Search (79 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.01 
    0.0052133217 = product of:
  0.041706573 = sum of:
    0.041706573 = product of:
      0.06255986 = sum of:
        0.031421255 = weight(_text_:29 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031421255 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
        0.0311386 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0311386 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
  2. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.00 
    0.004468561 = product of:
  0.03574849 = sum of:
    0.03574849 = product of:
      0.053622734 = sum of:
        0.026932506 = weight(_text_:29 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026932506 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
        0.026690228 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026690228 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    17.12.2006 19:44:29
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.0029655811 = product of:
  0.02372465 = sum of:
    0.02372465 = product of:
      0.07117394 = sum of:
        0.07117394 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07117394 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00 
    0.0026212279 = product of:
  0.020969823 = sum of:
    0.020969823 = product of:
      0.06290947 = sum of:
        0.06290947 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06290947 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  5. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.00 
    0.0022241857 = product of:
  0.017793486 = sum of:
    0.017793486 = product of:
      0.053380456 = sum of:
        0.053380456 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053380456 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  6. Juchem, K.: ¬Der Bibliotheksdienst in szientometrischer Analyse (2002) 0.00 
    0.0016772343 = product of:
  0.013417874 = sum of:
    0.013417874 = product of:
      0.06708937 = sum of:
        0.06708937 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 1213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06708937 = score(doc=1213,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876343 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.39753503 = fieldWeight in 1213, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1213)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Content
    Der BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST Ist das Organ der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände (BDB) und wird von der Zentral- und Landesbibliothek Berlin herausgegeben. Er ist eine Fachzeitschrift mit Mitteilungen und Berichten aus allen Bereichen der Bibliotheksarbeit. Der BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST erscheint monatlich (11mal im Jahr), die durchschnittliche Seitenzahl (im DIN A5-Format) beträgt 2.250 pro Jahrgang, wovon rund 200 bis 300 Seiten auf Anzeigen entfallen. Mit einer verkauften Auflage von 4.000 Exemplaren hat er eine große Reichweite in der deutschen Bibliothekswelt. 90% der Abonnenten leben in Deutschland, 10% im Ausland. Der Bezieherkreis setzt sich aus Bibliothekaren und verwandten Berufsgruppen (50%), aus Bibliotheken (40%) und Institutionen des Informationswesens (10%) zusammen. Der BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST erscheint als Printorgan, mit einer Verzögerung von drei Monaten werden die Artikel zusätzlich digital (http://bibliotheksdienst.zib.de) zur Verfügung gestellt. Wie werden die Beiträge des BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST rezipiert? Wo steht der BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST In der wissenschaftlichen Kommunikation?
  7. Tunger, D.: Bibliometrie als Teil eines Trenderkennugns-Systems in der Naturwissenschaft (2009) 0.00 
    0.0016772343 = product of:
  0.013417874 = sum of:
    0.013417874 = product of:
      0.06708937 = sum of:
        0.06708937 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 2770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06708937 = score(doc=2770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876343 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.39753503 = fieldWeight in 2770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2770)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Die Anzahl wissenschaftlicher Publikationen in Zeitschriften, die Anzahl von Zitaten in diesen Zeitschriftenartikeln und die Anzahl angemeldeter Patente steigen ständig und scheinbar unaufhaltsam. Der Einsatz von Bibliometrie eröffnet die Möglichkeit, diese Kommunikation in der Wissenschaft transparenter zu machen: So können mit Hilfe von Bibliometrie die Entwicklung von Themen nachvollzogen, die Wahrnehmung von Einrichtungen bestimmt und mögliche Kooperationspartner identifiziert werden. Der Beitrag illustriert, wie es mit Hilfe von quantitativen bibliometrischen Methoden möglich ist, einen objektiven Eindruck wissenschaftlicher Entwicklung zu gewinnen. Er befasst sich dabei mit der Frage, wie Bibliometrie im Kontext von Trendbeobachtung und Trenderkennung in der Naturwissenschaft eingesetzt werden kann und welcher Nutzen sich hieraus ergibt.
  8. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.00 
    0.001572737 = product of:
  0.012581896 = sum of:
    0.012581896 = product of:
      0.037745688 = sum of:
        0.037745688 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037745688 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  9. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00 
    0.001572737 = product of:
  0.012581896 = sum of:
    0.012581896 = product of:
      0.037745688 = sum of:
        0.037745688 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037745688 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  10. Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003) 0.00 
    0.0014962503 = product of:
  0.011970002 = sum of:
    0.011970002 = product of:
      0.035910007 = sum of:
        0.035910007 = weight(_text_:29 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035910007 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:52:23
  11. Zhao, L.: How librarians used e-resources : an analysis of citations in CCQ (2006) 0.00 
    0.0014962503 = product of:
  0.011970002 = sum of:
    0.011970002 = product of:
      0.035910007 = sum of:
        0.035910007 = weight(_text_:29 in 5766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035910007 = score(doc=5766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5766)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 9.2008 18:49:25
  12. Pernik, V.; Schlögl, C.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Web Structure Mining am Beispiel von informationswissenschaftlichen Hochschulinstituten im deutschsprachigen Raum (2006) 0.00 
    0.0014962503 = product of:
  0.011970002 = sum of:
    0.011970002 = product of:
      0.035910007 = sum of:
        0.035910007 = weight(_text_:29 in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035910007 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:14:29
  13. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.00 
    0.0014962503 = product of:
  0.011970002 = sum of:
    0.011970002 = product of:
      0.035910007 = sum of:
        0.035910007 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035910007 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    27.12.2007 17:16:29
  14. Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009) 0.00 
    0.0014962503 = product of:
  0.011970002 = sum of:
    0.011970002 = product of:
      0.035910007 = sum of:
        0.035910007 = weight(_text_:29 in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035910007 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    4. 2.2010 20:56:29
  15. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.00 
    0.0014827906 = product of:
  0.011862325 = sum of:
    0.011862325 = product of:
      0.03558697 = sum of:
        0.03558697 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03558697 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  16. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.00 
    0.0014827906 = product of:
  0.011862325 = sum of:
    0.011862325 = product of:
      0.03558697 = sum of:
        0.03558697 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03558697 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
  17. Ohly, K.P.: Bibliometrie in der Postmoderne (2006) 0.00 
    0.0014376295 = product of:
  0.011501036 = sum of:
    0.011501036 = product of:
      0.05750518 = sum of:
        0.05750518 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05750518 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876343 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.34074432 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Die Messung wissenschaftlicher Leistung hat gerade in Zeiten knapper öffentlicher Budgets Konjunktur. Wissenschaftliche Indikatoren zeichnen sich dadurch aus, dass nicht mehr einzelne Experten ihre subjektive Einschätzung über den Zustand der Wissenschaften abgeben, sondern die Summe dessen, was die Wissenschaft selbst produziert hat, so analysiert wird, dass ein objektives' Bild der Wissenschaft entsteht'. Zudem könnte mit der öffentlichen Diskussion etwa von Rankinglisten eine demokratische Steuerung des Wissenschaftsbetriebs erreicht zu werden'. Andererseits kann seriöse Forschung, die langfristige Forschungsziele in unspektakulären Schritten stützt, die unkonventionell Wissenschaft betreibt oder die Methodenkritik ernst nimmt, hierdurch benachteiligt werden. In unserer wissenschaftlichen Kommunikation wird es zunehmend schwerer, Wissenschaftsinhalte, Wissenschaftseinheiten und Wissenschaftsauswirkungen zu definieren oder gar ursächlich zuzuschreiben. Eine Bibliometrie, die sich als eine Wissenschaft von der Messbarkeit und Aussagekraft der wissenschaftlichen Prozesse und Produkte versteht, wird genau dort wieder anzusetzen haben, wo sie einst begonnen hat: nämlich bei der Hinterfragung dessen, wie Wissenschaftlichkeit und Forschungsfortschritt sich objektiv ausdrückt und wie dies 'unobstrusiv' ermittelt und sozialverträglich kommuniziert werden kann.
  18. Lucio-Arias, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬An indicator of research front activity : measuring intellectual organization as uncertainty reduction in document sets (2009) 0.00 
    0.001322511 = product of:
  0.010580088 = sum of:
    0.010580088 = product of:
      0.031740263 = sum of:
        0.031740263 = weight(_text_:29 in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031740263 = score(doc=3297,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    2. 2.2010 19:29:29
  19. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009) 0.00 
    0.0013106139 = product of:
  0.0104849115 = sum of:
    0.0104849115 = product of:
      0.031454735 = sum of:
        0.031454735 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031454735 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:51
  20. Bookstein, A.; Raita, T.: Discovering term occurence structure in text (2001) 0.00 
    0.001309219 = product of:
  0.010473752 = sum of:
    0.010473752 = product of:
      0.031421255 = sum of:
        0.031421255 = weight(_text_:29 in 5751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031421255 = score(doc=5751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032832656 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5751)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:00:18

Authors

Languages

  • e 65
  • d 14

Types

  • a 76
  • r 2
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications