Search (55 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"f"
  1. Martin, P.; Vaillant, S.: ¬Le records management : Concept nouveau? Pratique ancienne? (1998) 0.06
    0.055130847 = product of:
      0.11026169 = sum of:
        0.11026169 = sum of:
          0.040322836 = weight(_text_:data in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040322836 = score(doc=2430,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
          0.06993886 = weight(_text_:22 in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06993886 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Records management has appeared lately in France to designate the management of organizational documents and electronic data an enterprise must retain as proof of its activities and transactions. An international standard is under discussion to address issues concerned with retention. At the same time, some information professionals are finding themselves increasingly involved with active company records, since the role of records manager requires skills found in the professions of archivists, information scientist and quality controller. Presents examples which pose the question, is records management in fact a new profession or simply a new form of a familiar job?
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    31.12.1998 15:32:22
  2. Martin, P.: Intranet presentation technique et perspectives (1996) 0.05
    0.05130119 = product of:
      0.10260238 = sum of:
        0.10260238 = sum of:
          0.04608324 = weight(_text_:data in 6998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04608324 = score(doc=6998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 6998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6998)
          0.056519132 = weight(_text_:22 in 6998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056519132 = score(doc=6998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers how Intranets are being developed by adapting Internet technologies. Discusses the Internet technologies of data transport, file transfer, massage exchange, and information and document dissemination on the Web and explains how these may be implemented within an organization. Documentation professionals may use these techniques to improve the circulation of information within a company and increase the accumulation of knowledge
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  3. Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997) 0.05
    0.05112662 = product of:
      0.10225324 = sum of:
        0.10225324 = sum of:
          0.05986389 = weight(_text_:data in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05986389 = score(doc=2246,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.3630661 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
          0.04238935 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238935 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the apparently unattainable goal of compatibility of information languages. While controlled languages can improve retrieval performance within a single system, they make cooperation across different systems more difficult. The Internet and downloading accentuate this adverse outcome and the acceleration of data exchange aggravates the problem of compatibility. Defines this familiar concept and demonstrates that coherence is just as necessary as it was for indexing languages, the proliferation of which has created confusion in grouped data banks. Describes 2 types of potential solutions, similar to those applied to automatic translation of natural languages: - harmonizing the information languages themselves, both difficult and expensive, or, the more flexible solution involving automatic harmonization of indexing formulae based on pre established concordance tables. However, structural incompatibilities between post coordinated languages and classifications may lead any harmonization tools up a blind alley, while the paths of a universal concordance model are rare and narrow
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Integration of information data banks and compatibility of indexing languages
  4. Cliche, M.; Panneton, J.: ¬Les bibliothèques publiques et l'autoroute de l'information : depasser le role de point d'access (1997) 0.04
    0.04488854 = product of:
      0.08977708 = sum of:
        0.08977708 = sum of:
          0.040322836 = weight(_text_:data in 1579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040322836 = score(doc=1579,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 1579, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1579)
          0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 1579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049454242 = score(doc=1579,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1579, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1579)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the responsibilities and obligations of libraries in an electronic environment. These include: ensuring access, mostly free, to the Internet; training the public to use it; developing research and navigational tools; using the Internet as a gateway; participating in the organization of data; providing access to the documentary heritage; collection development; forging links with other database producers; providng a forum for dissemination projects; speaking out against censorship; and involving users and the local community in the development of databases
    Date
    6. 9.2000 14:13:22
  5. Piccotti, P.: ¬Les nouvelles technologies et la recherche documentaire (1998) 0.04
    0.04488854 = product of:
      0.08977708 = sum of:
        0.08977708 = sum of:
          0.040322836 = weight(_text_:data in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040322836 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
          0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049454242 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Venice University Institute of Architecture has developed Easyweb, a software package to integrate its heterogeneous non-compatible bibliographic and multimedia databases, standardise access and create internal links, by transferring all existing OPAC applications to the Web. Features include importation of UNIMARC data, multiple window searching, multibase searching and special applications, e.g. circulation management. Easyweb is notable user friendly and has become the point of reference for OPACs in Italy
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1998, no.178, S.20-22
  6. Tomitch, M.-M.: ¬Le role de l'IFLA en matière de normalisation (1998) 0.04
    0.04488854 = product of:
      0.08977708 = sum of:
        0.08977708 = sum of:
          0.040322836 = weight(_text_:data in 2243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040322836 = score(doc=2243,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 2243, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2243)
          0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 2243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049454242 = score(doc=2243,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2243, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2243)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discussing the work of the IFLA classification and indexing section, part of the Bibliographic Control Division. Activities related to subject access include (1) Guidelines for subject authority and reference entries; (2) the 1993 Lisbon conference on 'subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90s'; (3) research on the principles underlying subject heading languages; and (4) recommendations for classification data format. Future areas of work include compatibility between indexing languages and multilingual access
    Date
    17.11.1998 16:22:09
  7. Mitev, N.; Hildreth, C.R.: ¬Les catalogues interactifs en Grande-Bretagne et aux Etats-Unis (1989) 0.02
    0.024727121 = product of:
      0.049454242 = sum of:
        0.049454242 = product of:
          0.098908484 = sum of:
            0.098908484 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098908484 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 34(1989) no.1, S.22-47
  8. Degez, D.; Masse, C.: ¬L'indexation à l'ère d'Internet (2000) 0.02
    0.024727121 = product of:
      0.049454242 = sum of:
        0.049454242 = product of:
          0.098908484 = sum of:
            0.098908484 = weight(_text_:22 in 6140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098908484 = score(doc=6140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6140)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  9. Lardy, J.-P.: ¬Les outils de recherche d'information sur Internet : guides, listes thematiques et index (1996) 0.02
    0.021194674 = product of:
      0.04238935 = sum of:
        0.04238935 = product of:
          0.0847787 = sum of:
            0.0847787 = weight(_text_:22 in 4734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0847787 = score(doc=4734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  10. Menon, B.: Optimiser l'acces a l'information, une opportunite pour les langages documentaires? (2007) 0.02
    0.021194674 = product of:
      0.04238935 = sum of:
        0.04238935 = product of:
          0.0847787 = sum of:
            0.0847787 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0847787 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  11. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.02
    0.021194674 = product of:
      0.04238935 = sum of:
        0.04238935 = product of:
          0.0847787 = sum of:
            0.0847787 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0847787 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  12. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.02
    0.021194674 = product of:
      0.04238935 = sum of:
        0.04238935 = product of:
          0.0847787 = sum of:
            0.0847787 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0847787 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  13. Melot, M.: ¬Les nouveaux enjeux de la normalisation (1993) 0.02
    0.020366108 = product of:
      0.040732216 = sum of:
        0.040732216 = product of:
          0.08146443 = sum of:
            0.08146443 = weight(_text_:data in 4514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08146443 = score(doc=4514,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.49407038 = fieldWeight in 4514, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4514)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The future of standardization of bibliographic document processing depends a great deal upon electronic data processing techniques. Shows that the working out of library standards and their integration into data processing, telecommunications and optical disc storage techniques raises important questions regarding the professional habits of librarians
  14. Duclos-Faure, D.: Format d'echange des donnees locales : ou en sommes-nous? (1997) 0.02
    0.020161418 = product of:
      0.040322836 = sum of:
        0.040322836 = product of:
          0.08064567 = sum of:
            0.08064567 = weight(_text_:data in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08064567 = score(doc=888,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Since Sep 1996 a group with representatives from the French National Library (BNF), French Joint Catalogue (CCF), Directorate of Scientific and Technical Information (DISTNB), Directorate of Reading (DL) and the Higher Education Bibliography Agency (ABES) has been working on establishing a format for exchanging local data which will accomodtae the needs of all users; conform to international standards and take account of new technological tools (Z39.50-1995). Using pre-existing formats with UNIMARC as the basis, the new format will allow selection of documents by different location criteria, establish conditions of communication and manage interlibrary loan. To date fields have been defined for data on location and management of copies, and for descriptive data on copies
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Formats of exchanging local data: where are we now?
  15. Garden, A.: ¬L'avenir des formats de données (2001) 0.02
    0.020161418 = product of:
      0.040322836 = sum of:
        0.040322836 = product of:
          0.08064567 = sum of:
            0.08064567 = weight(_text_:data in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08064567 = score(doc=4202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The future of data formats
  16. Lahary, D.: Recommandations pour l'exchange de donnees d'exemplaires en format UNIMARC : un document de reference (1998) 0.02
    0.019954631 = product of:
      0.039909262 = sum of:
        0.039909262 = product of:
          0.079818524 = sum of:
            0.079818524 = weight(_text_:data in 4620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079818524 = score(doc=4620,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 4620, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4620)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To facilitate exchange, holdings data needs to be integrated into the main bibliographic record sequence in local collections. Recent recommendations for French libraries propose using designated fields within UNIMARC, to meet the needs respectively of departmental lending libraries and joint catalogues. Further provisions for holdings data is being considered at international level
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Recommendations for exchange of single copy data in UNIMARC format: a reference document
  17. Borgne, L.I.: INTERNET: vers la bibliothèque virtuel? (1993) 0.02
    0.017662229 = product of:
      0.035324458 = sum of:
        0.035324458 = product of:
          0.070648916 = sum of:
            0.070648916 = weight(_text_:22 in 7333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070648916 = score(doc=7333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7333)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Argus. 22(1993) no.2, S.21-29
  18. Briot, D.; Creff, J.A.: Enfin une norme francaise de description des resources électroniques (Z44-082) (2000) 0.02
    0.017662229 = product of:
      0.035324458 = sum of:
        0.035324458 = product of:
          0.070648916 = sum of:
            0.070648916 = weight(_text_:22 in 4634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070648916 = score(doc=4634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4634)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 2000, no.186, S.20-22
  19. Lupovici, C.: ¬Le digital object identifier : le système du DOI (1998) 0.02
    0.017484715 = product of:
      0.03496943 = sum of:
        0.03496943 = product of:
          0.06993886 = sum of:
            0.06993886 = weight(_text_:22 in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06993886 = score(doc=2747,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.1999 19:29:22
  20. Barbat, P.; Neste, E. van den; Drouhet, G.: Records management et archivistique française (1998) 0.02
    0.017484715 = product of:
      0.03496943 = sum of:
        0.03496943 = product of:
          0.06993886 = sum of:
            0.06993886 = weight(_text_:22 in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06993886 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    21. 2.1999 15:22:35

Years

Types

  • a 54
  • el 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…