Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997) 0.01
    0.0096599255 = product of:
      0.05795955 = sum of:
        0.05795955 = weight(_text_:internet in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05795955 = score(doc=701,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.5105517 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 1(1997) no.2, S.15-39
    Theme
    Internet
  2. Wheatley, A.; Armstrong, C.J.: Metadata, recall, and abstracts : can abstracts ever be reliable indicators of document value? (1997) 0.01
    0.007405799 = product of:
      0.044434793 = sum of:
        0.044434793 = weight(_text_:internet in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044434793 = score(doc=824,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.3914154 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Abstracts from 7 Internet subject trees (Euroferret, Excite, Infoseek, Lycos Top 5%, Magellan, WebCrawler, Yahoo!), 5 Internet subject gateways (ADAM, EEVL, NetFirst, OMNI, SOSIG), and 3 online databases (ERIC, ISI, LISA) were examined for their subject content, treatment of various enriching features, physical properties such as overall length, anf their readability. Considerable differences were measured, and consistent similarities among abstracts from each type of source were demonstrated. Internet subject tree abstracts were generally the shortest, and online database abstracts the longest. Subject tree and online database abstracts were the most informative, but the level of coverage of document features such as tables, bibliographies, and geographical constraints were disappointingly poor. On balance, the Internet gateways appeared to be providing the most satisfactory abstracts. The authors discuss the continuing role in networked information retrieval of abstracts and their functional analoques such as metadata
  3. Armstrong, C.J.; Wheatley, A.: Writing abstracts for online databases : results of database producers' guidelines (1998) 0.01
    0.0061094724 = product of:
      0.036656834 = sum of:
        0.036656834 = weight(_text_:internet in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036656834 = score(doc=3295,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.32290122 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on one area of research in an Electronic Libraries Programme (eLib) MODELS (MOving to Distributed Environments for Library Services) supporting study in 3 investigative areas: examination of current database producers' guidelines for their abstract writers; a brief survey of abstracts in some traditional online databases; and a detailed survey of abstracts from 3 types of electronic database (print sourced online databases, Internet subject trees or directories, and Internet gateways). Examination of database producers' guidelines, reported here, gave a clear view of the intentions behind professionally produced traditional (printed index based) database abstracts and provided a benchmark against which to judge the conclusions of the larger investigations into abstract style, readability and content
  4. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Summarizing information (1998) 0.00
    0.0037028994 = product of:
      0.022217397 = sum of:
        0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022217397 = score(doc=688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Summarizing is the process of reducing the large information size of something like a novel or a scientific paper to a short summary or abstract comprising only the most essential points. Summarizing is frequent in everyday communication, but it is also a professional skill for journalists and others. Automated summarizing functions are urgently needed by Internet users who wish to avoid being overwhelmed by information. This book presents the state of the art and surveys related research; it deals with everyday and professional summarizing as well as computerized approaches. The author focuses in detail on the cognitive pro-cess involved in summarizing and supports this with a multimedia simulation systems on the accompanying CD-ROM
  5. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998) 0.00
    0.0037028994 = product of:
      0.022217397 = sum of:
        0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022217397 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: Indexing principles, Indexing practice, Precoordinate indexes, Consistency of indexing, Quality of indexing, Abstracts: types and functions, Writing the Abstract, Evaluation aspects, Approaches used in indexing and abstracting services, Enhancing the indexing, On the indexing and abstracting of imaginative works, Indexing multimedia sources, Texte searching, Automatic indexing, automatic abstracting, and related procedures, Indexing and the Internet, The future of indexing and abstracting, exercises in indexing and abstracting
  6. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.00
    0.0028943846 = product of:
      0.017366307 = sum of:
        0.017366307 = product of:
          0.05209892 = sum of:
            0.05209892 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05209892 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  7. Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997) 0.00
    0.002336526 = product of:
      0.014019156 = sum of:
        0.014019156 = product of:
          0.042057466 = sum of:
            0.042057466 = weight(_text_:29 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042057466 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    25. 2.1997 10:29:16
  8. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.00
    0.0023155077 = product of:
      0.0138930455 = sum of:
        0.0138930455 = product of:
          0.041679136 = sum of:
            0.041679136 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041679136 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  9. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00
    0.0017366307 = product of:
      0.010419784 = sum of:
        0.010419784 = product of:
          0.03125935 = sum of:
            0.03125935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03125935 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  10. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.00
    0.0017366307 = product of:
      0.010419784 = sum of:
        0.010419784 = product of:
          0.03125935 = sum of:
            0.03125935 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03125935 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  11. Alonso, M.I.; Fernández, L.M.M.: Perspectives of studies on document abstracting : towards an integrated view of models and theoretical approaches (2010) 0.00
    0.0014603289 = product of:
      0.008761973 = sum of:
        0.008761973 = product of:
          0.026285918 = sum of:
            0.026285918 = weight(_text_:29 in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026285918 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2010 13:11:19
  12. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00
    0.0014471923 = product of:
      0.008683153 = sum of:
        0.008683153 = product of:
          0.02604946 = sum of:
            0.02604946 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02604946 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356