürlichen Ordnung der Dinge denkbar - oder werden wir an dieser Stelle mit einem letztlich unauflöslichen Mysterium konfrontiert, mit einem weissen Fleck auf der Landkarte des wissenschaftlichen Weltbildes, der vielleicht aus prinzipiellen Gründen immer ein weisser Fleck bleiben muss? Das Problem des Bewusstseins bildet heute - vielleicht zusammen mit der Frage nach der Entstehung unseres Universums - die äusserste Grenze des menschlichen Strebens nach Erkenntnis. Es erscheint deshalb vielen als das letzte grosse Rätsel überhaupt und als die grösste theoretische Herausforderung der Gegenwart. Mit Beiträgen von: Ansgar Beckermann, Peter Bieri, Dieter Birnbacher, Ned Block, Tyler Burge, David J. Chalmers, Patricia S. Churchland, Daniel C. Dennett, Owen Flanagan, Rick Grush, Güven Güzeldere, Robert Kirk, Martin Kurthen, Joseph Levine, William G. Lycan, Colin McGinn, Thomas Metzinger, Norton Nelkin, Martine Nida-Rümelin, David Papineau, Diana Raffman, Georges Rey, David M. Rosenthal, Eva Ruhnau, Michael Tye, Robert Van Gulick, Kathy Wilkes. Siehe auch: "Conscious Experience", gekürzte englischsprachige Version des Buches "Bewußtsein".
- Content
- Kommentare: Metzingers blauer Sammelband [...] bietet den zur Zeit vielseitigsten und aktuellsten deutschsprachigen Einstieg in die Thematik. Obwohl als Studienwerkzeug konzipiert, kann der Band auch das Interesse weiterer Kreise gewinnen. M. Lenzen, Frankfurter Rundschau. In den letzten Jahren hat es keine Veröffentlichung gegeben, die so kenntnisreich und informativ in die Gegenwartsdiskussion um das Bewusstsein einführte. H. Breuer, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Dieser monumentale Band ist nicht nur ein weiterer Sammelband auf dem wachsenden Markt von Büchern über Bewusstseinsforschung, sondern eine interdisziplinäre Bestandsaufnahme der philosophischen Problemstellungen, die mit der gegenwärtigen Kognitions- und Bewusstseinsforschung verbunden sind, herausgegeben von einem der führenden Vertreter dieser Bemühungen [...]; ein hervorragendes Buch, spannend zu lesen, wohl fundiert, ohne falsche Versprechungen, das »Rätsel des Bewusstseins« bald (oder jemals?) zufriedenstellend klären zu können. M. von Brück in Dialog der Religionen. Alles in allem: Dieses Werk gehört zu einem der wichtigsten Bücher der letzten Jahre zum Thema des menschlichen Bewusstseins. Mind Management. Wer heute zur Frage des Bewusstseins etwas sagen will und dies nicht nur aus neurologischer Sicht, wird an diesem Buch nicht vorbeigehen können. A. Resch, Grenzgebiete der Wissenschaft. Der Band stellt in einer bislang kaum dagewesenen Konzentration die führenden Autoren auf diesem Gebiet vor. Diese äusserst hochkarätige Textsammlung sollte nicht nur in der aktuellen Philosophie des Geistes, sondern auch in der empirischen Forschung grosse Wirkung entfalten. R. Schatta in Bundeswehr-Verwaltung. Der Leser wird, begleitet durch eine überaus sachkundige allgemeine und mehrere auf die neun Teile des Buches bezogene spezielle Einführungen des Herausgebers, durch die Diskussionslandschaft geführt. Er wird mit den begrifflichen Grundlagen der Diskussion vertraut gemacht und auf die Gratwanderung zwischen physischen und phänomenalen Wirklichkeiten geschickt. A. Ziemke, Psychologie Heute
- RSWK
- Philosophy of Mind / Bewusstsein
- Subject
- Philosophy of Mind / Bewusstsein
-
Day, R.E.: Community as event (2004)
0.10
0.10195024 = product of:
0.2548756 = sum of:
0.22492953 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22492953 = score(doc=827,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.97562057 = fieldWeight in 827, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=827)
0.029946059 = weight(_text_:of in 827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029946059 = score(doc=827,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.458417 = fieldWeight in 827, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=827)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Concepts and technologies of information and communication are discussed in the context of political philosophy and ontology. The questions of what is the meaning and sense of "information" and "communication" in modern political philosophy and what are the roles of technologies of such are discussed in regard to two notions of power and community: constitutional and constituent. The responsibility of designing and using information and communication technologies in response to an ontologically primary "social net" is discussed. One, ethical-political, role of the relation of philosophy to information is discussed.
- Footnote
- Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
