-
Krömmelbein, U.: linguistische und fachwissenschaftliche Gesichtspunkte. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Regeln für die Schlagwortvergabe der Deutschen Bibliothek, RSWK, Voll-PRECIS und Kurz-PRECIS : Schlagwort-Syntax (1983)
0.04
0.039598867 = product of:
0.118796594 = sum of:
0.10127265 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10127265 = score(doc=2566,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1578712 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.6414891 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
0.017523946 = product of:
0.052571837 = sum of:
0.052571837 = weight(_text_:29 in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052571837 = score(doc=2566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 6. 1.1999 9:29:10
- Footnote
- Examensarbeit Höherer Dienst an der FHBD in Köln. - Auch veröffentlicht in: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 8(1984) S.159-203
-
Krömmelbein, U.: Linguistische und fachwissenschaftliche Gesichtspunkte der Schlagwortsyntax : Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Regeln für die Schlagwortvergabe der Deutschen Bibliothek, der RSWK und der Indexierungsverfahren Voll-PRECIS und Kurz-PRECIS (1984)
0.01
0.014322116 = product of:
0.085932694 = sum of:
0.085932694 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085932694 = score(doc=984,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1578712 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.54432154 = fieldWeight in 984, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=984)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Die deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt bietet seit einigen Jahren zentrale Dienste im Bereich der verbalen Sacherschließung an, Um deren Akzeptanz zu verbessern, will die Deutsche Bibliothek ab 1986 von der augenblicklichen gleichordnenden Indexierung zu einem syntaktischen Verfahren übergehen. Als Alternativen standen die RSWK und eine verkürzte Version des britischen Indexierungsverfahrens PRECIS zur Diskussion. Die Anforderungen einer Fachwissenschaft an die Schlagwort-Syntax einer adäquaten Dokumentationssprache werden exemplarisch entwickelt, die vier Alternativen - augenblickliche verbale Sacherschließunf der DB, RSWK, PRECIS (britische Version) und Kurz-PRECIS (DB-Version) - an ihnen gemessen. Die Kriterien basiern auf Grammatiktheorien der modernen Linguistik und gehen von einer Analogie zwischen Dokumentationssprachen und natürlicher Sprache aus.
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 8(1984), S.159-202
-
Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997)
0.01
0.01087906 = product of:
0.03263718 = sum of:
0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022217397 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.010419784 = product of:
0.03125935 = sum of:
0.03125935 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03125935 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Discusses the apparently unattainable goal of compatibility of information languages. While controlled languages can improve retrieval performance within a single system, they make cooperation across different systems more difficult. The Internet and downloading accentuate this adverse outcome and the acceleration of data exchange aggravates the problem of compatibility. Defines this familiar concept and demonstrates that coherence is just as necessary as it was for indexing languages, the proliferation of which has created confusion in grouped data banks. Describes 2 types of potential solutions, similar to those applied to automatic translation of natural languages: - harmonizing the information languages themselves, both difficult and expensive, or, the more flexible solution involving automatic harmonization of indexing formulae based on pre established concordance tables. However, structural incompatibilities between post coordinated languages and classifications may lead any harmonization tools up a blind alley, while the paths of a universal concordance model are rare and narrow
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.01
0.008141059 = product of:
0.048846357 = sum of:
0.048846357 = product of:
0.07326953 = sum of:
0.036800284 = weight(_text_:29 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036800284 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.036469243 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036469243 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 2. 3.2013 12:29:05
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Bhattacharyya, G.: ¬A general theory of subject headings (1974)
0.00
0.004673052 = product of:
0.028038312 = sum of:
0.028038312 = product of:
0.08411493 = sum of:
0.08411493 = weight(_text_:29 in 1592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08411493 = score(doc=1592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1592)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation. 11(1974), S.23-29
-
Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991)
0.00
0.0040521384 = product of:
0.02431283 = sum of:
0.02431283 = product of:
0.07293849 = sum of:
0.07293849 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07293849 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 11:52:22
-
Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996)
0.00
0.0032746224 = product of:
0.019647734 = sum of:
0.019647734 = product of:
0.0589432 = sum of:
0.0589432 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0589432 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 31. 7.2006 14:22:21
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
-
Francu, V.: ¬A linguistic approach to information languages (2003)
0.00
0.0029206579 = product of:
0.017523946 = sum of:
0.017523946 = product of:
0.052571837 = sum of:
0.052571837 = weight(_text_:29 in 3538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052571837 = score(doc=3538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3538)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 11. 6.2005 19:38:29
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996)
0.00
0.0028943846 = product of:
0.017366307 = sum of:
0.017366307 = product of:
0.05209892 = sum of:
0.05209892 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05209892 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Pages
- S.11-22
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Gilchrist, A.; Will, L.: Revision and extension of thesaurus standards (2004)
0.00
0.0024685997 = product of:
0.014811598 = sum of:
0.014811598 = weight(_text_:internet in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014811598 = score(doc=2615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The current standards for monolingual and multilingual thesauri are long overdue for an update. This applies to the international standards ISO 2788 and ISO 5964, as well as the corresponding national standards in several countries and the American standard ANSI/NISO Z39.19. Work is now under way in the UK and in the USA to revise and extend the standards, with particular emphasis on interoperability needs in our world of vast electronic networks. Work in the UK is starting with the British Standards, in the hope of leading on to one international standard to serve all. Some of the issues still under discussion include the treatment of facet analysis, coverage of additional types of controlled vocabulary such as classification schemes, taxonomies and ontologies, and mapping from one vocabulary to another. 1. Are thesaurus standards still needed? Since the 1960s, even before the renowned Cranfield experiments (Cleverdon et al., 1966; Cleverdon, 1967) arguments have raged over the usefulness or otherwise of controlled vocabularies. The case has never been proved definitively one way or the other. At the same time, a recognition has become widespread that no one search method can answer all retrieval requirements. In today's environment of very large networks of resources, the skilled information professional uses a range of techniques. Among these, controlled vocabularies are valued alongside others. The first international standard for monolingual thesauri was issued in 1974. In those days, the main application was for postcoordinate indexing and retrieval from document collections or bibliographic databases. For many information professionals the only practicable alternative to a thesaurus was a classification scheme. And so the thesaurus developed a strong following. After computer systems with full text search capability became widely available, however, the arguments against controlled vocabularies gained more followers. The cost of building and maintaining a thesaurus or a classification scheme was a strong disincentive. Today's databases are typically immense compared with those three decades ago. Full text searching is taken for granted, not just in discrete databases but across all the resources in an intranet or even the Internet. But intranets have brought particular frustration as users discover that despite all the computer power, they cannot find items which they know to be present an the network. So the trend against controlled vocabularies is now being reversed, as many information professionals are turning to them for help. Standards to guide them are still in demand.
-
Green, R.; Bean, C.A.: Aligning systems of relationships (2006)
0.00
0.002336526 = product of:
0.014019156 = sum of:
0.014019156 = product of:
0.042057466 = sum of:
0.042057466 = weight(_text_:29 in 4949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042057466 = score(doc=4949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4949)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 2.2008 19:20:53
-
Green, R.; Fraser, L.: Patterns in verbal polysemy (2004)
0.00
0.002336526 = product of:
0.014019156 = sum of:
0.014019156 = product of:
0.042057466 = sum of:
0.042057466 = weight(_text_:29 in 2621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042057466 = score(doc=2621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2621)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Pages
- S.29-34
-
Miller, U.; Teitelbaum, R.: Pre-coordination and post-coordination : past and future (2002)
0.00
0.0020444603 = product of:
0.012266762 = sum of:
0.012266762 = product of:
0.036800284 = sum of:
0.036800284 = weight(_text_:29 in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036800284 = score(doc=1395,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.87-93
-
Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998)
0.00
0.0020260692 = product of:
0.012156415 = sum of:
0.012156415 = product of:
0.036469243 = sum of:
0.036469243 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036469243 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.00
0.0020260692 = product of:
0.012156415 = sum of:
0.012156415 = product of:
0.036469243 = sum of:
0.036469243 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036469243 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
-
Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000)
0.00
0.0017523945 = product of:
0.010514366 = sum of:
0.010514366 = product of:
0.0315431 = sum of:
0.0315431 = weight(_text_:29 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0315431 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
-
Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000)
0.00
0.0017523945 = product of:
0.010514366 = sum of:
0.010514366 = product of:
0.0315431 = sum of:
0.0315431 = weight(_text_:29 in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0315431 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
-
Hoerman, H.L.; Furniss, K.A.: Turning practice into principles : a comparison of the IFLA Principles underlying Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) and the principles underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings system (2000)
0.00
0.0017523945 = product of:
0.010514366 = sum of:
0.010514366 = product of:
0.0315431 = sum of:
0.0315431 = weight(_text_:29 in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0315431 = score(doc=5611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
-
Gilchrist, A.: Structure and function in retrieval (2006)
0.00
0.0017523945 = product of:
0.010514366 = sum of:
0.010514366 = product of:
0.0315431 = sum of:
0.0315431 = weight(_text_:29 in 5585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0315431 = score(doc=5585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5585)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 62(2006) no.1, S.21-29
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and index language in the field of information supply : an overview of their specific capabilities and limitations (2002)
0.00
0.0014603289 = product of:
0.008761973 = sum of:
0.008761973 = product of:
0.026285918 = sum of:
0.026285918 = weight(_text_:29 in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026285918 = score(doc=1412,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038453303 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.217-230
