-
Cossham, A.F.: Models of the bibliographic universe (2017)
0.05
0.049356025 = product of:
0.123390056 = sum of:
0.098406665 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098406665 = score(doc=3817,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23055021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.426834 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
0.024983391 = weight(_text_:of in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024983391 = score(doc=3817,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- What kinds of mental models do library catalogue users have of the bibliographic universe in an age of online and electronic information? Using phenomenography and grounded analysis, it identifies participants' understanding, experience, and conceptualisation of the bibliographic universe, and identifies their expectations when using library catalogues. It contrasts participants' mental models with existing LIS models, and explores the nature of the bibliographic universe. The bibliographic universe can be considered to be a social object that exists because it is inscribed in catalogue records, cataloguing codes, bibliographies, and other bibliographic tools. It is a socially constituted phenomenon.
- Content
- A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Monash University in 2017 Faculty of Information Technology. Vgl.: https://figshare.com/articles/Models_of_the_bibliographic_universe/5216347.
- Imprint
- Melbourne : Monash University; Faculty of Information Technology
-
D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011)
0.03
0.030249493 = product of:
0.05041582 = sum of:
0.009978054 = product of:
0.04989027 = sum of:
0.04989027 = weight(_text_:problem in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04989027 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.28137225 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.02345823 = weight(_text_:of in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02345823 = score(doc=4190,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.016979538 = product of:
0.033959076 = sum of:
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- National exercises for the evaluation of research activity by universities are becoming regular practice in ever more countries. These exercises have mainly been conducted through the application of peer-review methods. Bibliometrics has not been able to offer a valid large-scale alternative because of almost overwhelming difficulties in identifying the true author of each publication. We will address this problem by presenting a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometric datasets for large-scale research assessments. The application proposed concerns the Italian university system, comprising 80 universities and a research staff of over 60,000 scientists. The key advantage of the proposed approach is the ease of implementation. The algorithms are of practical application and have considerably better scalability and expandability properties than state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches. Moreover, the performance in terms of precision and recall, which can be further improved, seems thoroughly adequate for the typical needs of large-scale bibliometric research assessments.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:06:52
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.257-269
-
LeBoeuf, P.: ¬A strange model named FRBRoo (2012)
0.03
0.028211588 = product of:
0.07052897 = sum of:
0.016587472 = weight(_text_:of in 1904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016587472 = score(doc=1904,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 1904, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1904)
0.053941496 = product of:
0.10788299 = sum of:
0.10788299 = weight(_text_:mind in 1904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10788299 = score(doc=1904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.41376126 = fieldWeight in 1904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Libraries and museums developed rules for the description of their collections prior to formalizing the underlying conceptualization reflected in such rules. That formalizing process took place in the 1990s and resulted in two independent conceptual models: FRBR for bibliographic information (published in 1998), and CIDOC CRM for museum information (developed from 1996 on, and issued as ISO standard 21127 in 2006). An international working group was formed in 2003 with the purpose of harmonizing these two models. The resulting model, FRBROO, was published in 2009. It is an extension to CIDOC CRM, using the formalism in which the former is written. It adds to FRBR the dynamic aspects of CIDOC CRM, and a number of refinements (e.g. in the definitions of Work and Manifestation). Some modifications were made in CIDOC CRM as well. FRBROO was developed with Semantic Web technologies in mind, and lends itself well to the Linked Data environment; but will it be used in that context?
- Content
- Contribution to a special issue "The FRBR family of conceptual models: toward a linked future"
-
Guerrini, M.: Cataloguing based on bibliographic axiology (2010)
0.03
0.028211588 = product of:
0.07052897 = sum of:
0.016587472 = weight(_text_:of in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016587472 = score(doc=2624,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
0.053941496 = product of:
0.10788299 = sum of:
0.10788299 = weight(_text_:mind in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10788299 = score(doc=2624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.41376126 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The article presents the work of Elaine Svenonius The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization, translated in Italian and published by Le Lettere of Florence, within the series Pinakes, with the title Il fondamento intellettuale dell'organizzazione dell'informazione. The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization defines the theoretical aspects of library science, its philosophical basics and principles, the purposes that must be kept in mind, abstracting from the technology used in a library. The book deals with information organization and bibliographic universe, in particular using the bibliographic entities defined in FRBR, at first. Then, it analyzes all the specific languages by which works and subjects are treated. This work, already acknowledged as a classic, organizes, synthesizes and make easily understood the whole complex of knowledge, practices and procedures developed in the last 150 years.
-
Normore, L.F.: "Here be dragons" : a wayfinding approach to teaching cataloguing (2012)
0.02
0.024185965 = product of:
0.04030994 = sum of:
0.008315044 = product of:
0.041575223 = sum of:
0.041575223 = weight(_text_:problem in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041575223 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17731056 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23447686 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.017845279 = weight(_text_:of in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017845279 = score(doc=1903,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
0.0141496165 = product of:
0.028299233 = sum of:
0.028299233 = weight(_text_:22 in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028299233 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Teaching cataloguing requires the instructor to make strategic decisions about how to approach the variety and complexity of the field and to provide an adequate theoretical foundation while preparing students for their entry into the world of practice. Accompanying these challenges are the tactical demands of providing this instruction in a distance education environment. Rather than focusing on ways to support learners in catalogue record production, instructors may use a problem solving and decision making approach to instruction. In this paper, a way to conceptualize a decision making approach that builds on a foundation provided by theories of information navigation is described. This approach, which is called "wayfinding", teaches by having students learn to find their way in the sets of rules that are commonly used. The method focuses on instruction about the structural features of rule sets, providing basic definitions of what each of the "places" in the rule sets contain (e.g., "formatting personal names" in Chapter 22 of AACR2R) and about ways to navigate those structures, enabling students to learn not only about common rules but also about less well known cataloguing practices ("dragons"). It provides both pragmatic and pedagogical benefits and helps develop links between cataloguing practices and their theoretical foundations.
- Footnote
- Beitrag innerhalb eines special issue "Online delivery of cataloging and classification education and instruction"
-
Jones, E.: RDA and serials cataloguing (2013)
0.02
0.02037361 = product of:
0.050934028 = sum of:
0.0149730295 = weight(_text_:of in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0149730295 = score(doc=2088,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2292085 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
0.035961 = product of:
0.071922 = sum of:
0.071922 = weight(_text_:mind in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071922 = score(doc=2088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2607373 = queryWeight, product of:
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.27584085 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In this manual, expert cataloguer Ed Jones shows you how to catalogue serials using the new cataloguing standard, RDA: Resource Description and Access. Serials and continuing resources present a variety of unique challenges in bibliographic management, from special issues and unnumbered supplements to recording the changes that a long-running periodical can experience over time. Easing cataloguers through the RDA: Resource Description and Access transition by showing the continuity with past practice, serials cataloguing expert Jones frames the practice within the structure of the FRBR and FRAD conceptual models on which RDA is based. With serials' special considerations in mind, this essential guide explains the familiarities and differences between AACR2 and RDA and demonstrates how serials cataloguers' work fits in the cooperative context of OCLC, CONSER and NACO. Jones looks in detail at the process of cataloguing serials and ongoing integrating resources using RDA, from attributes and relationships between works to identifying related entities. Finally, looking at the possibilities offered by Linked Data, he presents examples of how RDA records can ultimately engage with the Semantic Web.
- Content
- Introduction to serials and serials cataloguing - Getting to know RDA: changes from AACR2 - Searching and the universe of serials - Cataloguing serials and ongoing integrating resources using RDA - General instructions relating to serials cataloguing using RDA and MARC 21 - Attributes of resources (Manifestations and Items and the Works and Expressions they embody) - Relationships between resources - Identifying Works and Expressions - Identifying related entities - Online serials and CONSER provider-neutral records - Ongoing integrating resources - RDA and Linked Data
- LCSH
- Cataloging of serial publications
Cataloging of integrating resources
- Subject
- Cataloging of serial publications
Cataloging of integrating resources
-
Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011)
0.02
0.018404907 = product of:
0.046012264 = sum of:
0.026202802 = weight(_text_:of in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026202802 = score(doc=2592,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.019809462 = product of:
0.039618924 = sum of:
0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039618924 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In June 2009, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Heads of Technical Services in Large Research Libraries Interest Group established the Task Force on Cost/Value Assessment of Bibliographic Control to address recommendation 5.1.1.1 of On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, which focused on developing measures for costs, benefits, and value of bibliographic control. This paper outlines results of that task force's efforts to develop and articulate metrics for evaluating the cost and value of cataloging activities specifically, and offers some next steps that the community could take to further the profession's collective understanding of the costs and values associated with bibliographic control.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015)
0.02
0.016284827 = product of:
0.040712066 = sum of:
0.020902606 = weight(_text_:of in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020902606 = score(doc=2609,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.019809462 = product of:
0.039618924 = sum of:
0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039618924 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Noruzi, A.: FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2012)
0.02
0.016279016 = product of:
0.040697537 = sum of:
0.018058153 = weight(_text_:of in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018058153 = score(doc=4564,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
0.022639386 = product of:
0.045278773 = sum of:
0.045278773 = weight(_text_:22 in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045278773 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic relationships are one of the most active research areas in knowledge organization, especially in cataloguing. This study attempts to examine and map the FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) bibliographic relationships with Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships, and to a ssess the congruence between them. The FRBR conceptual model provides a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships in chapter 5, illustrating them in 11 tables. This study shows that there is considerable congruence between these two taxonomies.
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:13:52
-
O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015)
0.02
0.015775634 = product of:
0.039439082 = sum of:
0.022459546 = weight(_text_:of in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022459546 = score(doc=2610,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.016979538 = product of:
0.033959076 = sum of:
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010)
0.02
0.015664605 = product of:
0.03916151 = sum of:
0.01935205 = weight(_text_:of in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01935205 = score(doc=4309,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.019809462 = product of:
0.039618924 = sum of:
0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039618924 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bloss, M.E.: Testing RDA at Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science : the students' perspectives (2011)
0.01
0.014990156 = product of:
0.03747539 = sum of:
0.017665926 = weight(_text_:of in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017665926 = score(doc=1899,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.019809462 = product of:
0.039618924 = sum of:
0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039618924 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS) was one of a funnel group of graduate schools of library and information science selected to test RDA. A seminar specifically for this purpose was conducted from August to December 2010. Fifteen students participated in the test, creating records in AACR2 and in RDA, encoding them in the MARC format, and responding to the required questionnaires. In addition to record creation, the students were also asked to submit a final paper in which they described their experiences and recommended whether or not to accept RDA as a replacement for AACR2.
- Date
- 25. 5.2015 18:36:22
-
Knowlton, S.A.: Power and change in the US cataloging community (2014)
0.01
0.014990156 = product of:
0.03747539 = sum of:
0.017665926 = weight(_text_:of in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017665926 = score(doc=2599,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
0.019809462 = product of:
0.039618924 = sum of:
0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039618924 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The US cataloging community is an interorganizational network with the Library of Congress (LC) as the lead organization, which reserves to itself the power to shape cataloging rules. Peripheral members of the network who are interested in modifying changes to the rules or to the network can use various strategies for organizational change that incorporate building ties to the decision-makers located at the hub of the network. The story of William E. Studwell's campaign for a subject heading code illustrates how some traditional scholarly methods of urging change-papers and presentations-are insufficient to achieve reform in an interorganizational network, absent strategies to build alliances with the decision makers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012)
0.01
0.014244139 = product of:
0.035610348 = sum of:
0.015800884 = weight(_text_:of in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015800884 = score(doc=2546,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.019809462 = product of:
0.039618924 = sum of:
0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039618924 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- As we move toward implementing RDA: Resource Description and Access, I have been pondering how we might manage the transition to new cataloging rules effectively. I was a practicing cataloger when Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., was implemented and remember it as a traumatic process. The published literature that I found focused on the impact of the then-new rules on specific formats and genres, but no one seems to have addressed the process of implementation and what type of training worked well (or did not). After a bit of sleuthing, I found a pertinent presentation by Arlene G. Taylor, which she graciously agreed to repurpose as this guest editorial.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.01
0.014244139 = product of:
0.035610348 = sum of:
0.015800884 = weight(_text_:of in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015800884 = score(doc=2600,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.019809462 = product of:
0.039618924 = sum of:
0.039618924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039618924 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011)
0.01
0.013958423 = product of:
0.034896057 = sum of:
0.01791652 = weight(_text_:of in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01791652 = score(doc=4199,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.016979538 = product of:
0.033959076 = sum of:
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:25:32
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.395-405
-
Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011)
0.01
0.013958423 = product of:
0.034896057 = sum of:
0.01791652 = weight(_text_:of in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01791652 = score(doc=302,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.016979538 = product of:
0.033959076 = sum of:
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Sapon-White, R.: E-book cataloging workflows at Oregon State University (2014)
0.01
0.013426805 = product of:
0.03356701 = sum of:
0.016587472 = weight(_text_:of in 2604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016587472 = score(doc=2604,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2604, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2604)
0.016979538 = product of:
0.033959076 = sum of:
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 2604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=2604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Among the many issues associated with integrating e-books into library collections and services, the revision of existing workflows in cataloging units has received little attention. The experience designing new workflows for e-books at Oregon State University Libraries since 2008 is described in detail from the perspective of three different sources of e-books. These descriptions highlight where the workflows applied to each vendor's stream differ. A workflow was developed for each vendor, based on the quality and source of available bibliographic records and the staff member performing the task. Involving cataloging staff as early as possible in the process of purchasing e-books from a new vendor ensures that a suitable workflow can be designed and implemented as soon as possible. This ensures that the representation of e-books in the library catalog is not delayed, increasing the likelihood that users will readily find and use these resources that the library has purchased.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014)
0.01
0.013426805 = product of:
0.03356701 = sum of:
0.016587472 = weight(_text_:of in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016587472 = score(doc=2608,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.016979538 = product of:
0.033959076 = sum of:
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016)
0.01
0.013426805 = product of:
0.03356701 = sum of:
0.016587472 = weight(_text_:of in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016587472 = score(doc=2946,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06532493 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.016979538 = product of:
0.033959076 = sum of:
0.033959076 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959076 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14628662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04177434 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The author revisits the development of RDA from its inception in 2005 through to its initial release in 2010. The development effort is set in the context of an evolving digital environment that was transforming both the production and dissemination of information resources and the technologies used to create, store, and access data describing those resources. The author examines the interplay between strategic commitments to align RDA with new conceptual models, emerging database structures, and metadata developments in allied communities, on the one hand, and compatibility with AACR2 legacy databases on the other. Aspects of the development effort examined include the structuring of RDA as a resource description language, organizing the new standard as a working tool, and refining guidelines and instructions for recording RDA data.
- Date
- 17. 5.2016 19:22:40
