-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: ¬An empirical process model of abstracting (1992)
0.01
0.014790262 = product of:
0.1183221 = sum of:
0.1183221 = product of:
0.29580525 = sum of:
0.18079488 = weight(_text_:maschine in 8834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18079488 = score(doc=8834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21159379 = queryWeight, product of:
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.8544432 = fieldWeight in 8834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8834)
0.11501036 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 8834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11501036 = score(doc=8834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876343 = queryWeight, product of:
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.68148863 = fieldWeight in 8834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8834)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
-
Kuhlen, R.: Informationsaufbereitung III : Referieren (Abstracts - Abstracting - Grundlagen) (2004)
0.01
0.0084029855 = product of:
0.067223884 = sum of:
0.067223884 = weight(_text_:alltag in 2917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067223884 = score(doc=2917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22347672 = queryWeight, product of:
6.806538 = idf(docFreq=132, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.30080932 = fieldWeight in 2917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.806538 = idf(docFreq=132, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2917)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Was ein Abstract (im Folgenden synonym mit Referat oder Kurzreferat gebraucht) ist, legt das American National Standards Institute in einer Weise fest, die sicherlich von den meisten Fachleuten akzeptiert werden kann: "An abstract is defined as an abbreviated, accurate representation of the contents of a document"; fast genauso die deutsche Norm DIN 1426: "Das Kurzreferat gibt kurz und klar den Inhalt des Dokuments wieder." Abstracts gehören zum wissenschaftlichen Alltag. Weitgehend allen Publikationen, zumindest in den naturwissenschaftlichen, technischen, informationsbezogenen oder medizinischen Bereichen, gehen Abstracts voran, "prefe-rably prepared by its author(s) for publication with it". Es gibt wohl keinen Wissenschaftler, der nicht irgendwann einmal ein Abstract geschrieben hätte. Gehört das Erstellen von Abstracts dann überhaupt zur dokumentarischen bzw informationswissenschaftlichen Methodenlehre, wenn es jeder kann? Was macht den informationellen Mehrwert aus, der durch Expertenreferate gegenüber Laienreferaten erzeugt wird? Dies ist nicht so leicht zu beantworten, zumal geeignete Bewertungsverfahren fehlen, die Qualität von Abstracts vergleichend "objektiv" zu messen. Abstracts werden in erheblichem Umfang von Informationsspezialisten erstellt, oft unter der Annahme, dass Autoren selber dafür weniger geeignet sind. Vergegenwärtigen wir uns, was wir über Abstracts und Abstracting wissen. Ein besonders gelungenes Abstract ist zuweilen klarer als der Ursprungstext selber, darf aber nicht mehr Information als dieser enthalten: "Good abstracts are highly structured, concise, and coherent, and are the result of a thorough analysis of the content of the abstracted materials. Abstracts may be more readable than the basis documents, but because of size constraints they rarely equal and never surpass the information content of the basic document". Dies ist verständlich, denn ein "Abstract" ist zunächst nichts anderes als ein Ergebnis des Vorgangs einer Abstraktion. Ohne uns zu sehr in die philosophischen Hintergründe der Abstraktion zu verlieren, besteht diese doch "in der Vernachlässigung von bestimmten Vorstellungsbzw. Begriffsinhalten, von welchen zugunsten anderer Teilinhalte abgesehen, abstrahiert' wird. Sie ist stets verbunden mit einer Fixierung von (interessierenden) Merkmalen durch die aktive Aufmerksamkeit, die unter einem bestimmten pragmatischen Gesichtspunkt als wesentlich' für einen vorgestellten bzw für einen unter einen Begriff fallenden Gegenstand (oder eine Mehrheit von Gegenständen) betrachtet werden". Abstracts reduzieren weniger Begriffsinhalte, sondern Texte bezüglich ihres proportionalen Gehaltes. Borko/ Bernier haben dies sogar quantifiziert; sie schätzen den Reduktionsfaktor auf 1:10 bis 1:12
-
Kuhlen, R.: Volltextanalyse zum Zwecke des Abstracting (1983)
0.00
0.002618438 = product of:
0.020947505 = sum of:
0.020947505 = product of:
0.06284251 = sum of:
0.06284251 = weight(_text_:29 in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06284251 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Gerdel, W.: Anforderungen an Referier Regeln aus Benutzersicht (1983)
0.00
0.002618438 = product of:
0.020947505 = sum of:
0.020947505 = product of:
0.06284251 = sum of:
0.06284251 = weight(_text_:29 in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06284251 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Eimermacher, M.: Textverstehen im Projekt KIT : kognitive Verfahren zur Informationsextraktion und Zusammenfassung aus Texten (1983)
0.00
0.002618438 = product of:
0.020947505 = sum of:
0.020947505 = product of:
0.06284251 = sum of:
0.06284251 = weight(_text_:29 in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06284251 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Hahn, U.; Reimer, U.: Informationslinguistische Konzepte der Volltextverarbeitung in TOPIC (1983)
0.00
0.002618438 = product of:
0.020947505 = sum of:
0.020947505 = product of:
0.06284251 = sum of:
0.06284251 = weight(_text_:29 in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06284251 = score(doc=450,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.00
0.0018534883 = product of:
0.014827906 = sum of:
0.014827906 = product of:
0.044483718 = sum of:
0.044483718 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044483718 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997)
0.00
0.0014962503 = product of:
0.011970002 = sum of:
0.011970002 = product of:
0.035910007 = sum of:
0.035910007 = weight(_text_:29 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035910007 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 25. 2.1997 10:29:16
-
Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988)
0.00
0.0014827906 = product of:
0.011862325 = sum of:
0.011862325 = product of:
0.03558697 = sum of:
0.03558697 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03558697 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.00
0.0011120929 = product of:
0.008896743 = sum of:
0.008896743 = product of:
0.026690228 = sum of:
0.026690228 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026690228 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.00
0.0011120929 = product of:
0.008896743 = sum of:
0.008896743 = product of:
0.026690228 = sum of:
0.026690228 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026690228 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006)
0.00
0.0011120929 = product of:
0.008896743 = sum of:
0.008896743 = product of:
0.026690228 = sum of:
0.026690228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026690228 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Alonso, M.I.; Fernández, L.M.M.: Perspectives of studies on document abstracting : towards an integrated view of models and theoretical approaches (2010)
0.00
9.351565E-4 = product of:
0.007481252 = sum of:
0.007481252 = product of:
0.022443755 = sum of:
0.022443755 = weight(_text_:29 in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022443755 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11549502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 29. 8.2010 13:11:19
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.00
9.2674413E-4 = product of:
0.007413953 = sum of:
0.007413953 = product of:
0.022241859 = sum of:
0.022241859 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022241859 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114974365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032832656 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
