Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ding, Y."
  1. Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.C.; Foo, S.: Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis (2001) 0.02
    0.015500413 = product of:
      0.062001653 = sum of:
        0.062001653 = weight(_text_:management in 6487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062001653 = score(doc=6487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6487)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.6, S.817-842
  2. Klein, M.; Ding, Y.; Fensel, D.; Omelayenko, B.: Ontology management : storing, aligning and maintaining ontologies (2004) 0.01
    0.012656034 = product of:
      0.050624136 = sum of:
        0.050624136 = weight(_text_:management in 4402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050624136 = score(doc=4402,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.3648795 = fieldWeight in 4402, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4402)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies need to be stored, sometimes aligned and their evolution needs to be managed. All these tasks together are called ontology management. Alignment is a central task in ontology re-use. Re-use of existing ontologies often requires considerable effort: the ontologies either need to be integrated, which means that they are merged into one new ontology, or the ontologies can be kept separate. In both cases, the ontologies have to be aligned, which means that they have to be brought into mutual agreement. The problems that underlie the difficulties in integrating and aligning are the mismatches that may exist between separate ontologies. Ontologies can differ at the language level, which can mean that they are represented in a different syntax, or that the expressiveness of the ontology language is dissimilar. Ontologies also can have mismatches at the model level, for example, in the paradigm, or modelling style. Ontology alignment is very relevant in a Semantic Web context. The Semantic Web will provide us with a lot of freely accessible domain specific ontologies. To form a real web of semantics - which will allow computers to combine and infer implicit knowledge - those separate ontologies should be aligned and linked.
    Support for evolving ontologies is required in almost all situations where ontologies are used in real-world applications. In those cases, ontologies are often developed by several persons and will continue to evolve over time, because of changes in the real world, adaptations to different tasks, or alignments to other ontologies. To prevent that such changes will invalidate existing usage, a change management methodology is needed. This involves advanced versioning methods for the development and the maintenance of ontologies, but also configuration management, that takes care of the identification, relations and interpretation of ontology versions. All these aspects come together in integrated ontology library systems. When the number of different ontologies is increasing, the task of storing, maintaining and re-organizing them to secure the successful re-use of ontologies is challenging. Ontology library systems can help in the grouping and reorganizing ontologies for further re-use, integration, maintenance, mapping and versioning. Basically, a library system offers various functions for managing, adapting and standardizing groups of ontologies. Such integrated systems are a requirement for the Semantic Web to grow further and scale up. In this chapter, we describe a number of results with respect to the above mentioned areas. We start with a description of the alignment task and show a meta-ontology that is developed to specify the mappings. Then, we discuss the problems that are caused by evolving ontologies and describe two important elements of a change management methodology. Finally, in Section 4.4 we survey existing library systems and formulate a wish-list of features of an ontology library system.
    Source
    Towards the semantic Web: ontology-driven knowledge management. Eds.: J. Davies, u.a
  3. Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: Discovering author impact : a PageRank perspective (2011) 0.01
    0.010333609 = product of:
      0.041334435 = sum of:
        0.041334435 = weight(_text_:management in 2704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041334435 = score(doc=2704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 2704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2704)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 47(2011) no.1, S.125-134
  4. Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998) 0.00
    0.00468962 = product of:
      0.01875848 = sum of:
        0.01875848 = product of:
          0.05627544 = sum of:
            0.05627544 = weight(_text_:29 in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05627544 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041162275 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 23(1998) no.2, S.20-29
  5. Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011) 0.00
    0.0032532034 = product of:
      0.013012813 = sum of:
        0.013012813 = product of:
          0.03903844 = sum of:
            0.03903844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03903844 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041162275 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:02:21
  6. Song, M.; Kim, S.Y.; Zhang, G.; Ding, Y.; Chambers, T.: Productivity and influence in bioinformatics : a bibliometric analysis using PubMed central (2014) 0.00
    0.0028137718 = product of:
      0.011255087 = sum of:
        0.011255087 = product of:
          0.03376526 = sum of:
            0.03376526 = weight(_text_:29 in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03376526 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041162275 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:40:41
  7. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.00
    0.0027884599 = product of:
      0.0111538395 = sum of:
        0.0111538395 = product of:
          0.03346152 = sum of:
            0.03346152 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03346152 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041162275 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  8. Min, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, J.; Bu, Y.; Pei, L.; Sun, J.: Innovation or imitation : the diffusion of citations (2018) 0.00
    0.00234481 = product of:
      0.00937924 = sum of:
        0.00937924 = product of:
          0.02813772 = sum of:
            0.02813772 = weight(_text_:29 in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02813772 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041162275 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2018 13:24:10
  9. Liu, M.; Bu, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Leng, Y.; Freeman, R.B.; Meyer, E.T.; Yoon, W.; Sung, M.; Jeong, M.; Lee, J.; Kang, J.; Min, C.; Zhai, Y.; Song, M.; Ding, Y.: Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty : evidence from COVID-19 (2022) 0.00
    0.00234481 = product of:
      0.00937924 = sum of:
        0.00937924 = product of:
          0.02813772 = sum of:
            0.02813772 = weight(_text_:29 in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02813772 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041162275 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Scientific novelty drives the efforts to invent new vaccines and solutions during the pandemic. First-time collaboration and international collaboration are two pivotal channels to expand teams' search activities for a broader scope of resources required to address the global challenge, which might facilitate the generation of novel ideas. Our analysis of 98,981 coronavirus papers suggests that scientific novelty measured by the BioBERT model that is pretrained on 29 million PubMed articles, and first-time collaboration increased after the outbreak of COVID-19, and international collaboration witnessed a sudden decrease. During COVID-19, papers with more first-time collaboration were found to be more novel and international collaboration did not hamper novelty as it had done in the normal periods. The findings suggest the necessity of reaching out for distant resources and the importance of maintaining a collaborative scientific community beyond nationalism during a pandemic.