-
Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995)
0.05
0.05130119 = product of:
0.10260238 = sum of:
0.10260238 = sum of:
0.04608324 = weight(_text_:data in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04608324 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
0.056519132 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056519132 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Most indexed databases now include their thesauri and/or coding in their bibliographic files, searchable at the databases' online connect rates. Assesses the searchability of these on the different hosts. Thesauri and classifications are also available as diskette or CD-ROM products. Describes a number of these, highlighting the diskette thesaurus from IFI/Plenum Data for its flexible databases, the CLAIMS Uniterm and Comprehensive indexes to US chemical patents
- Source
- Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
-
Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998)
0.03
0.032063242 = product of:
0.064126484 = sum of:
0.064126484 = sum of:
0.028802028 = weight(_text_:data in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028802028 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.035324458 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035324458 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Source
- Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.02
0.022541152 = product of:
0.045082305 = sum of:
0.045082305 = product of:
0.09016461 = sum of:
0.09016461 = weight(_text_:data in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09016461 = score(doc=2883,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.5468357 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.02
0.022541152 = product of:
0.045082305 = sum of:
0.045082305 = product of:
0.09016461 = sum of:
0.09016461 = weight(_text_:data in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09016461 = score(doc=207,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.5468357 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
-
Aluri, R.D.; Kemp, A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (1991)
0.02
0.020161418 = product of:
0.040322836 = sum of:
0.040322836 = product of:
0.08064567 = sum of:
0.08064567 = weight(_text_:data in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08064567 = score(doc=863,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- LCSH
- Subject cataloguing / Data processing
Machine / readable bibliographic data
- Subject
- Subject cataloguing / Data processing
Machine / readable bibliographic data
-
Schabas, A.H.: ¬A comparative evaluation of the retrieval effectiveness of titles, Library of Congress Subject Headings and PRECIS strings for computer searching of UK MARC data (1979)
0.02
0.017281216 = product of:
0.03456243 = sum of:
0.03456243 = product of:
0.06912486 = sum of:
0.06912486 = weight(_text_:data in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06912486 = score(doc=5277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Blair, D.C.: Language and representation in information retrieval (1991)
0.01
0.012880659 = product of:
0.025761317 = sum of:
0.025761317 = product of:
0.051522635 = sum of:
0.051522635 = weight(_text_:data in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051522635 = score(doc=1545,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.31247756 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Information or Document Retrieval is the subject of this book. It is not an introductory book, although it is self-contained in the sense that it is not necessary to have a background in the theory or practice of Information Retrieval in order to understand its arguments. The book presents, as clearly as possible, one particular perspective on Information Retrieval, and attempts to say that certain aspects of the theory or practice of the management of documents are more important than others. The majority of Information Retrieval research has been aimed at the more experimentally tractable small-scale systems, and although much of that work has added greatly to our understanding of Information Retrieval it is becoming increasingly apparent that retrieval systems with large data bases of documents are a fundamentally different genre of systems than small-scale systems. If this is so, which is the thesis of this book, then we must now study large information retrieval systems with the same rigor and intensity that we once studied small-scale systems. Hegel observed that the quantitative growth of any system caused qualitative changes to take place in its structure and processes.
- Classification
- ST 271 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme
ST 270 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme
- RVK
- ST 271 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme
ST 270 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme
-
Stone, A.T.: Up-ending Cutter's pyramid : the case for making subject references to broader terms (1996)
0.01
0.0123635605 = product of:
0.024727121 = sum of:
0.024727121 = product of:
0.049454242 = sum of:
0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049454242 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 20:43:23
-
Schabas, A.H.: Postcoordinate retrieval : a comparison of two retrieval languages (1982)
0.01
0.012219666 = product of:
0.024439331 = sum of:
0.024439331 = product of:
0.048878662 = sum of:
0.048878662 = weight(_text_:data in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048878662 = score(doc=1202,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article reports on a comparison of the postcoordinate retrieval effectiveness of two indexing languages: LCSH and PRECIS. The effect of augmenting each with title words was also studies. The database for the study was over 15.000 UK MARC records. Users returned 5.326 relevant judgements for citations retrieved for 61 SDI profiles, representing a wide variety of subjects. Results are reported in terms of precision and relative recall. Pure/applied sciences data and social science data were analyzed separately. Cochran's significance tests for ratios were used to interpret the findings. Recall emerged as the more important measure discriminating the behavior of the two languages. Addition of title words was found to improve recall of both indexing languages significantly. A direct relationship was observed between recall and exhaustivity. For the social sciences searches, recalls from PRECIS alone and from PRECIS with title words were significantly higher than those from LCSH alone and from LCSH with title words, respectively. Corresponding comparisons for the pure/applied sciences searches revealed no significant differences
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.: FAST - a new approach to controlled subject access (2008)
0.01
0.012219666 = product of:
0.024439331 = sum of:
0.024439331 = product of:
0.048878662 = sum of:
0.048878662 = weight(_text_:data in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048878662 = score(doc=2181,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid proliferation of digital resources, are forcing changes in bibliographic control to make it easier to use, understand, and apply subject data. Subject headings are no exception. The enormous volume and rapid growth of digital libraries and repositories and the emergence of numerous metadata schemes have spurred a reexamination of the way subject data are to be provided for such resources efficiently and effectively. To address this need, OCLC in cooperation with the Library of Congress, has taken a new approach, called FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology). FAST headings are based on the existing vocabulary in Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), but are applied with a simpler syntax than required by Library of Congress application policies. Adapting the LCSH vocabulary in a simplified faceted syntax retains the rich vocabulary of LCSH while making it easier to understand, control, apply, and use.
-
Seeman, D.; Chan, T.; Dykes, K.: Implementation and maintenance of FAST as linked data in a digital collections platform at University of Victoria Libraries (2023)
0.01
0.012219666 = product of:
0.024439331 = sum of:
0.024439331 = product of:
0.048878662 = sum of:
0.048878662 = weight(_text_:data in 1165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048878662 = score(doc=1165,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 1165, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- University of Victoria Libraries has implemented faceted vocabularies, particularly FAST, in its digital collections platform (Vault). The process involved migrating a variety of standardized (pre-coordinated Library of Congress subject headings) and non-standardized metadata to conform to a URI-centric metadata application profile. The authors argue that faceted vocabularies and FAST have helped to create a robust and intuitive user navigation in the platform and allowed for an efficient and straightforward metadata creation process. Maintaining FAST as linked data within Vault has required putting in place some technical processes to keep URIs and textual labels up to date and solutions (FAST Updater) have been locally developed.
-
Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies in the context of emerging technologies (1988)
0.01
0.01152081 = product of:
0.02304162 = sum of:
0.02304162 = product of:
0.04608324 = sum of:
0.04608324 = weight(_text_:data in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04608324 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Delineates on the changing role of vocabulary control devices such as classification, subject headings, and thesaurus. Identifies the basic issue in the design and development of these devices and their role in the changing information technology. The paper identifies the differentiations needed in the new roles of these devices in data base technology
-
Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000)
0.01
0.010597337 = product of:
0.021194674 = sum of:
0.021194674 = product of:
0.04238935 = sum of:
0.04238935 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238935 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2001 16:22:21
-
Frommeyer, J.: Chronological terms and period subdivisions in LCSH, RAMEAU, and RSWK : development of an integrative model for time retrieval across various online catalogs (2004)
0.01
0.010597337 = product of:
0.021194674 = sum of:
0.021194674 = product of:
0.04238935 = sum of:
0.04238935 = weight(_text_:22 in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238935 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Leissing, U.; Rädler, K.; Hauer, M.: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri : Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at (2010)
0.01
0.010597337 = product of:
0.021194674 = sum of:
0.021194674 = product of:
0.04238935 = sum of:
0.04238935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238935 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009)
0.01
0.010597337 = product of:
0.021194674 = sum of:
0.021194674 = product of:
0.04238935 = sum of:
0.04238935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238935 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:13
-
Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021)
0.01
0.0088311145 = product of:
0.017662229 = sum of:
0.017662229 = product of:
0.035324458 = sum of:
0.035324458 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035324458 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 9.2021 12:22:02
-
Geißelmann, F. (Hrsg.): Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen (1994)
0.01
0.008742358 = product of:
0.017484715 = sum of:
0.017484715 = product of:
0.03496943 = sum of:
0.03496943 = weight(_text_:22 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496943 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15. 7.2018 16:22:16
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 48(1995) H.1, S.66-68 (K. Niedermair) - Vgl. auch Lepsky, K. in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519; Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 19(1995) H.2, S.251-254 (G. Hartwieg; auch in: LDV-Forum Bd. 12, Nr. 2, Jg. 1995, S.22-29 [unter: http://www.jlcl.org/1995_Heft2/Rezensionen_19-27.pdf]) .
-
Drabenstott, K.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Using subject headings for online retrieval : theory, practice and potential (1994)
0.01
0.008640608 = product of:
0.017281216 = sum of:
0.017281216 = product of:
0.03456243 = sum of:
0.03456243 = weight(_text_:data in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456243 = score(doc=386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Using subject headings for Online Retrieval is an indispensable tool for online system desingners who are developing new systems or refining exicting ones. The book describes subject analysis and subject searching in online catalogs, including the limitations of retrieval, and demonstrates how such limitations can be overcome through system design and programming. The book describes the Library of Congress Subject headings system and system characteristics, shows how information is stored in machine readable files, and offers examples of and recommendations for successful methods. Tables are included to support these recommendations, and diagrams, graphs, and bar charts are used to provide results of data analyses.
-
Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : II. A preliminary evaluation and failure analysis (1998)
0.01
0.008640608 = product of:
0.017281216 = sum of:
0.017281216 = product of:
0.03456243 = sum of:
0.03456243 = weight(_text_:data in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456243 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Partial coordination is a new method for cataloging documents for subject access. It is especially designed to enhance the precision of document searches in online environments. This article reports a preliminary evaluation of partial coordination that shows promising results compared with full-text retrieval. We also report the difficulties in empirically evaluating the effectiveness of automatic full-text retrieval in contrast to mixed methods such as partial coordination which combine human cataloging with computerized retrieval. Based on our study, we propose research in this area will substantially benefit from a common framework for failure analysis and a common data set. This will allow information retrieval researchers adapting 'library style'cataloging to large electronic document collections, as well as those developing automated or mixed methods, to directly compare their proposals for indexing and retrieval. This article concludes by suggesting guidelines for constructing such as testbed
