Search (75 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.03 
    0.025384475 = product of:
  0.07615342 = sum of:
    0.051840592 = weight(_text_:internet in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051840592 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.45665127 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
    0.02431283 = product of:
      0.07293849 = sum of:
        0.07293849 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07293849 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  2. Chakrabarti, S.; Dom, B.; Kumar, S.R.; Raghavan, P.; Rajagopalan, S.; Tomkins, A.; Kleinberg, J.M.; Gibson, D.: Neue Pfade durch den Internet-Dschungel : Die zweite Generation von Web-Suchmaschinen (1999) 0.01 
    0.0145474505 = product of:
  0.04364235 = sum of:
    0.029623196 = weight(_text_:internet in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029623196 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.2609436 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
    0.014019156 = product of:
      0.042057466 = sum of:
        0.042057466 = weight(_text_:29 in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042057466 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
  3. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.01 
    0.012692237 = product of:
  0.03807671 = sum of:
    0.025920296 = weight(_text_:internet in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025920296 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
    0.012156415 = product of:
      0.036469243 = sum of:
        0.036469243 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036469243 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Theme
    Internet
  4. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.01 
    0.012692237 = product of:
  0.03807671 = sum of:
    0.025920296 = weight(_text_:internet in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025920296 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
    0.012156415 = product of:
      0.036469243 = sum of:
        0.036469243 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036469243 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des klassischen Information Retrieval wurden verschiedene Verfahren für das Ranking sowie die Suche in einer homogenen strukturlosen Dokumentenmenge entwickelt. Die Erfolge der Suchmaschine Google haben gezeigt dass die Suche in einer zwar inhomogenen aber zusammenhängenden Dokumentenmenge wie dem Internet unter Berücksichtigung der Dokumentenverbindungen (Links) sehr effektiv sein kann. Unter den von der Suchmaschine Google realisierten Konzepten ist ein Verfahren zum Ranking von Suchergebnissen (PageRank), das in diesem Artikel kurz erklärt wird. Darüber hinaus wird auf die Konzepte eines Systems namens CiteSeer eingegangen, welches automatisch bibliographische Angaben indexiert (engl. Autonomous Citation Indexing, ACI). Letzteres erzeugt aus einer Menge von nicht vernetzten wissenschaftlichen Dokumenten eine zusammenhängende Dokumentenmenge und ermöglicht den Einsatz von Banking-Verfahren, die auf den von Google genutzten Verfahren basieren.
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  5. Hora, M.: Methoden für das Ranking in Discovery-Systemen (2018) 0.01 
    0.011815144 = product of:
  0.07089086 = sum of:
    0.07089086 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07089086 = score(doc=4968,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1578712 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.44904238 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/bibliothek/article/view/57797. Vgl. auch: URN (PDF): http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-pb-577977.
    Source
    Perspektive Bibliothek. 7(2018) H.2, S.2-23
  6. Behnert, C.; Borst, T.: Neue Formen der Relevanz-Sortierung in bibliothekarischen Informationssystemen : das DFG-Projekt LibRank (2015) 0.01 
    0.009548077 = product of:
  0.057288464 = sum of:
    0.057288464 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057288464 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1578712 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.36288103 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 39(2015) H.3, S.384-393
  7. Weinstein, A.: Hochprozentig : Tipps and tricks für ein Top-Ranking (2002) 0.01 
    0.008727819 = product of:
  0.05236691 = sum of:
    0.05236691 = weight(_text_:internet in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05236691 = score(doc=1083,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.46128747 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Die Suchmaschinen haben in den letzten Monaten an ihren Ranking-Algorithmen gefeilt, um Spamern das Handwerk zu erschweren. Internet Pro beleuchtet die Trends im Suchmaschinen-Marketing
    Source
    Internet Professionell. 2002, H.9, S.66-71
  8. Zhang, D.; Dong, Y.: ¬An effective algorithm to rank Web resources (2000) 0.01 
    0.008640099 = product of:
  0.051840592 = sum of:
    0.051840592 = weight(_text_:internet in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051840592 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.45665127 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Internet
  9. Notess, G.R.: Search engine relevance : the never-ending quest (2000) 0.01 
    0.008640099 = product of:
  0.051840592 = sum of:
    0.051840592 = weight(_text_:internet in 4797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051840592 = score(doc=4797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.45665127 = fieldWeight in 4797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4797)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Bericht über verschiedene Relevanzverfahren der Suchdienste des Internet
  10. Wilhelmy, A.: Phonetische Ähnlichkeitssuche in Datenbanken (1991) 0.01 
    0.007161058 = product of:
  0.042966347 = sum of:
    0.042966347 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 5684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042966347 = score(doc=5684,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1578712 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.27216077 = fieldWeight in 5684, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5684)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Bibliotheken mit und ohne Grenzen: Informationsgesellschaft und Bibliothek. Der österreichische Bibliothekartag 1990, Bregenz, 4.-8.9.1990, Vorträge und Kommissionssitzungen
  11. Mandl, T.: Web- und Multimedia-Dokumente : Neuere Entwicklungen bei der Evaluierung von Information Retrieval Systemen (2003) 0.01 
    0.006982255 = product of:
  0.041893527 = sum of:
    0.041893527 = weight(_text_:internet in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041893527 = score(doc=1734,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.36902997 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Die Menge an Daten im Internet steigt weiter rapide an. Damit wächst auch der Bedarf an qualitativ hochwertigen Information Retrieval Diensten zur Orientierung und problemorientierten Suche. Die Entscheidung für die Benutzung oder Beschaffung von Information Retrieval Software erfordert aussagekräftige Evaluierungsergebnisse. Dieser Beitrag stellt neuere Entwicklungen bei der Evaluierung von Information Retrieval Systemen vor und zeigt den Trend zu Spezialisierung und Diversifizierung von Evaluierungsstudien, die den Realitätsgrad derErgebnisse erhöhen. DerSchwerpunkt liegt auf dem Retrieval von Fachtexten, Internet-Seiten und Multimedia-Objekten.
  12. Wills, R.S.: Google's PageRank : the math behind the search engine (2006) 0.00 
    0.0049371994 = product of:
  0.029623196 = sum of:
    0.029623196 = weight(_text_:internet in 5954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029623196 = score(doc=5954,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.2609436 = fieldWeight in 5954, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5954)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Approximately 91 million American adults use the Internet on a typical day The number-one Internet activity is reading and writing e-mail. Search engine use is next in line and continues to increase in popularity. In fact, survey findings indicate that nearly 60 million American adults use search engines on a given day. Even though there are many Internet search engines, Google, Yahoo!, and MSN receive over 81% of all search requests. Despite claims that the quality of search provided by Yahoo! and MSN now equals that of Google, Google continues to thrive as the search engine of choice, receiving over 46% of all search requests, nearly double the volume of Yahoo! and over four times that of MSN. I use Google's search engine on a daily basis and rarely request information from other search engines. One day, I decided to visit the homepages of Google. Yahoo!, and MSN to compare the quality of search results. Coffee was on my mind that day, so I entered the simple query "coffee" in the search box at each homepage. Table 1 shows the top ten (unsponsored) results returned by each search engine. Although ordered differently, two webpages, www.peets.com and www.coffeegeek.com, appear in all three top ten lists. In addition, each pairing of top ten lists has two additional results in common. Depending on the information I hoped to obtain about coffee by using the search engines, I could argue that any one of the three returned better results: however, I was not looking for a particular webpage, so all three listings of search results seemed of equal quality. Thus, I plan to continue using Google. My decision is indicative of the problem Yahoo!, MSN, and other search engine companies face in the quest to obtain a larger percentage of Internet search volume. Search engine users are loyal to one or a few search engines and are generally happy with search results. Thus, as long as Google continues to provide results deemed high in quality, Google likely will remain the top search engine. But what set Google apart from its competitors in the first place? The answer is PageRank. In this article I explain this simple mathematical algorithm that revolutionized Web search.
  13. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.00 
    0.0046310155 = product of:
  0.027786091 = sum of:
    0.027786091 = product of:
      0.08335827 = sum of:
        0.08335827 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08335827 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  14. Abdelali, A.; Cowie, J.; Soliman, H.S.: Improving query precision using semantic expansion (2007) 0.00 
    0.0043200497 = product of:
  0.025920296 = sum of:
    0.025920296 = weight(_text_:internet in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025920296 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Query Expansion (QE) is one of the most important mechanisms in the information retrieval field. A typical short Internet query will go through a process of refinement to improve its retrieval power. Most of the existing QE techniques suffer from retrieval performance degradation due to imprecise choice of query's additive terms in the QE process. In this paper, we introduce a novel automated QE mechanism. The new expansion process is guided by the semantics relations between the original query and the expanding words, in the context of the utilized corpus. Experimental results of our "controlled" query expansion, using the Arabic TREC-10 data, show a significant enhancement of recall and precision over current existing mechanisms in the field.
  15. Torra, V.; Miyamoto, S.; Lanau, S.: Exploration of textual document archives using a fuzzy hierarchical clustering algorithm in the GAMBAL system (2005) 0.00 
    0.0043200497 = product of:
  0.025920296 = sum of:
    0.025920296 = weight(_text_:internet in 1028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025920296 = score(doc=1028,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 1028, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1028)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The Internet, together with the large amount of textual information available in document archives, has increased the relevance of information retrieval related tools. In this work we present an extension of the Gambal system for clustering and visualization of documents based on fuzzy clustering techniques. The tool allows to structure the set of documents in a hierarchical way (using a fuzzy hierarchical structure) and represent this structure in a graphical interface (a 3D sphere) over which the user can navigate. Gambal allows the analysis of the documents and the computation of their similarity not only on the basis of the syntactic similarity between words but also based on a dictionary (Wordnet 1.7) and latent semantics analysis.
  16. Archuby, C.G.: Interfaces se recuperacion para catalogos en linea con salidas ordenadas por probable relevancia (2000) 0.00 
    0.004130434 = product of:
  0.024782602 = sum of:
    0.024782602 = product of:
      0.0743478 = sum of:
        0.0743478 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0743478 = score(doc=5727,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 18:23:13
    Source
    Ciencia da informacao. 29(2000) no.3, S.5-13
  17. Crestani, F.: Combination of similarity measures for effective spoken document retrieval (2003) 0.00 
    0.0040889205 = product of:
  0.024533523 = sum of:
    0.024533523 = product of:
      0.07360057 = sum of:
        0.07360057 = weight(_text_:29 in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07360057 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.2, S.87-96
  18. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.00 
    0.0040521384 = product of:
  0.02431283 = sum of:
    0.02431283 = product of:
      0.07293849 = sum of:
        0.07293849 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07293849 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  19. Martin-Bautista, M.J.; Vila, M.-A.; Larsen, H.L.: ¬A fuzzy genetic algorithm approach to an adaptive information retrieval agent (1999) 0.00 
    0.0037028994 = product of:
  0.022217397 = sum of:
    0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 3914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022217397 = score(doc=3914,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 3914, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3914)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    We present an approach to a Genetic Information Retrieval Agent filter (GIRAF) for documents from the Internet using a genetic algorithm (GA) with fuzzy set genes to learn the user's information needs. The population of chromosomes with fixed length represents such user's preferences. Each chromosome is associated with a fitness that may be considered the system's belief in the hypothesis that the chromosome, as a query, represents the user's information needs. In a chromosome, every gene characterizes documents by a keyword and an associated occurence frequency, represented by a certain type of a fuzzy subset of the set of positive integers. Based on the user's evaluation of the documents retrieved by the chromosome, compared to the scores computed by the system, the fitness of the chromosomes is adjusted. A prototype of GIRAF has been developed and tested. The results of the test are discussed, and some directions for further works are pointed out
  20. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Internet-Suchwerkzeuge im Vergleich (IV) : Relevance Ranking nach "Popularität" von Webseiten: Google (2001) 0.00 
    0.0037028994 = product of:
  0.022217397 = sum of:
    0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 5771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022217397 = score(doc=5771,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 5771, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5771)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 59
  • d 15
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Themes