Search (280 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.15 
    0.15254542 = product of:
  0.30509084 = sum of:
    0.07627271 = product of:
      0.22881813 = sum of:
        0.22881813 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22881813 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22881813 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22881813 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  2. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.11 
    0.10896101 = product of:
  0.21792202 = sum of:
    0.054480504 = product of:
      0.16344151 = sum of:
        0.16344151 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16344151 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16344151 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16344151 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  3. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.11 
    0.10896101 = product of:
  0.21792202 = sum of:
    0.054480504 = product of:
      0.16344151 = sum of:
        0.16344151 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16344151 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16344151 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16344151 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  4. Wersig, G.: Information science : the study of postmodern knowledge usage (1993) 0.06 
    0.05634122 = product of:
  0.11268244 = sum of:
    0.08266887 = weight(_text_:management in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08266887 = score(doc=4706,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
    0.030013567 = product of:
      0.0900407 = sum of:
        0.0900407 = weight(_text_:29 in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0900407 = score(doc=4706,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.2, S.229-240
  5. Essers, J.; Schreinemakers, J.: ¬The conceptions of knowledge and information in knowledge management (1996) 0.05 
    0.04941871 = product of:
  0.09883742 = sum of:
    0.08768358 = weight(_text_:management in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08768358 = score(doc=909,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.63198984 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
    0.0111538395 = product of:
      0.03346152 = sum of:
        0.03346152 = weight(_text_:22 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03346152 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The emergence of Knowledge Management (KM) over the last decade has triggered the question how or even whether this new management discipline can be distinguished from the established field of Information Management (IM). In this paper we critically examine this demarcation issue from two angles. First we will investigate to what extent the difference between IM and KM can be anchored an a conceptual distinction between their respective objects: information and knowledge. After having shown that this widely adopted strategy promises little success, we will shift our attention to an examination of the fundamental objectives or guiding principles behind both disciplines. Seen from this angle we argue that KM in order to foster organizational learning, innovation and strategy flexibility, should adopt a postmodern epistemological perspective that is geared to the management of incommensurability and difference within and between organizations.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge management; vol.1
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  6. Repo, A.J.: ¬The dual approach to the value of information : an appraisal of use and exchange values (1989) 0.05 
    0.04918044 = product of:
  0.09836088 = sum of:
    0.07233526 = weight(_text_:management in 5772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07233526 = score(doc=5772,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.521365 = fieldWeight in 5772, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5772)
    0.026025627 = product of:
      0.07807688 = sum of:
        0.07807688 = weight(_text_:22 in 5772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07807688 = score(doc=5772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5772)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.5, S.373-383
  7. Infield, N.: Capitalising on knowledge : if knowledge is power, why don't librarians rule the world? (1997) 0.05 
    0.048770327 = product of:
  0.097540654 = sum of:
    0.08266887 = weight(_text_:management in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08266887 = score(doc=668,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
    0.014871786 = product of:
      0.044615358 = sum of:
        0.044615358 = weight(_text_:22 in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044615358 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    While knowledge management is seen to be the biggest thing to hit the information profession since the Internet, the concept is surrounded by confusion. Traces the progress of knowledge on the information continuum which extends from data to informed decision. The reason for which knowledge management has suddenly become inluential is that its principal proponents now are not information professionals but management consultants seeking to retain their intellectual capital. Explains the reasons for this, the practical meaning of knowledge management and what information professionals should be doing to take advantage of the vogue
    Source
    Information world review. 1997, no.130, S.22
  8. Robertson, G.: What is information? (1996) 0.05 
    0.04582969 = product of:
  0.09165938 = sum of:
    0.07306965 = weight(_text_:management in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07306965 = score(doc=5735,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
    0.018589733 = product of:
      0.055769198 = sum of:
        0.055769198 = weight(_text_:22 in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055769198 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses information in the context of information resources management arguing that it is an essential resource for every organization but one that needs to be managed better. Examines information as a resource, as an asset, as a commodity, as a rubbish
    Source
    Managing information. 3(1996) no.6, S.22-23
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  9. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.05 
    0.04582969 = product of:
  0.09165938 = sum of:
    0.07306965 = weight(_text_:management in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07306965 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
    0.018589733 = product of:
      0.055769198 = sum of:
        0.055769198 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055769198 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
    Footnote
    Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
  10. Knowledge and communication : essays on the information chain (1991) 0.04 
    0.03521326 = product of:
  0.07042652 = sum of:
    0.051668044 = weight(_text_:management in 7289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051668044 = score(doc=7289,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 7289, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7289)
    0.01875848 = product of:
      0.05627544 = sum of:
        0.05627544 = weight(_text_:29 in 7289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05627544 = score(doc=7289,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 7289, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7289)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of documentation 47(1991) S.309-311 (J. Warner); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.524-525 (S. Edwards)
  11. Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015) 0.03 
    0.029030014 = product of:
  0.058060028 = sum of:
    0.050624136 = weight(_text_:management in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050624136 = score(doc=2596,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.3648795 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
    0.007435893 = product of:
      0.022307679 = sum of:
        0.022307679 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022307679 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose In contrast to the interest of describing and managing the social processes of knowing, information science and information and knowledge management research have put less emphasis on discussing how particular information becomes usable and how it is used in different contexts and situations. The purpose of this paper is to address this major gap, and introduce and discuss the applicability of the notion of situational appropriation of information for shedding light on this particular process in the context of daily information work practices of professionals. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on the analysis of 25 qualitative interviews of archives, library and museum professionals conducted in two Nordic countries. Findings The study presents examples of how individuals appropriate different tangible and intangible assets as information on the basis of the situation in hand. Research limitations/implications The study proposes a new conceptual tool for articulating and conducting research on the process how information becomes useful in the situation in hand. Practical implications The situational appropriation of information perspective redefines the role of information management to incorporate a comprehensive awareness of the situations when information is useful and is being used. A better understanding how information becomes useful in diverse situations helps to discern the active role of contextual and situational effects and to exploit and take them into account as a part of the management of information and knowledge processes. Originality/value In contrast to orthodoxies of information science and information and knowledge management research, the notion of situational appropriation of information represents an alternative approach to the conceptualisation of information utilisation. It helps to frame particular types of instances of information use that are not necessarily addressed within the objectivistic, information seeker or learning oriented paradigms of information and knowledge management.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.5, S.492-504
  12. Savolainen, R.: ¬The sense-making theory : reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use (1993) 0.03 
    0.02817061 = product of:
  0.05634122 = sum of:
    0.041334435 = weight(_text_:management in 2401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041334435 = score(doc=2401,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 2401, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2401)
    0.015006783 = product of:
      0.04502035 = sum of:
        0.04502035 = weight(_text_:29 in 2401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04502035 = score(doc=2401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2401)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.13-28
  13. Mutch, A.: Information literacy : an exploration (1997) 0.03 
    0.02817061 = product of:
  0.05634122 = sum of:
    0.041334435 = weight(_text_:management in 1020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041334435 = score(doc=1020,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1020, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1020)
    0.015006783 = product of:
      0.04502035 = sum of:
        0.04502035 = weight(_text_:29 in 1020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04502035 = score(doc=1020,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1020, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1020)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    19. 5.1998 20:04:29
    Source
    International journal of information management. 17(1997) no.5, S.377-386
  14. Bailey, R.L.: Information : the currency of the new millennium (1997) 0.03 
    0.02817061 = product of:
  0.05634122 = sum of:
    0.041334435 = weight(_text_:management in 5114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041334435 = score(doc=5114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 5114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5114)
    0.015006783 = product of:
      0.04502035 = sum of:
        0.04502035 = weight(_text_:29 in 5114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04502035 = score(doc=5114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5114)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Presents technology changes that are shaking the foundations of the methods previously employed by the library, archival and records management professions. Identifies current problems with what has worked in the past. Predicts what will be happening in the future and what effect it has on a global information society and the way the information professions need to proceed in the coming decades
    Source
    International information and library review. 29(1997) nos.3/4, S.319-331
  15. Hapke, T.: 'In-formation' - Informationskompetenz und Lernen im Zeitalter digitaler Bibliotheken (2005) 0.03 
    0.02817061 = product of:
  0.05634122 = sum of:
    0.041334435 = weight(_text_:management in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041334435 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
    0.015006783 = product of:
      0.04502035 = sum of:
        0.04502035 = weight(_text_:29 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04502035 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    27. 7.2005 12:29:44
    Source
    Bibliothekswissenschaft - quo vadis? Eine Disziplin zwischen Traditionen und Visionen: Programme - Modelle - Forschungsaufgaben / Library Science - quo vadis? A Discipline between Challenges and Opportunities: Programs - Models - Research Assignments. Mit einem Geleitwort von / With a Preface by Guy St. Clair Consulting Specialist for Knowledge Management and Learning, New York, NY und einem Vorwort von / and a Foreword by Georg Ruppelt Sprecher von / Speaker of BID - Bibliothek & Information Deutschland Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksund Informationsverbände e.V. Hrsg. von P. Hauke
  16. Schmidt, A.: Endo-Management : Wissenslenkung in Cyber-Ökonomien (1999) 0.03 
    0.027322078 = product of:
  0.054644156 = sum of:
    0.049016614 = weight(_text_:management in 5007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049016614 = score(doc=5007,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.35329306 = fieldWeight in 5007, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5007)
    0.0056275437 = product of:
      0.01688263 = sum of:
        0.01688263 = weight(_text_:29 in 5007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01688263 = score(doc=5007,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 5007, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5007)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Was ist Wissensmanagement? Wissensmanagement ist eine integrale Vorgehensweise, um das Wissen von Individuen, Teams, Organisationen oder Gesellschaften weiterzuentwickeln. Wissensmanagement verfolgt hierbei das Ziel, Wissen im Einklang mit der Unternehmensstrategie effizienter zu navigieren, zu erzeugen, zu nutzen und zu kommunizieren, um die Lebensfähigkeit und Kernkompetenzen von Unternehmen ständig zu verbessern. Da in den meisten Unternehmen weniger als 50 % des vorhandenen Wissens genutzt wird, ist Wissen der wichtigste Rohstoff der Zukunft. Wissen besteht aus Daten, beim Individuum erzeugten Informationen, aus zuvor gemachten Erfahrungen, aus Kreativität und ernotionaler Intelligenz. Wissen ist somit ein mehrdimensionales Phänomen, daß untrennbar mit den menschlichen Interfaces und ihren Interaktionen gekoppelt ist. Die Entwicklung des Wissensmanagements wird durch die Zunahme der Interaktionen im Internet nachhaltig beeinflusst. Die Vorteile eines gezielten Wissensmanagements sind ein kostengünstiger und schneller Zugang zu internen und externen Wissensquellen, die Reduzierung des Zeitaufwandes beim Hervorbringen von Innovationen, die Förderung der Kommunikations- und Teamfähigkeit bei den Mitarbeitern, Effizienzsteigerungen durch direkten Zugriff auf Daten durch alle Mitarbeiter, die Beschleunigung sämtlicher Unternehmensprozesse, eine effektivere Einbindung von Kunden in problemlösungsorientierte Netzwerke sowie die Möglichkeit der interaktiven Kommunikation und Simulation in komplexen Projektumgebungen. Erfolgreiches Wissens-Management erfordert interdisziplinäres Wissen, welches die unterschiedlichen Fachgebiete verbindet und dadurch zum Katalysator für Innovationen werden kann. Zielorientiertes Wissensmanagement erfordert die Lenkungsfähigkeiten im Hinblick auf Daten- und Informationserzeugung auf allen organisatorischen Ebenen zu verbessern. Dies ist die Voraussetzung, damit Führungskräfte, Sacharbeiter oder Studenten Gestaltungsprozesse mit der Ressource Wissen vornehmen können. Unternehmen, die zukünftig nicht über ein effizientes Wissens-Managenent verfügen, werden in einem wissensintensiven Wettbewerb nicht bestehen können.
    Die Wissensstrategie versucht deshalb die Innovationsfähigkeit von Organisationen systematisch zu verbessern, mit dem Ziel, die Adaption an die Kundenbedürfnisse zu steigern. Statt lediglich einen Return on Investment (ROI) zu betrachten wird zunehmend auch ein Retum on Knowledge (ROK), d.h. eine qualitative Größe bei der Bewertung des Unternehmungserfolges eine Rolle spielen. Die Wissen-Strategie gibt dem Wissensmanagement eine konkrete Richtung und definiert, wo Wissensdefizite sind und welche neuen Wissensquellen erschlossen werden müssen. Wer Wissen in Unternehmen hortet ohne es weiterzugeben, schadet dem Unternehmen. Deshalb muß es das Ziel jeder Wissensstrategie sein, die Fähigkeiten der Mitarbeiter derart zu schulen, daß diese das Wissen mit anderen Teilnehmern teilen und gemeinsam weiterentwickeln. Da effizientes Wissens-Management auch eine intelligente Vernetzung von Unternehmen bedingt, werden Firmen, die ein zielorientiertes Management der Ressource Wissen betreiben wollen, nicht umhin kommen, ihre Unternehmensstrukturen den Hyperlink-Strukturen des Meta-Wissensnetzes Internet anzupassen. Wissen schafft Wachstum. Management von Wissen ist ein typischer Endo-Prozeß, da er innen bei den Individuen beginnt und sich mit der temporären Vernetzung zu Endo-Netzen im Rahmen von Teams oder größeren Diskussionsgruppen fortsetzt. Voraussetzung für die Generierung von neuem Wissen ist jedoch, daß die Wissensquellen frei zugänglich sind (Wissenstransparenz), daß das Wissen im Unternehmen zielgerichtet weitergereicht wird (Wissenskommunikation) und daß dieses Wissen von den Teilnehmern auch verwendet werden kann (Wissensanschlußfähigkeit).
    Die Halbwertszeit neuer Technologien, Strukturen und Prozesse erfordert ein spezielles Wissensmanagement im Hinblick auf Innovationen und Erfindungen. Beispiele aus erfolgreichen Unternehmen wie Microsoft, Intel oder Compaq zeigen, daß durch die gezielte Nutzung und Weiterentwicklung des in den Unternehmen vorhandenen Wissens Kostensenkungs- und Wachstumspotentiale freigesetzt werden können, die mit herkömmlichen Verschlankungsansätzen oder ReorganisationskonzePten nicht hätten erreicht werden können. Qualitatives Wachstum durch Wissensaustausch erfordert jedoch Echtzeitsysteme, die instantane Diskussionen und Interaktionen in Internet-Foren, Intranets oder mit externen Netzwerken erlauben. Endo-Management. Beim Endo-Management (= Unternehmensführung im Cyberspace) geht es um die Gestaltung, Simulation und Lenkung von künstlichen Welten sowie die Wahrnehmung, Kommunikation und Interaktion mit diesen CyberWelten durch Virtuelle Realitäten. Netzwerke werden hierbei nicht im Rahmen von Markt- oder Organisationsuntersuchungen, sondern im Rahmen von Interfaces betrachtet, d.h. von Strukturen und Prozessen, die unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. Die Vielfalt der simulierten Alternativen erfordert hierbei Freiräume für die Teilnehmer, damit neue Regeln sowohl für die Exo (Außen)- als auch die Endo (Innen)-Welten erfunden werden können.
    Da der Mensch gleichzeitig Teilnehmer der physischen Exo-Welt sowie Teilnehmer der Endo-Welt des Computers im Rahmen des Cyberspace sein kann, hat er die notwendige ExoPerspektive (Super-BeobachterStatus) gegenüber der Simulation, um die Endo-Welten weiterzuentwickeln und zu verbessern. Darüber hinaus erfolgreiche Problemlösungen innerhalb des Cyberspace gegebenenfalls auch auf physische Exo-Welten übertragen werden. Ein Beispiel für erfolgreiches Endo-Management sind "Community Networks", d.h. Systeme, die sich an die gesamte Bevölkerung eines lokalen Gerneinwesens richten. Derartige Conirmunities haben das Ziel, Bürgerinnen und Bürger kostenlos bzw gegen ein äußerst geringes Entgelt an den Vorteilen der direkten Kommunikation und des echtzeitorientierten Wissensaustausches partizipieren zu lassen. Die Lenkungsproblematik wird oftmals von Software-Experten ignoriert und alleinig auf technologische Problemlösungen eingeengt. Es gibt jedoch keine Algorithmen für Communities, da diese sich durch die Wechselwirkung der Teilnehmer selbst organisieren und ständig neue Interfaces designen. Das Endo-Management von "Cornmunity-Networks" basiert hierbei auf folgenden Erfolgscharakteristiken: dauerhafte Identitäten, fortgesetzte Interaktion, Anschlußfähigkeit an vorhergehende Kommunikation, Transparenz der Handlungen der einzelnen Teilnehmer, eindeutige Spielregeln, eine relativ stabile Population, wohl definierte Grenzen sowie einen Mehrwert für die Teilnehmer, der in sozialen Bindungen oder einer Erhöhung des Wissens besteht
    Date
    29. 1.1997 18:49:05
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  17. Repo, A.J.: ¬The value of information : approaches in economics, accounting, and management science (1989) 0.03 
    0.025574377 = product of:
  0.10229751 = sum of:
    0.10229751 = weight(_text_:management in 3420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10229751 = score(doc=3420,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.73732144 = fieldWeight in 3420, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3420)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  18. Ponelis, S.; Fairer-Wessels, F.A.: Knowledge management : a literatur overview (1998) 0.03 
    0.025312068 = product of:
  0.10124827 = sum of:
    0.10124827 = weight(_text_:management in 2921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10124827 = score(doc=2921,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.729759 = fieldWeight in 2921, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2921)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The concept of knowledge management is becoming increasingly prevalent in academic and vocational literature. Reviews the conceptual foundations of knowledge management starting with a conceptual clarification of knowledge relative to data and information. Discusses the characteristics in terms of forms, levels and categories of knowlegde. Against this background seeks a definition of knowledge management which is compared with information management
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  19. Crowe, M.; Beeby, R.; Gammack, J.: Constructing systems and information : a process view (1996) 0.02 
    0.02459022 = product of:
  0.04918044 = sum of:
    0.03616763 = weight(_text_:management in 6964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03616763 = score(doc=6964,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 6964, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6964)
    0.013012813 = product of:
      0.03903844 = sum of:
        0.03903844 = weight(_text_:22 in 6964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03903844 = score(doc=6964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6964)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    25.12.2001 13:22:30
    Series
    The McGraw-Hill information systems, management and strategy series
  20. Evans, P.; Wurster, T.S.: Blown to bits : how the new economics of information transforms strategy (2000) 0.02 
    0.02237292 = product of:
  0.08949168 = sum of:
    0.08949168 = weight(_text_:management in 3185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08949168 = score(doc=3185,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.6450219 = fieldWeight in 3185, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3185)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    LCSH
    Knowledge management
    Subject
    Knowledge management
    Theme
    Information Resources Management

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 221
  • m 52
  • s 10
  • el 6
  • ? 1
  • fi 1
  • i 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications