Search (125 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.16 
    0.16286412 = product of:
  0.48859233 = sum of:
    0.24429616 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24429616 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32600754 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.24429616 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24429616 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32600754 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  2. Stuart, D.: Web metrics for library and information professionals (2014) 0.02 
    0.01929769 = product of:
  0.057893068 = sum of:
    0.03544543 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03544543 = score(doc=2274,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1578712 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.22452119 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
    0.022447636 = weight(_text_:internet in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022447636 = score(doc=2274,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.19773582 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    RSWK
    Bibliothek / World Wide Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Analyse / Statistik
    Internet / Bibliometrie / Einführung
    Subject
    Bibliothek / World Wide Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Analyse / Statistik
    Internet / Bibliometrie / Einführung
    Theme
    Internet
  3. Fiala, D.: Bibliometric analysis of CiteSeer data for countries (2012) 0.01 
    0.010910588 = product of:
  0.032731764 = sum of:
    0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022217397 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
    0.010514366 = product of:
      0.0315431 = sum of:
        0.0315431 = weight(_text_:29 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0315431 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This article describes the results of our analysis of the data from the CiteSeer digital library. First, we examined the data from the point of view of source top-level Internet domains from which the data were collected. Second, we measured country shares in publications indexed by CiteSeer and compared them to those based on mainstream bibliographic data from the Web of Science and Scopus. And third, we concentrated on analyzing publications and their citations aggregated by countries. This way, we generated rankings of the most influential countries in computer science using several non-recursive as well as recursive methods such as citation counts or PageRank. We conclude that even if East Asian countries are underrepresented in CiteSeer, its data may well be used along with other conventional bibliographic databases for comparing the computer science research productivity and performance of countries.
    Date
    29. 1.2016 18:36:47
  4. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.01 
    0.009304067 = product of:
  0.0558244 = sum of:
    0.0558244 = product of:
      0.0837366 = sum of:
        0.042057466 = weight(_text_:29 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042057466 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
        0.041679136 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041679136 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  5. Peng, T.-Q.; Zhu, J.J.H.: Where you publish matters most : a multilevel analysis of factors affecting citations of internet studies (2012) 0.01 
    0.0075585125 = product of:
  0.045351073 = sum of:
    0.045351073 = weight(_text_:internet in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045351073 = score(doc=386,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.39948666 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This study explores the factors influencing citations to Internet studies by assessing the relative explanatory power of three perspectives: normative theory, the social constructivist approach, and a natural growth mechanism. Using data on 7,700+ articles of Internet studies published in 100+ Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)-listed journals in 2000-2009, the study adopted a multilevel model to disentangle the impact between article- and journal-level factors on citations. This research strategy resulted in a number of both expected and surprising findings. The primary determinants for citations are found to be journal-level factors, accounting for 14% of the variances in citations of Internet studies. The impact of some, if not all, article-level factors on citations are moderated by journal-level factors. Internet studies, like studies in other areas (e.g., management, demography, and ecology), are cited more for rhetorical purposes, as suggested by the social constructivist approach, rather than as a form of reward, as argued by normative theory. The impact of time on citations varies across journals, which creates a growing "citation gap" for Internet studies published in journals with different characteristics.
  6. Hovden, R.: Bibliometrics for Internet media : applying the h-index to YouTube (2013) 0.01 
    0.0074825455 = product of:
  0.044895273 = sum of:
    0.044895273 = weight(_text_:internet in 1111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044895273 = score(doc=1111,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.39547163 = fieldWeight in 1111, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1111)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The h-index can be a useful metric for evaluating a person's output of Internet media. Here I advocate and demonstrate adaption of the h-index and the g-index to the top video content creators on YouTube. The h-index for Internet video media is based on videos and their view counts. The h-index is defined as the number of videos with >=h × 10**5 views. The g-index is defined as the number of videos with >=g × 10**5 views on average. When compared with a video creator's total view count, the h-index and g-index better capture both productivity and impact in a single metric.
  7. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.01 
    0.00697805 = product of:
  0.0418683 = sum of:
    0.0418683 = product of:
      0.06280245 = sum of:
        0.0315431 = weight(_text_:29 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0315431 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
        0.03125935 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03125935 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  8. May, M.: Bibliometrie - ein Aufgabengebiet von Bibliotheken? (2014) 0.00 
    0.0049371994 = product of:
  0.029623196 = sum of:
    0.029623196 = weight(_text_:internet in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029623196 = score(doc=2578,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.2609436 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Bibliometrie zur Evaluation wissenschaftlicher Leistung gewinnt zunehmend an Bedeutung. Vor allem für Hochschulleitungen sind bibliometrische Indices zur Leistungsbeurteilung ihrer Wissenschaftler attraktiv. Die Wissenschaftler hingegen stehen den bibliometrischen Analysen skeptisch gegenüber und nehmen die Indices nur zögerlich an, wie die geringe Nutzung auf ihren Homepages im Internet zeigt. Für Bibliotheken ergibt sich eine neue Aufgabe. Sie sollten sich als Partner beider Gruppen positionieren und durch aktive Beratung ihre Kompetenz auf diesem Feld einbringen.
  9. Khan, G.F.; Park, H.W.: Measuring the triple helix on the web : longitudinal trends in the university-industry-government relationship in Korea (2011) 0.00 
    0.0043639094 = product of:
  0.026183454 = sum of:
    0.026183454 = weight(_text_:internet in 4944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026183454 = score(doc=4944,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.23064373 = fieldWeight in 4944, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4944)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This study examines longitudinal trends in the university-industry-government (UIG) relationship on the web in the Korean context by using triple helix (TH) indicators. The study considers various Internet resources, including websites/documents, blogs, online cafes, Knowledge-In (comparable to Yahoo! Answers), and online news sites, by employing webometric and co-word analysis techniques to ascertain longitudinal trends in the UIG relationship, which have received considerable attention in the last decade. The results indicate that the UIG relationship varied according to the government's policies and that there was some tension in the longitudinal UIG relationship. Further, websites/documents and blogs were the most reliable sources for examining the strength of and variations in the bilateral and trilateral UIG relationships on the web. In addition, web-based T(uig) values showed a stronger trilateral relationship and larger variations in the UIG relationship than Science Citation Index-based T(uig) values. The results suggest that various Internet resources (e.g., advanced search engines, websites/documents, blogs, and online cafes), together with TH indicators, can be used to explore the UIG relationship on the web.
  10. Böhm, P.; Rittberger, M.: Einsatz von Webanalyse in überregionalen Informationsinfrastruktureinrichtungen (2016) 0.00 
    0.0043200497 = product of:
  0.025920296 = sum of:
    0.025920296 = weight(_text_:internet in 3239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025920296 = score(doc=3239,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 3239, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3239)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Internet
  11. Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019) 0.00 
    0.0040469817 = product of:
  0.02428189 = sum of:
    0.02428189 = product of:
      0.07284567 = sum of:
        0.07284567 = weight(_text_:29 in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07284567 = score(doc=5624,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.5385337 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17
    4. 8.2019 19:52:29
    Issue
    [29. Juli 2019].
  12. Simkin, M.V.; Roychowdhury, V.P.: Why does attention to web articles fall with Time? (2015) 0.00 
    0.0037028994 = product of:
  0.022217397 = sum of:
    0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 2163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022217397 = score(doc=2163,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 2163, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2163)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Internet
  13. Yang, S.; Han, R.; Ding, J.; Song, Y.: ¬The distribution of Web citations (2012) 0.00 
    0.0037028994 = product of:
  0.022217397 = sum of:
    0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022217397 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Internet
  14. Zhou, Q.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The normalization of occurrence and co-occurrence matrices in bibliometrics using Cosine similarities and Ochiai coefficients (2016) 0.00 
    0.0037028994 = product of:
  0.022217397 = sum of:
    0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022217397 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    We prove that Ochiai similarity of the co-occurrence matrix is equal to cosine similarity in the underlying occurrence matrix. Neither the cosine nor the Pearson correlation should be used for the normalization of co-occurrence matrices because the similarity is then normalized twice, and therefore overestimated; the Ochiai coefficient can be used instead. Results are shown using a small matrix (5 cases, 4 variables) for didactic reasons, and also Ahlgren et?al.'s (2003) co-occurrence matrix of 24 authors in library and information sciences. The overestimation is shown numerically and will be illustrated using multidimensional scaling and cluster dendograms. If the occurrence matrix is not available (such as in internet research or author cocitation analysis) using Ochiai for the normalization is preferable to using the cosine.
  15. Koulouri, X.; Ifrim, C.; Wallace, M.; Pop, F.: Making sense of citations (2017) 0.00 
    0.0037028994 = product of:
  0.022217397 = sum of:
    0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 3486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022217397 = score(doc=3486,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 3486, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3486)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Series
    Information Systems and Applications, incl. Internet/Web, and HCI; 10151
  16. Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Web citations in patents : evidence of technological impact? (2017) 0.00 
    0.0037028994 = product of:
  0.022217397 = sum of:
    0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 3764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022217397 = score(doc=3764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 3764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3764)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Patents sometimes cite webpages either as general background to the problem being addressed or to identify prior publications that limit the scope of the patent granted. Counts of the number of patents citing an organization's website may therefore provide an indicator of its technological capacity or relevance. This article introduces methods to extract URL citations from patents and evaluates the usefulness of counts of patent web citations as a technology indicator. An analysis of patents citing 200 US universities or 177 UK universities found computer science and engineering departments to be frequently cited, as well as research-related webpages, such as Wikipedia, YouTube, or the Internet Archive. Overall, however, patent URL citations seem to be frequent enough to be useful for ranking major US and the top few UK universities if popular hosted subdomains are filtered out, but the hit count estimates on the first search engine results page should not be relied upon for accuracy.
  17. Sugimoto, C.R.; Work, S.; Larivière, V.; Haustein, S.: Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics : A review of the literature (2017) 0.00 
    0.0037028994 = product of:
  0.022217397 = sum of:
    0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022217397 = score(doc=3781,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Internet
  18. Teplitskiy, M.; Lu, G.; Duede, E.: Amplifying the impact of open access : Wikipedia and the diffusion of science (2017) 0.00 
    0.0037028994 = product of:
  0.022217397 = sum of:
    0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 3782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022217397 = score(doc=3782,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 3782, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3782)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Internet
  19. Prathap, G.: Quantity, quality, and consistency as bibliometric indicators (2014) 0.00 
    0.003504789 = product of:
  0.021028733 = sum of:
    0.021028733 = product of:
      0.0630862 = sum of:
        0.0630862 = weight(_text_:29 in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0630862 = score(doc=1178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 1.2014 15:59:59
  20. Bornmann, L.: On the function of university rankings (2014) 0.00 
    0.003504789 = product of:
  0.021028733 = sum of:
    0.021028733 = product of:
      0.0630862 = sum of:
        0.0630862 = weight(_text_:29 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0630862 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:55:03

Authors

Languages

  • e 111
  • d 13

Types

  • a 122
  • el 3
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications