-
Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019)
0.12
0.116784364 = sum of:
0.096622944 = product of:
0.28986883 = sum of:
0.28986883 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28986883 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44208363 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.020161418 = product of:
0.040322836 = sum of:
0.040322836 = weight(_text_:data in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040322836 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
-
Houston, R.D.; Harmon, E.G.: Re-envisioning the information concept : systematic definitions (2002)
0.07
0.07198863 = product of:
0.14397725 = sum of:
0.14397725 = sum of:
0.04608324 = weight(_text_:data in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04608324 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.09789401 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09789401 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper suggests a framework and systematic definitions for 6 words commonly used in dthe field of information science: data, information, knowledge, wisdom, inspiration, and intelligence. We intend these definitions to lead to a quantification of information science, a quantification that will enable their measurement, manipulastion, and prediction.
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
22. 2.2007 19:22:13
-
Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014)
0.07
0.06980942 = product of:
0.13961884 = sum of:
0.13961884 = sum of:
0.09016461 = weight(_text_:data in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09016461 = score(doc=1296,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.5468357 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049454242 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- I analyze the text of an article that appeared in this journal in 2007 that published the results of a questionnaire in which a number of experts were asked to define the concepts of data, information, and knowledge. I apply standard information retrieval techniques to build a list of the most frequent terms in each set of definitions. I then apply information extraction techniques to analyze how the top terms are used in the definitions. As a result, I draw data-driven conclusions about the aggregate opinion of the experts. I contrast this with the original analysis of the data to provide readers with an alternative viewpoint on what the data tell us.
- Date
- 16. 6.2014 19:22:57
-
Infield, N.: Capitalising on knowledge : if knowledge is power, why don't librarians rule the world? (1997)
0.05
0.05130119 = product of:
0.10260238 = sum of:
0.10260238 = sum of:
0.04608324 = weight(_text_:data in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04608324 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
0.056519132 = weight(_text_:22 in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056519132 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- While knowledge management is seen to be the biggest thing to hit the information profession since the Internet, the concept is surrounded by confusion. Traces the progress of knowledge on the information continuum which extends from data to informed decision. The reason for which knowledge management has suddenly become inluential is that its principal proponents now are not information professionals but management consultants seeking to retain their intellectual capital. Explains the reasons for this, the practical meaning of knowledge management and what information professionals should be doing to take advantage of the vogue
- Source
- Information world review. 1997, no.130, S.22
-
Meadows, J.: Understanding information (2001)
0.04
0.04488854 = product of:
0.08977708 = sum of:
0.08977708 = sum of:
0.040322836 = weight(_text_:data in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040322836 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049454242 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die moderne Gesellschaft leidet an Reizüberflutung durch Fernsehen, Internet, Zeitschriften aller Art. Jack Meadows, Professor für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft setzt sich mit Definitionen zu Begriffen wie 'Data', 'Information', 'Communication' oder 'Knowledge' auseinander, die für uns alläglich geworden sind. wie verarbeiten wir den Fluss von wichtigen und unwichtigen Informationen, der täglich auf uns einströmt? Welche 'Daten' sind es für uns Wert, gespeichert zu werden, welche vergessen wir nach kurzer Zeit? Wann wird aus Information Wissen oder gar Weisheit? Das Buch ist eine grundlegende Einführung in das weitläufige Thema Information und Wissensmanagement
- Date
- 15. 6.2002 19:22:01
-
Westbrook, L.: Information myths and intimate partner violence : sources, contexts, and consequences (2009)
0.04
0.04488854 = product of:
0.08977708 = sum of:
0.08977708 = sum of:
0.040322836 = weight(_text_:data in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040322836 = score(doc=2790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049454242 = score(doc=2790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Survivors of intimate partner violence face more than information gaps; many face powerful barriers in the form of information myths. Triangulating data from in-depth interviews and community bulletin board postings, this study incorporates insights from survivors, police, and shelter staff to begin mapping the information landscape through which survivors move. An unanticipated feature of that landscape is a set of 28 compelling information myths that prevent some survivors from making effective use of the social, legal, economic, and support resources available to them. This analysis of the sources, contexts, and consequences of these information myths is the first step in devising strategies to counter their ill effects.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:16:44
-
fwt: Wie das Gehirn Bilder 'liest' (1999)
0.04
0.039965063 = product of:
0.07993013 = sum of:
0.07993013 = product of:
0.15986025 = sum of:
0.15986025 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15986025 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:01:22
-
Allen, B.L.: Visualization and cognitve abilities (1998)
0.04
0.03847589 = product of:
0.07695178 = sum of:
0.07695178 = sum of:
0.03456243 = weight(_text_:data in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456243 = score(doc=2340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
0.04238935 = weight(_text_:22 in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238935 = score(doc=2340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Source
- Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
-
Malsburg, C. von der: Concerning the neuronal code (2018)
0.04
0.03847589 = product of:
0.07695178 = sum of:
0.07695178 = sum of:
0.03456243 = weight(_text_:data in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456243 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
0.04238935 = weight(_text_:22 in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238935 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The central problem with understanding brain and mind is the neural code issue: understanding the matter of our brain as basis for the phenomena of our mind. The richness with which our mind represents our environment, the parsimony of genetic data, the tremendous efficiency with which the brain learns from scant sensory input and the creativity with which our mind constructs mental worlds all speak in favor of mind as an emergent phenomenon. This raises the further issue of how the neural code supports these processes of organization. The central point of this communication is that the neural code has the form of structured net fragments that are formed by network self-organization, activate and de-activate on the functional time scale, and spontaneously combine to form larger nets with the same basic structure.
- Date
- 27.12.2020 16:56:22
-
Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001)
0.03
0.03450819 = product of:
0.06901638 = sum of:
0.06901638 = product of:
0.20704915 = sum of:
0.20704915 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20704915 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44208363 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.03
0.03450819 = product of:
0.06901638 = sum of:
0.06901638 = product of:
0.20704915 = sum of:
0.20704915 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20704915 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44208363 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Li, A.: ¬A hierarchical typology of scholarly information units : based on a deduction-verification study (2020)
0.03
0.030422669 = product of:
0.060845338 = sum of:
0.060845338 = sum of:
0.032585774 = weight(_text_:data in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032585774 = score(doc=5655,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.19762816 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
0.028259566 = weight(_text_:22 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259566 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to lay a theoretical foundation for identifying operational information units for library and information professional activities in the context of scholarly communication. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a deduction-verification approach to formulate a typology of units for scholarly information. It first deduces possible units from an existing conceptualization of information, which defines information as the combined product of data and meaning, and then tests the usefulness of these units via two empirical investigations, one with a group of scholarly papers and the other with a sample of scholarly information users. Findings The results show that, on defining an information unit as a piece of information that is complete in both data and meaning, to such an extent that it remains meaningful to its target audience when retrieved and displayed independently in a database, it is then possible to formulate a hierarchical typology of units for scholarly information. The typology proposed in this study consists of three levels, which in turn, consists of 1, 5 and 44 units, respectively. Research limitations/implications The result of this study has theoretical implications on both the philosophical and conceptual levels: on the philosophical level, it hinges on, and reinforces the objective view of information; on the conceptual level, it challenges the conceptualization of work by IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and Library Reference Model but endorses that by Library of Congress's BIBFRAME 2.0 model. Practical implications It calls for reconsideration of existing operational units in a variety of library and information activities. Originality/value The study strengthens the conceptual foundation of operational information units and brings to light the primacy of "one work" as an information unit and the possibility for it to be supplemented by smaller units.
- Date
- 14. 1.2020 11:15:22
-
dpa: Struktur des Denkorgans wird bald entschlüsselt sein (2000)
0.03
0.029973798 = product of:
0.059947595 = sum of:
0.059947595 = product of:
0.11989519 = sum of:
0.11989519 = weight(_text_:22 in 3952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11989519 = score(doc=3952,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3952, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3952)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 7.1996 9:33:22
22. 7.2000 19:05:41
-
Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980)
0.03
0.028259566 = product of:
0.056519132 = sum of:
0.056519132 = product of:
0.113038264 = sum of:
0.113038264 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113038264 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
-
Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006)
0.03
0.028259566 = product of:
0.056519132 = sum of:
0.056519132 = product of:
0.113038264 = sum of:
0.113038264 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113038264 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:22:28
-
San Segundo, R.: ¬A new conception of representation of knowledge (2004)
0.03
0.025650594 = product of:
0.05130119 = sum of:
0.05130119 = sum of:
0.02304162 = weight(_text_:data in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02304162 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
0.028259566 = weight(_text_:22 in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259566 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The new term Representation of knowledge, applied to the framework of electronic segments of information, with comprehension of new material support for information, and a review and total conceptualisation of the terminology which is being applied, entails a review of all traditional documentary practices. Therefore, a definition of the concept of Representation of knowledge is indispensable. The term representation has been used in westere cultural and intellectual tradition to refer to the diverse ways that a subject comprehends an object. Representation is a process which requires the structure of natural language and human memory whereby it is interwoven in a subject and in conscience. However, at the present time, the term Representation of knowledge is applied to the processing of electronic information, combined with the aim of emulating the human mind in such a way that one has endeavoured to transfer, with great difficulty, the complex structurality of the conceptual representation of human knowledge to new digital information technologies. Thus, nowadays, representation of knowledge has taken an diverse meanings and it has focussed, for the moment, an certain structures and conceptual hierarchies which carry and transfer information, and has initially been based an the current representation of knowledge using artificial intelligence. The traditional languages of documentation, also referred to as languages of representation, offer a structured representation of conceptual fields, symbols and terms of natural and notational language, and they are the pillars for the necessary correspondence between the object or text and its representation. These correspondences, connections and symbolisations will be established within the electronic framework by means of different models and of the "goal" domain, which will give rise to organisations, structures, maps, networks and levels, as new electronic documents are not compact units but segments of information. Thus, the new representation of knowledge refers to data, images, figures and symbolised, treated, processed and structured ideas which replace or refer to documents within the framework of technical processing and the recuperation of electronic information.
- Date
- 2. 1.2005 18:22:25
-
Arning, M.: Wenn Philosophen die Welt von den Füßen auf den Kopf stellen : bei den 22. Römerberggesprächen sorgt Hermann Lübbe für eine erstaunliche Provokation (1995)
0.02
0.024978163 = product of:
0.049956325 = sum of:
0.049956325 = product of:
0.09991265 = sum of:
0.09991265 = weight(_text_:22 in 1408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09991265 = score(doc=1408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Der Sozialphilosoph Hermann Lübbe ist überzeugt davon, daß die Massenmedien nicht 'vermassend', sondern vielmehr 'pluralistisch' wirken. - Bericht zu den 22. Frankfurter Römerberggesprächen zum Thema: Kommt eine neue Kultur? Auf der Suche nach Wirklichkeit im Medienzeitalter
-
Schöne neue Welt? : Fragen und Antworten: Wie Facebook menschliche Gedanken auslesen will (2017)
0.02
0.024978163 = product of:
0.049956325 = sum of:
0.049956325 = product of:
0.09991265 = sum of:
0.09991265 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09991265 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2004 9:42:33
22. 4.2017 11:58:05
-
Flohr, H.: Denken und Bewußtsein (1994)
0.02
0.024727121 = product of:
0.049454242 = sum of:
0.049454242 = product of:
0.098908484 = sum of:
0.098908484 = weight(_text_:22 in 1823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098908484 = score(doc=1823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:23:03
-
Repo, A.J.: ¬The dual approach to the value of information : an appraisal of use and exchange values (1989)
0.02
0.024727121 = product of:
0.049454242 = sum of:
0.049454242 = product of:
0.098908484 = sum of:
0.098908484 = weight(_text_:22 in 5772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098908484 = score(doc=5772,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5772, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5772)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.5, S.373-383
