Search (222 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  1. Voigt, K.; Brüggemann, R.: Evaluation criteria for environmental and chemical databases (1998) 0.04
    0.03847589 = product of:
      0.07695178 = sum of:
        0.07695178 = sum of:
          0.03456243 = weight(_text_:data in 3296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03456243 = score(doc=3296,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 3296, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3296)
          0.04238935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238935 = score(doc=3296,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3296, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The large number and variety of online databases in the field of environment sciences and chemistry underlies the need for a cooperative evaluation approach. Presents 2 evaluation criteria, divided into 4 headings; general criteria (size of data source, cost of 1 hour searching, updating of database, availability on other media); chemical relevant criteria (number of chemicals, identification parameters of chemicals, test set chemicals, development of chemicals), environmental relevant criteria (information parameters for chemicals, parameter development); and criteria describing environmental chemicals (use of chemicals, quality of database). A 6 number scoring system is applied to these criteria and the Hasse diagram technique is presented for 19 bibliographic online databases using these criteria. Using this technique, 'good' and 'bad' databases are identified and changes in the database content from 1995 to 1998 can be visualized
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.4, S.247-262
  2. Fischer, T.; Neuroth, H.: SSG-FI - special subject gateways to high quality Internet resources for scientific users (2000) 0.04
    0.03847589 = product of:
      0.07695178 = sum of:
        0.07695178 = sum of:
          0.03456243 = weight(_text_:data in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03456243 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
          0.04238935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238935 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Project SSG-FI at SUB Göttingen provides special subject gateways to international high quality Internet resources for scientific users. Internet sites are selected by subject specialists and described using an extension of qualified Dublin Core metadata. A basic evaluation is added. These descriptions are freely available and can be searched and browsed. These are now subject gateways for 3 subject ares: earth sciences (GeoGuide); mathematics (MathGuide); and Anglo-American culture (split into HistoryGuide and AnglistikGuide). Together they receive about 3.300 'hard' requests per day, thus reaching over 1 million requests per year. The project SSG-FI behind these guides is open to collaboration. Institutions and private persons wishing to contribute can notify the SSG-FI team or send full data sets. Regular contributors can request registration with the project to access the database via the Internet and create and edit records
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:42
  3. Hill, L.L.; Zheng, Q.: Indirect geospatial referencing through place names in the digital library : Alexandra digital library experience with developing and implementing gazetteers (1999) 0.04
    0.038028337 = product of:
      0.076056674 = sum of:
        0.076056674 = sum of:
          0.040732216 = weight(_text_:data in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040732216 = score(doc=6543,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
          0.035324458 = weight(_text_:22 in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035324458 = score(doc=6543,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    All types of information can be referenced to a geographic place. Maps, aerial photographs, and remote sensing images are spatially georeferenced. Other forms of information such as books, articles, research papers, pieces of music, and art are often linked to a geographic location through place names (geographic names). A gazetteer (a dictionary of geographic names) that is spatially referenced itself provides the bridge between these two types of georeferencing. With a georeferenced gazetteer translation service, a user can start with a geographic name and find information that is described with either geographic names or with geospatial coordinates. Use of this powerful indirect geospatially referencing tool can be applied as a common approach to libraries, bibliographic files, data centers, web resources, and museum and specimen collections and can be particular useful across language barriers since latitude and longitude coordinates are universally understood. The Alexandria Digital Library has implemented a gazetteer component for its georeferenced digital library. This experience resulted in the creation of a Gazetteer Content Standard, a Feature Type Thesaurus, and an operational interactive gazetteer service. This paper describes the development of these components and illustrates the use of this tool in a georeferenced digital library. It also relates progress in working with Federal agencies and others toward developing shareable gazetteer data through Digital Gazetteer Information Exchange programs
    Date
    29. 9.2001 20:22:45
  4. Pesch, K.: ¬Eine gigantische Informationsfülle : "Brockhaus multimedial 2004" kann jedoch nicht rundum überzeugen (2003) 0.03
    0.03496943 = product of:
      0.06993886 = sum of:
        0.06993886 = product of:
          0.13987772 = sum of:
            0.13987772 = weight(_text_:22 in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13987772 = score(doc=502,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    22. 9.2003 10:02:00
  5. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.03
    0.03450819 = product of:
      0.06901638 = sum of:
        0.06901638 = product of:
          0.20704915 = sum of:
            0.20704915 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20704915 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.44208363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  6. Nicholas, D.: LISA Plus on CD-ROM : version 4 (1997) 0.03
    0.032063242 = product of:
      0.064126484 = sum of:
        0.064126484 = sum of:
          0.028802028 = weight(_text_:data in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028802028 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
          0.035324458 = weight(_text_:22 in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035324458 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief, critical review of LISA PLaus: the CD-ROM database version of LISA and which includes the database of Current Research in Library and Information Science (CRLIS). The review covers the DOS version only, as it appeared in the Summer 1996 CD-ROM, noting that the Windows version was planned for the future. Points to the way LISA has found its mark, if not its fortune, in LISA Plus and notes its strengths, including: ideal suitability for current awareness in library and information science (LIS); massive and convenient consolidation of the published LIS literature; and massive increase in coverage from 7.900 abstracts in 1993 to over 12.000 currently. Criticizes certain features of LISA Plus, notably: the OPTI-Ware search interface; the combination of 2 databases (LISA and CRLIS) in a single, searchable database; and certain unexpected effects caused by the building of the Subject and Free Text indexes. Points particularly to great lack of consistency in the indexes and the indexing (faults that were fully rectified by a complete overhaul of the data in Summer 1996). Notes that LISA Plus is the first port of call for both information researchers and information science students. The Windows version of LISA Plus was launched in Spring 1997
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  7. Nitzsche, J.: Inhaltserschließung von medizinischen Internetquellen und Multimediaprodukten (2001) 0.03
    0.032063242 = product of:
      0.064126484 = sum of:
        0.064126484 = sum of:
          0.028802028 = weight(_text_:data in 5674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028802028 = score(doc=5674,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 5674, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5674)
          0.035324458 = weight(_text_:22 in 5674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035324458 = score(doc=5674,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5674, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5674)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In zunehmendem Maße finden sich medizinische Informationen ausschließlich im Internet und auf Multimediaprodukten. Dies erhöht die Notwendigkeit einer inhaltlichen Erschließung dieser Medien, die über die Möglichkeiten der Suchmaschinen hinausgeht. Momentan erschließen medizinische Bibliotheken die Neuen Medien mit den traditionellen Mitteln der klassischen Inhaltserschließung konventioneller Medien: systematische Erschließung mit Klassifikationen (NLM-Klassifikation), im Internet meist in der Form strukturierter Listen, und verbale Sacherschließung mit Fachthesaurl (meist MESH oder RSWK), im Internet ergänzt um standardisierte Metadaten (wie Dublin Core DC, Learning Object Data LOD, Platform for Internet Content Selection PICS). Dies geschieht mit großem Aufwand auch deshalb, um eine Kompatibilität der Erschließung und Suchbarkeit von konventionellen und Neuen Medien sicherzustellen, obwohl die Neuen Medien eher wenig und nur in einem bestimmten Kontext genutzt werden. Hängt die geringe Nutzung der Neuen Medien möglicherweise mit einer inadäquaten Evaluierung und Systematisierung zusammen? Vor- und Nachteile der Erschließung der Neuen Medien durch systematische und verbale Klassifikation werden dargestellt. Daraus werden Empfehlungen entwickelt, welchen Anforderungen Erschließungsinstrumente für Neue Medien genügen sollten und welche Konsequenzen sich daraus für die zukünftige Inhaltserschließung Neuer Medien im Sinne einer höheren Nutzbarkeit und Nutzung ergeben (kooperative Erschließung, Bildung von Kompetenzzentren, Entwicklung neuer Erschließungsinstrumente)
    Date
    22. 3.2001 13:19:39
  8. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.03
    0.032063242 = product of:
      0.064126484 = sum of:
        0.064126484 = sum of:
          0.028802028 = weight(_text_:data in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028802028 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
          0.035324458 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035324458 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
  9. Bauer, P.: Information Retrieval in externen allgemeinbibliographischen Online-Datenbanken : eine Einführung in die Praxis des Information Retrieval sowie Materialiensammlung zur Nutzung der Zeitschriftendatenbank (Online-Version) und von BIBLIO-DATA (1989) 0.03
    0.028512552 = product of:
      0.057025105 = sum of:
        0.057025105 = product of:
          0.11405021 = sum of:
            0.11405021 = weight(_text_:data in 4405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11405021 = score(doc=4405,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.69169855 = fieldWeight in 4405, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4405)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    Biblio-Data
  10. ¬Das große Lexikon 2001 (2000) 0.03
    0.028512552 = product of:
      0.057025105 = sum of:
        0.057025105 = product of:
          0.11405021 = sum of:
            0.11405021 = weight(_text_:data in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11405021 = score(doc=5240,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.69169855 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Imprint
    Düsseldorf : Data Becker
    Object
    Große Data Becker Lexikon
  11. Kosmos Weltatlas 2000 : Der Kompass für das 21. Jahrhundert. Inklusive Welt-Routenplaner (1999) 0.03
    0.028259566 = product of:
      0.056519132 = sum of:
        0.056519132 = product of:
          0.113038264 = sum of:
            0.113038264 = weight(_text_:22 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113038264 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:39
  12. Rowley, J.: Current awareness in an electronic age (1998) 0.02
    0.024978163 = product of:
      0.049956325 = sum of:
        0.049956325 = product of:
          0.09991265 = sum of:
            0.09991265 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09991265 = score(doc=183,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 17:50:37
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.4, S.277-279
  13. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.02
    0.024978163 = product of:
      0.049956325 = sum of:
        0.049956325 = product of:
          0.09991265 = sum of:
            0.09991265 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09991265 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  14. ¬Das große Data Becker Lexikon (1995) 0.02
    0.024943287 = product of:
      0.049886573 = sum of:
        0.049886573 = product of:
          0.099773146 = sum of:
            0.099773146 = weight(_text_:data in 5368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099773146 = score(doc=5368,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.60511017 = fieldWeight in 5368, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Imprint
    Düsseldorf : Data Becker
    Object
    Große Data Becker Lexikon
  15. Grobe, K.: Da wird die Goldprägung blaß : Lehrt die Konkurrenz das Fürchten: Die Encarta-Enzyklopädie von Microsoft (1998) 0.02
    0.024727121 = product of:
      0.049454242 = sum of:
        0.049454242 = product of:
          0.098908484 = sum of:
            0.098908484 = weight(_text_:22 in 7133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098908484 = score(doc=7133,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7133, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7133)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  16. Wollschläger, H.: Welt-Archiv der Vergangenheit (1994) 0.02
    0.024727121 = product of:
      0.049454242 = sum of:
        0.049454242 = product of:
          0.098908484 = sum of:
            0.098908484 = weight(_text_:22 in 8997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098908484 = score(doc=8997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Süddeutsche Zeitung. Nr.xx vom 21./22./23.5.1994, S
  17. Stock, W.G.: Endnutzersystem für internationale Geschäftsinformationen (1998) 0.02
    0.024727121 = product of:
      0.049454242 = sum of:
        0.049454242 = product of:
          0.098908484 = sum of:
            0.098908484 = weight(_text_:22 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098908484 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Password. 1998, H.10, S.22-28
  18. Schult, T.J.: World Book 1999 (1999) 0.02
    0.024727121 = product of:
      0.049454242 = sum of:
        0.049454242 = product of:
          0.098908484 = sum of:
            0.098908484 = weight(_text_:22 in 2504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098908484 = score(doc=2504,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2504, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2504)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1999 12:36:22
  19. Oehlen, M.: Unser Wissen im Strudel der Zeit : 20. Auflage des 'Brockhaus' in neuer Rechtschreibung (1997) 0.02
    0.024727121 = product of:
      0.049454242 = sum of:
        0.049454242 = product of:
          0.098908484 = sum of:
            0.098908484 = weight(_text_:22 in 6103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098908484 = score(doc=6103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 1.1997 12:15:22
  20. Vögel unserer Heimat (1999) 0.02
    0.024727121 = product of:
      0.049454242 = sum of:
        0.049454242 = product of:
          0.098908484 = sum of:
            0.098908484 = weight(_text_:22 in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098908484 = score(doc=4084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:54

Years

Languages

  • d 128
  • e 90
  • chi 1
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 193
  • i 17
  • el 14
  • m 11
  • s 3
  • h 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications