Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Putkey, T.: Using SKOS to express faceted classification on the Semantic Web (2011) 0.00
    0.0024685997 = product of:
      0.014811598 = sum of:
        0.014811598 = weight(_text_:internet in 311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014811598 = score(doc=311,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 311, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=311)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper looks at Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) to investigate how a faceted classification can be expressed in RDF and shared on the Semantic Web. Statement of the Problem Faceted classification outlines facets as well as subfacets and facet values. Hierarchical relationships and associative relationships are established in a faceted classification. RDF is used to describe how a specific URI has a relationship to a facet value. Not only does RDF decompose "information into pieces," but by incorporating facet values RDF also given the URI the hierarchical and associative relationships expressed in the faceted classification. Combining faceted classification and RDF creates more knowledge than if the two stood alone. An application understands the subjectpredicate-object relationship in RDF and can display hierarchical and associative relationships based on the object (facet) value. This paper continues to investigate if the above idea is indeed useful, used, and applicable. If so, how can a faceted classification be expressed in RDF? What would this expression look like? Literature Review This paper used the same articles as the paper A Survey of Faceted Classification: History, Uses, Drawbacks and the Semantic Web (Putkey, 2010). In that paper, appropriate resources were discovered by searching in various databases for "faceted classification" and "faceted search," either in the descriptor or title fields. Citations were also followed to find more articles as well as searching the Internet for the same terms. To retrieve the documents about RDF, searches combined "faceted classification" and "RDF, " looking for these words in either the descriptor or title.
  2. Frické, M.: Logic and the organization of information (2012) 0.00
    0.0010222301 = product of:
      0.006133381 = sum of:
        0.006133381 = product of:
          0.018400142 = sum of:
            0.018400142 = weight(_text_:29 in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018400142 = score(doc=1782,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    16. 3.2012 11:26:29