Search (65 results, page 1 of 4)

0.049298562 = product of:
  0.098597124 = sum of:
    0.07233526 = weight(_text_:management in 4357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07233526 = score(doc=4357,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4357, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4357)
    0.02626187 = product of:
      0.078785606 = sum of:
        0.078785606 = weight(_text_:29 in 4357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078785606 = score(doc=4357,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4357, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4357)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.47-59

0.02817061 = product of:
  0.05634122 = sum of:
    0.041334435 = weight(_text_:management in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041334435 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
    0.015006783 = product of:
      0.04502035 = sum of:
        0.04502035 = weight(_text_:29 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04502035 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This article presents a conceptual framework for library name authority control, including methods for disambiguating agents that share the same name and for collocating works of agents who use multiple names. It then discusses the identifier solutions tried or proposed in the library community for name authority control, analyzes the various identity management systems emerging outside of the library community, and envisions future trends in name authority control.

Date

29. 5.2015 13:20:17

0.021127958 = product of:
  0.042255916 = sum of:
    0.031000827 = weight(_text_:management in 2296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031000827 = score(doc=2296,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2296, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2296)
    0.011255087 = product of:
      0.03376526 = sum of:
        0.03376526 = weight(_text_:29 in 2296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03376526 = score(doc=2296,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2296, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2296)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The paper presents experiences and challenges encountered during the planning and creation of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) authority database in the National and University Library in Zagreb, Croatia. The project started in 2014 with the objective of facilitating classification data management, improving the indexing consistency at the institutional level and the machine readability of data for eventual sharing and re-use in the Web environment. The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of UDC, which is an analytico-synthetic classification scheme tending towards a more faceted structure, in regard to various aspects of authority control. This discussion represents the referential framework for the project. It determines the choice of elements to be included in the authority file, e.g. distinguishing between syntagmatic and paradigmatic combinations of subjects. It also determines the future lines of development, e.g. interlinking with the subject headings authority file in order to provide searching by verbal expressions.

Source

Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro

0.01760663 = product of:
  0.03521326 = sum of:
    0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 2295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025834022 = score(doc=2295,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2295, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2295)
    0.00937924 = product of:
      0.02813772 = sum of:
        0.02813772 = weight(_text_:29 in 2295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02813772 = score(doc=2295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2295)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The paper provides an illustration of the benefits of subject authority control improving multilingual subject access in NEBIS - Netzwerk von Bibliotheken und Informationsstellen in der Schweiz. This example of good practice focuses on some important aspects of classification and indexing. NEBIS subject authorities comprise a classification scheme and multilingual subject descriptor system. A bibliographic system supported by subject authority control empowers libraries as it enables them to expand and adjust vocabulary and link subjects to suit their specific audience. Most importantly it allows the management of different subject vocabularies in numerous languages. In addition, such an enriched subject index creates re-usable and shareable source of subject statements that has value in the wider context of information exchange. The illustrations and supporting arguments are based on indexing practice, subject authority control and use of classification in ETH-Bibliothek, which is the largest library within the NEBIS network.

Source

Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro

0.015661046 = product of:
  0.06264418 = sum of:
    0.06264418 = weight(_text_:management in 975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06264418 = score(doc=975,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 975, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=975)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Entity management in a Linked Open Data (LOD) environment is a process of associating a unique, persistent, and dereferenceable Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) with a single entity. It allows data from various sources to be reused and connected to the Web. It can help improve data quality and enable more efficient workflows. This article describes a semi-automated entity management project conducted by the "Wikidata: WikiProject Chinese Culture and Heritage Group," explores the challenges and opportunities in describing Chinese women poets and historical places in Wikidata, the largest crowdsourcing LOD platform in the world, and discusses lessons learned and future opportunities.

0.015500413 = product of:
  0.062001653 = sum of:
    0.062001653 = weight(_text_:management in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062001653 = score(doc=4870,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.010960448 = product of:
  0.04384179 = sum of:
    0.04384179 = weight(_text_:management in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04384179 = score(doc=5483,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

We present an overview of Nomenclature's history, characteristics, structure, use, management, development process, limitations, and future. Nomenclature for Museum Cataloging is a bilingual (English/French) structured and controlled list of object terms organized in a classification system to provide a basis for indexing and cataloging collections of human-made objects. It includes illustrations and bibliographic references as well as a user guide. It is used in the creation and management of object records in human history collections within museums and other organizations, and it focuses on objects relevant to North American history and culture. First published in 1978, Nomenclature is the most extensively used museum classification and controlled vocabulary for historical and ethnological collections in North America and represents thereby a de facto standard in the field. An online reference version of Nomenclature was made available in 2018, and it will be available under open license in 2020.

0.010333609 = product of:
  0.041334435 = sum of:
    0.041334435 = weight(_text_:management in 5354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041334435 = score(doc=5354,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 5354, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5354)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This paper proposes an approach for managing vocabulary for reference databases on the Web. The approach is directed at domain specific databases in which much of the referenced material remains in non-digital form. A combination of interactive and manual processes are outlined along with a proposed implementation approach. For this limited class of databases, it is suggested that the approach can significantly improve vocabulary management with relatively low costs in manual effort.

0.010333609 = product of:
  0.041334435 = sum of:
    0.041334435 = weight(_text_:management in 227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041334435 = score(doc=227,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 227, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=227)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This article examines the implementation of an authority control project in the Keystone Library Network, an eighteen-member1 library consortium in Pennsylvania. The project was made possible with monies procured through two Library Services and Technology Act grants. The first grant funded staff training opportunities; the second covered base file cleanup of bibliographic records. The grant process and the management of the authority control project are described in detail.

0.010333609 = product of:
  0.041334435 = sum of:
    0.041334435 = weight(_text_:management in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041334435 = score(doc=1160,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This paper is the second in a series in D-Lib Magazine and describes a workflow management system being developed by the Digital Knowledge Center (DKC) at the Milton S. Eisenhower Library (MSEL) of The Johns Hopkins University. Based on experience from digitizing the Lester S. Levy Collection of Sheet Music, it was apparent that large-scale digitization efforts require a significant amount of human labor that is both time-consuming and costly. Consequently, this workflow management system aims to reduce the amount of human labor and time for large-scale digitization projects. The mission of this second phase of the project ("Levy II") can be summarized as follows: * Reduce costs for large collection ingestion by creating a suite of open-source processes, tools, and interfaces for workflow management * Increase access capabilities by providing a suite of research tools * Demonstrate utility of tools and processes with a subset of the online Levy Collection The cornerstones of the workflow management system include optical music recognition (OMR) software and an automated name authority control system (ANAC). The OMR software generates a logical representation of the score for sound generation, music searching, and musicological research. The ANAC disambiguates names, associating each name with an individual (e.g., the composer Septimus Winner also published under the pseudonyms Alice Hawthorne and Apsley Street, among others). Complementing the workflow tools, a suite of research tools focuses upon enhanced searching capabilities through the development and application of a fast, disk-based search engine for lyrics and music and the incorporation of an XML structure for metadata. The first paper (Choudhury et al. 2001) described the OMR software and musical components of Levy II. This paper focuses on the metadata and intellectual access components that include automated name authority control and the aforementioned search engine.

0.009041907 = product of:
  0.03616763 = sum of:
    0.03616763 = weight(_text_:management in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03616763 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Authority control enhances the accessibility of library resources by controlling the choice and form of access points, improving users' ability to efficiently find the works most relevant to their information search. While authority control and the technologies that support its implementation continue to evolve, the underlying principles and purposes remain the same. Written primarily for a new generation of librarians, this paper illuminates the importance of authority control in cataloging and library database management, discusses its history, describes current practices, and introduces readers to trends and issues in the field, including future applications beyond the library catalog.

0.009041907 = product of:
  0.03616763 = sum of:
    0.03616763 = weight(_text_:management in 707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03616763 = score(doc=707,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 707, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=707)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This paper discusses the basics of creating name authority records for Arabic personal names in accordance with Resource Description and Access instructions and Program for Cooperative Cataloging guidelines. A background into the use of romanization for non-Latin scripts in bibliographic and authority records is provided to establish the context. Issues with romanization that are particular to Arabic are addressed. Separate sections on modern and classical names provide an overview of the major challenges, and strategies to enhance discovery are outlined. The paper concludes with an examination of the possible benefits of identity management and other changes in the authority control landscape for names in non-Latin script.

0.0077502066 = product of:
  0.031000827 = sum of:
    0.031000827 = weight(_text_:management in 5803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031000827 = score(doc=5803,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 5803, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5803)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In 2018, the national, bilingual authority file maintained by Library and Archives Canada (LAC), called Canadiana Authorities, underwent major changes when the internally-developed Integrated Library System (ILS) AMICUS was decommissioned and OCLC's WorldShare Management Services (WMS) was adopted as a replacement. As a part of the transition, LAC split its single, bilingual authority file Canadiana Authorities into separate English and French language files and joined Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) in order to manage its English-language authority records. This has been a significant change that has challenged the organization to rethink everyday practices while maintaining its commitments to the Canadian and global library community. This paper discusses this national library's history of bilingual cataloging, the reason for the changes, and the attempt to ensure that the two files "talk" to each other.

0.0065654675 = product of:
  0.02626187 = sum of:
    0.02626187 = product of:
      0.078785606 = sum of:
        0.078785606 = weight(_text_:29 in 5821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078785606 = score(doc=5821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5821)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

AKMB-news. 3(1997) H.3, S.26-29

0.0065654675 = product of:
  0.02626187 = sum of:
    0.02626187 = product of:
      0.078785606 = sum of:
        0.078785606 = weight(_text_:29 in 2331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078785606 = score(doc=2331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 2331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2331)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

19. 3.2015 16:29:52

0.0065064067 = product of:
  0.026025627 = sum of:
    0.026025627 = product of:
      0.07807688 = sum of:
        0.07807688 = weight(_text_:22 in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07807688 = score(doc=5819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

24. 5.2001 19:22:37

0.0064585055 = product of:
  0.025834022 = sum of:
    0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025834022 = score(doc=3083,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Authority control is a quite recent term in the long history of cataloguing, although the underlying principle is among the very early principles of bibliographic control. Bibliographic control is a Field in transformation by the rapid expansion of the WWW, which has brought new problems to infonnation discovery and retrieval, creating new challenges and requirements in information management. In a comprehensive approach, authority control is presented as one of the most promising library activities in this respect. The evolution of work methods and standards for the sharing of authority files is reviewed, showing the imbalance in developments and practical achievements between name and subject authority, in an international perspective. The need to improve the network availability and usability of authority information assets in more effective and holistic ways is underlyned; and a new philosophy and scope is proposed for library authority work, based an the primacy of the linking function of authority data, and by expanding the finding, relating and informing functions of authority records. Some of these aspects are being addressed in several projects dealing with knowledge organization systems, notably to cope with multilingual needs and to enable semantic interoperability among different systems. Library practice itself should evolve in the same direction, thereby providing practical experience to inform new or improved principles and standards for authority work, while contributing to enhance local information services and to promote their involvement in the WWW environment.

0.0064585055 = product of:
  0.025834022 = sum of:
    0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025834022 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Today's electronic catalogue makes retrieval of specific records very simple and quick in most (not all) cases, but searches aimed at the reliable retrieval of all material answering a well-defined need (author, work, theme, form, etc.) are still long and tiring, and sometimes impossible, in crowded bibliographic databases. In spite of its great relevance, authority control has been and still is the "poor relative" of cataloguing, the often neglected or overlooked "other half" if we compare it to the creation of bibliographic records. The FRBR study and the new authority control standards (GARR and UNIMARC Authorities) are important steps towards future perspectives. Even today, cataloguing codes do not make clear the difference between the access points for bibliographic records and the relationships (work-to-work, author-to-work, etc.) that are independent from spoecific publications. With the development of richer authority records and relationships, the bibliographic record might be relieved of information related to entities different from publications and of all the functions more suitably worked out upstream or downstream in access systems or by links to the images and/or the texts of the publications themselves. A "light" bibliographic record would no longer be the paramount component of library information systems; it would keep its central role rather as nimble, swift turntable between access and content organization systems and systems for management and display of digital resources themselves.

0.0064585055 = product of:
  0.025834022 = sum of:
    0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 5687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025834022 = score(doc=5687,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5687, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5687)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

InterParty is a project that aims to develop a mechanism that will enable the interoperation of identifiers for "parties" or persons (authors, publishers, etc. - persons and corporate bodies in library authority files) across multiple domains. Partners represent the book industry, rights management, libraries, and identifier and technology communities, united by their perception of a common benefit from interoperation in terms of access to "common metadata" held by other members to improve the quality of their own data. The InterParty solution proposes a distributed network of members who provide access to "common metadata," defined as information in the public domain, sufficient to identify and distinguish the "public identity" of a person. At a minimum the InterParty network would provide access to multiple domains of data about persons, including multiple library authority files, author licensing data files, etc. It will also add value by providing a facility for linking records between different data files by means of a "link record." Link records will assert that an identity recorded in one database is the same as another identity recorded in another database. Linked data will be mutually enriching and therefore more reliable and supportive of accurate disambiguation of persons within and between databases. InterParty has potential to develop a common system that supports both the emerging needs of e-commerce and the traditional requirements of library authority control.

0.0064585055 = product of:
  0.025834022 = sum of:
    0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025834022 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The University and Regional Library (ULB) of Münster in Westphalia indexes its documents since 1990 with Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK) and Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD), the German rules for subject indexing and its authority file. In this area the library profits from the regional and national cooperation, particularly from the German National Library's external services for new German publications. The ULB itself has to index primarily new foreign literature, for instance Dutch books within the scope of the special subject fields programme of the German Research Society (DFG), but also its numerous acquisitions of older books and collections. Also some retrospective conversion has been done in the field of subject cataloguing. In the ULB indexing is the task of the subject librarians. They are supported by a small local editorial staff which especially takes care of the subject catalogue management and cooperates with the North-Rhine Westphalian library network for academic libraries, HBZ in Cologne. Furthermore, in its function as the Regional Library of Westphalia the ULB indexes books and above all a great number of articles listed in the regional bibliography of North Rhine-Westphalia (NWBib). RSWK in Münster im Kontext regionaler und überregionaler Kooperation. - Entwicklung der Schlagwort-Kooperation und Fremddatennutzung. - Aktuelle Probleme und Potenziale der Schlagwort-Kooperation. - Eigenbeschlagwortete Literatur in der ULB Münster. - Schlagwortredaktion in der ULB Münster. - RSWK Erschließung in der Nordrhein-Westfälischen Bibliographie (NWBib). - Münsters Schlagworterschließung in der sachlichen Suche.