-
Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.; Foo, S.: Organsising keywords in a Web search environment : a methodology based on co-word analysis (2000)
0.00
0.0037028994 = product of:
0.022217397 = sum of:
0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022217397 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The rapid development of the Internet and World Wide Web has caused some critical problem for information retrieval. Researchers have made several attempts to solve these problems. Thesauri and subject heading lists as traditional information retrieval tools have been criticised for their efficiency to tackle these newly emerging problems. This paper proposes an information retrieval tool generated by cocitation analysis, comprising keyword clusters with relationships based on the co-occurrences of keywords in the literature. Such a tool can play the role of an associative thesaurus that can provide information about the keywords in a domain that might be useful for information searching and query expansion
-
Milojevic, S.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: ¬The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science : analysis of article title words (2011)
0.00
0.00308575 = product of:
0.018514499 = sum of:
0.018514499 = weight(_text_:internet in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018514499 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This study comprises a suite of analyses of words in article titles in order to reveal the cognitive structure of Library and Information Science (LIS). The use of title words to elucidate the cognitive structure of LIS has been relatively neglected. The present study addresses this gap by performing (a) co-word analysis and hierarchical clustering, (b) multidimensional scaling, and (c) determination of trends in usage of terms. The study is based on 10,344 articles published between 1988 and 2007 in 16 LIS journals. Methodologically, novel aspects of this study are: (a) its large scale, (b) removal of non-specific title words based on the "word concentration" measure (c) identification of the most frequent terms that include both single words and phrases, and (d) presentation of the relative frequencies of terms using "heatmaps". Conceptually, our analysis reveals that LIS consists of three main branches: the traditionally recognized library-related and information-related branches, plus an equally distinct bibliometrics/scientometrics branch. The three branches focus on: libraries, information, and science, respectively. In addition, our study identifies substructures within each branch. We also tentatively identify "information seeking behavior" as a branch that is establishing itself separate from the three main branches. Furthermore, we find that cognitive concepts in LIS evolve continuously, with no stasis since 1992. The most rapid development occurred between 1998 and 2001, influenced by the increased focus on the Internet. The change in the cognitive landscape is found to be driven by the emergence of new information technologies, and the retirement of old ones.
-
Li, D.; Luo, Z.; Ding, Y.; Tang, J.; Sun, G.G.-Z.; Dai, X.; Du, J.; Zhang, J.; Kong, S.: User-level microblogging recommendation incorporating social influence (2017)
0.00
0.00308575 = product of:
0.018514499 = sum of:
0.018514499 = weight(_text_:internet in 3426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018514499 = score(doc=3426,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 3426, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3426)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Theme
- Internet
-
Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998)
0.00
0.0029206579 = product of:
0.017523946 = sum of:
0.017523946 = product of:
0.052571837 = sum of:
0.052571837 = weight(_text_:29 in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052571837 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 23(1998) no.2, S.20-29
-
Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011)
0.00
0.0020260692 = product of:
0.012156415 = sum of:
0.012156415 = product of:
0.036469243 = sum of:
0.036469243 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036469243 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:02:21
-
Song, M.; Kim, S.Y.; Zhang, G.; Ding, Y.; Chambers, T.: Productivity and influence in bioinformatics : a bibliometric analysis using PubMed central (2014)
0.00
0.0017523945 = product of:
0.010514366 = sum of:
0.010514366 = product of:
0.0315431 = sum of:
0.0315431 = weight(_text_:29 in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0315431 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:40:41
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.00
0.0017366307 = product of:
0.010419784 = sum of:
0.010419784 = product of:
0.03125935 = sum of:
0.03125935 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03125935 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
-
Min, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, J.; Bu, Y.; Pei, L.; Sun, J.: Innovation or imitation : the diffusion of citations (2018)
0.00
0.0014603289 = product of:
0.008761973 = sum of:
0.008761973 = product of:
0.026285918 = sum of:
0.026285918 = weight(_text_:29 in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026285918 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 9.2018 13:24:10
-
Liu, M.; Bu, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Leng, Y.; Freeman, R.B.; Meyer, E.T.; Yoon, W.; Sung, M.; Jeong, M.; Lee, J.; Kang, J.; Min, C.; Zhai, Y.; Song, M.; Ding, Y.: Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty : evidence from COVID-19 (2022)
0.00
0.0014603289 = product of:
0.008761973 = sum of:
0.008761973 = product of:
0.026285918 = sum of:
0.026285918 = weight(_text_:29 in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026285918 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Scientific novelty drives the efforts to invent new vaccines and solutions during the pandemic. First-time collaboration and international collaboration are two pivotal channels to expand teams' search activities for a broader scope of resources required to address the global challenge, which might facilitate the generation of novel ideas. Our analysis of 98,981 coronavirus papers suggests that scientific novelty measured by the BioBERT model that is pretrained on 29 million PubMed articles, and first-time collaboration increased after the outbreak of COVID-19, and international collaboration witnessed a sudden decrease. During COVID-19, papers with more first-time collaboration were found to be more novel and international collaboration did not hamper novelty as it had done in the normal periods. The findings suggest the necessity of reaching out for distant resources and the importance of maintaining a collaborative scientific community beyond nationalism during a pandemic.
